Search

We describe the synthesis of a novel series of bis-basic substituted benzamides and their relative potency in inhibiting rat brain protein kinase alpha (PKC alpha) activity. None of the compounds inhibited enzyme activity via the catalytic domain but several did via the regulatory domain at 1-5 microM concentrations. Inhibition was comparable to that of several di- and triphenylacrylonitriles and triphenylethylenes. According to a multivariate factor (correspondence) analysis of QSAR descriptors, hydrophobicity (log p) and hydration energy were the most discriminant descriptors, much more so than molecular mass, molar refractivity, polarizability, molecular volume and solvent-accessible surface. Inhibitory activity was correlated with high hydrophobicity and low hydration energy. The higher potency of GL9 (N,N'-oxalyl-bis[(o-amino)[2-(diethylamino)ethyl]-benzamide]) that differed from its congener (GL25) by the presence of an oxamide rather than succinamide moiety was tentatively explained by the greater negative charges associated with the carbonyl groups of its oxamide residue. The higher potency of GL22 (N,N'-tere-phthalyl-bis[(o-amino)[2-(diethylamino)ethyl]-benzamide ] in which an aromatic ring is inserted between two benzamide moieties in para, para' rather than ortho, ortho' positions as in GL23 might be due to a planar conformation facilitating membrane insertion. In conclusion, correspondence analysis is a neat way of highlighting similarities and differences in molecular properties (QSAR descriptors and potency). Therapeutic doses of many classes of drug might interfere with the regulatory domain of PKC alpha if, like our test-compounds, they have basic side-chain(s), high hydrophobicity, low hydration energy, a planar conformation and/or a highly charged reactive (oxamide) moiety.

A multivariate statistical method, correspondence factorial (CF) analysis, was used to examine the correlations among the protein binding and cell proliferation effects of a series of 36 di- and triphenylethylenes (DPEs and TPEs). The analysis was applied to a study which measured their competition for estradiol binding to cytosol estrogen receptor (ER), their influence on protein kinase C (PKC) activity under different conditions of enzyme activation, their ability to promote the growth of a breast cancer cell line and to inhibit growth at high concentrations (cytotoxicity). The CF analysis revealed several levels of correlation. First, it distinguished those molecules within the population that stimulated rather than inhibited PKC activity. Second, it made apparent a strong correlation between cytotoxicity and inhibition of Ca++ and phosphatidylserine-dependent PKC activity, which was most marked when the enzyme had been activated by diacylglycerol indicating that PKC inhibition under physiological conditions might contribute to the overall cytotoxicity of these compounds. Third, a lower level of correlation was established between competition for ER binding and cytotoxicity. Taken together, the results suggest that MCF7 cells might be most sensitive to a cytotoxic effect of TPEs (via PKC and other targets) when they at the same time decrease estrogen-stimulated proliferation via an ER-mediated antiestrogenic effect.

The response profiles of 36 para-substituted diphenylethylenes (DPEs) and triphenylacrylonitriles (TPEs) have been compared by multivariate analysis. The responses measured were (a) relative binding affinity (RBA) for the cytosol estrogen receptor (ER), (b) ability to promote the growth of the human MCF7 breast cancer cell-line, (c) cytotoxicity in MCF7 cells, and (d) ability to stimulate or inhibit protein kinase C (PKC) III activity under three different conditions of enzyme activation. The prime object of the analysis was to observe the simultaneous influence of diverse combinations of substituents on all these in vitro responses. To do this, the minimum spanning tree (MST) method was used to organize the molecules into a network in which proximate molecules are closely related with regard to their responses whereas remote molecules are distinct. The MST of this population of molecules had four main branches. E2 and its TPE mime were located in a central position within the trunk whereas the tips of the branches tended toward molecules of different specificity, i.e., cytotoxic molecules that bind to ER and interfere with PKC, noncytotoxic molecules that also bind to ER and interfere with PKC but promote cell growth, molecules only active on PKC, and molecules active on all parameters except PKC stimulation. A parallel MST analysis of the relationships among the response parameters themselves confirmed previous conclusions: For this population of molecules, RBAs for ER are fairly closely related to ability to promote MCF7 cell growth and only little to cytotoxicity (Bignon et al. J. Med. Chem. 1989, 32, 2092). Cytotoxicity is much more clearly correlated with inhibition of diacylglycerol-stimulated PKC activity than with RBAs for ER. PKC inhibition differs substantially depending upon whether the substrate is H1 histone or protamine sulfate.

We have performed a systematic study of the interaction of 36 di- and tri-phenylethylene derivatives (DPEs and TPEs) with protein kinase C (PKC). The results were submitted to a multivariate analysis in order to identify the structural features that might be implicated in interference with the activity of three PKC subspecies under three enzyme activation conditions. Four groups of test-compounds, each with common chemical features, could be distinguished clearly. The first group comprised all TPEs substituted with at least one basic dialkylaminoethoxy side-chain. These inhibited type alpha, beta and gamma PKC subspecies activated by Ca2+ and phosphatidylserine (PS) with or without diolein (DO) at micromolar concentrations but did not inhibit protamine sulfate phosphorylation. The other effectors, which all possessed a 1,1-bis-(p-hydroxyphenyl) ethylene moiety, influenced PKC activity at high concentrations (30-200 microM) and could be divided into two groups. One group constituted PKC inhibitors in the TPE series and inhibited PKC activated by Ca2+, PS and DO, as well as protamine sulfate phosphorylation. The other group constituted dual-type inhibitors/activators in the DPE series and stimulated PKC in the presence of Ca2+ and low PS concentrations but inhibited the enzyme in the simultaneous presence of DO. The fourth group of compounds was inactive and had, for the most part, one or two substituents with weak steric hindrance. In agreement with previous data for six lead compounds, this study suggests that, in these chemical series, a basic amino side-chain leads to interaction with phospholipid and the regulatory domain of PKC, whereas a 1,1-bis-(p-hydroxyphenyl) ethylene moiety leads to interaction with the catalytic domain of the enzyme.

The activation of type I (gamma), II (beta) and III (alpha) protein kinase C (PKC) subspecies by phosphatidylserine (PS) and diacylglycerol (DAG) is inhibited by micromolar concentrations of triphenylacrylonitrile (TPE) antiestrogens. TPE A (with p-hydroxy and p-diethylaminoethoxy groups on the 3- and 3'-phenyl rings, respectively) interacts with PS-vesicles as well as with the regulatory domain of PKC, probably at a site different from the Ca2+ and DAG binding sites. The interaction of TPE A with the regulatory domain of enzyme is very slow. Apparently, TPE A does not interact with the catalytic domain of PKC. In contrast, another TPE derivative, TPE B (with a p-hydroxy group on each of the three phenyl rings) inhibits the enzyme activity in a competitive manner with respect to ATP, suggesting that this TPE interacts with the catalytically active site of the enzyme. It seems likely that various TPE antiestrogen derivatives may exert their inhibitory action on PKC by multiple different mechanisms.

Estrogen receptor-positive (MCF7) and -negative (BT20) human breast cancer cell lines, which are frequently used for studies on cancer chemotherapy with triphenylethylene (TPE) anti-estrogens, express at least three protein kinase C subspecies. Two of them are identified as type II PKC having the beta-sequence and type III PKC having the alpha-sequence. The other one shows typical characteristics of PKC which responds to Ca2+, phosphatidylserine and diacylglycerol, but shows kinetic properties subtly different from the previously known PKC subspecies. Immunoblot analysis has shown that this enzyme does not correspond to any of the well defined subspecies with known sequence structures. All of these PKC subspecies are similarly susceptible to the TPE antiestrogens.

Protein kinase C (PKC) I (gamma), II (beta) and III (alpha) subspecies are all activated by 1,1-di-(p-hydroxyphenyl)ethylene derivatives (DPE) at micromolar concentrations. This PKC activation depends on the presence of both Ca2+ and phosphatidylserine (PS) but does not require diacylglycerol (DG). DPEs enhance PKC activity at low PS concentrations, but not at saturating PS concentrations. Like DG, DPEs increase the apparent affinity of PKC for PS as well as for Ca2+, but lead to a decrease in the catalytic activity (Vmax). In the presence of saturating DG concentrations, DPEs exhibit an inhibitory action. The derivatives also inhibit the activity of the proteolytic fragment of PKC, protein kinase M. It is concluded that DPEs are mixed-type inhibitors, probably interacting with the catalytic domain of the enzyme.

Protein kinase C (PKC) I (gamma), II (beta) and III (alpha) subspecies' activities are inhibited by three triphenylacrylonitrile (TPE) antiestrogens at micromolar concentrations. TPE 1 (having a p-hydroxy and a p-diethylaminoethoxy group on the 3-, and 3'- phenyl rings respectively) and TPE 2 (having a p-diethylaminoethoxy group on both the 3-, and 3'- phenyl rings) are competitive with the mechanism of activation by phosphatidylserine (PS). TPE 3 (having p-hydroxy groups on each of the three phenyl rings) is non-competitive with PS and inhibits the Ca2+- and PS-independent phosphorylation of protamine sulfate by PKC subspecies. This evidence suggests that PKC activity can be inhibited by different routes depending on the TPE structure: diethylaminoethoxy side chain-substituted TPEs (TPE 1 and 2) interact with PS as well as with the regulatory domain, whereas the trihydroxylated derivative (TPE 3) inhibits the enzyme by interacting with the catalytically active site.