Search

Targeted mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic assays, such as multiplexed multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)-MS assays, enable sensitive and specific quantification of proteotypic peptides as stoichiometric surrogates for proteins. Efforts are underway to expand the use of MRM-MS assays in clinical environments, which requires a reliable strategy to monitor proteolytic digestion efficiency within individual samples. Towards this goal, extended stable isotope-labeled standard (SIS) peptides (hE), which incorporate native proteolytic cleavage sites, can be spiked into protein lysates prior to proteolytic (trypsin) digestion, and release of the tryptic SIS peptide (hT) can be monitored. However, hT measurements alone cannot monitor the extent of digestion and may be confounded by matrix effects specific to individual patient samples; therefore, they are not sufficient to monitor sample-to-sample digestion variability. We hypothesized that measuring undigested hE, along with its paired hT, would improve detection of digestion issues compared to only measuring hT. We tested the ratio of the SIS pair measurements, or hE/hT, as a quality control (QC) metric of trypsin digestion for two MRM assays: a direct-MRM (398 targets) and an immuno-MRM (126 targets requiring immunoaffinity peptide enrichment) assay, with extended SIS peptides observable for 54% (216) and 62% (78) of the targets, respectively. We evaluated the quantitative bias for each target in a series of experiments that adversely affected proteolytic digestion (e.g., variable digestion times, pH, and temperature). We identified a subset of SIS pairs (36 for the direct-MRM, 7 for the immuno-MRM assay) for which the hE/hT ratio reliably detected inefficient digestion that resulted in decreased assay sensitivity and unreliable endogenous quantification. The hE/hT ratio was more responsive to a decrease in digestion efficiency than a metric based on hT measurements alone. For clinical-grade MRM-MS assays, this study describes a ready-to-use QC panel and also provides a road map for designing custom QC panels., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immunotherapies are revolutionizing cancer care, producing durable responses and potentially cures in a subset of patients. However, response rates are low for most tumors, grade 3/4 toxicities are not uncommon, and our current understanding of tumor immunobiology is incomplete. While hundreds of immunomodulatory proteins in the tumor microenvironment shape the anti-tumor response, few of them can be reliably quantified. To address this need, we developed a multiplex panel of targeted proteomic assays targeting 52 peptides representing 46 proteins using peptide immunoaffinity enrichment coupled to multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry. We validated the assays in tissue and plasma matrices, where performance figures of merit showed over 3 orders of dynamic range and median inter-day CVs of 5.2% (tissue) and 21% (plasma). A feasibility study in clinical biospecimens showed detection of 48/52 peptides in frozen tissue and 38/52 peptides in plasma. The assays are publicly available as a resource for the research community., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Whiteaker, Lundeen, Zhao, Schoenherr, Burian, Huang, Voytovich, Wang, Kennedy, Ivey, Lin, Murillo, Lorentzen, Thiagarajan, Colantonio, Caceres, Roberts, Knotts, Reading, Kaczmarczyk, Richardson, Garcia-Buntley, Bocik, Hewitt, Murray, Do, Brophy, Wilz, Yu, Ajjarapu, Boja, Hiltke, Rodriguez and Paulovich.)

Despite a clinical, economic, and regulatory imperative to develop companion diagnostics, precious few new biomarkers have been successfully translated into clinical use, due in part to inadequate protein assay technologies to support large-scale testing of hundreds of candidate biomarkers in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Although the feasibility of using targeted, multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) for quantitative analyses of FFPE tissues has been demonstrated, protocols have not been systematically optimized for robust quantification across a large number of analytes, nor has the performance of peptide immuno-MRM been evaluated. To address this gap, we used a test battery approach coupled to MRM-MS with the addition of stable isotope-labeled standard peptides (targeting 512 analytes) to quantitatively evaluate the performance of three extraction protocols in combination with three trypsin digestion protocols (i.e., nine processes). A process based on RapiGest buffer extraction and urea-based digestion was identified to enable similar quantitation results from FFPE and frozen tissues. Using the optimized protocols for MRM-based analysis of FFPE tissues, median precision was 11.4% (across 249 analytes). There was excellent correlation between measurements made on matched FFPE and frozen tissues, both for direct MRM analysis (R(2) = 0.94) and immuno-MRM (R(2) = 0.89). The optimized process enables highly reproducible, multiplex, standardizable, quantitative MRM in archival tissue specimens.

Background: For many years, basic and clinical researchers have taken advantage of the analytical sensitivity and specificity afforded by mass spectrometry in the measurement of proteins. Clinical laboratories are now beginning to deploy these work flows as well. For assays that use proteolysis to generate peptides for protein quantification and characterization, synthetic stable isotope-labeled internal standard peptides are of central importance. No general recommendations are currently available surrounding the use of peptides in protein mass spectrometric assays., Content: The Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium of the National Cancer Institute has collaborated with clinical laboratorians, peptide manufacturers, metrologists, representatives of the pharmaceutical industry, and other professionals to develop a consensus set of recommendations for peptide procurement, characterization, storage, and handling, as well as approaches to the interpretation of the data generated by mass spectrometric protein assays. Additionally, the importance of carefully characterized reference materials-in particular, peptide standards for the improved concordance of amino acid analysis methods across the industry-is highlighted. The alignment of practices around the use of peptides and the transparency of sample preparation protocols should allow for the harmonization of peptide and protein quantification in research and clinical care., (© 2015 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.)

Introduction: Immunotherapy is an effective treatment for a subset of cancer patients, and expanding the benefits of immunotherapy to all cancer patients will require predictive biomarkers of response and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). To support correlative studies in immunotherapy clinical trials, we are developing highly validated assays for quantifying immunomodulatory proteins in human biospecimens. Methods: Here, we developed a panel of novel monoclonal antibodies and incorporated them into a novel, multiplexed, immuno-multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS)-based proteomic assay targeting 49 proteotypic peptides representing 43 immunomodulatory proteins. Results and discussion: The multiplex assay was validated in human tissue and plasma matrices, where the linearity of quantification was >3 orders of magnitude with median interday CVs of 8.7% (tissue) and 10.1% (plasma). Proof-of-principle demonstration of the assay was conducted in plasma samples collected in clinical trials from lymphoma patients receiving an immune checkpoint inhibitor. We provide the assays and novel monoclonal antibodies as a publicly available resource for the biomedical community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]