Search

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Novel hormonal agents (NHAs) such abiraterone acetate (ABI) and enzalutamide (ENZ) are frequently used in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Despite...

PURPOSE: Several new drug therapies have been approved in CRPC in the past decade. However, little is known about their potential overuse at the end of life. Cancer therapy use at the end of life has been considered an indicator of overtreatment. The study objective was to describe CRPC drug use in the last month of life of CRPC patients in Quebec. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using administrative databases from the province of Quebec in Canada, we identified patients who received medical or surgical castration treatment, received one or more CRPC drugs (chemotherapy, abiraterone, or bone-targeted therapy), and died between 2001 and 2013. CRPC drug use in the last month of life was the primary outcome. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 1,148 patients with CRPC. A total of 316 men (27.5%) received a CRPC drug in the last month of life. For those who received chemotherapy, abiraterone, and bone-targeted therapy, 10.2%, 27.8%, and 31.8% received them in the last month of life, respectively. In multivariable analyses, age older than 75 years (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.99), and prostate cancer diagnosis received less than 24 months earlier (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.72) were associated with less CRPC drug use. Relative to dying between 2005 and 2011, dying between 2012 and 2013 (OR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.18) was associated with greater CRPC drug use. CONCLUSION: More than one quarter of patients received CRPC drug therapies in the last month of life. Persistent chemotherapy, abiraterone, bone-targeted therapies, and medical castration drugs in the last month of life may be an indicator of inappropriate and expensive end-of-life care.

Background: Inaccurate risk classification and the burden of unnecessary biopsies are a challenge due to the limited ability of current risk assessment tools and modalities to diagnose prostate cancer (PCa) and distinguish indolent from aggressive disease. This systematic review assesses newly developed tests and interventions with high evidence of clinical utility that might be adopted in clinical practice during PCa management before initial and repeat biopsy, after positive biopsy, and after radical treatment. Methods: The Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies pertaining to the clinical utility of PCa diagnostic tests. Outcomes of interest were (1) a measure of the percentage of altered decision-making, (2) decrease in number of unnecessary biopsies, (3) decrease or increase in treatment intensity, and (4) risk reclassification after test results. Results: The search yielded 2,940 articles, of which 46 met the inclusion criteria. We found clinical utility evidence on the Prostate Health Index (PHI), 4Kscore test, MRI, OncotypeDX, Decipher test, Prolaris, ConfirmMDx, Progensa PCA3, NADiA ProsVue, and ProMark. No evidence was identified for Prostarix, ProstaVysion, Prostate Core Mitomic Test, and Mi-Prostate Score. The interventions demonstrated their clinical utility in terms of change in treatment recommendations, decrease/increase in interventional treatment, decrease in biopsy, and risk reclassification. At diagnosis after a positive biopsy, ProMark, OncotypeDX, Prolaris, and MRI guided the use of active surveillance. Use of NADiA ProsVue, Decipher, and Prolaris aided in the decision to add adjuvant therapy post-prostatectomy. PHI, 4Kscore, and MRI used prior initial and repeat biopsies, and ConfirmMDx and Progensa PCA3 used prior repeat biopsies to improve prediction of biopsy outcome, allowing a decrease in unnecessary biopsies. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that implementation of these tests in clinical practice could effectuate personalized treatment of PCa. Further clinical and economic evaluation studies of long-term PCa outcomes are warranted to provide further guidance.

Since just after the year 2000 in Quebec, the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mcrpc) has evolved considerably, with the inclusion of docetaxel-based chemotherapy, bone-targeted therapies (zoledronic acid and denosumab), and more recently, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and cabazitaxel for docetaxel-refractory patients. In the present study, we aimed to analyze contemporary mcrpc management patterns and therapy utilization trends in Quebec. The study cohort consisted of patients dying of prostate cancer (pca) between January 2001 and December 2013, selected from Quebec public health care insurance databases. Patient selection was based on death from a pca-related cause or therapy used according to the Canadian Urological Association guidelines on mcrpc management. Treatments included chemotherapy (mitoxantrone before 2005 and docetaxel after 2005), abiraterone, bone-targeted therapy (zoledronic acid or denosumab, or both), and palliative radiation therapy (rt). During the study period, neither enzalutamide nor cabazitaxel was publicly reimbursed in Quebec, and as a result, no capture of their use was possible for this study. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the probability of receiving chemotherapy, bone-targeted therapies, and palliative rt before death from pca. Overall, the database search identified 3106 patients who died of pca between January 2001 and December 2013. Median age of death was 78 years. Of those 3106 patients, just 2568 (83%) received mcrpc-specific treatments: chemotherapy, abiraterone, palliative rt, or bone-targeted therapy, the other 17% of the patients were managed solely with maximum androgen blockade (androgen deprivation therapy plus anti-androgens) despite a record of pca-related death. Logistic regression analyses indicate that patients dying after 2005 were more likely to have received chemotherapy [odds ratio (or): 1.51, 95% ci: 1.22 to 1.85] and bone-targeted therapy (or: 1.97, 95% ci: 1.64 to 2.37). Age was a significant predictor for the use of chemotherapy, bone-targeted therapy, and palliative rt (ors in the range 0.96&ndash, 0.98, p < 0.05). Patient age seems to be a strong determinant in the of selection mcrpc therapy, affecting the probability of the use of chemotherapy, bone-targeted therapy, or palliative rt. Although chemotherapy is still used only in a small percentage of patients, the introduction of new therapies&mdash, such as bone-targeted therapy, docetaxel, and abiraterone&mdash, affected treatment selection over time. The availability of enzalutamide since February 2014 will likely produce additional changes in mcrpc management.

Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a cornerstone of treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PCa); however, it accelerates the loss of bone mineral density (BMD), which increases fracture risk. Guidelines recommend BMD testing when initiating ADT to assess baseline fracture risk properly. The objective of this study was to examine the proportion of BMD testing in men initiating ADT in Quebec and to identify factors associated with receipt of this testing. Methods: The study cohort consisted of men extracted from Quebec public healthcare insurance administrative databases who initiated continuous ADT from 2000 to 2015 for >12 months. The primary study outcome was receipt of BMD testing in the period from 6 months before through 12 months after ADT initiation. Multivariable generalized linear mixed regression modeling with a logit link was performed to identify variables associated with BMD testing. Results: We identified 22,033 patients, of whom 3,910 (17.8%) underwent BMD testing. Rates of BMD testing increased from 4.1% in 2000 to 23.4% in 2015. After multivariable analyses, prior history of osteoporosis (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; 95% CI, 1.32–2.57; PP=.006), use of bisphosphonates (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.25–1.73; PP=.006) were associated with higher odds of BMD testing. Patient age >80 years (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59–0.76; PPPPConclusions: In our study population, BMD testing rates in men initiating ADT were low, although they increased over the years especially in the years after the publication of recommendations for BMD testing in these patients. Potential gaps identified include being older, more comorbid, and rural areas. Overall, additional efforts emphasizing the importance of BMD testing in PCa guidelines may be needed.

Background Docetaxel-based chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of the management of symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) since 2004. This study aimed to describe how real-world clinical practice was changed with the public funding of novel hormonal agents (abiraterone and enzalutamide) in Quebec. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study in two McGill University hospitals. Hospital-based cancer registries were used to select mCRPC patients in medical oncology departments from January 2010 to June 2014. Two groups according to mCRPC diagnosis year were built, with 2012 chosen as the cut-off year, corresponding to the year abiraterone was approved for public reimbursement in second-line in Quebec. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate time to first docetaxel prescription since mCRPC diagnosis before and after 2012. Cox regression was used to identify predictive factors of docetaxel and novel hormonal agent use. Results In our cohort, 308 patients diagnosed with mCRPC were selected with 162 patients in the pre-2012 group and 146 patients in the post-2012 group. The median age at mCRPC was 74.0 years old. At 12 months from diagnosis, 69% of patients received a prescription for docetaxel in the pre-2012 group comparatively to 53% in the post-2012 group. Factors that decreased the likelihood of docetaxel utilization were: age older than 80 at mCRPC diagnosis (HR: 0.5; 95%CI: 0.3–0.7), mCRPC diagnosis after 2012 (HR: 0.6; 95%CI: 0.4–0.8), and asymptomatic disease at mCRPC diagnosis (HR: 0.5; 95%CI: 0.3–0.7). Conclusion The introduction of novel hormonal agents reduced first-line and overall docetaxel utilization and delayed time to its initiation.

62 Background: Novel hormonal agents (NHAs) such abiraterone (ABI) and enzalutamide (ENZA) have demonstrated similar survival benefits against placebo groups in their respective clinical trials leading to their regulatory approval in both the pre- and post-chemotherapy settings in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Despite the overall tolerable risk profile, certain signals of cardiovascular toxicity were reported for these agents in clinical trials but little is known about their incidence in clinical practice. The objective was to assess the comparative cardiovascular safety of ABI and ENZA in patients with mCRPC in the real-world. Methods: A retrospective population-based cohort was extracted from Quebec public healthcare administrative databases. Patients were selected on the basis of having received androgen deprivation therapy prior to initiating a novel hormonal agent (ABI or ENZA) between 2012 and 2016. The primary outcome of interest was cardiovascular-related hospitalization (composite outcome that included acute coronary disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, arrhythmia and other cardiovascular causes). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with the propensity score was used to adjust for measured baseline confounders including pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Results: The cohort comprises 2,183 patients, with 1,773 (81.2%) in the ABI group and 410 (18.8%) in the ENZA group. Before IPTW, mean age of the ENZA group was higher than the ABI group (78 vs 76). There were more ENZA patients with pre-existing arrythmia (ABI: 10.7%, ENZA: 15.1%) and diabetes (ABI: 21.5%, ENZA: 25.1%). Crude incidence rates of cardiovascular-related hospitalization were of 10 events per 100 person-years (PYs) and of 7 events per 100 PYs for the ABI and ENZA groups, respectively. After applying IPTW, all baseline variables were well balanced across both groups with standardized differences < 0.05. The ABI group was at greater risk of cardiovascular-related hospitalization compared to the ENZA group (IPTW-hazard ratio (HR): 1.79, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.04-3.09). The risk of hospitalization for heart failure was greater in ABI (IPTW-HR: 3.02, 95%CI: 1.17-7.78). Conclusions: In our study population, there was a greater risk of cardiovascular-related hospitalizations for ABI users relative to ENZA users, in particular for hospitalization for heart failure. Given the lack of evidence from randomized head-to-head comparisons of both agents, these results provide clinicians with additional insight on the cardiovascular risks of mCRPC patients treated with NHAs in the real-world and further large studies are required to corroborate these findings.

Purpose The TAXYNERGY trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01718353) evaluated clinical benefit from early taxane switch and circulating tumor cell (CTC) biomarkers to interrogate mechanisms of sensitivity or resistance to taxanes in men with chemotherapy-naïve, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to docetaxel or cabazitaxel. Men who did not achieve ≥ 30% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline by cycle 4 (C4) switched taxane. The primary clinical endpoint was confirmed ≥ 50% PSA decline versus historical control (TAX327). The primary biomarker endpoint was analysis of post-treatment CTCs to confirm the hypothesis that clinical response was associated with taxane drug-target engagement, evidenced by decreased percent androgen receptor nuclear localization (%ARNL) and increased microtubule bundling. Results Sixty-three patients were randomly assigned to docetaxel (n = 41) or cabazitaxel (n = 22); 44.4% received prior potent androgen receptor–targeted therapy. Overall, 35 patients (55.6%) had confirmed ≥ 50% PSA responses, exceeding the historical control rate of 45.4% (TAX327). Of 61 treated patients, 33 (54.1%) had ≥ 30% PSA declines by C4 and did not switch taxane, 15 patients (24.6%) who did not achieve ≥ 30% PSA declines by C4 switched taxane, and 13 patients (21.3%) discontinued therapy before or at C4. Of patients switching taxane, 46.7% subsequently achieved ≥ 50% PSA decrease. In 26 CTC-evaluable patients, taxane-induced decrease in %ARNL (cycle 1 day 1 v cycle 1 day 8) was associated with a higher rate of ≥ 50% PSA decrease at C4 ( P = .009). Median composite progression-free survival was 9.1 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 11.7 months); median overall survival was not reached at 14 months. Common grade 3 or 4 adverse events included fatigue (13.1%) and febrile neutropenia (11.5%). Conclusion The early taxane switch strategy was associated with improved PSA response rates versus TAX327. Taxane-induced shifts in %ARNL may serve as an early biomarker of clinical benefit in patients treated with taxanes.

Background Abiraterone acetate was introduced in Quebec in 2012 for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in patients who had received chemotherapy with docetaxel. This study describes abiraterone use in the early postapproval period and its clinical effectiveness in Quebec, for both patients who had received docetaxel chemotherapy and those who could not receive docetaxel therapy owing to medical reasons. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Quebec public health care administrative databases. Our cohort consisted of patients with mCRPC who received abiraterone between January 2012 and June 2013. Treatment groups were defined as patients who received abiraterone following docetaxel chemotherapy and those who received abiraterone without having had chemotherapy, under the "exception patient" measure. Study outcomes included overall survival, duration of abiraterone therapy and number of hospital days. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the effectiveness of abiraterone adjusted for several covariates. Results Our cohort consisted of 303 patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone (99 after chemotherapy and 204 as exception patients). The median age at initiation of abiraterone therapy was 75.0 for the postchemotherapy group and 80.0 for the exception patient group. The corresponding median survival values were 12 and 14 months (log-rank test p = 0.8). Risk of death was similar in the 2 groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.89 [95% confidence interval 0.57-1.38]). Interpretation The effectiveness of abiraterone in older patients who were ineligible for chemotherapy was similar to that of patients with prior docetaxel exposure. Overall, the real-world survival benefits of abiraterone were similar to those in the COU-AA-301 trial.

40 Background: The approval of novel hormonal agents (NHAs), abiraterone and enzalutamide, have increased the therapeutic arsenal available in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, the use of chemotherapy and other antineoplastics at the end of life has been suggested as an indicator of poor quality of care. In this study, we report the use of NHAs at the end of life in men with mCRPC in the province of Quebec, Canada. Methods: Using Quebec public healthcare administrative databases, we identified patients with prostate cancer who used an NHA (abiraterone or enzalutamide) after androgen deprivation therapy and who died between 2012 and 2016. The primary outcome was the use of an NHA in the 30 days before death. Use of an NHA in the 60 and 90 days before dying, and initiation (first prescription) of an NHA in the 30 days before death were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Multivariable analysis of the primary outcome was performed with logistic regression with results reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results: The cohort consists of 1316 patients who used an NHA over the course of their disease and died at a median age of 78 years old, with 292 (22.2%), 464 (35.3%), and 575 (43.7%) having used an NHA in the 30, 60 and 90 days of life, respectively. Use of NHA 30 days before dying decreased over the study period, from 44.8% in 2012 to 17.0% in 2016 (Cochran-Armitage test p-value < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, later years of death remained associated with lower odds of NHA use 30 days before death (OR 0.74, 95%CI 0.66 to 0.81, p < 0.001). Fifty-eight (4.4%) patients initiated a NHA 30 days before dying. Conclusions: Rates of NHA use 30 days before dying were high initially but decreased over the study period. Further assessment of NHA use at the end of life is warranted to examine if the trend will be maintained given the recent approval of additional oral NHAs for prostate cancer.

38 Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a cornerstone of advanced prostate cancer (PCa) treatment, however several side-effects are associated with its long-term use. Notably, loss of bone mineral density (BMD) is accelerated which increases fracture risk. Guidelines recommend BMD testing when initiating ADT to properly assess baseline fracture risk. The objective was to examine the proportion of BMD testing in men initiating long-term ADT in Quebec. Methods: The cohort consists of men extracted from Quebec public healthcare insurance administrative databases who were diagnosed with PCa from 2001-2012 and treated by ADT for at least one continuous year. The primary study outcome was the receipt of baseline BMD testing (defined as a BMD test identified in the period from 6 months prior to and up to 12 months after ADT initiation). Multivariable generalized linear mixed with a logit link was performed to identify variables associated with baseline BMD testing accounting for physician clustering. Results: We identified 7,069 patients, of which 887 (12.6%) underwent baseline BMD testing. Baseline BMD testing varied by year of ADT initiation, from 7.7% in 2001-2003 to 12.3% in 2013-2012. Following multivariable analyses, later years of ADT initiation (2004-2006, 2007-2009, 2010-2012, 2013-2015) remained associated with higher odds of baseline BMD testing compared to the earlier years (2001-2003) (ORs ranging from 1.43-1.88; p < 0.001). Conversely, age > 80 (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.57-0.94; p = 0.001), greater Charlson comorbidity score (OR 0.51; 95%CI 0.34-0.75; p = 0.001), and rural residence (OR 0.60; 95%CI 0.48-0.75; p < 0.001) were associated with lower odds of baseline BMD testing. Conclusions: In our study population, rates of baseline BMD testing in men initiating ADT are low, although the rates increased over the course of the study period. Potential gaps identified in baseline BMD testing include older, more comorbid patients, and rural residence. Additional efforts emphasizing the importance of BMD testing in PCa guidelines may be needed.

134 Background: A better understanding of taxane sensitivity/resistance in mCRPC is needed to optimize treatment. Preclinically, taxane efficacy has been linked to the ability of microtubules (MT) to inhibit AR nuclear trafficking. In this prospective biomarker study, we used circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from patients (pts) in TAXYNERGY to perform real-time analysis of AR nuclear localization (ARNL) and MT stabilization (bundling; MTB) in order to predict taxane sensitivity. Methods: TAXYNERGY (NCT01718353) is a phase 2 trial randomizing chemo-naïve mCRPC pts 2:1 to docetaxel or cabazitaxel, with a switch to the alternative taxane in the absence of a ≥ 30% PSA drop by C4. Here we present the co-primary biomarker endpoints. CTCs at baseline (C1D1) were compared to CTCs after 1 week of taxane treatment (C1D8), and were analyzed by multiplex confocal microscopy for %ARNL (integrated AR intensity in the cell and nuclear areas) and MTB (assessed for increase compared to C1D1 on a scale from 0–3 from no to most MTB increase). Associations between %ARNL and MTB with clinical outcomes were sought. Results: Of 63 randomized pts, 26 had evaluable CTCs both at C1D1 and C1D8. At C1D8, mean %ARNL was significantly lower in pts achieving a ≥ 50% PSA drop by C4 vs those without (44% vs 64%; p = 0.004). A taxane-induced decrease in mean %ARNL (C1D8 vs C1D1) was associated with a higher rate of ≥ 50% PSA response (73% vs 13%; p = 0.009); mean %ARNL decreased by 18% in responders and increased by 2% in non-responders (p = 0.02). Finally, a taxane-induced increase in mean MTB trended higher in pts achieving a ≥ 30% PSA drop by C4 vs those without (0.69 vs 0.09; p = 0.09); increase in mean MTB score was indicative of response and observed in pts who did not require a taxane switch after C4 (0.75 vs 0.09; p = 0.06). Conclusions: We provide the first prospective data suggesting that taxane-induced shifts in ARNL and MTB (measured in CTCs) may serve as an early biomarker of taxane sensitivity. Consistent with preclinical data, AR nuclear exclusion caused by microtubule bundling may be a clinically-actionable marker of taxane efficacy. Funding: Sanofi Genzyme. Clinical trial information: NCT01718353.

5007Background: TAXYNERGY (NCT01718353), a randomized phase II trial, evaluated early taxane switch with CTC biomarkers to study mechanisms of sensitivity/resistance in men with chemo-naive mCRPC. ...

5031 Background: Microtubule-targeted therapy with taxanes is the only chemo with survival benefit in advanced PC. Emerging molecular evidence suggests sensitivity/resistance to taxanes may relate ...

226 Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) death is mainly due to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) which results from disease progression despite androgen ablation therapy (ADT). Little is known about clinical outcomes and trends of real-life CRPC management in the present era, which has become very complex. Our study aimed to analyze healthcare services use, clinical outcomes and survival trends in real-life management of CRPC in Quebec, Canada. Methods: The study cohort consisted of 7,123 patients which shown evidence of CRPC from January/2001 to July/2013, selected from the public healthcare insurance programs the Régie de l’Assurance Maladie du Québec (RAMQ) databases. Survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Maier and the difference in survival between pre-/post-docetaxel (Doc) (2002-2005 vs 2008-2011) era by log-rank test. The association between Doc exposure and survival was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for several co-variables. Results: Chemotherapy was offered to 17% of patients, while 45% were kept on maximal androgen blockade (MAB) alone, or offered Abiraterone (3%). Androgen targeted therapies (MAB or Abiraterone) were the treatment of choice for the elderly population (mean age 78.8 and 78 ±7, respectively) while chemotherapy was offered to younger patients (mean age 72 ±7.3). Survival rates at 1 and 2 years after the initiation of chemotherapy were 52% and 26% in post-Doc era vs 46% and 17% in the pre-Doc period. In patients receiving first line chemotherapy only, hospitalization due to PCa was a poor prognostic predictor (HR: 2.0; 95%CI: 1.5-2.6), as expected. In addition among patients without previous hospitalization the risk of death was higher in the pre- vs post-Doc era (HR: 1.7 CI: 1.003-2.851). Conclusions: Patient age seems to be a strong determinant in CRPC therapy selection. In patients without serious complications leading to hospitalization, survival was greatly improved in the post-Doc era. Our data also supports that patients older than those in the TAX327 trial (72 vs 68) may equally benefit from chemotherapy. This is encouraging as we hope to observe comparable results for new approved therapies for CRPC.

Background For Canadian men, prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer and the 3rd leading cause of cancer mortality. Men dying of PCa do so after failing castration. The management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is complex and the associated drug treatments are increasingly costly. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost of drug treatments over the mCRPC period, in the context of the latest evidence-based approaches. Methods Two Markov models with Monte-Carlo microsimulations were developed in order to simulate the management of the disease and to estimate the cost of drug treatments in mCRPC, as per Quebec’s public healthcare system. The models include recently approved additional lines of treatment after or before docetaxel (i.e. abiraterone and cabazitaxel). Drug exposure and survival were based on clinical trial results and clinical practice guidelines found in a literature review. All costs were assigned in 2013 Canadian dollars ($). Only direct drug costs were estimated. Results The mean cost of mCRPC drug treatments over an average period of 28.1 months was estimated at $48,428 per patient (95% Confidence Interval: $47,624 to $49,232). The mean cost increased to $104,071 (95% CI: $102,373 - $105,770) per patient when one includes abiraterone initiation prior to docetaxel therapy. Over the mCRPC period, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LHRHa) prescribed to maintain castrate testosterone levels accounted for 20.4% of the total medication cost, whereas denosumab prescribed to decrease bone-related events accounted for 30.5% of costs. When patients received cabazitaxel in sequence after abiraterone and docetaxel, the mCRPC medications cost per patient per month increased by 60.2%. The total cost of medications for the treatment of each annual Canadian cohort of 4,000 mCRPC patients was estimated at $ 193.6 million to $416.3 million. Conclusions Our study estimates the direct drug costs associated with mCRPC treatments in the Canadian healthcare system. Recently identified effective yet not approved therapies will become part of the spectrum of mCRPC treatments, and may potentially increase the cost.

e16029 Background: Medical or surgical castration are the treatments of choice for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with a high-risk of disease recurrence or progression. In addition, androgen abl...