1. Low detectable prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy--treat or watch?
- Author
-
Koulikov D, Mohler MC, Mehedint DC, Attwood K, Wilding GE, and Mohler JL
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Biomarkers, Tumor blood, Disease-Free Survival, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Incidence, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local epidemiology, New York epidemiology, Postoperative Period, Prostatic Neoplasms mortality, Prostatic Neoplasms surgery, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate trends, Time Factors, Prostate-Specific Antigen blood, Prostatectomy, Prostatic Neoplasms blood
- Abstract
Purpose: We determined whether the pattern of low detectable prostate specific antigen during the first 3 years of followup after radical prostatectomy would predict subsequent biochemical recurrence., Materials and Methods: An institutional database was queried to identify 1,136 patients who underwent open retropubic or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between January 5, 1993 and December 29, 2008. After applying exclusion criteria we used serum prostate specific antigen and the prostate specific antigen pattern during the first 3 years of followup to divide 566 men into 3 groups, including 1) undetectable prostate specific antigen (0.03 ng/ml or less), 2) low detectable-stable prostate specific antigen (greater than 0.03 and less than 0.2 ng/ml, no 2 subsequent increases and/or prostate specific antigen velocity less than 0.05 ng per year) and 3) low detectable-unstable prostate specific antigen (greater than 0.03 and less than 0.2 ng/ml, 2 subsequent increases according to NCCN criteria and/or prostate specific antigen velocity 0.05 ng per year or greater). The primary end point was biochemical recurrence, defined as prostate specific antigen 0.2 ng/ml or greater, or receipt of radiation therapy beyond 3 years of followup., Results: Seven-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 95%, 94% and 37% in the undetectable, low detectable-stable and low detectable-unstable groups, respectively (log rank test p <0.0001). On multivariate analysis the prostate specific antigen pattern during 3 years postoperatively (undetectable vs low detectable-unstable HR 15.9 and vs low detectable-stable HR 1.6), pathological T stage (pT2 vs greater than pT2 HR 1.8), pathological Gleason score (less than 7 vs 7 HR 2.3 and less than 7 vs 8-10 HR 3.3) and surgical margins (negative vs positive HR 1.8) significantly predicted biochemical recurrence., Conclusions: The combination of prostate specific antigen velocity and NCCN criteria for biochemical recurrence separated well men with low detectable prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy into those who required treatment and those who could be safely watched., (Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF