Search

Background. Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced lung cancer. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether adding stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to immunotherapy (IT) further improves responses and survival outcomes. Therefore, in this pooled analysis, we comprehensively compared IT plus SBRT with IT alone in patients with advanced lung cancer. Methods. Online databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL, were systematically searched on April 24, 2022. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials comparing IT plus SBRT to IT. The primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were explored as secondary outcomes. Results. Overall, three phase 2 randomized clinical trials with a total of 146 previously treated lung cancer patients were enrolled. The median PFS and OS were 3.8 months and 9.5 months for IT plus SBRT versus 2.4 months and 6.1 months for IT. Comparing IT plus SBRT with IT alone, pooled risk ratios for ORR and DCR were 1.95 (95% confidence interval 1.07–3.53, p = 0.03) and 1.28 (0.94–1.73, p = 0.12). While pooled hazard ratios were 0.77 (0.25–2.42, p = 0.66) for PFS and 0.71 (0.16–3.21, p = 0.65) for OS, respectively. No publication bias was found across the trials. Conclusion. Compared to IT alone, the addition of SBRT improved the best response but failed to prolong the survival outcomes in treating advanced lung cancer patients. Future studies are necessary to explore new modalities of the combination of IT and SBRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The major aim of this Bayesian network analysis was to determine the optimal treatment strategy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). Method: We systematically searched databases and extracted data from randomized clinical trials involving LANPC patients randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC+CCRT), CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CCRT+AC), or CCRT. Results: In the network analysis, IC+CCRT was significantly better than CCRT alone for 5-year FFS (odds ratio [OR]: 1.63, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.16–2.29), DMFS (OR: 1.56, 95% CrI 1.08–2.22), and LFRS (OR: 1.62, 95% CrI 1.02–2.59), but not OS (OR: 1.35, 95% CrI 0.92–2.00). Rank probabilities showed that IC+CCRT was ranked the best followed by CCRT+AC and CCRT for all 5-year outcomes. Although compared to IC+CCRT and CCRT, CCRT+AC did not significantly improve survival but had the highest 5-year survival rates. Conclusions: IC+CCRT could be recommended as a front-preferred primary definitive therapy for patients with LANPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: There is currently no effective salvage therapeutic modality that improves the survival outcomes of patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) inhibitors may provide clinical benefit for these advanced patients.Materials and Methods: The databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and Cochrane Library, were systematically searched up to Nov 5, 2019. Data of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) rate, overall survival (OS) rate, and drug-related adverse events were extracted and pooled meta-analyzed.Results: From 71 search records, eight studies were included in the systematic review, of which three were eligible for final meta-analysis. In recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy, the pooled ORR was 27% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19-36%), DCR was 63% (95% CI 50-75%), 6 months PFS rate was 49% (95% CI 40-58%), 1-year PFS rate was 25% (95% CI 19-32%), 1-year OS rate was 61% (95% CI 49-72%). The pooled incidences of any grade and grade ≥ 3 drug-related adverse events were 94% and 20% respectively.Conclusion: We present the aggregate response rates, survival rates and incidences of drug-related adverse events for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 blockage treatment, which could provide useful information for future design of clinical studies. There is a need for more randomized controlled studies with head-to-head comparison of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and traditional chemotherapeutic strategies to enable better recommendations for optimal advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]