Search

Background: Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men in Europe. Several classes of agents can be considered for the treatment of metastatic prostate carcinoma, and their use is supported by extensive guidelines. In the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), it is currently unclear which sequence of systemic therapies is most effective. Currently approved system therapies in the castration-resistant setting generally include hormone-manipulating agents, taxane-based chemotherapies, radioactive agents, or inhibitiors of DNA repair mechanisms. This study aims to summarize real world data of mCRPC therapy., Methods: Retrospectively, 90 mCRPC patients undergoing treatment at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck Campus between February 2006 and March 2020 were identified. The patient data were analyzed for their treatment sequence and disease progression. Due to the inclusion period, the mCRPC therapy sequences studied were limited to: Abiraterone, Cabazitaxel, Docetaxel, Enzalutamide, Lutetium-177-PSMA and Radium-223. The analysis includes the therapy sequences and their duration, clinical information of the respective cohort, overall and cancer-specific survival (OS/CSS) as well as time to second-line therapy in relation to the respective first-line therapy., Results: Approximately two-thirds of patients underwent a true therapy sequence (at least two of the drugs listed above), with this proportion halving by the third line.The majority of patients received the sequence (first/second line) abiraterone/docetaxel (n=13), followed by docetaxel/abiraterone (n=12) and abiraterone/enzalutamid (n=10) and docetaxel/docetaxel (n=8).Within the different docetaxel sequences, first-line (mean 4.7 months ± SD 3.1; median 4.0) and rechallenge (mean 5.3 months ± SD 5.9; median 3.0) therapy durations were the longest. The subjective side effect rate of docetaxel was lower in the second line, so that a better tolerability can be assumed here.The abiraterone/docetaxel sequence was used mainly in patients with metachronous metastases. Among the different sequences of abiraterone, first-line (mean 10.8 months ± SD 10.2; median 9.0) and second-line (mean 10.6 months ± SD 9.0; median 7.0) therapy durations were the longest.The sequence abiraterone/enzalutamide was prescribed mainly to older patients with synchronous metastases. Among the different enzalutamide sequences first-line (mean 9.6 months ± SD 7.1; median 7.0) and rechallenge (mean 11.0 ± SD 0.0; median 11.0) therapy durations were the longest.In contrast, the sequence docetaxel/docetaxel was used mainly in younger patients with a high initial PSA.The evaluation shows a trend that both abiraterone and enzalutamide can account for a survival advantage in the first line., Conclusion: Ultimately, an optimal treatment sequence cannot be confidently derived from these data.However, it was found that only a small proportion of patients underwent fourth- or even fifth-line treatment at all. Thus, the focus on first- and second-line in this study seems reasonable. It could be shown in a trend that docetaxel as first-line therapy seems to be disadvantegous regarding OS as well as CSS when compared to abiraterone or enzalutamide. However, due to the small number of patients in this study, a clear significance cannot be derived. Moreover, the subjectively better tolerability of docetaxel in the second-line setting could provide an impetus for treatment planning in multimorbid elderly patients in the future. The sequence abiraterone/docetaxel may offer a beneficial option for initial mCRPC therapy., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment is advancing yet Nordic, real-world evidence for its use is scarce. In this population-based cohort study, we describe characteristics of patients with mCRPC, and their treatment patterns and survival outcomes in Finland., Methods: Incident patients with mCRPC diagnosed during 2013-2021 were identified from data lakes in two large and representative, Finnish hospital districts, and linked to data on drug purchases and causes of death from national registries., Results: Of a total of 31,307 patients with prostate cancer, 2,475 progressed to mCRPC during 2013-2021. Those who received no life-prolonging treatment(s) (28% overall) were older with more comorbidities than treated patients. After 2018, the proportion of patients who received life-prolonging treatments increased from 61% to 80%. Of those who received treatment before androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) were reimbursed as first-line (1L) treatment for mCRPC in Finland, 68% received docetaxel, 19% abiraterone and 12% enzalutamide 1L; post-reimbursement, 4% received docetaxel, 24% abiraterone and 71% enzalutamide 1L. Median overall survival for treated patients with mCRPC was 28.3 (95% CI: 26.3-30.4) and 38.5 (95% CI: 32.7-42.1) months pre- and post-reimbursement of 1L-ARPIs, respectively., Interpretation: The ARPI reimbursement status changes significantly influenced treatment patterns for mCRPC in Finland, favouring enzalutamide over docetaxel. This expanded the pool of men eligible for 1L treatment and improved overall survival by a median of 10 months. These findings highlight the importance of health policy decisions in shaping treatment strategies and patient outcomes in prostate cancer.

Background: In recent years, many studies have illustrated that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a prognostic factor of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but their conclusions are controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of the NLR in patients with mCRPC treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy., Methods: Database searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to retrieve relevant published English-language literature up to 20 February 2023. RevMan 5.4.1 was used to summarize the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with subgroup analysis. Finally, Stata software was adopted for sensitivity analysis, and Egger's test was used to calculate the results of stability to determine whether there was publication bias., Results: A total of 1,983 mCRPC patients from 14 retrospective cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. The combined results showed that elevated NLR was significantly associated with worse OS (HR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.55-2.23, P < 0.00001) and PFS (HR = 1.96 (95% CI: 1.52-2.53), P < 0.00001) in patients with mCRPC treated with docetaxel-based therapy. For subgroup analysis of high NLR, studies performed in Asia and cutoff value > 3 were associated with poorer OS, while cutoff values > 3 were associated with poorer PFS., Conclusion: Our results suggest that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may be a prognostic factor in patients with mCPRC with docetaxel-based chemotherapy., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) presents significant therapeutic challenges due to its aggressive nature and poor prognosis. Targeting Aurora-A kinase (AURKA) has shown promise in cancer treatment. This study investigates the efficacy of ART-T cell membrane-encapsulated AMS@AD (CM-AMS@AD) nanoparticles (NPs) in a photothermal-chemotherapy-immunotherapy combination for CRPC. Bioinformatics analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas-prostate adenocarcinoma (TCGA-PRAD) dataset revealed overexpression of AURKA in PCa, correlating with poor clinical outcomes. Single-cell RNA sequencing data from the GEO database showed a significant reduction in immune cells in CRPC. Experimentally, T cell membrane-biomimetic NPs loaded with the AURKA inhibitor Alisertib and chemotherapy drug DTX were synthesized and characterized by dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy, showing good stability and uniformity (average diameter: 158 nm). In vitro studies demonstrated that these NPs inhibited CRPC cell proliferation, increased the G2/M cell population, and elevated apoptosis, confirmed by γH2AX expression. In vivo, CM-AMS@AD NPs accumulated in tumor tissues, significantly slowed tumor growth, decreased proliferation, increased apoptosis, and improved the immune environment, enhancing dendritic cell (DC) maturation and increasing CD8 + /CD4 + ratios. These findings suggest that CM-AMS@AD NPs offer a promising triple-combination therapy for CRPC, integrating photothermal, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, with significant potential for future clinical applications., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Study protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Ganzhou Hospital-Nanfang Hospital (Grant No.ZKY2023-107) and based on the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The animal experiments were performed strictly per the guidelines in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The protocol of animal experiments was ratified by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Ganzhou Hospital-Nanfang Hospital (Grant No.DKY2023-019). Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: No currently available phase III trial compared docetaxel vs. androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) regarding cancer-control outcomes in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Moreover, few is known about the effect of sequential therapies in mHSPC and subsequent metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)., Methods: We relied on the FRAMCAP database and compared docetaxel vs. ARPI in mHSPC patients regarding time to mCRPC (ttCRPC) and overall survival (OS). Sensitivity analyses addressed high volume mHSPC patients. Finally, sequential therapies were compared regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in first-line mCRPC., Results: Of 419 included mHSPC patients, 25% received docetaxel vs. 75% ARPI. ARPI patients were significantly older (71 vs. 66 years), and harbored lower baseline PSA (38 vs. 183 ng/ml, both p ≤ 0.002). Median ttCRPC was significantly longer for ARPI than for docetaxel-treated patients (30 vs. 17 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.49, p < 0.001). In OS analyses, ARPI patients also exhibited significantly longer OS, relative to docetaxel patients (96 vs. 50 months, HR: 0.67, p = 0.03). After multivariable adjustment in Cox regression models, no difference between both treatments remained in both analyses (all p > 0.05). In sensitivity analyses of high volume mHSPC patients only, also no ttCRPC or OS differences were observed for ARPI vs. docetaxel (all p > 0.05). Regarding sequential therapies, no PFS and OS differences were observed for all and specifically high volume mHSPC patients, when ARPI-ARPI vs. ARPI-docetaxel vs. docetaxel-ARPI treatments were compared (all p > 0.05)., Conclusion: In real-world setting, ARPI treatment performs comparable to docetaxel chemotherapy in mHSPC. Therefore, docetaxel should only be used in triplet therapy. Moreover, no differences for sequential therapies of ARPI/docetaxel combinations in first-line mCRPC were observed., Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: Financial disclosures and Conflicts of interest: Mike Wenzel receives speaker honoraria or is consultant for Accord, Johnsen&Johnsen, Pfizer, MSD, Astra Zeneca, Ipsen, Benedikt Hoeh receives speaker honoraria or is consultant for Johnsen&Johnsen and Ipsen, Thomas Steuber receives speaker honoraria or is consultant for Amgen, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Proteomedics, Sanofi, Markus Graefen receives speaker honoraria or is consultant for Intuitive Surgical, Metronic, Ipsen, Astellas, Johnson & Johnson und Takeda, Felix Chun receives speaker honoraria or is consultant for Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Johnson & Johnson, Lumenis, Molecular Health, Olympus, Pfizer, Philipp Mandel receives speaker honoraria or is consultant for AMGEN, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, IPSEN, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Novartis, Orion, Pfizer. Conflicts of interest: Mike Wenzel receives speaker honoraria or is consultant for Accord, Johnsen&Johnsen, Pfizer, MSD, Astra Zeneca, Ipsen, Benedikt Hoeh receives speaker honoraria or is consultant for Johnsen&Johnsen and Ipsen, Thomas Steuber receives speaker honoraria or is consultant for Amgen, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Proteomedics, Sanofi, Markus Graefen receives speaker honoraria or is consultant for Intuitive Surgical, Metronic, Ipsen, Astellas, Johnson & Johnson und Takeda, Felix Chun receives speaker honoraria or is consultant for Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Johnson & Johnson, Lumenis, Molecular Health, Olympus, Pfizer, Philipp Mandel receives speaker honoraria or is consultant for AMGEN, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, IPSEN, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Novartis, Orion, Pfizer. Consent to participate: No informed consent was necessary according to the approval of the study by the ethic committee., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is the most dangerous stage of prostate cancer, with a high mortality rate. Docetaxel chemotherapy is one of the most effective treatment methods currently, but some patients do not respond to chemotherapy. To avoid unnecessary toxicity in non-responders, this study explores the potential of circulating microRNAs as early biomarkers of docetaxel response in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer., Methods: PC3 cells and DU145 cells were divided into the control, NC mimics, and miRNA-136-5p-mimics groups. Cell viability was measured using the CCK-8 assay. Cell apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry. Cell migration and invasion abilities were evaluated using the Transwell assay. Real-time quantitative PCR was used to measure the miRNA levels in cells and peripheral blood of patients. The miRNA-136-5p target genes were predicted by using the PITA, TargetScan, and miRanda databases. The target genes were analyzed with KEGG pathway analysis., Results: In both PC3 and DU145 cells, the miRNA-136-5p-mimics group exhibited significantly increased cell survival rates, migration and invasion numbers, and significantly decreased apoptosis rates than the control group (p < 0.05). The miRNA-222-3p and miRNA-136-5p levels were significantly increased in docetaxel-resistant PC3 and DU145 cells (p < 0.05). The levels of circulating miRNA-222-3p and miRNA-136-5p were significantly associated with docetaxel treatment (p < 0.05). Higher levels of miRNA-222-3p were observed in non-responsive patients (p < 0.05). The area under the curve for miRNA-222-3p was 0.76 (95%CI: 0.55-0.97), indicating its effectiveness as a predictive factor for non-responsive patients to docetaxel. Patients with high expression of miRNA-34c-5p after docetaxel chemotherapy had shorter overall survival times (P < 0.05). Bioinformatics analysis identified 110 potential target genes of miRNA-136-5p. KEGG revealed that these genes were mainly distributed in three pathways. Among them, the PI3K-AKT pathway was closely related to the metastasis of prostate cancer cells., Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that miRNA-136-5p promotes the proliferation and invasion of PC3 and DU145 cells while inhibiting apoptosis. Circulating miRNA-222-3p may serve as a biomarker for early therapeutic response to docetaxel, and further clinical investigation is warranted. Additionally, miRNA-136-5p may have anti-cancer effects during docetaxel chemotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: All patients had signed informed consent. All methods were performed following the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (approval no. S-2017131). Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous cancer where advancements are needed in biomarker discovery and targeted therapy. A critical and often effective component of treatment includes taxanes. We perform a high-throughput screen across a cohort of 30 diverse patient-derived castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) organoids to a library of 78 drugs. Combining quantitative response measures with transcriptomic analyses demonstrates that HNF1 homeobox A (HNF1A) drives a transcriptional program of taxane resistance, commonly dependent upon cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein 2 (cIAP2). Monotherapy with cIAP2 inhibitor LCL161 is sufficient to treat HNF1A+ models of mCRPC previously resistant to docetaxel. These data may be useful in future clinical trial designs., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests E.C. received sponsored research funding from Sanofi, Gilead, AbbVie, Genentech, Janssen Research, AstraZeneca, GSK, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Forma Pharmaceuticals, Foghorn, Kronos, and MarcoGenics., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: Although docetaxel and ARSI are picked up as treatment options against chemo-naïve metastatic CRPC in clinical guidelines for prostate cancer, there is no clear evidence which agent should be introduced as first line treatment. Therefore, we investigated our CRPC cohort treated with docetaxel or ARSI as first-line agent against chemo-naïve CRPC to solve these clinical questions., Patients and Methods: A total of 345 chemotherapy-naïve CRPC patients introduced to first-line docetaxel or ARSI (abiraterone or enzalutamide) between March 2006 and April 2017 at Jikei University Hospital and its affiliated institutions were included in this study. Propensity score matching method was used to minimize the patients' background. The outcome measures were PSA response rate, PSA decline ≥ 90%, cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: PSA decline correlated OS and CSS (p = 0.027, < 0.001, respectively) and median PSA decline rate was 60.4% in docetaxel group and 85.7% in ARSI group (p = 0.0311). Median OS was 33 m (95%CI: 27-53) in docetaxel group and 61 m (95%CI: 47-NA) in ARSI group (p = 0.0246). Median CSS was 34 m (95%CI: 27-53) in docetaxel group and NR (not reached) (95%CI: 61-NA) in ARSI group (p = 0.000133) in propensity score matching cohort. In multivariate analysis, ARSI induction first showed significantly better for OS and CSS (p = 0.0033 and < 0.001, respectively)., Conclusion: In this study, better survival outcome with ARSI induction first than docetaxel against chemo-naïve CRPC. And the candidates who had survival benefit by induction docetaxel first could not be found in this study., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

Background: Upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) along with androgen deprivation therapy is the current standard of care for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. However, evidence on second-line therapy after upfront ARSI is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the oncological outcome of ARSI versus docetaxel (DOC) after upfront ARSI therapy in a real-world clinical practice., Methods: Subjects were metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who had progressed within 2 years of upfront ARSI therapy and received ARSI (ARSI group) or DOC (DOC group) as a second-line therapy. Second-line progression-free survival (second-line PFS), and second-line overall survival (second-line OS) were assessed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust the clinicopathological features and treatment patterns., Results: A total of 101 mCRPC patients, 68 in the ARSI group, and 33 in the DOC group, were included in this analysis. Median second-line PFS was 6.3 months in the ARSI group and 4.9 months in the DOC group (p = 0.21). Median second-line OS was 25.0 months in the ARSI group and 14.2 months in the DOC group (p = 0.06). Prostate-specific antigen nadir ≤ 0.2 ng/ml during upfront ARSI therapy was significantly associated with improved second-line PFS. After PSM, no significant difference in second-line PFS and second-line OS were observed between the two groups., Conclusion: ARSI or DOC has comparable oncologic outcomes in terms of second-line PFS and second-line OS. Further prospective research with longer follow-ups will be needed to identify the optimal treatment after upfront ARSI therapy., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: Takahiro Kimura received honoraria from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda. Kazutoshi Fujita received honoraria from Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, MSD, and Ono., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Introduction: Real-world data on management of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with novel therapies is sparse. The aim of this study was to capture real-world management strategies in patients with mCRPC who initiated first line (1L) systemic therapy with chemotherapy or novel hormonal agents (NHAs) in Greece and describe the therapeutic sequencing strategy among patients who advanced to 2L and 3L treatment., Patients and Methods: In this noninterventional, multicentre, retrospective study (PROSPECT), a medical chart review of 149 patients with mCRPC who initiated 1L systemic therapy with chemotherapy or NHAs in 7 major anticancer hospital clinics, from public, academic, and private sectors in Greece was conducted. All endpoints were descriptively analysed. Kaplan-Meier was used for time-to-event outcomes., Results: At 1L (N = 149), most (78.5%) patients received NHAs; enzalutamide (52.3%), and abiraterone (26.2%). At 2L (N = 68), most (72.1%) patients received chemotherapy, most frequently docetaxel (50.0% of all patients). At 3L (N = 32), 56.3% and 31.3% of patients received chemotherapy and NHAs, respectively. Regarding treatment sequencing from 1L→2L (N = 68), most patients (55.9%) advanced from NHA→chemotherapy. Regarding treatment sequencing from 1L→2L→3L (N = 32), 34.4% advanced from NHAs→chemotherapy→chemotherapy and 31.3% from NHAs→chemotherapy→NHA. Estimated median times spent on treatment at 1L, 2L, and 3L were 9.8, 4.4, and 3.7 months, respectively., Conclusion: Most patients were treated with 1L NHAs, in accordance to established guidelines (which suggest both NHA and chemo as preferred 1st line options). There appeared to be a longer time on treatment of NHAs at 1L than chemotherapy, suggesting an unmet need for treatment optimisation/recommendations for 2L and 3L treatment in mCRPC., Competing Interests: Disclosure LM has received honoraria from Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD Oncology, Roche, Sanofi, personal fees for advisory/consultancy from Amgen, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen and travel/accommodation fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pfizer, Roche. ID is employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA and may own stocks and/or stock options in Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA. GE is full-time employee of MSD Greece, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ,USA. CC declared Amgen, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Genesis, Gilead, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche as potential conflicts of interest. TM has received consulting and medical advisor fees from Janssen, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, GSK, Janssen, IPSEN, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, honoraria from Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, GSK, Janssen, IPSEN, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. ZF has received honoraria for lectures and have served in an advisory role for AstraZeneca, Daiichi, Eli- Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Genesis- Pharma, Roche and Gilead. BA has received honoraria, advisory fees, and research support from MSD, ASTELLAS, JANSSEN, VIANEX. For the remaining authors, there are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA., The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSIs) abiraterone acetate (AA) enzalutamide (Enza), are currently the standard first-line (L1) treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and docetaxel (D) is reserved as second-line (L2) after ARSI failure. Nonetheless, D use in men ≥ 75 years old is restricted owing to treatment toxicities and patient comorbidities, and a L2 alternative ARSI is frequently used. We aimed to evaluate real-life survival and toxicity outcomes of these elderly patients after failure of L1 ARSI treatment., Material and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated efficacy and safety in a real-world international cohort of consecutive patients ≥ 75 years old when starting L1 ARSI for mCRPC according to the choice of L2 treatment (D versus alternative ARSI)., Results: Of the 122 identified patients, 57 (46.7%) had received L2 ARSI and 65 (53.3%) L2 D. No difference was found in the L1 overall survival (OS) for the ARSI and D groups (32.8 vs. 30.0 months, respectively; Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.77-1.95; P = .40) or in the L2 OS (18.5 vs. 17.8 months, respectively; HR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.69-1.74; P = .71). No difference was observed for rPFS from L2 (P = .12), although a trend was observed for a numerically improved rPFS on D., Conclusion: Within the limitations of a retrospective design and small population, our study suggests that D or ARSI after failure of L1 alternative ARSI are clinically comparable L2 options for elderly patients with mCRPC., Competing Interests: Disclosure Loana Bueno Valencia received consulting fees from Janssen and travel grants from Janssen, Astellas, and Bayer. The other authors report no competing interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objectives: New drugs for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) were approved, first in the pos-docetaxel and then in the pre-docetaxel setting. We aim to assess the real daily practice benefit of abiraterone (Abi), enzalutamide (Enz) and cabazitaxel (Cab) in patients with mCRPC, compare it with RCT results and compare Abi vs Enz., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively collected the data of all consecutive mCRPC patients treated with Abi, Enz or Cab in the six major oncological hospitals in the north of Portugal until December 2020., Results: A total of 470 treatments pre-docetaxel (163 Abi and 307 Enz) and 373 pos-docetaxel (160 Abi, 148 Enz and 59 Cab) were included, with median follow-up time of 35 months. Mean age was 73.1, 84.4% had ECOG status < 2, ISUP grade was ≥ 4 in 59% and 28.0% had oligometastatic disease. In first line, for Abi and for Enz respectively, the proportion of patients with PSA reduction > 50% was 64.4% and 80.4% (P < .001), the mean duration of treatment (DT) was 10 and 14 months (P = .037) and the median overall survival (OS) was 25 months and 30 months (P = .17). In second line the results for Abi, Enz and Cab were respectively: proportion of patients with PSA reduction > 50% was 40.4%, 57.4% and 24.6% (p for Abi vs Enz=0.004); DT was 7, 8, and 3 months (p for Abi vs Enz = 0.27); OS was 17, 22 and 10 months (p for Abi vs. Enz = 0,07)., Conclusion: These drugs have good efficacy in real-world evidence, similar to those reported in randomized clinical trials, with the expected exception of lower OS due to the inclusion of a broader sample of patients. Our results add to the evidence that Enz might have better efficacy in this setting compared with Abi., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors declare to have received remuneration from consulting and lectures of the following companies: Francisco Botelho: Astellas, Janssen-Cilag, Bayer, MSD Isaac Braga: Astellas, Janssen-Cilag, Bayer Frederico Teves: Astellas, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Bayer, Glaxo, Jaba-Recordatti, Medtronic Ricardo Leão: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen. Carlos Silva: Astellas, Janssen-Cilag, Astra Zéneca, Menarini, Ferring, Pfizer, Glaxo, Bayer. Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo: Astellas. The remaining authors have no confit of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of death among American men. If detected and treated at an early stage, prostate cancer is often curable. However, an advanced stage such as metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has a high risk of mortality. Multiple treatment options exist, the most common included docetaxel, abiraterone, and enzalutamide. Docetaxel is a cytotoxic chemotherapy, whereas abiraterone and enzalutamide are androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI). ARPIs are preferred over docetaxel due to lower toxicity. No study has used machine learning with patients' demographics, test results, and comorbidities to identify heterogeneous treatment rules that might improve the survival duration of patients with mCRPC., Objective: This study aimed to measure patient-level heterogeneity in the association of medication prescribed with overall survival duration (in the form of follow-up days) and arrive at a set of medication prescription rules using patient demographics, test results, and comorbidities., Methods: We excluded patients with mCRPC who were on docetaxel, cabaxitaxel, mitoxantrone, and sipuleucel-T either before or after the prescription of an ARPI. We included only the African American and white populations. In total, 2886 identified veterans treated for mCRPC who were prescribed either abiraterone or enzalutamide as the first line of treatment from 2014 to 2017, with follow-up until 2020, were analyzed. We used causal survival forests for analysis. The unit level of analysis was the patient. The primary outcome of this study was follow-up days indicating survival duration while on the first-line medication. After estimating the treatment effect, a prescription policy tree was constructed., Results: For 2886 veterans, enzalutamide is associated with an average of 59.94 (95% CI 35.60-84.28) more days of survival than abiraterone. The increase in overall survival duration for the 2 drugs varied across patient demographics, test results, and comorbidities. Two data-driven subgroups of patients were identified by ranking them on their augmented inverse-propensity weighted (AIPW) scores. The average AIPW scores for the 2 subgroups were 19.36 (95% CI -16.93 to 55.65) and 100.68 (95% CI 62.46-138.89). Based on visualization and t test, the AIPW score for low and high subgroups was significant (P=.003), thereby supporting heterogeneity. The analysis resulted in a set of prescription rules for the 2 ARPIs based on a few covariates available to the physicians at the time of prescription., Conclusions: This study of 2886 veterans showed evidence of heterogeneity and that survival days may be improved for certain patients with mCRPC based on the medication prescribed. Findings suggest that prescription rules based on the patient characteristics, laboratory test results, and comorbidities available to the physician at the time of prescription could improve survival by providing personalized treatment decisions., (©Deepika Gopukumar, Nirup Menon, Martin W Schoen. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (https://medinform.jmir.org), 19.11.2024.)

Background: This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles of current combination therapies based on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for the heterogeneous population of individuals with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC)., Methods: We retrieved pertinent literature from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and international conference databases. The study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023453853) for transparency., Results: Our analysis included 20 RCTs involving 14,995 patients, evaluating 15 ADT-based combinations, including systemic therapies, radiotherapy and surgery. In the overall population, the darolutamide triplet (DARO + docetaxel + ADT) demonstrated comparable overall survival (OS) benefits to prostatectomy/radical local therapy (RLT) plus ADT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-1.57). Additionally, the enzalutamide (ENZ) triplet (ENZ + DOC + ADT) appeared to confer the best progression-free survival (HR, 0.34; 95% CI: 0.27-0.43). Subgroup analysis based on metastatic burden indicated that RLT plus ADT had the best OS performance in patients with low burden, while the DARO triplet was associated with the best OS in patients with high burden. Regarding adverse events (AEs), the addition of certain androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) agents to ADT led to an increased incidence of severe AEs, while the addition of DOC to the ARPI doublet did not appear to elevate the exposure-adjusted incidence rates., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that combined treatments result in better survival outcomes than does ADT alone. In the current landscape of systemic therapy, the significance of local therapy should not be underestimated, and therapeutic decisions should be tailored with meticulous consideration of clinical heterogeneity among patients., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background and Purpose: Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is a common male malignancy that requires new therapeutic strategies due to acquired resistance to its first-line treatment, docetaxel. The benefits of vitamin D on prostate cancer (PCa) progression have been previously reported. This study aimed to investigate the effects of vitamin D on chemoresistance in CRPC., Experimental Approach: Structure function relationships of potent vitamin D analogues were determined. The combination of the most potent analogue and docetaxel was explored in chemoresistant primary PCa spheroids and in a xenograft mouse model derived from a patient with a chemoresistant CRPC., Key Results: Here, we show that Xe4MeCF3 is more potent than the natural ligand to induce vitamin D receptor (VDR) transcriptional activities and that it has a larger therapeutic window. Moreover, we demonstrate that VDR agonists restore docetaxel sensitivity in PCa spheroids. Importantly, Xe4MeCF3 reduces tumour growth in a chemoresistant CRPC patient-derived xenograft. In addition, this treatment targets signalling pathways associated with cancer progression in the remaining cells., Conclusion and Implications: Taken together, these results unravel the potency of VDR agonists to overcome chemoresistance in CRPC and open new avenues for the clinical management of PCa., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used due to their affordability and minimal severe side effects. However, their influence on the efficacy of cancer treatments, particularly androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), remains unclear. This study investigates the impact of PPI usage on the treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)., Methods: A total of 117 mCRPC patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups based on the concomitant use of PPI at the initiation of ARSI treatment: PPI+ (n = 38) and PPI- (n = 79). Patient characteristics, including age at ARSI treatment administered, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value at ARSI treatment administered, International Society of Urological Pathology grade group at prostate biopsy, metastatic site at ARSI treatment administered, prior docetaxel (DTX) treatment, and type of ARSI (abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide) were recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and PSA response rates were compared between the two groups. Patients were further stratified by clinical background to compare PFS and OS between the two groups., Results: The PPI- group exhibited significantly extended PFS and a trend toward improved OS. For PSA response (reduction of 50% or more from baseline), the rates were 62.3% and 45.9% in the PPI- group and the PPI+ group, respectively. For deep PSA response (reductions of 90% or more from baseline), the rates were 36.4% and 24.3% in the PPI- group and the PPI+ group, respectively. The effects were consistent across subgroups divided by prior DTX treatment and type of ARSI administered., Conclusions: The administration of PPIs appears to diminish the therapeutic efficacy of ARSIs in mCRPC patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the biological mechanisms involved., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Managing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in men aged ≥ 75 is challenging due to limited data. Regardless of age, in real-world clinical practice, most mCRPC still derive from failure of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel (D) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). As abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) and enzalutamide (Enza) are common first-line treatments for mCRPC. The impact of prior use of D for mCSPC on the efficacy and safety of AA or Enza in this older population remains unclear., Methods: A cohort of patients aged ≥ 75 years starting AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC from January 2015 to April 2019 was identified from the registries of 10 institutions. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on previous use of D for mCSPC. Primary endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS) from AA or Enza start, CSS from ADT onset, and safety. We used Kaplan-Meier method to estimate the endpoints distribution, including median values with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)., Results: Of the 337 patients identified, 24 (7.1%) received ADT+D and 313 (92.9%) received ADT alone for mCSPC. Median follow-up from AA/Enza start was 18.8 months. Median CSS from ADT or AA/Enza was not significantly different between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts (71.9 vs. 52.7 months, P = .97; 25.4 vs. 27.2 months, P = .89, respectively). No statistically significant difference in adverse events (AEs) of any grade rate (58.3% vs. 52.1%, respectively; P = .67) or grade ≥ 3 (12.5% vs. 15.7%, respectively; P = 1.0) was found between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts., Conclusions: Despite the innate limitations of a retrospective design and relatively small size of the ADT+D cohort, this analysis suggests that elderly men receiving AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC have similar survival outcomes and tolerability, regardless of previous D for mCSPC., Competing Interests: Disclosure Loana Valenca received consulting fees from Janssen and travel grants from Janssen, Astellas, and Bayer. The other authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The landscape of systemic therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) and castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) extensively improved within the last decades resulting in a significantly prolonged overall survival. However, subgroup analyses of phase III trials suggest potentially different overall survival outcomes for older adults., Methods: We relied on our institutional metastatic prostate cancer database to identify mHSPC and subsequently mCRPC patients. Older adults were stratified according to age groups 70-74 versus ≥75-79 versus ≥80 years at metastatic occurrence. Subsequently, uni- and multivariable time to mCRPC and overall survival analyses were performed., Results: Of 494 older adults, 217 (44%) were 70-74 versus 180 (36%) 75-79 versus 97 (20%) ≥80 years old. Rates of local prostate cancer treatment differed significantly between all three groups (p < 0.01). Regarding mHSPC treatment, androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) were administered in 30-39% of patients and docetaxel with 9% in age group 70-74 years and 6% and 3% in age groups 75-79 years and ≥80 years. Regarding mCRPC treatment, significant differences between treatment proportions were observed (p < 0.01). Most common treatment was ARSI for all three groups. Conversely, chemotherapy was more frequently administered in patients aged 70-74 (16%), relative to 4% and 3% in 75-79 year and ≥80 year aged patients. In univariable and multivariable time to mCRPC analyses, overall survival in mHSPC and OS in mCRPC analyses, no significant differences between all three age groups were observed (all p ≥ 0.3)., Conclusions: Treatment patterns differ significantly between older adults with metastatic prostate cancer. However, these differences may not result in differences of overall life expectancy., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of the American Geriatrics Society published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Geriatrics Society.)

Background/aim: In patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), upfront treatment intensification with the addition of new hormonal agents and/or docetaxel to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is recommended. However, this modality is potentially excessive in a subset of these patients. This study aimed to identify patients who may be eligible to omit upfront treatment intensification., Patients and Methods: Patients with mCSPC who underwent ADT were enrolled. The association between undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (<0.2 ng/ml) after ADT initiation and overall or castration-resistance-free survival was evaluated., Results: Ninety-seven out of the 242 enrolled patients had low-risk and/or low-volume cancer and were further analyzed. Of these, 45 (46.4%) patients achieved undetectable PSA. The median follow-up period after ADT initiation was 70 months. The median overall survival among patients with undetectable PSA was quite long, reaching 226 months and significantly longer than that among patients with detectable PSA [71 months, hazard ratio (HR)=0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.15-0.49, p<0.001]. Time to development of castration-resistance was also long and significantly longer in the undetectable PSA group than that in the detectable PSA group (median: 124 vs. 17 months, HR=0.20, 95% CI=0.12-0.34, p<0.001)., Conclusion: Patients with low-risk and/or low-volume mCSPC showed long-term survival when undetectable PSA was achieved during conventional ADT. In these patients, skipping upfront treatment intensification does not seem to negatively impact survival., (Copyright © 2024, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: The management of advanced prostate cancer continues to evolve rapidly, particularly with the earlier use of survival-prolonging therapies in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Though approved prior to the use of intensification therapy in mCSPC, taxane-based chemotherapies remain a relevant option for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, there is little evidence determining the outcomes of taxane chemotherapies as the first subsequent taxane (FST) in mCRPC pts who received docetaxel intensification (DI) in mCSPC. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes between the survival-prolonging taxanes, docetaxel and cabazitaxel as FST after DI., Methods: New patient consults seen at the Cross Cancer Institute from 1 July 2014 to 31 December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Pts were considered eligible if they received DI for mCSPC and then received either docetaxel or cabazitaxel in mCRPC. Variables of interest were collected from electronic medical records. The primary endpoint was ≥50% PSA response at 12 weeks relative to baseline for FST. Secondary endpoints included OS from mCSPC diagnosis, as well as PFS and OS from the FST start date. PSA responses were compared using the chi-squared test, and time-based endpoints were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: In total, 34 pts were identified: docetaxel = 22 and cabazitaxel = 12 as FST. 91.2% of pts (docetaxel 95.5% vs. cabazitaxel 83.3%) received FST in 2nd line mCRPC. The median age at diagnosis (63.1 vs. 67.1 yrs, p = 0.236) and the median time to CRPC (18.6 vs. 14.2 mos, p = 0.079) were similar for docetaxel and cabazitaxel, respectively. The median time to FST (24.1 vs. 34.6 mos, p = 0.036) and OS from mCSPC diagnosis (30.9 vs. 52.7 mos, p = 0.002) were significantly shorter for pts receiving cabazitaxel vs. docetaxel. PSA responses occurred in 40.9% of pts treated with docetaxel compared to 25.0% treated with cabazitaxel ( p = 0.645). There was no significant difference in median PFS (2.7 vs. 3.5 mos, p = 0.727) or median OS (11.4 vs. 8.1 mos, p = 0.132) from the time of FST for pts treated with docetaxel vs. cabazitaxel, respectively., Conclusions: Both docetaxel and cabazitaxel demonstrated activity as FST after DI in mCSPC. Pts who received cabazitaxel had a shorter time to FST and OS from mCSPC. The reasons for this may reflect clinician preference for cabazitaxel in pts with aggressive or rapidly progressing disease. No difference was found in PSA response, PFS, or OS from FST with docetaxel compared to cabazitaxel. While limited by its retrospective nature and small sample size, this study suggests that docetaxel is active as FST despite treatment with DI in mCSPC.

High-dose intravenous vitamin C (HDIVC) administered to produce pharmacologic concentrations shows promise in preclinical models and small clinical trials, but larger prospective randomized trials are lacking. We evaluated the clinical benefit of combining HDIVC with docetaxel in patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In this double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial, 47 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive docetaxel (75 mg/m2 i.v.) with either HDIVC (1 g/kg) or placebo. Coprimary endpoints were PSA50 response and adverse event rates. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, radiographic progression-free survival, and quality of life measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate instrument. Correlative analyses included pharmacokinetics and oxidative stress markers. Eighty-nine percent of patients previously had three or more lines of therapy. The PSA50 response rate was 41% in the HDIVC group and 33% in the placebo group (P = 0.44), with comparable adverse event rates in both groups. There were no significant differences in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate scores. The median radiographic progression-free survival was not significantly different between the HDIVC and placebo groups, with durations of 10.1 and 10.0 months (HR, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-2.75; P = 0.40), respectively. The median overall survival was 15.2 months in the HDIVC group and 29.5 months in the placebo group (HR, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-4.58; P = 0.11). HDIVC did not decrease F2-isoprostanes, indicators of oxidative stress. The study was suspended after prespecified interim analysis indicated futility in achieving primary endpoints. In this patient population, combining HDIVC with docetaxel did not improve PSA response, toxicity, or other clinical outcomes compared with docetaxel alone. Findings do not support the routine use of HDIVC in mCRPC treatment outside of clinical trials., Significance: This is the first randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to evaluate HDIVC in cancer treatment. The addition of HDIVC to docetaxel in patients with mCRPC does not improve PSA response, toxicity, or other clinical outcomes compared with docetaxel alone. The routine use of HDIVC in mCRPC treatment is not supported outside of clinical trials., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background/aim: The therapeutic landscape for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has changed dramatically with the introduction of several novel agents. However, limited data are available to determine whether the introduction of novel agents affected patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes compared with the period when these agents were not available. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the introduction of novel mCRPC agents on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes., Patients and Methods: Two cohorts of Japanese patients diagnosed with mCRPC between 2009 and 2014 (Epoch 1) and 2015 and 2019 (Epoch 2) were retrospectively analyzed., Results: A total of 125 treatment-naïve mCRPC patients, consisting of 42 patients in Epoch 1 and 83 patients in Epoch 2, were evaluated. We obtained the following results: (i) a dramatic shift in the first-line treatment from docetaxel to androgen receptor axis-targeted agents (ARATs), (ii) an age range expansion for first-line treatment, and (iii) an overall survival (OS) advantage in Eopch 2 compared to Epoch 1. Multivariate analysis in the overall population showed that Epoch 2 and low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at the start of first-line treatment were independent prognostic factors for OS., Conclusion: In real-world mCRPC practice, the introduction of novel agents has improved the prognosis of mCRPC while allowing more patients to receive mCRPC treatment across a broad age range. In addition, low PSA levels at the start of first-line treatment were associated with improved OS, indicating the importance of starting mCRPC treatment while PSA levels are low., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: PTEN loss and aberrations in PI3K/AKT signaling kinases associate with poorer response to abiraterone acetate (AA) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In this study, we assessed antitumor activity of the AKT inhibitor capivasertib combined with enzalutamide in mCRPC with prior progression on AA and docetaxel., Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase 2 trial, recruited men ≥ 18 years with progressing mCRPC and performance status 0-2 from 15 UK centers. Randomized participants (1:1) received enzalutamide (160 mg orally, once daily) with capivasertib (400 mg)/ placebo orally, twice daily on an intermittent (4 days on, 3 days off) schedule. Primary endpoint was composite response rate (RR): RECIST 1.1 objective response, ≥ 50 % PSA decrease from baseline, or circulating tumor cell count conversion (from ≥ 5 at baseline to < 5 cells/7.5 mL). Subgroup analyses by PTEN IHC status were pre-planned., Results: Overall, 100 participants were randomized (50:50); 95 were evaluable for primary endpoint (47:48); median follow-up was 43 months. RR were 9/47 (19.1 %) enzalutamide/capivasertib and 9/48 (18.8 %) enzalutamide/placebo (absolute difference 0.4 % 90 %CI -12.8 to 13.6, p = 0.58), with similar results in the PTEN IHC loss subgroup. Irrespective of treatment, OS was significantly worse for PTEN IHC loss (10.1 months [95 %CI: 4.6-13.9] vs 14.8 months [95 %CI: 10.8-18]; p = 0.02). Most common treatment-emergent grade ≥ 3 adverse events for the combination were diarrhea (13 % vs 2 %) and fatigue (10 % vs 6 %)., Conclusions: Combined capivasertib/enzalutamide was well tolerated but didn't significantly improve outcomes from abiraterone pre-treated mCRPC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: JdB reports advisory board fees from many companies including Acai Therapeutics, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Astellas, Bayer, Bioxcel Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cellcentric, Crescendo, Daiichi, Dark Blue Therapeutics, Eisai, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, GSK, Harpoon, ImCheck Therapeutics, Janssen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Menarini/Silicon Biosystems, MetaCurUm, Myricx, Novartis, Nurix Therapeutics, Oncternal, Orion, Pfizer, Qiagen, Sanofi Aventis, Sierra Oncology, Taiho, Takeda, Tango Therapeutics, Terumo, Vertex Pharmaceuticals. He is an employee of The ICR, which have received funding or other support for his research work from Acai Therapeutics, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astellas, Bayer, Cellcentric, Crescendo, Daiichi, Genentech, Genmab, GSK, Harpoon, Immunic Therapeutics, Janssen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Menarini/Silicon Biosystems, MetaCurUm, Myricx, Nurix Therapeutics, Oncternal, Orion, Pfizer, Qiagen, Sanofi Aventis, Sierra Oncology, Taiho, Vertex Pharmaceuticals. The ICR have a commercial interest in abiraterone, PARP inhibition in DNA repair defective cancers and PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors (no personal income). JDB was named as an inventor, with no financial interest for patent 8,822,438, submitted by Janssen that covers the use of abiraterone acetate with corticosteroids. EH reports that their institution has received an Investigator Initiated Research grant (IIR) from AstraZeneca for the central coordination of the trial. EH reports grants received by their institution as contribution to support central trial costs for non-commercial trials from Accuray, Varian Medical Systems, AstraZeneca, Janssen-Cilag, Bayer, Roche Products, and Merck Sharp and Dohm. SJ reports advisory boards and speaker fees received from AAA/Novartis, Accord, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Janssen and Pfizer, as well as consultancy fees received from Boston Scientific and BXT Nanotherapy. SJ also reports conferences travel received from Bayer and Janssen. AJB reports honoraria from Janssen-Cilag, consulting or advisory roles from Roche, Astellas Medivation, Janssen Oncology, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Bayer Schering Pharma, Bristol-Myers-Squib, Merck Serono and Pfizer. AJB also reports speakers’ fees received from Bayer, Janssen Oncology and Pfizer. RJ reports honoraria from Astellas Pharma, Janssen, AstraZeneca, MSD Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis, Ipsen, Bayer, Roche/Genentech, Merck Serono, Eisai, WebMD, Advanced Accelerator Applications/Novartis and Elsevier. RJ also reports speakers’ fees received from Merck Serono, Pfizer, Janssen, Astellas Pharma, MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene and Bayer. RJ also reports research Funding received from Roche (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Exelixis (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst) and Bayer (Inst), as well as travel, accommodations and expenses received from Ipsen, Bayer, Janssen, Astellas Pharma, MSD, Merck Serono and Pfizer. PR, NP, LF, AE, SM, PF, JG, JN, RR, BG, DR, IF, SC, CB, AF, MC, SC, ZM, CR, UMC, PH, PS, EC and DML have no conflicts to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Radium-223 and taxane chemotherapy each improve survival of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Whether the radium-223-taxane sequence could extend survival without cumulative toxicity was explored., Methods: The global, prospective, observational REASSURE study (NCT02141438) assessed real-world safety and effectiveness of radium-223 in patients with mCRPC. Using data from the prespecified second interim analysis (data cutoff, March 20, 2019), hematologic events and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in patients who were chemotherapy-naive at radium-223 initiation and subsequently received taxane chemotherapy starting ≤90 days ("immediate") or >90 days ("delayed") after the last radium-223 dose., Results: Following radium-223 therapy, 182 patients received docetaxel (172 [95%]) and/or cabazitaxel (44 [24%]); 34 patients (19%) received both. Seventy-three patients (40%) received immediate chemotherapy and 109 patients (60%) received delayed chemotherapy. Median time from last radium-223 dose to first taxane cycle was 3.6 months (range, 0.3-28.4). Median duration of first taxane was 3.7 months (range, 0-22.0). Fourteen patients (10 in the immediate and four in the delayed subgroup) had grade 3/4 hematologic events during taxane chemotherapy, including neutropenia in two patients in the delayed subgroup and thrombocytopenia in one patient in each subgroup. Median OS was 24.3 months from radium-223 initiation and 11.8 months from start of taxane therapy., Conclusions: In real-world clinical practice settings, a heterogeneous population of patients who received sequential radium-223-taxane therapy had a low incidence of hematologic events, with a median survival of 1 year from taxane initiation. Thus, taxane chemotherapy is a feasible option for those who progress after radium-223., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02141438., Plain Language Summary: Radium-223 and chemotherapy are treatment options for metastatic prostate cancer, which increase survival but may affect production of blood cells as a side effect. We wanted to know what would happen if patients received chemotherapy after radium-223. Among the 182 men treated with radium-223 who went on to receive chemotherapy, only two men had severe side effects affecting white blood cell production (neutropenia) during chemotherapy. On average, the 182 men lived for 2 years after starting radium-223 and 1 year after starting chemotherapy. In conclusion, patients may benefit from chemotherapy after radium-223 treatment without increasing the risk of side effects., (© 2024 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.)

Background: Elevated circulating growth differentiation factor (GDF15/MIC-1), interleukin 4 (IL4), and IL6 levels were associated with resistance to docetaxel in an exploratory cohort of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study aimed to establish level 2 evidence of cytokine biomarker utility in mCRPC., Methods: IntVal: Plasma samples at baseline (BL) and Day 21 docetaxel (n = 120). ExtVal: Serum samples at BL and Day 42 of docetaxel (n = 430). IL4, IL6, and GDF15 levels were measured by ELISA. Monocytes and dendritic cells were treated with 10% plasma from men with high or low GDF15 or recombinant GDF15., Results: IntVal: Higher GDF15 levels at BL and Day 21 were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (BL; p = 0.03 and Day 21; p = 0.004). IL4 and IL6 were not associated with outcomes. ExtVal: Higher GDF15 levels at BL and Day 42 predicted shorter OS (BL; p < 0.0001 and Day 42; p < 0.0001). Plasma from men with high GDF15 caused an increase in CD86 expression on monocytes (p = 0.03), but was not replicated by recombinant GDF15., Conclusions: Elevated circulating GDF15 is associated with poor prognosis in men with mCRPC receiving docetaxel and may be a marker of changes in the innate immune system in response to docetaxel resistance. These findings provide a strong rationale to consider GDF15 as a biomarker to guide a therapeutic trial of drugs targeting the innate immune system in combination with docetaxel in mCRPC., (© 2024 The Authors. The Prostate published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a heterogeneous disease with prognoses varying from months to years at time of castration-resistant diagnosis. Optimal first-line therapy for those with different prognoses is unknown., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of men in a national healthcare delivery system receiving first-line therapy for mCRPC (abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, or ketoconazole) from 2010 to 2017, with follow-up through 2019. Using commonly drawn prognostic labs at start of mCRPC therapy (hemoglobin, albumin, and alkaline phosphatase), we categorized men into favorable, intermediate, or poor prognostic groups depending on whether they had none, one to two, or all three laboratory values worse than designated laboratory cutoffs. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to examine prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression-free and overall survival (OS) according to prognostic group and first-line therapy, and multivariable cox regression to determine variables associated with survival outcomes., Results: Among 4135 patients, median PSA progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.6-7.3), and median OS 18.8 months (95% CI 18.0-19.6), ranging from 5.7 months (95% CI 4.8-7.0) in the poor prognosis group to 31.3 months (95% CI 29.7-32.9) in the favorable group. OS was similar regardless of initial treatment received for favorable and intermediate groups, but worse for those in the poor prognostic group who received ketoconazole (adjusted hazard ratio 2.07, 95% CI 1.2-3.6). PSA PFS was worse for those who received ketoconazole compared to abiraterone across all prognostic groups (favorable HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.34-2.31; intermediate HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.41-2.25; poor HR 8.01, 95% CI 2.93-21.9)., Conclusion: Commonly drawn labs at mCRPC treatment start may aid in predicting survival and response to therapies, potentially informing discussions with care teams. First-line treatment selection impacts disease progression for all men with mCRPC regardless of prognostic group, but impacted OS only for men with poor prognosis at treatment start., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) intensification (ADTi) (i.e., ADT with androgen receptor pathway inhibitor or docetaxel, or both) has significantly improved survival outcomes of patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the impact of prior ADTi in the mHSPC setting on the disease presentation and survival outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is not well characterized. In this study, our objective was to compare the disease characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with new mCRPC with respect to receipt of intensified or nonintensified ADT in the mHSPC setting., Methods: In this institutional review board-approved retrospective study, eligibility criteria were as follows: patients diagnosed with mCRPC, treated with an approved first-line mCRPC therapy, and who received either intensified or nonintensified ADT in the mHSPC setting. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined from the start of first-line therapy for mCRPC to progression per Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria or death, and overall survival (OS) was defined from the start of first-line therapy for mCRPC to death or censored at the last follow-up. A multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model was used, adjusting for potential confounders., Results: Patients (n = 387) treated between March 20, 2008, and August 18, 2022, were eligible and included: 283 received nonintensified ADT, whereas 104 were treated with ADTi. At mCRPC diagnosis, patients in the ADTi group were significantly younger, had more visceral metastasis, lower baseline prostate-specific antigen (all p < 0.01), and lower hemoglobin (p = 0.027). Furthermore, they had significantly shorter PFS (median 4.8 vs. 8.4 months, adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.46, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.07-2, p = 0.017) and OS (median 21.3 vs. 33.1 months, adjusted HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.06-2.21, p = 0.022) compared to patients in the nonintensified ADT group., Conclusion: Patients treated with ADTi in the mHSPC setting and experiencing disease progression to mCRPC had more aggressive disease features of mCRPC (characterized by a higher number of poor prognostic factors at mCRPC presentation). They also had shorter PFS on first-line mCRPC treatment and shorter OS after the onset of mCRPC compared to those not receiving ADTi in the mHSPC setting. Upon external validation, these findings may impact patient counseling, prognostication, treatment selection, and design of future clinical trials in the mCRPC setting. There remains an unmet need to develop novel life-prolonging therapies with new mechanisms of action to improve mCRPC prognosis in the current era., (© 2024 The Authors. The Prostate published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of early PSA decline following initiation of second-generation hormone therapy (2nd HT), namely abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide, in patients with taxane-refractory metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and evaluate utility of this metric in informing intensified surveillance/imaging protocols., Methods: We retrospectively identified 75 mCRPC patients treated with 2nd HT following docetaxel failure (defined as PSA rise and radiographic progression). Patients were categorized patients into two cohorts based on the first PSA within 3 months after initiation of therapy: PSA reduction ≥50% (Group A) and PSA reduction <50% (Group B). The primary endpoint was cancer-specific mortality (CSM). The secondary endpoint was radiographic disease progression (rDP) on 2nd HT. In univariate and multivariate analyses, we investigated factors associated with rPD and CSM., Results: We included 75 patients (52 in Group A, 23 in Group B) in the analytic cohort. Baseline clinico-demographic characteristics, including median age, primary Gleason score risk group, median pre-treatment PSA, disease burden, site of metastases, and pre-treatment ECOG score were not statistically different between the two groups. Median follow up time was 30 months and the median time to radiographic disease progression was 28.1 and 12.5 months (p = 0.002) in cohorts A and B, respectively. On univariate and multivariate analyses, both PSA reduction ≥50% and volume of metastatic disease were significantly associated with a decreased risk of radiographic disease progression (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.80, p = 0.0113) as well as a decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.87, p = 0.0325)., Conclusion: PSA reduction ≥50% within 3 months of starting 2nd HT was associated with significantly improved radiographic disease progression-free survival and 3-year cancer-specific mortality. This suggests using PSA 50%-decline metric in surveillance patients with on 2nd HT and identifies patients who require further evaluation with imaging., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Study Aim: ModraDoc006, an oral formulation of docetaxel, is co-administered with the cytochrome P450-3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitor, ritonavir (r): ModraDoc006/r. The preliminary efficacy and safety of oral ModraDoc006/r was evaluated in a global randomized phase II trial and compared to the current standard chemotherapy regimen of intravenous (i.v.) docetaxel and prednisone., Methods: 103 mCRPC patients, chemotherapy-naïve with/without abiraterone and/or enzalutamide pretreated, with adequate organ function and evaluable disease per RECIST v1.1 and PCWG3 guidelines were randomized 1:1 into two cohorts. In Cohort 1, 49 patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 i.v. every 3 weeks (Q3W). In Cohort 2, 52 patients received ModraDoc006/r; 21 patients with a starting dose of ModraDoc006 30 mg with ritonavir 200 mg in the morning and ModraDoc006 20 mg with ritonavir 100 mg in the evening (30-20/200-100 mg) bi-daily-once-weekly (BIDW) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 21-day cycle. To alleviate tolerability, the starting dose was amended to ModraDoc006/r 20-20/200-100 mg in another 31 patients. All patients received prednisone 10 mg daily. Primary endpoint was rPFS., Results: There was no significant difference in rPFS between the 2 arms (p = 0.1465). Median rPFS was 9.5 months and 11.1 months (95% CI) for ModraDoc006/r and i.v. docetaxel, respectively. Partial response was noted in 44.1% and 38.7% measurable disease patients, and 50% decline of PSA was seen in 23 (50%) and 26 (56.5%) evaluable cases treated with ModraDoc006/r and i.v. docetaxel, respectively. The safety profile of ModraDoc006/r 20-20/200-100 mg dose was significantly better than i.v. docetaxel, with mild (mostly Grade 1) gastrointestinal toxicities, no hematologic adverse events, and neuropathy and alopecia incidence of 11.5% and 25%, respectively., Conclusions: ModraDoc006/r potentially represents a widely applicable, convenient, effective, and better tolerated oral taxane therapy option for mCRPC. Further investigation of ModraDoc006/r in a large randomized trial is warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Modra Pharmaceuticals BV was founded as a spin-off company of the Netherlands Cancer Institute, enabling the further clinical development of novel oral taxane formulations, after their pharmaceutical and preclinical development in the Netherlands Cancer Institute. Marianne Keessen is a full-time employee of Modra Pharmaceuticals BV. The other authors declare no relevant conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Androgen deprivation in combination with novel hormonal agents, docetaxel or the combination of abiraterone/prednisone plus docetaxel or darolutamide plus docetaxel represent the standard therapeutic approach in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Patients with low-risk prostate cancer also benefit from additional radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy in terms of progression-free and overall survival. Despite favourable response rates, basically all patients will develop castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) within 2.5 to 4 years. Systemic chemotherapy, second-line hormonal treatment or systemic application of radionuclides such as Radium-223 or 177Lu-PSMA represent salvage management options. As the new medical treatment options have led to an improved oncological outcome with significantly prolonged survival times, about 50% to 65% of patients will develop symptoms due to local progression of prostate cancer. The management of such symptomatic local progression will become more important in upcoming years, which means that all uro-oncologists need to be aware of the various surgical management options. If complications of the lower urogenital tract occur, for example repetitive gross haematuria with or without bladder clotting and with the necessity for red blood cell transfusions, subvesical obstruction, acute urinary retention or rectourethral or rectovesical fistulas, these may be managed by palliative surgery such as palliative TURP, radical cystectomy, radical cystoprostatectomy with urinary diversion, and pelvic exenteration. Symptomatic or asymptomatic obstruction of the upper urinary tract can be managed by endoluminal or percutaneous urinary diversion, ureteral reimplantation, ileal ureter replacement, or implantation of a Detour system. However, an individualised and risk-adapted treatment strategy needs to be developed for each single patient to achieve an optimal therapeutic outcome with improvement of both symptoms and quality of life. In specific clinical situations, best supportive care may be an adequate option., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To summarize and indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of different second-line systematic therapies after first-line androgen-receptor targeting therapies (ARTs) for biomarker-unselected metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients., Methods: Studies published in English up to May 2023 were identified in PubMed, Web of Science and ASCO-GU 2023. Studies accessing the efficacy and safety of second-line systematic therapies after first-line ARTs for biomarker-unselected mCRPC patients were eligible for current systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA)., Results: Thirty-two studies with 5388 patients and 10 unique treatment modalities met our inclusion criteria. Current evidence suggested that docetaxel (DOC) combined with the same ART as first-line (ART1) (ART1 + DOC) were associated with significantly improved PSA response, PSA progression-free survival (PFS) and clinical or radiographic PFS (rPFS) compared with other reported second-line systematic therapies, including DOC. An increase in toxicity was observed with ART1 + DOC. Our NMA indicated that DOC monotherapy was only inferior to ART1 + DOC in improvement disease outcomes. The incidence of toxicity between patients received second-line DOC and an alternative ART (ART2) was similar., Conclusion: The available evidence reviewed in our work suggested a clinical benefit of DOC nomotherapy and DOC plus ART1 as the second-line systematic therapy for biomarker-unselected mCRPC patients progressed on a first-line ART. More studies and RCTs are needed to evaluate the optimal second-line treatments for mCRPC patients with one prior first-line ART., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are limitations in treating advanced prostate cancer (PC), especially castration-resistant (CR) cases, in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). We describe the case of RTR with metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) treated with docetaxel., Case Report: A 60-year-old man with end-stage renal disease due to autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) underwent living-related kidney transplantation. A year later, he was diagnosed with PC (prostate-specific antigen level: 998 ng/mL). Prostate biopsy revealed prostatic adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 4 + 4 = 8. Radiographic examination revealed seminal vesicle invasion and multiple bone and lymph node metastases. Combined androgen blockade therapy was initiated; however, the patient was diagnosed with CRPC 6 months later. Triweekly docetaxel therapy was administered 28 months after diagnosis. The patient successfully completed 7 cycles of this therapy without major adverse events. However, after the 7th cycle, he developed a high fever caused by an infection of ADPKD-associated renal cysts. Therefore, docetaxel was discontinued, and enzalutamide was started, followed by abiraterone, but without any effect. We then introduced cabazitaxel but discontinued it because of hepatic dysfunction. Hence, the patient underwent a docetaxel rechallenge. He was administered the PEGylated form of the recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for neutropenia prophylaxis. After 6 cycles of rechallenge docetaxel therapy, the patient accidentally fell, resulting in a cervical spine fracture and subsequent death due to respiratory failure., Conclusions: Docetaxel can be safely delivered to patients with CRPC after renal transplantation who are taking oral immunosuppressants. It can be a good treatment option for them., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the ARASENS trial (NCT02799602), darolutamide in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and docetaxel significantly reduced the risk of death by 32.5% (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57-0.80; P < .0001) compared with placebo plus ADT with docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). We present efficacy and safety of darolutamide versus placebo in Black patients from ARASENS., Patients and Methods: Patients with mHSPC were randomized 1:1 to darolutamide 600 mg or placebo twice daily in combination with ADT and docetaxel. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Key secondary endpoints included time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and safety., Results: In ARASENS, 54 Black patients received darolutamide (n = 26) or placebo (n = 28) plus ADT and docetaxel. In Black patients, overall survival favored darolutamide versus placebo (median, not reached vs. 38.7 months; stratified HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17-1.02), with 4-year survival rates of 62% versus 41%. The darolutamide group also had longer time to CRPC compared with the placebo group (median, not reached vs .12.6 months; HR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02-0.30). The safety profile of darolutamide in Black patients was consistent with that observed for the overall ARASENS population (grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, TEAEs: 61.5% vs. 66.1%; serious TEAEs: 42.3% vs. 44.8%)., Conclusion: In this small population of Black patients with mHSPC from the ARASENS trial, darolutamide was associated with an improvement in survival and time to CRPC and was well tolerated. Efficacy and safety findings in Black patients were consistent with the overall ARASENS population., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Androgen deprivation in combination with novel hormonal agents, docetaxel, or in combination with abiraterone/prednisone plus docetaxel or darolutamid plus docetaxel represent the standard therapeutic approach in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Patients with low-risk prostate cancer also benefit from additional radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy in terms of progression-free and overall survival. Despite favorable response rates, basically all patients will develop castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) within 2.5 to 4 years. In addition to systemic chemotherapy, second-line hormonal treatment of systemic application of radionuclides such as radium223 or 177 Lu-PSMA represent salvage management options. However, nowadays about 50-65% of patients will develop symptoms due to local progression of prostate cancer which is the result of improved oncological outcomes with significantly prolonged survival times due to the new medical treatment options. Management of such symptomatic local progression will become more important in upcoming years so that all uro-oncologists need to be aware of the various surgical management options. Complications of the lower urogenital tract such as recurrent gross hematuria ± bladder clotting and with the necessity for red blood cell transfusions, subvesical obstruction and acute urinary retention, rectourethral or rectovesical fistulas might be managed by palliative surgery such as palliative transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), radical cystectomy, radical cystoprostatectomy with urinary diversion, and pelvic exenteration. Symptomatic or asymptomatic obstruction of the upper urinary tract might be managed by endoluminal or percutaneous urinary diversion, ureteral reimplantation, ileal ureter replacement, or implantation of the Detour® system (Coloplast GmbH, Hamburg, Germany)., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Prior work from the Intermediate Clinical Endpoints in Cancer of the Prostate (ICECaP) consortium (ICECaP-1) demonstrated that metastasis-free survival (MFS) is a valid surrogate for overall survival (OS) in localized prostate cancer (PCa). This was based on data from patients treated predominantly before 2004, prior to docetaxel being available for the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We sought to validate surrogacy in a more contemporary era (ICECaP-2) with greater availability of docetaxel and other systemic therapies for mCRPC., Patients and Methods: Eligible trials for ICECaP-2 were those providing individual patient data (IPD) after publication of ICECaP-1 and evaluating adjuvant/salvage therapy for localized PCa, and which collected MFS and OS data. MFS was defined as distant metastases or death from any cause, and OS was defined as death from any cause. Surrogacy was evaluated using a meta-analytic two-stage validation model, with an R 2 ≥ 0.7 defined a priori as clinically relevant., Results: A total of 15 164 IPD from 14 trials were included in ICECaP-2, with 70% of patients treated after 2004. The median follow-up was 8.3 years and the median postmetastasis survival was 3.1 years in ICECaP-2, compared with 1.9 years in ICECaP-1. For surrogacy condition 1, Kendall's tau was 0.92 for MFS with OS at the patient level, and R 2 from weighted linear regression (WLR) of 8-year OS on 5-year MFS was 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.53-0.82) at the trial level. For condition 2, R 2 was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.64-0.89) from WLR of log[hazard ratio (HR)]-OS on log(HR)-MFS. The surrogate threshold effect on OS was an HR(MFS) of 0.81., Conclusions: MFS remained a valid surrogate for OS in a more contemporary era, where patients had greater access to docetaxel and other systemic therapies for mCRPC. This supports the use of MFS as the primary outcome measure for ongoing adjuvant trials in localized PCa., (Copyright © 2023 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Docetaxel is the most commonly used chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer (PC), including castration-resistant disease (CRPC), but the eventual development of docetaxel resistance constitutes a major clinical challenge. Here, we demonstrate activation of the cholinergic muscarinic M1 receptor (CHRM1) in CRPC cells upon acquiring resistance to docetaxel, which is manifested in tumor tissues from PC patients post- vs. pre-docetaxel. Genetic and pharmacological inactivation of CHRM1 restores the efficacy of docetaxel in resistant cells. Mechanistically, CHRM1, via its first and third extracellular loops, interacts with the SEMA domain of cMET and forms a heteroreceptor complex with cMET, stimulating a downstream mitogen-activated protein polykinase program to confer docetaxel resistance. Dicyclomine, a clinically available CHRM1-selective antagonist, reverts resistance and restricts the growth of multiple docetaxel-resistant CRPC cell lines and patient-derived xenografts. Our study reveals a CHRM1-dictated mechanism for docetaxel resistance and identifies a CHRM1-targeted combinatorial strategy for overcoming docetaxel resistance in PC., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests T.B., B.B., K.V., and B.J.W. have a patent pending for using muscarinic acetylcholine receptor inhibitors to treat chemotherapy-resistant cancers. E.C. received sponsored research funding from Sanofi, Gilead, AbbVie, Genentech, Janssen Research, Astra Zeneca, GSK, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Forma Pharmaceuticals, Foghorn, Kronos, and MacroGenics., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This paper presents results from one of the few comparative effectiveness evaluations of novel antiandrogen medications (NHT) against standard of care (SoC) for patients suffering from metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)., Methods: The design and the analysis are published in a protocol before accessing outcome data. Two groups of patients are balanced on hundreds of important covariates measured before the prostate cancer diagnosis and up to the date of the prescription. While the design yields balance on the observed covariates, one cannot discard the possibility that unobserved confounders are not balanced. The unconfoundedness assumption is assessed by estimating placebo regressions on two health measures, not included in the design but added together with the outcome data after protocol publication., Results: We find a substantial (64 percent) increase in mortality for patients prescribed with NHT rather than SoC. However, based on the results from one of the two placebo regressions, we cannot rule out that the difference in mortality may be due to confounding. Using a bounding strategy of the effect, we can, however, rule out that NHT reduces mortality compared to SoC. Under an empirical valid assumption that most mCRPC patients who die suffer from bone metastases, we have a strong indication of increased skeleton-related events in patients if prescribed NHT against SoC., Conclusions: Generally, the SoC for this group of patients is docetaxel. Given the substantially higher costs of many of the NHT, the finding of no positive effects from NHT on both mortality and SRE is important. More comparative studies, including studies analysing quality of life outcomes, are thus needed., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Jonéus et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

The development of taxane resistance remains a major challenge for castration resistant prostate cancer (CR-PCa), despite the effectiveness of taxanes in prolonging patient survival. To uncover novel targets, we performed an epigenetic drug screen on taxane (docetaxel and cabazitaxel) resistant CR-PCa cells. We identified BRPF reader proteins, along with several epigenetic groups (CBP/p300, Menin-MLL, PRMT5 and SIRT1) that act as targets effectively reversing the resistance mediated by ABCB1. Targeting BRPFs specifically resulted in the resensitization of resistant cells, while no such effect was observed on the sensitive compartment. These cells were successfully arrested at the G 2 /M phase of cell cycle and underwent apoptosis upon BRPF inhibition, confirming the restoration of taxane susceptibility. Pharmacological inhibition of BRPFs reduced ABCB1 activity, indicating that BRPFs may be involved in an efflux-related mechanism. Indeed, ChIP-qPCR analysis confirmed binding of BRPF1 to the ABCB1 promoter suggesting direct regulation of the ABCB1 gene at the transcriptional level. RNA-seq analysis revealed that BRPF1 knockdown affects the genes enriched in mTORC1 and UPR signaling pathways, revealing potential mechanisms underlying its functional impact, which is further supported by the enhancement of taxane response through the combined inhibition of ABCB1 and mTOR pathways, providing evidence for the involvement of multiple BRPF1-regulated pathways. Beyond clinical attributes (Gleason score, tumor stage, therapy outcome, recurrence), metastatic PCa databases further supported the significance of BRPF1 in taxane resistance, as evidenced by its upregulation in taxane-exposed PCa patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: In a previous exploratory study, modeled early longitudinal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics observed within the 100-first treatment days with androgen deprivation therapy with or without docetaxel was associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with prostate cancer with rising PSA levels after primary local therapy. This prognostic value had to be confirmed in different settings. The objectives were to assess PSA kinetics modeling in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with chemotherapy in FIRSTANA trial and to investigate modeled PSA kinetic parameters prognostic/predictive value., Materials and Methods: FIRSTANA phase III trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01308567) assessed whether cabazitaxel is superior to docetaxel in terms of PFS/OS in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC. PSA longitudinal kinetics was assessed using the previous kinetic-pharmacodynamics model. Patient modeled ELIMination rate constant K (PSA.KELIM) was used to categorize favorable/unfavorable PSA declines (standardized PSA.KELIM < or ≥ 1.0 days -1 ) and further correlated with PFS/OS., Results: In total, 1,050 of 1,168 enrolled patients were assessable for PSA.KELIM estimation. The median PSA.KELIM was 0.02 days -1 . In univariate analyses, PSA.KELIM exhibited a significant prognostic value regarding survival: unfavorable versus favorable PSA.KELIM; median PFS, 3.6 months (95% CI, 3.0 to 4.2) versus 4.7 months (95% CI, 3.9 to 5.2), P = .002; median OS, 17.4 months (95% CI, 14.8 to 19.3) versus 28.4 months (95% CI, 26.7 to 31.6), P < .001. In multivariate analyses, PSA.KELIM was significant for PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.67 to 0.93], P = .005) and OS (HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.60], P < .001), together with baseline radiological tumor progression and PSA doubling time. PSA.KELIM predictive value was not significant across treatment arms., Conclusion: This external validation study confirmed previous results about modeled PSA longitudinal kinetics prognostic value regarding PFS/OS in patients with mCRPC treated with taxanes. PSA.KELIM could be used to identify a subpopulation with poor prognosis, who may benefit from treatment intensification.

Background: The TheraP study reported improved prostate-specific antigen responses with lutetium-177 [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel. In this Article, we report the secondary outcome of overall survival with mature follow-up, and an updated imaging biomarker analysis. We also report the outcomes of participants excluded due to ineligibility on gallium-68 [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and 2-[ 18 F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-[ 18 F]FDG) PET-CT., Methods: TheraP was an open-label, randomised phase 2 trial at 11 centres in Australia. Eligible participants had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel, and PET imaging with [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and 2-[ 18 F]FDG that showed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive disease and no sites of metastatic disease with discordant 2-[ 18 F]FDG-positive and PSMA-negative findings. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (every 6 weeks for a maximum of six cycles; starting at 8·5 GBq, decreasing by 0.5 GBq to 6·0 GBq for the sixth cycle) versus cabazitaxel (20 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks, maximum of ten cycles). Overall survival was analysed by intention-to-treat and summarised as restricted mean survival time (RMST) to account for non-proportional hazards, with a 36-month restriction time corresponding to median follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03392428, and is complete., Findings: 291 men were registered from Feb 6, 2018, to Sept 3, 2019; after study imaging, 200 were eligible and randomly assigned to treatment with [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (n=99) or cabazitaxel (n=101). After completing study treatment, 20 (20%) participants assigned to cabazitaxel and 32 (32%) assigned to [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 were subsequently treated with the alternative regimen. After a median follow-up of 35·7 months (IQR 31·1 to 39·2), 77 (78%) participants had died in the [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 70 (69%) participants had died in the cabazitaxel group. Overall survival was similar among those assigned to [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus those assigned to cabazitaxel (RMST 19·1 months [95% CI 16·9 to 21·4] vs 19·6 months [17·4 to 21·8]; difference -0·5 months [95% CI -3·7 to 2·7]; p=0·77). No additional safety signals were identified with the longer follow-up in this analysis. 80 (27%) of 291 men who were registered after initial eligibility screening were excluded after [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and 2-[ 18 F]FDG PET. In the 61 of these men with follow-up available, RMST was 11·0 months (95% CI 9·0 to 13·1)., Interpretation: These results support the use of [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 as an alternative to cabazitaxel for PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel. We did not find evidence that overall survival differed between the randomised groups. Median overall survival was shorter for men who were excluded because of low PSMA expression or 2-[ 18 F]FDG-discordant disease., Funding: Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Endocyte (a Novartis company), Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization, Movember, It's a Bloke Thing, CAN4CANCER, and The Distinguished Gentleman's Ride., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MSH reports research grant support (to their institution) from Novartis (including AAA and Endocyte), Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (ANSTO), Bayer, Isotopia, and MIM; and consulting fees for lectures or advisory boards from Astellas and AstraZeneca in the past 2 years, and from Janssen, MSD, and Mundipharma in the past 5 years. LE reports personal fees from AstraZenca, Janssen, and Astellas, outside the submitted work. SS reports grants from AAA, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Genetech to their institution; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca to their institution, outside the submitted work. DAP reports personal fees from Ipsen and Eisai, outside the submitted work. RJF reports institution funding and consulting fees from AIQ Solutions, outside of the submitted work; and committee involvement in the Australasian Radiopharmaceutical Trials Network (unpaid). CG donated personal fees from Astellas, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Ipsen, Astellas, and MSD, direct and complete, to a third party not-for-profit. AMS reports trial or research funding from EMD Serono, ITM, AVID, Medimmune, Telix, Adalta, Fusion, Antengene, Earli, Curis, and Cyclotek; grants from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF), including an NHMRC Investigator Grant; and board and advisory committee involvement for the Australian and New Zealand Society of Nuclear Medicine and Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group (unpaid); all outside the submitted work. EMK reports personal fees from Astellas Pharma, Janssen, Pfizer, Ipsen, and Roche, all outside the submitted work; and is supported by a Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigator Award and University of British Columbia Killam Postdoctoral Fellowship. AAA reports grants or personal fees from Janssen, Astellas, Novartis, Merck Serono, Tolmar, Amgen, Pfizer, Bayer, Telix Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Noxopharm, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, MSD, Aculeus Therapeutics, and Daiichi Sankyo; and grants from Astellas (investigator), Merck Serono (investigator), AstraZeneca (investigator), Bristol Myers Squibb (institutional), AstraZeneca (institutional), Aptevo Therapeutics (institutional), GlaxoSmithKline (institutional), Pfizer (institutional), MedImmune (institutional), Astellas (institutional), Synthorx (institutional), Bionomics (institutional), Sanofi Aventis (institutional), Novartis (institutional), Ipsen (institutional), Exelixis (institutional), MSD (institutional), Janssen (institutional), Eli Lilly (institutional), Gilead Sciences (institutional), Merck Serono (institutional), and Hinova (institutional), all outside the submitted work. MRS reports grants to his institution from the NHMRC, Cancer Australia, Astellas, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bionomics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Medivation, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Tilray, all outside the submitted work. IDD reports grants from the NHMRC, during the conduct of the study; and institutional payments to support prostate cancer trials from Pfizer, the ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Bayer, Astellas, Janssen, Movember Foundation, and MSD, outside the submitted work. IDD is also unremunerated Chair of the ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, and is supported in part by an NHMRC Investigator Grant (grant number 2016274). AMJ reports consulting or advisory roles (to their institution) from Janssen Oncology, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Eisai, Bayer, and Astellas Pharma; and research funding (to their institution) from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen Oncology, MSD, Mayne Pharma, Genentech, Bayer, Lilly, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. AI reports personal fees for a consulting role for Curium Pharma and payment to their institution for a consulting role from Ambrx Pharma, all outside the submitted work. AJW reports a consulting role for and travel support from Bayer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Serum testosterone level is a potential prognostic marker for castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, its role as a prognostic marker in cabazitaxel chemotherapy remains unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical significance of serum testosterone levels before cabazitaxel chemotherapy., Methods: This single-institution, retrospective study included 47 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who received cabazitaxel therapy. Serum testosterone levels were measured before the initiation of cabazitaxel therapy., Results: Progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between patients with high and low serum testosterone levels. Analysis of patients aged <70 years revealed that those with high serum testosterone levels (total testosterone level > 0.055 ng/mL) had significantly longer OS than those with low serum testosterone levels (total testosterone level < 0.055 ng/mL, p = 0.012). Multivariate analysis revealed that low serum testosterone levels (hazard ratio [HR] = 11.874, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.076-67.953, p = 0.005) and high prostate-specific antigen levels (HR = 18.051, 95% CI 2.462-132.347, p = 0.004) in the pretreatment phase were independent prognostic factors for OS in patients receiving cabazitaxel therapy., Conclusions: Serum testosterone level may be a prognostic marker for cabazitaxel therapy in patients with mCRPC who are younger than 70 years, and high serum testosterone levels may lead to longer survival., (© 2023 The Authors. The Prostate published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: Docetaxel (DXL), a noted radiosensitizer, is one of the few chemotherapy drugs approved for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), though only a fraction of CRPCs respond to it. CAV-1, a critical regulator of radioresistance, has been known to modulate DXL and radiation effects. Combining DXL with radiotherapy may create a synergistic anticancer effect through CAV-1 and improve CRPC patients' response to therapy. Here, we investigate the effectiveness and molecular characteristics of DXL and radiation combination therapy in vitro., Materials and Methods: We used live/dead assays to determine the IC 50 of DXL for PC3, DU-145, and TRAMP-C1 cells. Colony formation assay was used to determine the radioresponse of the same cells treated with radiation with/without IC 50 DXL (4, 8, and 12 Gy). We performed gene expression analysis on public transcriptomic data collected from human-derived prostate cancer cell lines (C4-2, PC3, DU-145, and LNCaP) treated with DXL for 8, 16, and 72 hours. Cell cycle arrest and protein expression were assessed using flow cytometry and western blot, respectively., Results: Compared to radiation alone, combination therapy with DXL significantly increased CRPC death in PC3 (1.48-fold, p  < .0001), DU-145 (1.64-fold, p  < .05), and TRAMP-C1 (1.13-fold, p  < .05) at 4 Gy of radiation. Gene expression of CRPC treated with DXL revealed downregulated genes related to cell cycle regulation and upregulated genes related to immune activation and oxidative stress. Confirming the results, G2/M cell cycle arrest was significantly increased after treatment with DXL and radiation. CAV-1 protein expression was decreased after DXL treatment in a dose-dependent manner; furthermore, CAV-1 copy number was strongly associated with poor response to therapy in CRPC patients., Conclusions: Our results suggest that DXL sensitizes CRPC cells to radiation by downregulating CAV-1. DXL + radiation combination therapy may be effective at treating CRPC, especially subtypes associated with high CAV-1 expression, and should be studied further.

Background: Recent oncology guidelines recommend BRCA1/2 testing for a wide range of prostate cancer (PCa) patients. In addition, PARP inhibitors are available for mutation-positive metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) patients following prior treatment with abiraterone, enzalutamide or docetaxel. However, the question of which of these standard treatments is the most effective for BRCA1/2 positive mCRPC patients remains to be answered. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of abiraterone, enzalutamide and docetaxel in BRCA1/2 mutation-positive mCRPC patients in terms of PSA-response (PSA50), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Methods: As no interventional trials are available on this topic, we performed the data synthesis of BRCA1/2 positive mCRPC patients by using both proportional and individual patient data. For PSA50 evaluation, we pooled event rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI), while for time-to-event (PFS, OS) analyses we used individual patient data with random effect Cox regression calculations., Results: Our meta-analysis included 16 eligible studies with 348 BRCA1/2 positive mCRPC patients. In the first treatment line, response rates for abiraterone, enzalutamide and docetaxel were 52% (CI: 25-79%), 64% (CI: 43-80%) and 55% (CI: 36-73%), respectively. Analyses of individual patient data revealed a PFS (HR: 0.47, CI: 0.26-0.83, p = 0.010) but no OS (HR: 1.41, CI: 0.82-2.42, p = 0.210) benefit for enzalutamide compared to abiraterone-treated patients., Conclusions: Our PSA50 analyses revealed that all the three first-line treatments have therapeutic effect in BRCA1/2 positive mCRPC; although, based on the results of PSA50 and PFS analyses, BRCA positive mCRPC patients might better respond to enzalutamide treatment. However, molecular marker-driven interventional studies directly comparing these agents are crucial for providing higher-level evidence., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: In advanced prostate cancer, disease progression during ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is referred to as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Various therapeutic modalities are available for its treatment, including endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase [PARP] inhibition, radionuclide therapy, and radioligand therapy., Objectives: This review outlines practical aspects and considerations regarding treatment sequencing in mCRPC., Materials and Methods: The findings are based on existing prospective phase 3 studies that have demonstrated clinically relevant and statistically significant benefits in radiographically progression-free and/or overall survival., Results: Sequential therapy, aside from numerous patient-specific factors, depends on the treatment patients received in the hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) setting. Following pretreatment with ADT alone or ADT plus docetaxel in the mHSPC context, additional endocrine therapy is the standard approach. In the event of progression under combined endocrine therapy initiated in the mHSPC setting, docetaxel currently serves as the standard for the majority of patients. Patients who received triplet therapy as a pretreatment in the mHSPC scenario can be treated with radioligand therapy or second-line chemotherapy., Conclusion: Various active and well-tolerated treatment options are available for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The choice of therapy is primarily determined by previous treatments, but many other individual factors are also taken into consideration., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Several new systemic treatments for primary metastatic prostate cancer patients (mPCa) were introduced in the last decade for both hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, little is known about the introduction of these treatments in clinical practice. In this national cohort study, we described users and non-users of systemic treatment beyond androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). We also explored whether there was a shift in treatment patterns after the introduction of Docetaxel for mHSPC patients., Materials and Methods: All patients registered in the Cancer Registry of Norway with mPCa diagnosed in 2010-18 were included. Data on systemic therapy (Docetaxel, Abiraterone, Enzalutamide, Cabazitaxel, and Radium-223) were provided from the Norwegian Prescription Database, the Norwegian Patient Registry, and the Norwegian Control and Payment of Health Reimbursement Database. Descriptive results about patient and disease characteristics were presented using frequencies and proportions, means and standard deviations, or medians and interquartile ranges., Results: Of the 2770 patients included in this study, 48% received systemic treatment beyond ADT. The proportion of patients receiving systemic treatment increased during the study period. Systemic treatment users were younger, in better general condition, and had more aggressive tumors than non-users. A treatment shift was observed after 2015, with 48% of patients receiving systemic treatment (mainly Docetaxel) in the mHSPC phase compared to 4% of those diagnosed 2010-14. No significant treatment differences were observed across health regions., Conclusions: An increasing proportion of patients received systemic treatment during the period 2010-18. However, less than 50% of patients in our study received systemic treatment. In accordance with updated guidelines, Docetaxel was introduced after 2015 with an increasing proportion of patients receiving systemic treatment as mHSPC. Further studies should address the disease course and treatment given to patients who do not receive systemic treatment.

Background: Taxanes have been used as monotherapy for metastatic prostate cancer for two decades., Objectives: The current status of docetaxel and cabazitaxel in the treatment sequence for metastatic prostate cancer needs to be clarified., Materials and Methods: Overview of the existing literature regarding approval, dosage and new combination options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)., Results: Taxanes represent one, but no longer the only treatment option for mCRPC. Previously, monotherapy was standard of care in the first and second line for mCRPC; nowadays taxanes are thrusted in the background due to new encouraging drug options. Based on the promising data of docetaxel in triple therapy setting for hormone-sensitive stage, its role as monotherapy in mCRPC needs to be clarified. Cabazitaxel is an alternative to PSMA radioligand therapy after failure of novel hormonal therapy (NHT) and docetaxel. Therapy adherence for taxanes can be significantly improved by dosage adjustments. Both treatment-related neuroendocrine prostate cancer (t-NEPC) and aggressive variant of prostate cancer (AVPC) represent a challenge for experienced uro-oncologists. Here, the combination of taxane plus platinum represents a promising option., Conclusions: Taxanes are indicated in different stages of metastatic prostate cancer. Their use, particularly in combination with other drugs, appears to be promising. Traditional sequential taxane monotherapy regimens will be challenged by novel systemic therapy approaches., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) inhibitor [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 has been previously demonstrated to be noninferior to docetaxel in achieving a biochemical response in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. Here, we report the final analysis of overall survival (OS) for a phase 2 randomized, controlled trial. Methods: Forty chemotherapy-naïve, PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients were randomly assigned to [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 ( n = 20) or docetaxel ( n = 20). Thirty-five patients received treatment per the protocol. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier curves and the Cox regression model. Results: The mean follow-up duration was 33.4 mo. In intention-to-treat analysis, the median OS for the [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and docetaxel arms was 15.0 mo (95% CI, 9.5-20.5 mo) and 15.0 mo (95% CI, 8.1-21.9 mo), respectively ( P = 0.905). In per-protocol analysis, the median OS was 19.0 mo (95% CI, 12.3-25.7 mo) versus 15.0 mo (95% CI, 8.1-21.9 mo), respectively ( P = 0.712). No significant difference in OS was observed between the 2 arms across the analyzed subgroups. Conclusion: Long-term outcomes with [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 administered earlier in the prechemotherapy setting are comparable to those with docetaxel., (© 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Introduction: Prostate cancer (PC) is the second commonest malignancy and fifth leading cause of cancer death in men worldwide. Older men are more likely to develop PC but are underrepresented in pivotal clinical trials, leading to challenges in treatment selection in the real-world setting. We aimed to examine treatment patterns and outcomes in older Australians with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)., Materials and Methods: We identified 753 men with mCRPC within the electronic CRPC Australian Database (ePAD). Clinical data were analysed retrospectively to assess outcomes including time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), PSA doubling time (PSADT), PSA 50 response rate, and pre-defined adverse events of special interest (AESIs). Descriptive statistics were used to report baseline characteristics, stratified by age groups (<75y, 75-85y and >85y). Groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square analyses. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared through log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of variables on OS., Results: Fifty-seven percent of men were aged <75y, 31% 75-85y, and 12% >85y. Patients ≥75y more frequently received only one line of systemic therapy (40% of <75y vs 66% 75-85y vs 68% >85y; P < 0.01). With increasing age, patients were more likely to receive androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSIs) as initial therapy (42% of <75y vs 70% of 75-85y vs 84% of >85y; p < 0.01). PSA 50 response rates or TTF did not significantly differ between age groups for chemotherapy or ARSIs. Patients >85y receiving enzalutamide had poorer OS but this was not an independent prognostic variable on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93(0.09-9.35); p = 0.95). PSADT >3 months was an independent positive prognostic factor for patients receiving any systemic therapy. Older patients who received docetaxel were more likely to experience AESIs (18% in <75y vs 37% 75-85y vs 33% >85y, p = 0.038) and to stop treatment as a result (21% in <75y vs 39% in 75-85y; p = 0.011)., Discussion: In our mCRPC cohort, older men received fewer lines of systemic therapy and were more likely to cease docetaxel due to adverse events. However, treatment outcomes were similar in most subgroups, highlighting the importance of individualised assessment regardless of age., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Angelyn Anton. Honoraria: Janssen, Bayer, Amgen. Christopher Steer: Honoraria- Advisory board membership: Janssen, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi, GSK, Ipsen, MSD; speakers fees: Novartis, Eisai and BMS. The ePAD registry received funding from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Astellas and Janssen during the period of data entry and analysis. These pharmaceutical companies were not involved in the study design, data analysis or manuscript preparation., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of systemic therapies in patients with worse performance status (PS) treated for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC), and non-metastatic/metastatic castration-resistant PCa (nmCRPC/mCRPC), as there is sparse pooled data showing the effect of PS on oncological outcomes in patients with PCa., Methods: Three databases were queried in June 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysing patients with PCa treated with systemic therapy (i.e., adding androgen receptor signalling inhibitor [ARSI] or docetaxel [DOC] to androgen-deprivation therapy [ADT]). We analysed the oncological outcomes of patients with PCa with worse PS, defined as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS ≥ 1, treated with combination therapies and compared these to patients with good PS. The main outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and progression-free survival., Results: Overall, 25 and 18 RCTs were included for systematic review and meta-analyses/network meta-analyses, respectively. In all clinical settings, combination systemic therapies significantly improved OS in patients with worse PS as well as in those with good PS, while the MFS benefit from ARSI in the nmCRPC setting was more pronounced in patients with good PS than in those with worse PS (P = 0.002). Analysis of treatment ranking in patients with mHSPC revealed that triplet therapy had the highest likelihood of improved OS irrespective of PS; specifically, adding darolutamide to DOC + ADT had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with worse PS. Analyses were limited by the small proportion of patients with a PS ≥ 1 (19%-28%) and that the number of PS 2 was rarely reported., Conclusions: Among RCTs, novel systemic therapies seem to benefit the OS of patients with PCa irrespective of PS. Our findings suggest that worse PS should not discourage treatment intensification across all disease stages., (© 2023 The Authors. BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.)