3 results on '"van der Vliet, Hans J."'
Search Results
2. Systemic Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Author
-
Werter, Inge M., Remmelzwaal, Sharon, Burchell, George L., de Gruijl, Tanja D., Konings, Inge R., van der Vliet, Hans J., and Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, C. Willemien
- Subjects
THERAPEUTIC use of antimetabolites ,THERAPEUTIC use of monoclonal antibodies ,THERAPEUTIC use of antineoplastic agents ,ONLINE information services ,MEDICAL databases ,ETOPOSIDE ,META-analysis ,MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,EPIDERMAL growth factor receptors ,CANCER chemotherapy ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,TRASTUZUMAB ,METASTASIS ,BRAIN tumors ,CANCER patients ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,PROTEIN-tyrosine kinase inhibitors ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,CISPLATIN ,MEDLINE ,PROGRESSION-free survival ,BEVACIZUMAB ,BREAST tumors - Abstract
Simple Summary: Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer develop brain metastases in up to 30% of cases. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of different systemic therapies in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases, acknowledging the heterogeneity and sometimes low quality of 51 included studies. Tucatinib (combined with trastuzumab and capecitabine) and trastuzumab-deruxtecan appear to constitute the most effective systemic therapy, while pyrotinib might be an option in Asian patients. Preferably, future research will comprise of randomized controlled trials, including patients with active and/or inactive brain metastases. Aim: Patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) develop brain metastases (BM) in up to 30% of cases. Treatment of patients with BM can consist of local treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy) and/or systemic treatment. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of different systemic therapies in patients with HER2+ mBC and BM. Methods: A systematic search was performed in the databases PubMed, Embase.com, Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection and the Wiley/Cochrane Library. Eligible articles included prospective or retrospective studies reporting on the effect of systemic therapy on objective response rate (ORR) and/or median progression free survival (mPFS) in patients with HER2+ mBC and BM. The timeframe within the databases was from inception to 19 January 2022. Fixed-effects meta-analyses were used. Quality appraisal was performed using the ROBINS-I tool. Results: Fifty-one studies were included, involving 3118 patients. Most studies, which contained the largest patient numbers, but also often carried a moderate-serious risk of bias, investigated lapatinib and capecitabine (LC), trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) or pyrotinib. The best quality data and/or highest ORR were described with tucatinib (combined with trastuzumab and capecitabine, TTC) and trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd). TTC demonstrated an ORR of 47.3% in patients with asymptomatic and/or active BM. T-DXd achieved a pooled ORR of 64% (95% CI 43–85%, I
2 0%) in a heavily pretreated population with asymptomatic BM (3 studies, n = 96). Conclusions: Though our meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the heterogeneity of included studies and a related serious risk of bias, this review provides a comprehensive overview of all currently available systemic treatment options. T-Dxd and TTC that appear to constitute the most effective systemic therapy in patients with HER2+ mBC and BM, while pyrotinib might be an option in Asian patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Tumor Mutational Burden and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Author
-
Kim, Jong Yeob, Kronbichler, Andreas, Eisenhut, Michael, Hong, Sung Hwi, van der Vliet, Hans J., Kang, Jeonghyun, Shin, Jae Il, and Gamerith, Gabriele
- Subjects
ANTINEOPLASTIC agents ,THERAPEUTIC use of monoclonal antibodies ,CANCER patients ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems ,MEDLINE ,META-analysis ,GENETIC mutation ,ONLINE information services ,SURVIVAL ,TUMOR markers ,TUMORS ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,PREDICTIVE tests ,EVALUATION - Abstract
Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a genomic biomarker that predicts favorable responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Here, we set out to assess the predictive value of TMB on long-term survival outcomes in patients undergoing ICIs. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to 6 August 2019. We included retrospective studies or clinical trials of ICIs that reported hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) according to TMB. Data on 5712 patients from 26 studies were included. Among patients who received ICIs, high TMB groups showed better OS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.67) and PFS (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.67) compared to low TMB groups. In patients with high TMB, those who received ICIs had a better OS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.95) and PFS (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.92) compared to those who received chemotherapy alone, while in patients with low TMB, such ICI benefits of OS or PFS were not statistically significant. In conclusion, TMB may be an effective biomarker to predict survival in patients undergoing ICI treatment. The role of TMB in identifying patient groups who may benefit from ICIs should be determined in future randomized controlled trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.