Search

Posttranscriptional modifications of RNA play an important role in promoting the maturation and functional diversity of many RNA species. Accordingly, understanding the enzymes and mechanisms that underlie RNA modifications is an important aspect in advancing our knowledge of the continually expanding RNA modification field. However, of the more than 160 currently identified RNA modifications, a large portion remains without quantitative detection assays for their biochemical characterization. Here, we describe the tritium release assay as a convenient tool allowing for the quantitative assessment of in vitro RNA pseudouridylation by stand-alone or box H/ACA RNA-guided pseudouridine synthases. This assay enables quantification of RNA pseudouridylation over a time course to effectively compare pseudouridylation activity between different substrates and/or different recombinant enzymes as well as to determine kinetic parameters. With the help of a quench-flow apparatus, the tritium release assay can be adapted for rapid kinetic measurements under single-turnover conditions to dissect reaction mechanisms. As examples, we show the formation of pseudouridines by a reconstituted Saccharomyces cerevisiae H/ACA small ribonucleoprotein (snoRNP) and an Escherichia coli stand-alone pseudouridine synthase.

tRNAs constitute the most highly modified class of RNA. Every tRNA contains a unique set of modifications, and Ψ55, m 5 U54, and m 7 G46 are frequently found within the elbow of the tRNA structure. Despite the abundance of tRNA modifications, we are only beginning to understand the orchestration of modification enzymes during tRNA maturation. Here, we investigated whether pre-existing modifications impact the binding affinity or catalysis by tRNA elbow modification enzymes. Specifically, we focused on the Escherichia coli enzymes TruB, TrmA, and TrmB which generate Ψ55, m 5 U54, and m 7 G46, respectively. tRNAs containing a single modification were prepared, and the binding and activity preferences of purified E. coli TrmA, TruB, and TrmB were examined in vitro. TruB preferentially binds and modifies unmodified tRNA. TrmA prefers to modify unmodified tRNA, but binds most tightly to tRNA that already contains Ψ55. In contrast, binding and modification by TrmB is insensitive to the tRNA modification status. Our results suggest that TrmA and TruB are likely to act on mostly unmodified tRNA precursors during the early stages of tRNA maturation whereas TrmB presumably acts on later tRNA intermediates that are already partially modified. In conclusion, we uncover the mechanistic basis for the preferred modification order in the E. coli tRNA elbow region., (© 2020 Schultz and Kothe; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the RNA Society.)

H/ACA small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins (snoRNPs) pseudouridylate RNA in eukaryotes and archaea. They target many RNAs site-specifically through base-pairing interactions between H/ACA guide and substrate RNA. Besides ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and small nuclear RNA (snRNA), H/ACA snoRNPs are thought to also modify messenger RNA (mRNA) with potential impacts on gene expression. However, the base pairing between known target RNAs and H/ACA guide RNAs varies widely in nature, and therefore the rules governing substrate RNA selection are still not fully understood. To provide quantitative insight into substrate RNA recognition, we systematically altered the sequence of a substrate RNA target by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae H/ACA guide RNA snR34. Time courses measuring pseudouridine formation revealed a gradual decrease in the initial velocity of pseudouridylation upon reducing the number of base pairs between substrate and guide RNA. Changing or inserting nucleotides close to the target uridine severely impairs pseudouridine formation. Interestingly, filter binding experiments show that all substrate RNA variants bind to H/ACA snoRNPs with nanomolar affinity. Next, we showed that binding of inactive, near-cognate RNAs to H/ACA snoRNPs does not inhibit their activity for cognate RNAs, presumably because near-cognate RNAs dissociate rapidly. We discuss that the modulation of initial velocities by the base-pairing strength might affect the order and efficiency of pseudouridylation in rRNA during ribosome biogenesis. Moreover, the binding of H/ACA snoRNPs to near-cognate RNAs may be a mechanism to search for cognate target sites. Together, our data provide critical information to aid in the prediction of productive H/ACA guide-substrate RNA pairs., (© 2019 Kelly et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the RNA Society.)

H/ACA ribonucleoproteins (H/ACA RNPs) are responsible for introducing many pseudouridines into RNAs, but are also involved in other cellular functions. Utilizing a purified and reconstituted yeast H/ACA RNP system that is active in pseudouridine formation under physiological conditions, we describe here the quantitative characterization of H/ACA RNP formation and function. This analysis reveals a surprisingly tight interaction of H/ACA guide RNA with the Cbf5p-Nop10p-Gar1p trimeric protein complex whereas Nhp2p binds comparably weakly to H/ACA guide RNA. Substrate RNA is bound to H/ACA RNPs with nanomolar affinity which correlates with the GC content in the guide-substrate RNA base pairing. Both Nhp2p and the conserved Box ACA element in guide RNA are required for efficient pseudouridine formation, but not for guide RNA or substrate RNA binding. These results suggest that Nhp2p and the Box ACA motif indirectly facilitate loading of the substrate RNA in the catalytic site of Cbf5p by correctly positioning the upper and lower parts of the H/ACA guide RNA on the H/ACA proteins. In summary, this study provides detailed insight into the molecular mechanism of H/ACA RNPs., (© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.)

Pseudouridine synthases introduce the most common RNA modification and likely use the same catalytic mechanism. Besides a catalytic aspartate residue, the contributions of other residues for catalysis of pseudouridine formation are poorly understood. Here, we have tested the role of a conserved basic residue in the active site for catalysis using the bacterial pseudouridine synthase TruB targeting U55 in tRNAs. Substitution of arginine 181 with lysine results in a 2500-fold reduction of TruB's catalytic rate without affecting tRNA binding. Furthermore, we analyzed the function of a second-shell aspartate residue (D90) that is conserved in all TruB enzymes and interacts with C56 of tRNA. Site-directed mutagenesis, biochemical and kinetic studies reveal that this residue is not critical for substrate binding but influences catalysis significantly as replacement of D90 with glutamate or asparagine reduces the catalytic rate 30- and 50-fold, respectively. In agreement with molecular dynamics simulations of TruB wild type and TruB D90N, we propose an electrostatic network composed of the catalytic aspartate (D48), R181 and D90 that is important for catalysis by fine-tuning the D48-R181 interaction. Conserved, negatively charged residues similar to D90 are found in a number of pseudouridine synthases, suggesting that this might be a general mechanism.

Almost all elongator tRNAs (Transfer RNAs) harbor 5-methyluridine 54 and pseudouridine 55 in the T arm, generated by the enzymes TrmA and TruB, respectively, in Escherichia coli. TrmA and TruB both act as tRNA chaperones, and strains lacking trmA or truB are outcompeted by wild type. Here, we investigate how TrmA and TruB contribute to cellular fitness. Deletion of trmA and truB in E. coli causes a global decrease in aminoacylation and alters other tRNA modifications such as acp³U47. While overall protein synthesis is not affected in ΔtrmA and ΔtruB strains, the translation of a subset of codons is significantly impaired. As a consequence, we observe translationally reduced expression of many specific proteins, that are either encoded with a high frequency of these codons or that are large proteins. The resulting proteome changes are not related to a specific growth phenotype, but overall cellular fitness is impaired upon deleting trmA and truB in accordance with a general protein synthesis impact. In conclusion, we demonstrate that universal modifications of the tRNA T arm are critical for global tRNA function by enhancing tRNA maturation, tRNA aminoacylation, and translation, thereby improving cellular fitness irrespective of the growth conditions which explains the conservation of trmA and truB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During ribosome synthesis, ribosomal RNA is modified through the formation of many pseudouridines and methylations which contribute to ribosome function across all domains of life. In archaea and eukaryotes, pseudouridylation of rRNA is catalyzed by H/ACA small ribonucleoproteins (sRNPs) utilizing different H/ACA guide RNAs to identify target uridines for modification. H/ACA sRNPs are conserved in archaea and eukaryotes, as they share a common general architecture and function, but there are also several notable differences between archaeal and eukaryotic H/ACA sRNPs. Due to the higher protein stability in archaea, we have more information on the structure of archaeal H/ACA sRNPs compared to eukaryotic counterparts. However, based on the long history of yeast genetic and other cellular studies, the biological role of H/ACA sRNPs during ribosome biogenesis is better understood in eukaryotes than archaea. Therefore, this review provides an overview of the current knowledge on H/ACA sRNPs from archaea, in particular their structure and function, and relates it to our understanding of the roles of eukaryotic H/ACA sRNP during eukaryotic ribosome synthesis and beyond. Based on this comparison of our current insights into archaeal and eukaryotic H/ACA sRNPs, we discuss what role archaeal H/ACA sRNPs may play in the formation of ribosomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For a long time, eukaryotic stand-alone pseudouridine synthases (Pus enzymes) were neglected as non-essential enzymes adding seemingly simple modifications to tRNAs and small nuclear RNAs. Most studies were limited to the identification and initial characterization of the yeast Pus enzymes. However, recent transcriptome-wide mapping of pseudouridines in yeast and humans revealed pervasive modification of mRNAs and other non-coding RNAs by Pus enzymes which is dynamically regulated in response to cellular stress. Moreover, mutations in at least 2 genes encoding human Pus enzymes cause inherited diseases affecting muscle and brain function. Together, the recent findings suggest a broader-than-anticipated role of the Pus enzymes which are emerging as potential regulators of gene expression. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on Pus enzymes, generate hypotheses regarding their cellular function and outline future areas of research of pseudouridine synthases. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The isomerization of uridine to pseudouridine is the most common type of RNA modification found in RNAs across all domains of life and is performed by RNA-dependent and RNA-independent enzymes. The Escherichia coli pseudouridine synthase RluE acts as a stand-alone, highly specific enzyme forming the universally conserved pseudouridine at position 2457, located in helix 89 (H89) of the 23S rRNA in the peptidyltransferase center. Here, we conduct a detailed structure–function analysis to determine the structural elements both in RluE and in 23S rRNA required for RNA–protein interaction and pseudouridine formation. We determined that RluE recognizes a large part of 23S rRNA comprising both H89 and the single-stranded flanking regions which explains the high substrate specificity of RluE. Within RluE, the target RNA is recognized through sequence-specific contacts with loop L7–8 as well as interactions with loop L1–2 and the flexible N-terminal region. We demonstrate that RluE is a faster pseudouridine synthase than other enzymes which likely enables it to act in the early stages of ribosome formation. In summary, our biochemical characterization of RluE provides detailed insight into the molecular mechanism of RluE forming a highly conserved pseudouridine during ribosome biogenesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]