Search

Top-down proteomics is a powerful tool for characterizing genetic variations and post-translational modifications at intact protein level. However, one significant technical gap of top-down proteomics is the inability to analyze a low amount of biological samples, which limits its access to isolated rare cells, fine needle aspiration biopsies, and tissue substructures. Herein, we developed an ultrasensitive top-down platform by incorporating a microfluidic sample preparation system, termed nanoPOTS (nanodroplet processing in one pot for trace samples), into a top-down proteomic workflow. A unique combination of a nonionic detergent dodecyl-β-d-maltopyranoside (DDM) with urea as protein extraction buffer significantly improved both protein extraction efficiency and sample recovery. We hypothesize that the DDM detergent improves protein recovery by efficiently reducing nonspecific adsorption of intact proteins on container surfaces, while urea serves as a strong denaturant to disrupt noncovalent complexes and release intact proteins for downstream analysis. The nanoPOTS-based top-down platform reproducibly and quantitatively identified ∼170 to ∼620 proteoforms from ∼70 to ∼770 HeLa cells containing ∼10 to ∼115 ng of total protein. A variety of post-translational modifications including acetylation, myristoylation, and iron binding were identified using only less than 800 cells. We anticipate the nanoPOTS top-down proteomics platform will be broadly applicable in biomedical research, particularly where clinical specimens are not available in amounts amenable to standard workflows.

The application of proteomics to fresh frozen (FF) and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) human tissues is an important development spurred on by requests from stakeholder groups in clinical fields. One objective is to complement current diagnostic methods with new specific molecular information. An important goal is to achieve adequate and consistent protein recovery across and within large-scale studies. Here, we describe development of several protocols incorporating mass spectrometry compatible detergents, including Rapigest, PPS, and ProteaseMax. Methods were applied on 4 and 15 µm thick FF tissues, and 4 µm thick FFPE tissues. We evaluated sensitivity and repeatability of the methods and found that the protocol containing Rapigest enabled detection of 630 proteins from FF tissue of 1 mm2 and 15 µm thick, whereas 498 and 297 proteins were detected with the protocols containing ProteaseMax and PPS, respectively. Surprisingly, PPS-containing buffer showed good extraction of the proteins from 4 µm thick FFPE tissue with the average of 270 protein identifications (1 mm2), similar to the results on 4 µm thick FF. Moreover, we found that temperature increases during incubation with urea on 4 µm thick FF tissue revealed a decrease in the number of identified proteins and increase in the number of the carbamylated peptides.

Solitary aculeate wasps are abundant and diverse hymenopteran insects that disable prey using venom. The venom may possess neuromodulation, immunomodulatory, metabolic-modulatory and antimicrobial functions. Venom analysis of transcriptomes and proteomes has been previously performed in social and parasitoid wasp species. We develop methodologies including mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics to analyse the protein constituents from venom sacs of the solitary aculeate wasp Cerceris rybyensis. The venom sac constituents of C. rybyensis are discussed with respect to other wasp species.

Moving from macroscale preparative systems in proteomics to micro- and nanotechnologies offers researchers the ability to deeply profile smaller numbers of cells that are more likely to be encountered in clinical settings. Herein a recently developed microscale proteomic method, microdroplet processing in one pot for trace samples (microPOTS), was employed to identify proteomic changes in ∼200 Barrett's esophageal cells following physiologic and radiation stress exposure. From this small population of cells, microPOTS confidently identified >1500 protein groups, and achieved a high reproducibility with a Pearson's correlation coefficient value of R > 0.9 and over 50% protein overlap from replicates. A Barrett's cell line model treated with either lithocholic acid (LCA) or X-ray had 21 (e.g., ASNS, RALY, FAM120A, UBE2M, IDH1, ESD) and 32 (e.g., GLUL, CALU, SH3BGRL3, S100A9, FKBP3, AGR2) overexpressed proteins, respectively, compared to the untreated set. These results demonstrate the ability of microPOTS to routinely identify and quantify differentially expressed proteins from limited numbers of cells.

Tissues and biofluids are important sources of information used for the detection of diseases and decisions on patient therapies. There are several accepted methods for preservation of tissues, among which the most popular are fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin embedded methods. Depending on the preservation method and the amount of sample available, various specific protocols are available for tissue processing for subsequent proteomic analysis. Protocols are tailored to answer various biological questions, and as such vary in lysis and digestion conditions, as well as duration. The existence of diverse tissue-sample protocols has led to confusion in how to choose the best protocol for a given tissue and made it difficult to compare results across sample types. Here, we summarize procedures used for tissue processing for subsequent bottom-up proteomic analysis. Furthermore, we compare protocols for their variations in the composition of lysis buffers, digestion procedures, and purification steps. For example, reports have shown that lysis buffer composition plays an important role in the profile of extracted proteins: the most common are tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, radioimmunoprecipitation assay, and ammonium bicarbonate buffers. Although, trypsin is the most commonly used enzyme for proteolysis, in some protocols it is supplemented with Lys-C and/or chymotrypsin, which will often lead to an increase in proteome coverage. Data show that the selection of the lysis procedure might need to be tissue-specific to produce distinct protocols for individual tissue types. Finally, selection of the procedures is also influenced by the amount of sample available, which range from biopsies or the size of a few dozen of mm2 obtained with laser capture microdissection to much larger amounts that weight several milligrams.

Proteomics of human tissues and isolated cellular subpopulations create new opportunities for therapy and monitoring of a patients’ treatment in the clinic. Important considerations in such analysis include recovery of adequate amounts of protein for analysis and reproducibility in sample collection. In this study we compared several protocols for proteomic sample preparation: i) filter-aided sample preparation (FASP), ii) in-solution digestion (ISD) and iii) a pressure-assisted digestion (PCT) method. PCT method is known for already a decade [1], however it is not widely used in proteomic research. We assessed protocols for proteome profiling of isolated immune cell subsets and formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples. Our results show that the ISD method has very good efficiency of protein and peptide identification from the whole proteome, while the FASP method is particularly effective in identification of membrane proteins. Pressure-assisted digestion methods generally provide lower numbers of protein/peptide identifications, but have gained in popularity due to their shorter digestion time making them considerably faster than for ISD or FASP. Furthermore, PCT does not result in substantial sample loss when applied to samples of 50 000 cells. Analysis of FFPE tissues shows comparable results. ISD method similarly yields the highest number of identifications. Furthermore, proteins isolated from FFPE samples show a significant reduction of cleavages at lysine sites due to chemical modifications with formaldehyde-such as methylation (+14 Da) being among the most common. The data we present will be helpful for making decisions about the robust preparation of clinical samples for biomarker discovery and studies on pathomechanisms of various diseases.

Human tissues are an important link between organ-specific spatial molecular information, patient pathology, and patient treatment options. However, patient tissues are uniquely obtained by time and location, and limited in their availability and size. Currently, little knowledge exists about appropriate and simplified protocols for routine MS-based analysis of the various types and sizes of tissues. Following standard procedures used in pathology, we selected small fresh frozen uterine tissue samples to investigate how the tissue preparation protocol affected the subsequent proteomics analysis. First, we observed that protein extraction with 0.1% SDS followed by extraction with a 30% ACN/urea resulted in a decrease in the number of identified proteins, when compared to extraction with 30% ACN/urea only. The decrease in the number of proteins was approximately 55% and 20%, for 10 and 16 μm thick tissue, respectively. Interestingly, the relative abundance of the proteins shared between the two methods was higher when SDS/ACN/urea was used, compared to the 30% ACN/urea extraction, indicating the role of SDS to be beneficial for protein solubility. Second, the influence of tissue thickness was investigated by comparing the results obtained for 10, 16, and 20 μm thick (1 mm2) tissue using urea/30% ACN. We observed an increase in the number of identified proteins and corresponding quantity with an increase in the tissue thickness. Finally, by analyzing very small amounts of tissues (∼0.2 mm2) of 10, 16, and 20 μm thickness, we observed that the increase in tissue thickness resulted in a higher number of protein identifications and corresponding quantitative values.

Neoantigen-based immunotherapies promise to improve patient outcomes over the current standard of care. However, detecting these cancer-specific antigens is one of the significant challenges in the field of mass spectrometry. Even though the first sequencing of the immunopeptides was done decades ago, today there is still a diversity of the protocols used for neoantigen isolation from the cell surface. This heterogeneity makes it difficult to compare results between the laboratories and the studies. Isolation of the neoantigens from the cell surface is usually done by mild acid elution (MAE) or immunoprecipitation (IP) protocol. However, limited amounts of the neoantigens present on the cell surface impose a challenge and require instrumentation with enough sensitivity and accuracy for their detection. Detecting these neopeptides from small amounts of available patient tissue limits the scope of most of the studies to cell cultures. Here, we summarize protocols for the extraction and identification of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II peptides. We aimed to evaluate existing methods in terms of the appropriateness of the isolation procedure, as well as instrumental parameters used for neoantigen detection. We also focus on the amount of the material used in the protocols as the critical factor to consider when analyzing neoantigens. Beyond experimental aspects, there are numerous readily available proteomics suits/tools applicable for neoantigen discovery; however, experimental validation is still necessary for neoantigen characterization.