Search

To compare the prostate antigen 3 (PCA3) test with (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging ((1)H-MRSI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCEMR) combined examination in the detection of prostate tumor foci in patients with persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and prior negative random transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy.Forty-three patients with a first random biopsy negative for prostate adenocarcinoma, persistent elevated PSA and negative digital rectal examination were recruited. All the patients were submitted to MRSI examination (MRSI-DCEMR) and were submitted to an attentive prostate massage in order to perform PCA3 assay. Afterwards, 10-core laterally-directed random TRUS-guided prostate biopsy was performed.The overall sensitivity and specificity of a PCA3 score ≥35 for positive biopsy were 76.9% and 66.6%, respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 80% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 62.5%; as for MRSI sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 92.8% and 86.6% with a PPV of 92.8% and a NPV of 86.6%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis rates were 0.755 for PCA3 and 0.864 for MRSI.Combined MRSI/DCEMR can better improve the cancer detection rate in patients with prior negative TRUS-guided biopsy and altered PSA serum levels than PCA3. Optimization of MRSI will allow more precise diagnosis of local invasion and improved bioptical procedures.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of unenhanced whole-body MRI, including whole-body Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI), used as a diagnostic modality to detect pathologic lymph nodes and skeletal metastases in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing restaging after primary treatment.152 male patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) underwent MRI at a 1.5 Tesla magnet with whole spinal sagittal T2-weighted, sagittal T1-weighted, sagittal STIR images, axial T1 and T2-weighted and STIR images of the pelvis and whole-body. 18Fcholine-PET/CT exam was used as the reference standard.MRI protocol including whole-body combined T1-weighted+T2-weighted+STIR+DWI showed a sensitivity (Se) of 99%, a specificity (Spe) of 98%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 98%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96%, an accuracy of 98% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.971 for identification of bone metastatic lesion. The same protocol, displayed a Se of 98%, a Spe of 99%, a PPV of 97%, a NPV of 98%, an accuracy of 98 % and an AUC of 0.960 in the detection of pathologic lymph nodes.Unenhanced whole-body MRI, including whole-body-DWI, is an accurate and cost-effective diagnostic tool which is able to detect lymph node involvement and bone metastases in patients with biochemically recurrent PCa after RP or EBRT. Thanks to its lack of ionizing radiation, excellent soft tissue contrast, high spatial resolution, no need of contrast agent, high Se and Spe, it could play a role in the restaging procedure of such patients.

Background: We aim to evaluate the impact of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and fusion-target biopsy for early reclassification of patients with low-risk Prostate Cancer in a randomized trial. Materials and methods: Between 2015 and 2018, patients diagnosed with Prostate Cancer after random biopsy fulfilling PRIAS criteria were enrolled and centrally randomized (1:1 ratio) to study group or control group. Patients randomized to study group underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging at 3 months from enrollment: patients with positive findings (PIRADS-v2>2) underwent fusion-target biopsy; patients with negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging or confirmed ISUP - Grade Group 1 at fusion-target biopsy were managed according to PRIAS schedule and 12-core random biopsy was performed at 12 months. Patients in control group underwent PRIAS protocol, including a confirmatory 12-core random biopsy at 12 months. Primary endpoint was a reduction of reclassification rate at 12-month random biopsy in study group at least 20% less than controls. Reclassification was defined as biopsy ISUP Grade Group 1 in >2 biopsy cores or disease upgrading. Results: A total of 124 patients were randomized to study group (n = 62) or control group (n = 62). Around 21 of 62 patients (34%) in study group had a positive multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and underwent fusion-target biopsy, with 11 (17.7%) reclassifications. Considering the intention-to-treat population, reclassification rate at 12-month random biopsy was 6.5% for study group and 29% for control group, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The early employment of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for active surveillance patients enrolled after random biopsy consents to significantly reduce reclassifications at 12-month random biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without targeted biopsy, is an alternative to standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy for prostate-cancer detection in men with a raised prostate-specific antigen level who have not undergone biopsy. However, comparative evidence is limited. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, we assigned men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who had not undergone biopsy previously to undergo MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, or standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy. Men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group underwent a targeted biopsy (without standard biopsy cores) if the MRI was suggestive of prostate cancer; men whose MRI results were not suggestive of prostate cancer were not offered biopsy. Standard biopsy was a 10-to-12-core, transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy. The primary outcome was the proportion of men who received a diagnosis of clinically significant cancer. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of men who received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer. RESULTS: A total of 500 men underwent randomization. In the MRI-targeted biopsy group, 71 of 252 men (28%) had MRI results that were not suggestive of prostate cancer, so they did not undergo biopsy. Clinically significant cancer was detected in 95 men (38%) in the MRI-targeted biopsy group, as compared with 64 of 248 (26%) in the standard-biopsy group (adjusted difference, 12 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4 to 20; P = 0.005). MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, was noninferior to standard biopsy, and the 95% confidence interval indicated the superiority of this strategy over standard biopsy. Fewer men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group than in the standard-biopsy group received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer (adjusted difference, -13 percentage points; 95% CI, -19 to -7; P

We aimed to review the current state-of-the-art imaging methods used for primary and secondary staging of prostate cancer, mainly focusing on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography/computed tomography with new radiotracers. An expert panel of urologists, radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians with wide experience in prostate cancer led a PubMed/MEDLINE search for prospective, retrospective original research, systematic review, meta-analyses and clinical guidelines for local and systemic staging of the primary tumor and recurrence disease after treatment. Despite magnetic resonance imaging having low sensitivity for microscopic extracapsular extension, it is now a mainstay of prostate cancer diagnosis and local staging, and is becoming a crucial tool in treatment planning. Cross-sectional imaging for nodal staging, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, is clinically useless even in high-risk patients, but is still suggested by current clinical guidelines. Positron-emission tomography/computed tomography with newer tracers has some advantage over conventional images, but is not cost-effective. Bone scan and computed tomography are often useless in early biochemical relapse, when salvage treatments are potentially curative. New imaging modalities, such as prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging, are showing promising results for early local and systemic detection. Newer imaging techniques, such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography/computed tomography with prostate-specific membrane antigen, have the potential to fill the historical limitations of conventional imaging methods in some clinical situations of primary and secondary staging of prostate cancer.

Key points† PSA measurement does not discriminate the site and ex-tent of recurrent disease† Imaging may be of help in detecting site and extent ofrecurrence† Choline PET/CT is recommended in patients with PCarecurrence and PSA ≥1ng/mL† Mp-MRI is recommended for PSA between 0.2 and 1 ng/mL to detect small local recurrence† The appropriate use of imaging modalities can guidepersonalized treatment† PSMA might overcome some of the limitations of cholinein PCa recurrence assessmentThe relevance of prostate cancer (PCa) as a clinical prob-lem is clearly and simply represented by numbers: accordingto the International Agency for Research on Cancer, theworldwide PCa burden is expected to grow to 1.7 millionnew cases and 499,000 deaths annually by 2030 due to thegrowth and ageing of the global population [1]. Moreover,prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement for early detec-tion and monitoring of men with PCa has increased the num-ber of patients presenting with potentially curable disease.Although many treatment options are available for localizeddisease,between27%and53%ofpatientstreatedforprima-ry PCa will experience a recurrence, typically indicated by arise in PSA serum levels. Once recurrence is suspected, thediscriminationbetweenlocalanddistantrelapseisessentialinchoosingthebesttreatmentstrategy.IfrestrictedtoPSAmea-surement, which is limited by the lack of serum biomarkers,and is unable to discriminate the precise recurrence site andextent,theassessmentofdiseaseprogressionisdefinitelysub-optimal.However,ithasbeenshownthatPSAkineticsinclud-ing PSA doubling time and PSA velocity strongly correlatewithclinicaloutcomesafterlocaltherapyandmaysuggestthelikelihoodofapatienthavingoccultdistantmetastaticdisease[2].Considering that PCa recurrence can occur at thelocoregional level or involve lymph nodes and bone, ideallya one-stop-shop imaging modalityabletoidentify all the pos-sible sites of recurrence in a single examination would be aninvaluable diagnostic weapon. But what are the best meanscurrentlyavailableforclinicianstoproperlyidentifyandchar-acterize PCa recurrence? Is PSA able to indicate the best di-agnostic modality to be performed?Transrectalultrasonography(TRUS)isnotsufficientlysen-sitive or specific for the early detection of PCa local recur-rence, it is invasive and expensive, and additionally it has alow but not insignificant rate of complications such as infec-tions.EspeciallyinpatientswithlowPSAlevels,TRUSisnotthe optimal choice and, moreover, multiple biopsies are oftenrequired because of potential sampling error that cannot defi-nitely exclude local recurrence. Because of these limitations,TRUS and biopsy are only recommended if they will affectthe treatment plan, not being necessary before second-linetherapy in most patients [3].Over recent years, the development of imaging techniquescombining anatomical, functional and biological information