1. Clonal evaluation of prostate cancer molecular heterogeneity in biopsy samples by dual immunohistochemistry and dual RNA in situ hybridization.
- Author
-
Dedigama-Arachchige P, Carskadon S, Li J, Loveless I, Alhamar M, Peabody JO, Stricker H, Chitale DA, Rogers CG, Menon M, Gupta NS, Bismar TA, Williamson SR, and Palanisamy N
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biopsy, DNA-Binding Proteins genetics, DNA-Binding Proteins metabolism, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, In Situ Hybridization, Male, Middle Aged, Prostate pathology, Prostatic Neoplasms metabolism, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ets genetics, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ets metabolism, Transcription Factors genetics, Transcription Factors metabolism, Transcriptional Regulator ERG genetics, Transcriptional Regulator ERG metabolism, Trypsin Inhibitor, Kazal Pancreatic genetics, Trypsin Inhibitor, Kazal Pancreatic metabolism, Prostate metabolism, Prostatic Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
Prostate cancer is frequently multifocal. Although there may be morphological variation, the genetic underpinnings of each tumor are not clearly understood. To assess the inter and intra tumor molecular heterogeneity in prostate biopsy samples, we developed a combined immunohistochemistry and RNA in situ hybridization method for the simultaneous evaluation of ERG, SPINK1, ETV1, and ETV4. Screening of 601 biopsy cores from 120 consecutive patients revealed multiple alterations in a mutually exclusive manner in 37% of patients, suggesting multifocal tumors with considerable genetic differences. Furthermore, the incidence of molecular heterogeneity was higher in African Americans patients compared with Caucasian American patients. About 47% of the biopsy cores with discontinuous tumor foci showed clonal differences with distinct molecular aberrations. ERG positivity occurred in low-grade cancer, whereas ETV4 expression was observed mostly in high-grade cancer. Further studies revealed correlation between the incidence of molecular markers and clinical and pathologic findings, suggesting potential implications for diagnostic pathology practice, such as defining dominant tumor nodules and discriminating juxtaposed but molecularly different tumors of different grade patterns.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF