Search

Background: the pathological stage of prostate cancer with high-risk prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, but otherwise favorable and/or intermediate risk characteristics (clinical T-stage, Gleason Grade group at biopsy [B-GGG]) is unknown. We hypothesized that a considerable proportion of such patients will exhibit clinically meaningful GGG upgrading or non-organ confined (NOC) stage at radical prostatectomy (RP). Materials and methods: within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results: database (2010-2015) we identified RP-patients with cT1c-stage and B-GGG1, B-GGG2, or B-GGG3 and PSA 20-50 ng/ml. Rates of GGG4 or GGG5 and/or rates of NOC stage (>= pT3 and/or pN1) were analyzed. Subsequently, separate univariable and multivariable logistic regression models tested for predictors of NOC stage and upgrading at RP. Results Of 486 assessable patients, 134 (28%) exhibited B-GGG1, 209 (43%) B-GGG2, and 143 (29%) B-GGG3, respectively. The overall upgrading and NOC rates were 11% and 51% for a combined rate of upgrading and/or NOC stage of 53%. In multivariable logistic regression models predicting upgrading, only B-GGG3 was an independent predictor (odds ratio [OR]: 5.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.21-14.19; p < 0.001). Conversely, 33%-66% (OR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.42-3.95; p = 0.001) and >66% of positive biopsy cores (OR: 4.85; 95% CI: 2.84-8.42; p < 0.001), as well as B-GGG2 and B-GGG3 were independent predictors for NOC stage (all p, Stiftung Giersch; Projekt DEAL

To investigate pathological stage at radical prostatectomy (RP) using the "Partin tables" approach in NCCN high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients.Within the SEER 2010 to 2016 database, we identified 7,718 NCCN HR PCa patients. Cross-tabulation was used to illustrate the distribution of organ confined disease (OC, pT2), extra-prostatic extension (EPE, pT3a), seminal vesicles invasion (SVI, pT3b), lymph node invasion (LNI, pT2N1), extra-prostatic and lymph node invasion (EPE + LNI, pT3aN1), and seminal vescicale and lymph node invasion (SVI + LNI, pT3bN1), according to preoperative criteria, which consisted in PSA, clinical T stage, biopsy Gleason Score (GS). Binomial 95%CI was constructed for the reported proportions.Median (IQR) PSA levels was 9 (6-20) ng/ml. The majority of patient harbored cT1c (51%) followed by cT2 (35%) and cT3 (14%) stage. Most patients exhibited GS 4+4 (43%). Overall, 87 vs. 15 vs. 2% of patients harbored only 1 vs. 2 vs. all 3 HR criteria. At RP, OC, EPE, SVI, and LNI rates were respectively 36%, 27%, 17%, and 19%. Highest levels of OC were recorded for cT1c, PSA10 ng/mL and biopsy GS4+4. Conversely, EPE, SVI and LNI were the highest in patients with cT3, PSA ≥20 ng/mL and GS 5+5. After stratification according to clinical stages, OC rates decreased with increasing PSA levels and GS. Conversely, EPE, SVI and LNI rates increased with increasing PSA and GS.We provide a lookup table to illustrate the relationship between clinical and pathological characteristics in NCCN HR PCa patients.

Not infrequently patients are diagnosed with clinically localized prostate based on a single positive biopsy core exhibiting Gleason grade group 1 (GGG1) with variable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. We investigated treatment patterns and hypothesized that regardless of PSA in cT1- to cT2-stage patients, presence of GGG3/GGG4/GGG5 and/or non-organ confined stage will rarely be identified.Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2015), clinically localized prostate cancer (CaP) patients with PSA ≤ 50 ng/ml and a single positive GGG1 biopsy core were identified. Overall treatment rates were examined, estimated annual percentage changes and logistic regression analyses were fitted to test for no-local treatment. Subsequently, rates of upgrading (GGG3/GGG4/GGG5) and/or upstaging (≥pT3 and/or pN1) were investigated in radical prostatectomy patients.13,342 clinically localized CaP patients harbored single GGG1 positive biopsy core at diagnosis. No local treatment was recorded in 5,235 (53.0%) cT1-stage vs. in 1,039 (49.0%) cT2-stage patients. No local treatment rates increased over time from 35.0% to 67.0% vs. 34.0% to 63.0% in cT1 vs. cT2 patients, observations were confirmed in logistic regression analyses (cT1: multivariable odds ratio [mOR]: 1.39; cT2: mOR: 1.33). In radical prostatectomy treated cT1-patients (n = 2,293) and cT2-patients (n = 659), upgrading vs. upstaging vs. upgrading/upstaging combined was 6.1%, 6.5%, 11.0% and 6.2%, 5.0%, 9.9% respectively.In single GGG1 positive biopsy core CaP patients, the combined proportion of upgrading and upstaging should be expected in one tenth. In consequence, the overwhelming majority harbors favorable grade and stage that is compatible with no local treatment.

Conventional gray scale ultrasound has a low sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer detection. Better imaging modalities are needed.To determine sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer detection with ultrasound-based real-time elastography (elastography) in patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy (RP).Between July and October 2007, 109 patients with biopsy-proven localized prostate cancer (PCa) underwent elastography before RP. The investigator was blinded to clinical data.A EUB-6500HV ultrasound system with a V53W 7.5MHz end-fire transrectal probe was used preoperatively. Areas found to be suspicious for PCa were recorded for left and right side of the apex, mid-gland, and base. These findings were correlated with the obtained whole-mount sections after RP.Sensitivity and specificity for detecting PCa were 75.4% and 76.6%, respectively. A total of 439 suspicious areas in elastography were recorded, and 451 cancerous areas were found in the RP specimens. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for elastography were 87.8%, 59%, and 76%, respectively. Nevertheless, there are limitations to our studies because we investigated specific patients scheduled for RP with apparent PCa. Whether elastography is practical as a diagnostic tool or can be used to target a biopsy and be at least as sensitive in tumor detection as extended biopsy schemes has yet to be determined.Elastography can detect prostate cancer foci within the prostate with good accuracy and has potential to increase ultrasound-based PCa detection. Further studies need to be done to approve these data and to evaluate whether tumor detection can be increased by elastography-guided biopsies.