Search

Objective To evaluate tender joints (TJ) and swollen joints (SJ) for the assessment of ultrasound (US) defined inflammation in PsA. Methods Eighty-three PsA patients underwent clinical and US examinations at two scheduled study visits 12 months apart. Tenderness and swelling were assessed at 68 and 66 joints, respectively, and US examinations were conducted at all 68 joints. At patient level, associations with clinical composites and US scores were performed using correlations and by analysing patients with predominantly tender (pTender) or swollen joints (pSwollen). At joint level, a Power Doppler (PD) value ≥ 1 was defined as active synovitis. A generalized linear mixed model was created to assess the predictive value of TJ and SJ for active synovitis after 12 months. Results SJC showed better correlations with GS/PD scores (r  = 0.37/0.47) than with TJC (PD: r  = 0.33), while TJC correlated better with patient reported outcomes (PROMs) like patient global assessment (TJC: r  = 0.57; SJC r  = 0.39). Patients with pTender showed poorer results for PROMs and disease activity scores than patients with pSwollen, but not for laboratory or US markers of inflammation. Swollen joints showed active synovitis in 35% of cases, while only 16% of tender joints were active according to US. Swelling at baseline better predicted active synovitis at the same joint after 12 months [odds ratio (OR) 6.33, P  <0.001] as compared with tenderness (OR 3.58, P  <0.001). Conclusions SJ are more closely linked with US signs of inflammation as compared with TJ in PsA. Joint swelling is a better predictor for signs of US inflammation than tenderness after one year of follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The aim of this prospective study was to examine whether ultrasound or clinical abnormalities at enthesal sites predict radiographic progression at entheses in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods Consecutive PsA patients were included and subjected to clinical and ultrasound assessments at 14 entheses at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Radiographs were performed at 0 and 12 months. By US, we investigated structural (erosions, osteophytes) and inflammatory changes [grey scale (0–32) and power Doppler (0–14, range global ultrasound score 0–140)], and radiographs were evaluated for enthesophytes and erosions (score range 0–56). Multivariate regression models were conducted to identify the possible association of clinical and ultrasound findings with radiographic progression. Results We examined 83 patients at baseline, of whom 43 (51.8%) had complete clinical, ultrasound and X-ray data. Twenty-four of 43 patients (55.8%) developed radiographic progression of entheses. These patients were younger (49.6 vs 59.3, P  =0.005), had shorter disease duration (9.7 vs 17.9 years, P =0.015) and lower clinical disease activity at 6-months [disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA) 6.7 vs 17.0, P =0.018] as compared with patients without progression. Non-progressors had higher ultrasound enthesophyte scores at baseline than progressors (20 vs 15, P <0.05). The multivariate regression analysis revealed that 48.6% of the variance of the X-ray score at 12-months follow-up (RegcoeffB = 0.827, P =0.000) could be explained by the baseline US enthesophyte score. Conclusion Our data indicate that radiographic progression at entheses is linked with age, disease duration and ultrasound verified enthesophytes at baseline. No other ultrasound parameter predicted radiographic progression at entheses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To evaluate low disease activity (LDA) cut-offs in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) using ultrasound. Methods Eighty-three PsA patients underwent clinical and ultrasound examinations at two visits. LDA was assessed using the Disease Activity index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA ⩽ 14), the Psoriatic ArthritiS Disease Activity Score (PASDAS ⩽ 3.2), the Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index ⩽ 4, the DAS28-CRP ⩽ 2.8 and the minimal disease activity criteria. Ultrasound was performed at 68 joints and 14 entheses. Minimal ultrasound disease activity (MUDA-j/e) was defined as a Power Doppler score ⩽ 1, respectively at joints, paratendinous tissue, tendons and entheses. A global ultrasound score was calculated by summing Grey Scale and Power Doppler information (GUIS-j/e). Results LDA was present in 33.7–65.0% at baseline and in 44.3–80.6% at follow-up, depending on the criteria used. MUDA-j/e was observed in 16.9% at baseline and in 30% at follow-up. GUIS-j/e was significantly higher in patients with moderate/high disease activity vs LDA according to DAPSA and PASDAS at baseline and DAPSA, PASDAS, Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index and minimal disease activity at follow-up. Patients in moderate/high disease activity had MUDA-j/e in 8.1–21.4% at baseline and in 8.3–20.0% at follow-up, depending on the applied clinical composite. MUDA-j/e patients with moderate/high disease activity had higher levels of pain and pain-related items than those with LDA. Conclusion The LDA cut-offs of DAPSA, PASDAS, Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index, minimal disease activity, but not DAS28-CRP are capable of distinguishing between high and low ultrasound activity. Pain and pain-related items are the main reason why PsA patients without signs of ultrasound inflammation are classified with higher disease activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To study the association of clinical and/or ultrasound variables with patients’ (PGA) and physicians’ (EGA) global assessment of disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The correlation of these parameters with the discordance between PGA and EGA, as well as with PGA/EGA changes over 6 months was also investigated. Methods Prospective study of 83 consecutive PsA patients with 2 visits scheduled 6 months apart. All patients underwent the following assessments: tender (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC), PASI, dactylitis and Leeds enthesitis index. PGA, patients’ level of pain (pain VAS), EGA, and HAQ were also recorded. Grey scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) ultrasound were performed at 68 joints (evaluating synovia and tendons) and 14 entheses. Regression analyses were performed to assess the association of these variables with PGA and EGA. Two new variables “PGA minus EGA” and “PGAchange − EGAchange” were developed to explore the discrepancy between PGA and EGA and the consistency of PGA/EGA changes over time, respectively. Results The parameters explaining most of PGA and EGA variability were pain VAS (30.5%) and SJC (48.5%), respectively. The correlation between EGA and joint counts was stronger in patients with high vs. low levels of ultrasound verified inflammation. PGA minus EGA was mainly explained by pain and SJC. Pain was the most important predictor of PGA change whereas TJC and HAQ were more closely associated with EGA changes. “PGAchange-EGAchange” was linked to pain and SJC. Ultrasound scores were not linked with either of these variables. Conclusions Pain VAS and joint counts are the most important clinical parameters explaining patients’ and physicians’ perception of disease activity, whereas the correlation of active inflammation as verified by sonography with these factors is limited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]