Search

Cervical cancer (CC) is a type of pelvic malignant tumor that severely threatens women's health. Current evidence suggests that IER5, as a potential radiosensitizer, promotes irradiation-induced apoptosis in CC tissues in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy. IER5 has been shown to be involved in the G2/M-phase transition. In the present study, we used Cdc25B as the breakthrough point to explore the underlying mechanism of IER5 in the cell cycle regulation of radiation-damaged HeLa cells. IER5 was evidently upregulated after irradiation, but Cdc25B was significantly downregulated. In monoclonal IER5-silenced HeLa cells, irradiation-induced downregulation of Cdc25B was attenuated. The effect of irradiation on Cdc25B promoter activity was determined by dual-luciferase reporter assays. The response elements on the Cdc25B promoter related to irradiation were predicted by JASPAR. These conserved sequences were mutated individually or in combination by splicing-by-overlap extension PCR, and their function was confirmed by dual-luciferase reporter assays. The enrichment efficiency of transcription factors after irradiation was determined by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. Both Sp1/Sp3 and NF-YB binding sites were involved in irradiation-mediated regulation of Cdc25B. IER5 was involved in irradiation-mediated regulation of Cdc25B through the NF-YB binding site. Furthermore, ChIP assays showed that IER5 bound to the Cdc25B promoter, and the binding of IER5 to the Cdc25B promoter region in irradiation-induced HeLa cells induced the release of the coactivator p300 through interaction with NF-YB. Taken together, these findings indicate that IER5 is the transcriptional repressor that accelerates the downregulation of Cdc25B expression after irradiation.

Homeodomain-containing (HOX) factors such as the abdominal class homeodomain protein HOXA10 and the TALE-family protein PBX1 form coregulatory complexes and are potent transcriptional and epigenetic regulators of tissue morphogenesis. We have identified that HOXA10 and PBX1 are expressed in osteoprogenitors; however, their role in osteogenesis has not been established. To determine the mechanism of HOXA10-PBX-mediated regulation of osteoblast commitment and the related gene expression, PBX1 or HOX10 were depleted (shRNA or genetic deletion, respectively) or exogenously expressed in C3H10T1/2, bone marrow stromal progenitors, and MC3T3-E1 (preosteoblast) cells. Overexpression of HOXA10 increased the expression of osteoblast-related genes, osteoblast differentiation and mineralization; expression of PBX1 impaired osteogenic commitment of pluripotent cells and the differentiation of osteoblasts. In contrast, the targeted depletion of PBX1 by shRNA increased the expression of bone marker genes (osterix, alkaline phosphatase, BSP, and osteocalcin). Chromatin-associated PBX1 and HOXA10 were present at osteoblast-related gene promoters preceding gene expression, but PBX1 was absent from promoters during the transcription of bone-related genes, including osterix (Osx). Further, PBX1 complexes were associated with histone deacetylases normally linked with chromatin inactivation. Loss of PBX1 but not of HOXA10 from the Osx promoter was associated with increases in the recruitment of histone acetylases (p300), as well as decreased H3K9 methylation, reflecting transcriptional activation. We propose PBX1 plays a central role in attenuating the activity of HOXA10 as an activator of osteoblast-related genes and functions to establish the proper timing of gene expression during osteogenesis, resulting in proper matrix maturation and mineral deposition in differentiated osteoblasts.

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling plays a critical role in skeletal development, yet the mechanism by which FGFs affect bone mineralization is not well understood. Review of the literature investigating effects of FGF signaling on bone mineralization indicates that FGFs may stimulate expression of factors that prevent mineralization in the short term and enhance mineralization in the long term. Pyrophosphate is an ideal example of a factor that, dependent upon environment, has the capacity to inhibit or enhance mineralization. PC-1 is the primary generator of pyrophosphate in osteoblastic cells; therefore, regulated expression of PC-1 by FGFs may be a principal mechanism by which FGF signaling affects bone mineralization. We previously showed that FGF2 induces PC-1 expression in preosteoblastic cells and that this induction is differentiation stage dependent. In order to more directly investigate the mechanism by which PC-1 expression is regulated, we have cloned a 2.8-kb region of the PC-1 gene promoter and constructed a PC-1 gene promoter/firefly luciferase reporter construct. Results indicate that this construct is specifically responsive to FGF2 or ascorbate (an inducer of osteoblast differentiation). Promoter responsiveness to FGF2 is significantly diminished upon osteoblast differentiation, and increases in promoter activity that occur with osteoblast differentiation are inhibited by FGF2 treatment. These results indicate that the mechanism of PC-1 induction by FGF2 in preosteoblastic cells is distinct from the mechanism of induction that occurs with osteoblast differentiation. These results also indicate that PC-1 may play multiple and distinct roles in the development of mineralized tissues.

Background—Connective tissue growth factor (CCN2; CTGF) is a newly identified growth factor, which is involved in the regulation of wound repair and fibrosis. Because there is variation among individuals with respect to tissue response to injury, genetic factors might be involved in the final outcome of tissue repair or scarring. For example, polymorphisms in the promoter region of genes, such as those encoding transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1), interleukin 10 (IL-10), and tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α), influence transcriptional responses and are thought to contribute to the dysregulation of these genes in pathological conditions. Aim—To investigate whether the promoter region of the ccn2 (ctgf) gene contains polymorphic sequences that might account for differential expression. Materials/Methods—Seventy seven human DNA samples were sequenced—45 were from healthy controls and 32 were from patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD)—using M13 tailed sequence specific ccn2 (ctgf) primers for amplification of a 600 bp fragment upstream of the transcription start site. Amplicons were bidirectionally sequenced with a dye primer M13 forward and reverse sequencing kit. Results—A C to G substitution was identified at position −132 in one of the patients with IHD. Moreover, in five of the 32 patients with IHD and in six of the 45 healthy controls, a G to C polymorphism was found at position −447. These substitutions at −132 and −447 are thought to lie within predicted binding domains for the transcription factors Pbx-1 and MZF1, respectively. In addition, insertions at position −43 (G), −47 (C), −71 (G) and a C to T substitution at position −198 were found in all DNA samples compared with the published ccn2 (ctgf) promoter sequence. These corrections do not involve sequences predicted to function as transcription factor binding sites. Conclusion—Sequence analysis of the ccn2 (ctgf) promoter of 77 human DNA samples has revealed corrections and polymorphic sites. The latter lie within putative regulatory elements.

Aims—To study the distribution of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) variants containing mutations in the latent membrane protein 1 (LMP-1) oncogene and promoter in EBV associated Hodgkin's disease and infectious mononucleosis compared with previous findings in asymptomatic EBV carriers. Methods—Sequence analysis of the EBV LMP-1 promoter and gene in isolates from Danish patients with Hodgkin's disease (n = 61) and infectious mononucleosis (n = 10). Results—Viruses (previously designated group D) that contain two mutations in the activating transcription factor/cAMP response element (ATF/CRE) in the LMP-1 promoter, which are known to decrease promoter activity greatly, were significantly less frequent in Hodgkin's disease than in both infectious mononucleosis (p = 0.0081) and asymptomatic EBV carriers (p = 0.0084). In some cases, the LMP-1 gene contained mutations in a recently identified cytotoxic T cell (CTL) epitope. Most viral isolates contained mutations shown to increase nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) activation and had one of two newly identified C-terminal activation regions 3 (CTAR-3) deleted. The exon 1 Xho-I restriction site in the LMP-1 gene could be lost through a range of different mutations. Conclusions—These findings indicate selection pressure against EBV strains with weak LMP-1 promoter activity in Hodgkin's disease and thus provide further strong circumstantial evidence for the pathogenic role of EBV (and LMP-1) in this disease. Mutation of the CTL epitope suggests immune selection of EBV strains. Many EBV isolates contain functionally important mutations in the LMP-1 gene. Loss of the Xho-I restriction site should not be used as a marker of specific LMP-1 variants.

The osteoinductive BMP2 signal facilitates commitment to the osteoblast phenotype by inducing several classes of early response genes. Among these are bone-related HOX factors, homeodomain, RUNX and OSTERIX proteins. Here we demonstrate molecular events among BMP2-induced transcription factors that constitute a network of molecular switches on promoters of bone-related genes to coordinate their temporal expression during cellular differentiation. Our studies provide evidence for (1) selective association of HOXA10, MSX2, DLX3 and DLX5 homeodomain transcription factors on Runx2 and OC genes at stages of osteoblast maturation as well as (2) participation of these factors with RUNX2 in chromatin remodeling of bone-specific genes for repression, activation and attenuation of transcription. These findings reveal the requirement for multiple levels of control for the appropriate timing of osteoblast-related gene expression.

Background/Aims - In Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positive cell lines that are stably infected, three different promoters are known to direct the transcription of EBV nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1). These are located in the BamHI-C, BamHI-Q, and BamHI-F regions of the viral genome (Cp, Qp, and Fp, respectively). Fp is activated upon induction of the viral lytic cycle. The aim of this study was to investigate the activity of Fp in EBV associated diseases. Methods - Using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, a qualitative analysis of EBNA1 promoter usage in various EBV associated diseases was performed. Results - Fp driven transcription was detected in the context of primary infection and/or lytic replication; at least a portion of the Fp driven transcripts encoded EBNA1. Qp driven EBNA1 transcripts were detected in most samples across the range of disorders tested. Cp driven EBNA1 transcripts were detected in the context of immune suppression and in samples containing EBV positive (nonneoplastic) lymphoid cells. Conclusions - These results confirm the previously proposed housekeeping function of the Qp promoter., published_or_final_version

Yeast ENO1 promoter was prepared by a chemical synthetic method. Two variant promoters containing a pyrimidine-rich region (CT block), located between the TATA box and the transcription start site, either 32 or 34 base pairs (bp) longer than the native ENO1 promoter were isolated during the chemical synthesis. Gene expression of variant promoters was compared with that of the native promoter by measuring the amount of mRNA and the activity of beta-galactosidase by constructing ENO1-lacZ gene fusions. No significant differences were observed between the native and variant promoters in transcription levels. The start site of transcription was mapped on CAAG, a consensus sequence of transcription start site of yeast glycolytic genes. The results suggest a longer CT block in ENO1 promoter may not affect the expression of the yeast ENO1 gene. In addition, the level of ENO1 gene expression was found to be higher in stationary phase cells than in log phase cells.