Search

Drop profile analysis tensiometry used in the oscillating drop mode provides the dilational viscoelasticity of adsorption layers at liquid interfaces. Applied during the progress of adsorption the dynamic surface rheology can be monitored. For β-casein solutions at the same surface pressure values, the larger the dynamic dilational viscoelasticity the longer the adsorption time, i.e., the smaller the studied protein concentration is. For β-lactoglobulin and human serum albumin, the differences in the viscoelasticity values are less or not dependent on the adsorption time at identical surface pressures. The observed effects are caused by the flexibility of BCS, while the globular proteins BLG and HSA do not change their conformation significantly within the adsorption layer.

Proteins and their mixtures with surfactants are widely used in many applications. The knowledge of their solution bulk behavior and its impact on the properties of interfacial layers made great progress in the recent years. Different mechanisms apply to the formation process of protein/surfactant complexes for ionic and non-ionic surfactants, which are governed mainly by electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. The surface activity of these complexes is often remarkably different from that of the individual protein and has to be considered in respective theoretical models. At very low protein concentration, small amounts of added surfactants can change the surface activity of proteins remarkably, even though no strongly interfacial active complexes are observed. Also small added amounts of non-ionic surfactants change the surface activity of proteins in the range of small bulk concentrations or surface coverages. The modeling of the equilibrium adsorption behavior of proteins and their mixtures with surfactants has reached a rather high level. These models are suitable also to describe the high frequency limits of the dilational viscoelasticity of the interfacial layers. Depending on the nature of the protein/surfactant interactions and the changes in the interfacial layer composition rather complex dilational viscoelasticities can be observed and described by the available models. The differences in the interfacial behavior, often observed in literature for studies using different experimental methods, are at least partially explained by a depletion of proteins, surfactants and their complexes in the range of low concentrations. A correction of these depletion effects typically provides good agreement between the data obtained with different methods, such as drop and bubble profile tensiometry., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Interfacial tension measurements have been performed at the water/hexane interface on mixtures of the bovine milk protein β-lactoglobulin and positively charged cationic surfactants (alkytrimethylammonium bromides). The addition of surfactants with different chain lengths leads to the formation of protein-surfactant complexes with different adsorption properties as compared to those of the single protein. In this study, the formation of complexes has been observed clearly for protein-long chain surfactant (TTAB and CTAB) mixtures, which has shown in addition to specific electrostatic interactions the relevance of hydrophobic interactions between surfactant molecules and the protein. The modeling of interfacial tension data by using a mixed adsorption model provides a quantitative understanding of the mixture behavior. Indeed, the value of the adsorption constant of the protein obtained in the presence of surfactants has strongly varied as compared to the single protein. Actually, this parameter which represents the affinity of the molecule for the interface is representative of the hydrophobic character of the compound and so of its surface activity. Even if a more hydrophobic and more surface active protein-surfactant complex has been formed, the replacement of this complex from the interface by surfactants close to their cmc was observed.

Depending on the bulk composition, adsorption layers formed from mixed protein/surfactant solutions contain different amounts of protein. Clearly, increasing amounts of surfactant should decrease the amount of adsorbed proteins successively. However, due to the much larger adsorption energy, proteins are rather strongly bound to the interface and via competitive adsorption surfactants cannot easily displace proteins. A thermodynamic theory was developed recently which describes the composition of mixed protein/surfactant adsorption layers. This theory is based on models for the single compounds and allows a prognosis of the resulting mixed layers by using the characteristic parameters of the involved components. This thermodynamic theory serves also as the respective boundary condition for the dynamics of adsorption layers formed from mixed solutions and their dilational rheological behaviour. Based on experimental studies with milk proteins (beta-casein and beta-lactoglobulin) mixed with non-ionic (decyl and dodecyl dimethyl phosphine oxide) and ionic (sodium dodecyl sulphate and dodecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) surfactants at the water/air and water/hexane interfaces, the potential of the theoretical tools is demonstrated. The displacement of pre-adsorbed proteins by subsequently added surfactant can be successfully studied by a special experimental technique based on a drop volume exchange. In this way the drop profile analysis can provide tensiometry and dilational rheology data (via drop oscillation experiments) for two adsorption routes--sequential adsorption of the single compounds in addition to the traditional simultaneous adsorption from a mixed solution. Complementary measurements of the surface shear rheology and the adsorption layer thickness via ellipsometry are added in order to support the proposed mechanisms drawn from tensiometry and dilational rheology, i.e. to show that the formation of mixed adsorption layer is based on a modification of the protein molecules via electrostatic (ionic) and/or hydrophobic interactions by the surfactant molecules and a competitive adsorption of the resulting complexes with the free, unbound surfactant. Under certain conditions, the properties of the sequentially formed layers differ from those formed simultaneously, which can be explained by the different locations of complex formation.

With modified measuring procedure and measuring cell design in the drop profile tensiometer PAT, it became possible to study the rate of water evaporation through adsorbed or spread surface layers. This method was employed to measure the rate of water evaporation from drops covered by adsorbed layers of some proteins and surfactants, in particular n-dodecanol. It was shown that the formation of dense (double or condensed) adsorbed layers of protein and the formation of 2D-condensed n-dodecanol layer decrease the water evaporation rate by 20-25% as compared with pure water. At the same time, the adsorbed layers of ordinary surfactants (sodium dodecyl sulfate and nonionic ethoxylated surfactant C(14)EO(8)) do not affect the water evaporation rate remarkably.

It is shown experimentally that the desorption of sodium decyl sulphate from the liquid/air interface is purely diffusion controlled, while the desorption of higher surface active surfactants such as the non-ionic surfactants Triton X-100 and tridecyl dimethyl phosphine oxide obeys a mixed mechanism. The desorption kinetics of beta-lactoglobulin (BLG) and beta-casein is, however, determined by a barrier mechanism. From the analysis of the BLG and beta-casein desorption kinetics at different temperatures the activation energy of desorption is calculated. The values obtained are rather close to the free energy of adsorption. The theoretical model of desorption kinetics predicts that these two energetic parameters are similar if the adsorption activation energy is low. This explains why substances with a higher adsorption activity have a lower desorption rate. Adsorption kinetics studies for beta-casein with and without forced convection show the same equilibrium surface tension values. This leads to the conclusion that the protein adsorption at liquid interfaces is thermodynamically reversible, although the slow desorption kinetics would allow to assume it to be an irreversible process.

It is shown by experiments that the DeSNa desorption kinetics is governed by a pure diffusion mechanism, while the desorption of more surface active surfactants such as C13DMPO and Triton X-100 obeys a mixed mechanism. The BLG desorption kinetics, as shown by experiments, is determined by a barrier mechanism. From the analysis of the temperature dependence of the BLG desorption kinetics it is possible to calculate the activation energy of this process, which is quite close to the free energy of BLG adsorption. The theoretical model of desorption kinetics predicts that these two energetic parameters are approximately equal to each other if the adsorption activation energy is low. This can explain the fact that the higher the adsorption activity of a substance is, the lower is its desorption rate.

A thermodynamic model is derived which is suitable to describe adsorption from a mixed protein/surfactant solution. The comparison with experimental data for HSA mixed with the nonionic surfactant decyl dimethyl phosphine oxide shows good agreement. Some model calculations are discussed in terms of the competitive character of the process of adsorption from mixed protein/surfactant solutions. The behavior of globular (HSA) and flexible (beta-casein) proteins appears to be quite different due to the possibility of changing the molar area of adsorbed protein molecules.

In the framework of the two-dimensional non-ideal solution model, surface layer equations of state, adsorption isotherms and functions of the distribution of protein molecules in respect to different molar area were derived. The thermodynamic analysis was based on Butler's equation for the chemical potentials of the components and a first-order model for the non-ideality of surface layer enthalpy and entropy. For concentrated solutions, aggregation of protein molecules in the surface layer was assumed. The resulting equations satisfactorily describe the measured adsorption and surface pressure isotherms of proteins at liquid/fluid interfaces in terms of a set of constant parameters. The model reflects the well-known differences between proteins and ordinary surfactants: a sharp increase in the surface pressure with concentration beyond a certain protein adsorption; an almost constant surface pressure at higher concentrations and a significant increase in the adsorption layer thickness with increasing adsorption for flexible proteins.

The review demonstrates the recent theoretical and experimental progress in the understanding of penetration systems at the air-water interface in which a dissolved amphiphile (surfactant, protein) penetrates into a Langmuir monolayer. The critical review of the existing theoretical models which describe the thermodynamics of the penetration are critically reviewed. Although a rigorous thermodynamic analysis of penetration systems is unavailable due to their complexity, some model assumptions, e.g. the invariability of the activity coefficient of the insoluble component of the monolayer during the penetration of the soluble component results in reasonable solutions. New theoretical models describing the equilibrium behaviour of the insoluble monolayers which undergo the 2D aggregation in the monolayer, and the equations of state and adsorption isotherms which assume the existence of multiple states (conformations) of a protein molecule within the monolayer and the non-ideality of the adsorbed monolayers are now available. The theories which describe the penetration of a soluble surfactant into the main phases of Langmuir monolayers were presented first for the case of the mixture of the molecules possessing equal partial molar surfaces (the mixture of homologues), with further extension of the models to include the interesting process of the protein penetration into the monolayer of 2D aggregating phospholipid. This extension was based on a concept which subdivides the protein molecules into independent fragments with areas equal to those of the phospholipid molecule. Various mechanisms for the effect of the soluble surfactant on the aggregation of the insoluble component were considered in the theoretical models: (i) no effect on the aggregate formation process; (ii) formation of mixed aggregates; and (iii) the influence on the aggregating process via the change of aggregation constant, but without any formation of mixed aggregates. Accordingly depending on the mechanism, different forms of the equations of state of the monolayer and of the adsorption isotherms of soluble surfactant are predicted. Based on the shape of the experimental pi-A isotherms, interesting conclusions can be drawn on the real mechanism. First experimental evidence has been provided that the penetration of different proteins and surfactants into a DPPC monolayer in a fluid-like state induces a first order main phase transition of pure DPPC. The phase transition is indicated by a break point in the pi(t) penetration kinetics curves and the domain formation by BAM. Mixed aggregates of protein with phospholipid are not formed. These results agree satisfactorily with the predictions of the theoretical models. New information on phase transition and phase properties of Langmuir monolayers penetrated by soluble amphiphiles are obtained by coupling of the pi(t) penetration kinetics curves with BAM and GIXD measurements. The GIXD results on the penetration of beta-lactoglobulin into DPPC monolayers have shown that protein penetration occurs without any specific interactions with the DPPC molecules and the condensed phase consists only of DPPC.

The adsorption behaviour of proteins and systems mixed with surfactants of different nature is described. In the absence of surfactants the proteins mainly adsorb in a diffusion controlled manner. Due to lack of quantitative models the experimental results are discussed partly qualitatively. There are different types of interaction between proteins and surfactant molecules. These interactions lead to protein/surfactant complexes the surface activity and conformation of which are different from those of the pure protein. Complexes formed with ionic surfactants via electrostatic interaction have usually a higher surface activity, which becomes evident from the more than additive surface pressure increase. The presence of only small amounts of ionic surfactants can significantly modify the structure of adsorbed proteins. With increasing amounts of ionic surfactants, however, an opposite effect is reached as due to hydrophobic interaction and the complexes become less surface active and can be displaced from the interface due to competitive adsorption. In the presence of non-ionic surfactants the adsorption layer is mainly formed by competitive adsorption between the compounds and the only interaction is of hydrophobic nature. Such complexes are typically less surface active than the pure protein. From a certain surfactant concentration of the interface is covered almost exclusively by the non-ionic surfactant. Mixed layers of proteins and lipids formed by penetration at the water/air or by competitive adsorption at the water/chloroform interface are formed such that at a certain pressure the components start to separate. Using Brewster angle microscopy in penetration experiments of proteins into lipid monolayers this interfacial separation can be visualised. A brief comparison of the protein adsorption at the water/air and water/n-tetradecane shows that the adsorbed amount at the water/oil interface is much stronger and the change in interfacial tension much larger than at the water/air interface. Also some experimental data on the dilational elasticity of proteins at both interfaces measured by a transient relaxation technique are discussed on the basis of the derived thermodynamic model. As a fast developing field of application the use of surface tensiometry and rheometry of mixed protein/surfactant mixed layers is demonstrated as a new tool in the diagnostics of various diseases and for monitoring the progress of therapies.