Search

Objective: We evaluate the clinical feasibility of a portable, low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system for prostate cancer (PCa) biopsy., Methods: A retrospective analysis of men who underwent a 12-core systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (SB) and a low-field MRI guided transperineal targeted biopsy (MRI-TB). Comparison of the detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) (Gleason Grade [GG] ≥ 2) by SB and low field MRI-TB, stratified by Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) score, prostate volume, and prostate serum antigen (PSA) was performed., Results: A total of 39 men underwent both the MRI-TB and SB biopsy. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 69.0 (61.5-73) years, body mass index (BMI) was 28.9 kg/m 2 (25.3-34.3), prostate volume was 46.5 cc (32-72.7), and PSA was 9.5 ng/ml (5.5-13.2). The majority (64.4%) of patients had PI-RADS ≥ 4 lesions and 25% of lesions were anterior on pre-biopsy MRII. Cancer detection rate (CDR) was greatest when combining SB and MRI-TB (64.1%). MRI-TB detected 74.3% (29/39) cancers. Of which, 53.8% (21/39) were csPCa while SB detected 42.5% (17/39) csPCa (p = 0.21). In 32.5% (13/39) of cases, MRI-TB upstaged the final diagnosis, compared to 15% (6/39) of cases in which SB upstaged the final diagnosis (p = 0.11)., Conclusion: Low-field MRI-TB is clinically feasible. Although future studies on the accuracy of MRI-TB system are needed, the initial CDR is comparable to those seen with fusion-based prostate biopsies. A transperineal and targeted approach may be beneficial in patients with higher BMI and anterior lesions., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate the role of a hybrid T2-weighted imaging-DWI sequence for prostate cancer diagnosis and differentiation of aggressive prostate cancer from nonaggressive prostate cancer., Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients with prostate cancer who underwent preoperative 3-T MRI and prostatectomy were included in this study. Patients underwent a hybrid T2-weighted imaging-DWI examination consisting of DW images acquired with TEs of 47, 75, and 100 ms and b values of 0 and 750 s/mm(2). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2 were calculated for cancer and normal prostate ROIs at each TE and b value. Changes in ADC and T2 as a function of increasing the TE and b value, respectively, were analyzed. A new metric termed "PQ4" was defined as the percentage of voxels within an ROI that has increasing T2 with increasing b value and has decreasing ADC with increasing TE., Results: ADC values were significantly higher in normal ROIs than in cancer ROIs at all TEs (p < 0.0001). With increasing TE, the mean ADC increased 3% in cancer ROIs and increased 12% in normal ROIs. T2 was significantly higher in normal ROIs than in cancer ROIs at both b values (p ≤ 0.0002). The mean T2 decreased with increasing b value in cancer ROIs (ΔT2 = -17 ms) and normal ROIs (ΔT2 = -52 ms). PQ4 clearly differentiated normal ROIs from prostate cancer ROIs (p = 0.0004) and showed significant correlation with Gleason score (ρ = 0.508, p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Hybrid MRI measures the response of ADC and T2 to changing TEs and b values, respectively. This approach shows promise for detecting prostate cancer and determining its aggressiveness noninvasively.

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to determine short-term reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) estimated from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (DW-MR) imaging of the prostate., Methods: Fourteen patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer were studied under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol. Each patient underwent two, consecutive and identical DW-MR scans on a 3T system. ADC values were calculated from each scan and a deformable registration was performed to align corresponding images. The prostate and cancerous regions of interest (ROIs) were independently analyzed by two radiologists. The prostate volume was analyzed by sextant. Per-voxel absolute and relative percentage variations in ADC were compared between sextants. Per-voxel and per-ROI variations in ADC were calculated for cancerous ROIs., Results: Per-voxel absolute difference in ADC in the prostate ranged from 0 to 1.60 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (per-voxel relative difference 0% to 200%, mean 10.5%). Variation in ADC was largest in the posterior apex (0% to 200%, mean 11.6%). Difference in ADC variation between sextants was not statistically significant. Cancer ROIs' per-voxel variation in ADC ranged from 0.001 × 10(-3) to 0.841 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (0% to 67.4%, mean 11.2%) and per-ROI variation ranged from 0 to 0.463 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (mean 0.122 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s)., Conclusions: Variation in ADC within the human prostate is reasonably small, and is on the order of 10%.