Search

Fiscal stress is a common condition in shrinking cities such as Detroit. Among the contributing factors, property tax delinquency is a significant consideration due to the unwillingness or inability to pay property taxes. The literature shows that improvement in the quality of public goods and services can increase tax compliance and strengthen the social contract between taxpayers and the local government. Nonetheless, this relationship is unclear in the context of low-income shrinking cities. This article estimates the effects of new publicly provided transportation infrastructure on property tax compliance in Detroit, Michigan. Specifically, we use the announcement of the Qline in Detroit. We compute the effects of the Qline announcement on tax delinquency behavior using a Spatial Difference-in-Difference approach. The results indicate that the announcement of the Qline had an economically and statistically significant impact on tax delinquency for properties within one mile of the nearest Qline station. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article evaluates the impacts of reductions in residential effective tax rates on homeownership in Detroit, Michigan. The decline in effective tax rates was driven by a citywide reassessment that significantly reduced effective tax rates. These estimates are used to infer the potential impacts of moving from a traditional property tax to a split-rate tax in which the tax rate applied to land is higher than the tax rate applied to structures. Using Detroit parcel-level data over the years 2012–2019, we find that tax reductions resulting from property reassessment generated a very small net decrease in homeownership. Our evaluation suggests that moving to a split rate tax would likely result in a minimal change in the homeownership rate in Detroit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the degree to which the demolition of low-quality structures affects property tax compliance in Detroit. During the real estate crisis, the rate of property tax delinquency in the city exceeded 50%. The demolition of dilapidated structures could lead to improvements in tax compliance in two ways. The first is through an amenity effect: removal of blighted structures improves the neighborhood and thus may increase the likelihood that neighbors pay their property taxes. The second is via the existence of a peer effect in property tax compliance decisions. We use a 6-year panel database to examine the degree to which demolitions affect nearby residential property tax delinquency. Even though we are unable to disentangle the amenity and peer effects, our analysis shows that when a dilapidated property is demolished, tax delinquency within the neighborhood is reduced, providing evidence that demolitions improve tax compliance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]