Search

Background: Inverse psoriasis (IP) is a variant of plaque psoriasis involving flexor surfaces. A clear definition of IP is still lacking. Therapy is based on topical and systemic treatments, including classic systemic drugs and biologic agents, but a well-defined therapeutic strategy is absent., Materials and Methods: This retrospective study investigated the general characteristics of patients with IP or vulgar psoriasis and compared the effectiveness of anti-interleukin-17 or anti-interleukin-23 agents in the same groups. Second, treatment effectiveness and the demographic characteristics of IP patients treated with IL-23 and IL-17 inhibitors were also compared. IP patients were included if they had specific psoriatic involvement of the axillary, inguinal, or submammary lines, breast folds, antecubital and popliteal pits, intergluteal fold, and perianal area. Patients with vulgar plaque psoriasis and concomitant intertriginous involvement were included in the vulgar psoriasis cohort., Results: Patients with IP were prevalently female and treated with IL-17 inhibitors compared to those with vulgar psoriasis. They also had a greater risk of drug discontinuation and subsequent therapeutical switch (32.1% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.002). At later time points, those with IP showed progressively slower achievement of PASI100 and 90 compared to the cohort with vulgar psoriasis. In the IP cohort, there was greater joint involvement in patients treated with an anti-IL-17 agent (P = 0.011), who also had a lower median age of onset (P = 0.011) compared to patients treated with an anti-IL-23 agent. Patients with IP treated with an anti-IL-23 agent initiated with a lower mean PASI and showed a slower response than patients on an anti-IL-17 agent. At later time points, progressively greater effectiveness of IL-23 inhibitors was observed compared to IL-17 inhibitors., Conclusions: Patients with IP responded less to biologic agents than those with vulgar psoriasis. In the IP cohort, IL-17 inhibitors had a faster onset than IL-23 inhibitors, but long-term anti-IL-23 agents seem to be associated with better outcomes., (© 2024 the International Society of Dermatology.)

Background: Biologics targeting IL-23 and IL-17 show efficacy and safety in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis., Objective: To investigate drug survival in patients with psoriasis treated with biologics., Patients and Methods: We performed a comparative evaluation of the achievement of PASI 90 and PASI ≤ 3 at 16, 28, and 52 weeks along with a DS (drug survival) analysis with IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors brodalumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab, and guselkumab on 1,057 patients., Results: IL-17 inhibitors showed a faster achievement of PASI 90 and PASI ≤ 3 with significant superiority over IL-23 inhibitors at week 16 (p < 0.001; 56% vs. 42% and 70% vs. 59%, respectively). A difference was shown in favor of IL-23 inhibitors regarding DS (p < 0.001), which was 88% at 24 months vs. 75% for IL-17 inhibitors. In multivariate analysis, IL-23 inhibitors (HR 0.54 CI 0.37-0.78, p = 0.001), and male sex (HR 0.57 CI 0.42-0.76, p < 0.001) were all associated with a lower probability of drug interruption. Risankizumab (HR 0.42 CI 0.26-0.69, p = 0.001), guselkumab (HR 0.49 CI 0.24-0.99, p = 0.046), and male sex (HR 0.57 CI 0.43-0.77, p < 0.001) were associated with a lower probability of drug interruption than secukinumab., Conclusions: IL-23 inhibitors showed the best performance on DS. Overall, the most effective class was IL-17 inhibitors considering the short-term effectiveness, but long-term effectiveness is in favor of anti-IL-23., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft.)

Background: Many national guidelines at the European level recommend first-line therapy based on the anti-TNF-alpha adalimumab for treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, mainly for economic reasons. Consequently, patients being treated with newer IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors underwent previous unsuccessful first-line adalimumab-based therapy., Objectives: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors after treatment with adalimumab compared to adalimumab-naive psoriatic patients., Methods: We retrospectively analysed 1053 psoriatic patients treated with anti-IL17 and anti-IL23 agents, which included 68 and 24 adalimumab-experienced and 399 and 260 bio-naive patients. Efficacy was assessed with mean PASI, PASI90, PASI100, and <3., Results: Concerning the achieving of PASI100, PASI90 and PASI < 3 in patients treated with anti-IL17 agents, no significant differences were observed between adalimumab-experienced and bio-naive patients. In patients treated with an anti-IL-23 agent, a faster response was observed in bio-naive patients, with PASI < 3 significantly higher than ADA-experienced patients at 16 weeks (77% vs. 58% p = 0.048). In a sub-analysis that evaluated the performance of anti-IL17 and anti-IL23 agents in adalimumab-experienced patients with a history of secondary failure, no significant differences were found. In multivariate analysis of PASI100, only anti-IL-17 therapy appeared to have a negative impact at 52 weeks (OR: 0.54 p = 0.04) independently of previous treatment. For PASI90, type of treatment and bio-naïve status did not seem to have an impact at any time point., Conclusions: Anti-IL 23 and anti-IL 17 agents are not significantly different in terms of efficacy in bio-naive patients or as second-line therapy after failure with a biosimilar or originator adalimumab., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Available evidence to guide clinicians in the management of psoriasis patients with a history of malignancies is scarce. The latest generation of biological drugs is traditionally considered to be safe in patients with previous malignancy, although only case reports and short case series on the use of biological drugs in this population are available in the literature. In this paper, we present the experience of our clinic on 37 psoriatic patients with a previous diagnosis of neoplasia treated subsequently with biological drugs. Subsequently, a systematic review of the literature was performed and 38 cases were found. The main biologic used in our patients and the patients described in the literature was secukinumab. In both populations treatment with biologics was safe, disease progressions reported were not related to treatment. Based on our experience, which is the largest currently available, and the cases reported in the literature the treatment of psoriasis in patients with previously diagnosed cancer with biologics against TNFalpha, IL17, IL23, and IL12 would appear to be safe. The first experience on the use of Risankizumab and brodalumab on this special population is also reported in our series.

Background: Real-life studies in psoriasis are lacking. Many monoclonal antibodies targeting tumor-necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin 17, and 23 are approved drugs for psoriasis treatment., Objectives: To compare the short and long-term efficacy, safety, and drug survival of anti TNF-alpha, anti-IL-17, and anti-IL-23 in a large case series., Methods: Psoriasis area severity index (PASI) and retention rates for adalimumab, secukinumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab were analised., Results: A total of 263 patients were randomly selected among the five drugs register of the patients attending the Psoriasis Unit at the Turin University Hospital. The mean PASI at baseline was 14.3. Ixekizumab showed a significantly higher efficacy profile compared to other drugs in terms of PASI90 and PASI100 at week 12, 24, and week 48 even when adjusted for other confounding factors. This superiority was not followed by an expected higher drug survival. On the contrary, secukinumab was the only drug that showed a higher drug survival among bio-naïve patients.