Search

Two major challenges in proteomics are the large number of proteins and their broad dynamic range in the cell. We exploited the abundance-dependent Michaelis-Menten kinetics of trypsin digestion to selectively digest and deplete abundant proteins with a method we call DigDeAPr. We validated the depletion mechanism with known yeast protein abundances, and we observed greater than threefold improvement in low-abundance human-protein identification and quantitation metrics. This methodology should be broadly applicable to many organisms, proteases and proteomic pipelines.

We describe a solid phase microextraction (SPME), multistep elution, transient isotachophoresis (tITP) capillary electrophoresis-tandem mass spectrometry (CE-MS/MS) procedure which employs a high sensitivity porous electrospray ionization (ESI) sprayer for the proteomic analysis of a moderately complex protein mixture. In order to improve comprehensiveness and sensitivity over a previously reported proteomic application of the ESI sprayer, we evaluated preconcentration with SPME and multistep elution prior to tITP stacking and CE separation. To maximize separation efficiency, we primarily employed electrokinetic methods for elution and separation after loading the sample by application of pressure. Conditions were developed for optimum simultaneous electrokinetic elution and sample stacking using a tryptic digest of 16 proteins to maximize peptide identifications and minimize band broadening. We performed comparative proteomic analysis of a dilution series using CE and nanoflow liquid chromatography (nLC). We found complementary peptide and protein identifications with larger quantities (100 ng) of a Pyrococcus furiosus tryptic digest, but with mass-limited amounts (5 ng) CE was 3 times more effective at identifying proteins. We attribute these gains in sensitivity to lower noise levels with the porous CE sprayer, illustrated by better signal-to-noise ratios of peptide precursor ions and associated higher XCorr values of identified peptides when compared directly to nLC. From comparative analysis of SPME-tITP-CE with direct injection CE, the SPME-tITP process improved comprehensiveness and sensitivity.