1. Is Active Surveillance Too Active?
- Author
-
Kearns JT and Helfand BT
- Subjects
- Male, Humans, Watchful Waiting methods, Biopsy methods, Prostate pathology, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Purpose of Review: Many prostate cancer active surveillance protocols mandate serial monitoring at defined intervals, including but certainly not limited to serum PSA (often every 6 months), clinic visits, prostate multiparametric MRI, and repeat prostate biopsies. The purpose of this article is to evaluate whether current protocols result in excessive testing of patients on active surveillance., Recent Findings: Multiple studies have been published in the past several years evaluating the utility of multiparametric MRI, serum biomarkers, and serial prostate biopsy for men on active surveillance. While MRI and serum biomarkers have promise with risk stratification, no studies have demonstrated that periodic prostate biopsy can be safely omitted in active surveillance. Active surveillance for prostate cancer is too active for some men with seemingly low-risk cancer. The use of multiple prostate MRIs or additional biomarkers do not always add to the prediction of higher-grade disease on surveillance biopsy., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF