7 results on '"Schulz-Kindermann, Frank"'
Search Results
2. Sinnbasierte Interventionen bei fortgeschritten erkrankten Patienten
- Author
-
Schulz-Kindermann, Frank and Vehling, Sigrun
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Psychooncological care for patients with cancer during 12 months of the Covid‐19 pandemic: Views and experiences of senior psychooncologists at German Comprehensive Cancer Centers.
- Author
-
Dinkel, Andreas, Goerling, Ute, Hönig, Klaus, Karger, André, Maatouk, Imad, Petermann‐Meyer, Andrea, Senf, Bianca, Woellert, Katharina, Wünsch, Alexander, Zimmermann, Tanja, and Schulz‐Kindermann, Frank
- Subjects
COVID-19 pandemic ,CANCER patient care ,SARS-CoV-2 ,PSYCHOLOGICAL adaptation ,PANDEMICS - Abstract
Key points: A monthly videoconference was maintained over 1 year, allowing senior psychooncologists from German Comprehensive Cancer Centers to discuss the implications of the Covid‐19 pandemic for psychooncological care.In the early phase of the pandemic, a widespread disruption of psychooncological services was noted.Rapidly developed adaptations of regular services worked well and sometimes brought about unexpected, creative solutions.In March 2021, the high numbers of infections, the occurrence of new variants of the coronavirus, and the slow progress in vaccination raise fears about new disruptions and restrictions in service provision.In coping with the pandemic, many therapists have felt like many cancer patients do feel in the process of coping with cancer, and this might help to better understand our patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Testing the Treatment Integrity of the Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully Psychotherapeutic Intervention for Patients With Advanced Cancer.
- Author
-
Koranyi, Susan, Philipp, Rebecca, Quintero Garzón, Leonhard, Scheffold, Katharina, Schulz-Kindermann, Frank, Härter, Martin, Rodin, Gary, and Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Anja
- Subjects
PSYCHO-oncology ,GOAL (Psychology) ,MEDICAL personnel ,LIKERT scale ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,MEDICAL communication - Abstract
Introduction: The Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) therapy for patients with advanced cancer was tested against a supportive psycho-oncological counseling intervention (SPI) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We investigated whether CALM was delivered as intended (therapists' adherence); whether CALM therapists with less experience in psycho-oncological care show higher adherence scores; and whether potential overlapping treatment elements between CALM and SPI can be identified (treatment differentiation). Methods: Two trained and blinded raters assessed on 19 items four subscales of the Treatment Integrity Scale covering treatment domains of CALM (SC: Symptom Management and Communication with Health Care Providers; CSR: Changes in Self and Relationship with Others; SMP: Spiritual Well-being and Sense of Meaning and Purpose; FHM: Preparing for the Future, Sustaining Hope and Facing Mortality). A random sample of 150 audio recordings (75 CALM, 75 SPI) were rated on a three-point Likert scale with 1 = "adherent to some extent," 2 = "adherent to a sufficient extent," 3 = "very adherent." Results: All 19 treatment elements were applied, but in various frequencies. CALM therapists most frequently explored symptoms and/or relationship to health care providers (SC_1: n_
applied = 62; 83%) and allowed expression of sadness and anxiety about the progression of disease (FHM_2: n_applied = 62; 83%). The exploration of CALM treatment element SC_1 was most frequently implemented in a satisfactory or excellent manner (n_sufficient or very adherent = 34; 45%), whereas the treatment element SMP_4: Therapist promotes acknowledgment that some life goals may no longer be achievable (n_sufficient or very adherent = 0; 0%) was not implemented in a satisfactory manner. In terms of treatment differentiation, no treatment elements could be identified which were applied significantly more often by CALM therapists than by SPI therapists. Conclusion: Results verify the application of CALM treatment domains. However, CALM therapists' adherence scores indicated manual deviations. Furthermore, raters were not able to significantly distinguish CALM from SPI, implying that overlapping treatment elements were delivered to patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Efficacy of the Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) individual psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer: A single‐blind randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Mehnert, Anja, Koranyi, Susan, Philipp, Rebecca, Scheffold, Katharina, Kriston, Levente, Lehmann‐Laue, Antje, Engelmann, Dorit, Vehling, Sigrun, Eisenecker, Christina, Oechsle, Karin, Schulz‐Kindermann, Frank, Rodin, Gary, and Härter, Martin
- Subjects
PSYCHOTHERAPY patients ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,MENTAL depression ,PSYCHO-oncology ,GROUP psychotherapy ,CANCER patients ,BIBLIOTHERAPY - Abstract
Objective: We aimed to determine whether the Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) therapy is superior to a non‐manualized supportive psycho‐oncological counselling intervention (SPI). Methods: Adult patients with advanced cancer and ≥9 points on the PHQ‐9 and/or ≥5 points on the DT were randomized to CALM or SPI. We hypothesized that CALM patients would report significantly less depression (primary outcome) on the BDI‐II and the PHQ‐9 6 months after baseline compared to SPI patients. Results: From 329 eligible patients, 206 participated (61.2% female; age: M = 57.9 [SD = 11.7]; 84.5% UICC IV stage). Of them, 99 were assigned to CALM and 107 to SPI. Intention‐to‐treat analyses revealed significantly less depressive symptoms at 6 months than at baseline (P <.001 for BDI‐II and PHQ‐9), but participants in the CALM and SPI group did not differ in depression severity (BDI‐II: P =.62, PHQ‐9: P =.998). Group differences on secondary outcomes were statistically not significant either. Conclusions: CALM therapy was associated with reduction in depressive symptoms over time but this improvement was not statistically significant different than that obtained within SPI group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Parental cancer: Characteristics of users of child-centred counselling versus individual psycho-oncological treatment.
- Author
-
Inhestern, Laura, Geertz, Wiebke, Schulz‐Kindermann, Frank, Bergelt, Corinna, and Schulz-Kindermann, Frank
- Subjects
HEALTH counseling ,PSYCHO-oncology ,ONCOLOGY ,CHILDHOOD cancer ,INTELLECTUAL disabilities ,DISABILITIES - Abstract
Objective: The aims of this study were to investigate the characteristics of users of a specific child-centred counselling service (COSIP) and to compare those to parents using an individual psycho-oncological treatment (PO).Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis on data of users of COSIP and users of PO. Database was the routine assessment (demographic and disease-related characteristics, GAD-7, PHQ-9, EORTC QLQ-C30, and current concerns) of an outpatient psycho-oncological clinic with additional child-centred counselling. A total of 151 patients and 49 partners with children ≤21 years were included. We conducted descriptive analyses and group comparisons.Results: Fifty-nine patients and partners used COSIP only or additionally to individual psycho-oncological service. PO users were more depressed and were more anxious than COSIP users. Patients using PO reported worse emotional functioning than patients using COSIP. Partners using PO reported worse global quality of life and more symptoms of fatigue than partners using COSIP. With regard to current concerns, patients using COSIP reported child-related issues more frequently than PO users. PO users reported symptoms of anxiety, depressive symptoms, or exhaustion more frequently than COSIP users.Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that patients and partners self-referring to PO or COSIP are highly burdened. COSIP users experience different psychosocial burden than PO users. As poor mental state of parents is a risk factor for the development of mental problems in children, parents using only PO may benefit from additional child-centred support. Accordingly, the need for COSIP should be assessed continuously during PO of patients with children ≤21 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Efficacy of a brief manualized intervention Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) adapted to German cancer care settings: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Scheffold, Katharina, Philipp, Rebecca, Engelmann, Dorit, Schulz-Kindermann, Frank, Rosenberger, Christina, Oechsle, Karin, Härter, Martin, Wegscheider, Karl, Lordick, Florian, Lo, Chris, Hales, Sarah, Rodin, Gary, and Mehnert, Anja
- Subjects
CANCER patients ,GERMANS ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,RESEARCH protocols ,PSYCHO-oncology ,PSYCHOTHERAPY ,DISEASES - Abstract
Background: Although psycho-oncological interventions have been shown to significantly reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression and enhance quality of life, a substantial number of patients with advanced cancer do not receive psycho-oncological interventions tailored to their individual situation. Given the lack of reliable data on the efficacy of psycho-oncological interventions in palliative care settings, we aim to examine the efficacy of a brief, manualized individual psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer: Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM). CALM aims to reduce depression and death anxiety, to strengthen communication with health care providers, and to enhance hope and meaning in life. We adapted the intervention for German cancer care settings. Methods/Design: We use a single-blinded randomized-controlled trial design with two treatment conditions: intervention group (IG, CALM) and control group (CG). Patients in the CG receive a usual non-manualized supportive psycho-oncological intervention (SPI). Patients are randomized between the IG and CG and assessed at baseline (t
0 ), after three (t1 ) and after 6 months (t2 ). We include patients with a malignant solid tumor who have tumor stages of III or IV (UICC classification). Patients who are included in the study are at least 18 years old, speak German fluently, score greater than or equal to nine on the PHQ-9 or/and greater than or equal to five on the Distress Thermometer. It is further necessary that there is no evidence of severe cognitive impairments. We measure depression, anxiety, distress, quality of life, demoralization, symptom distress, fatigue as well as spiritual well-being, posttraumatic growth and close relationship experiences using validated questionnaires. We hypothesize that patients in the IG will show a significantly lower level of depression 6 months after baseline compared to patients in the CG. We further hypothesize a significant reduction in anxiety and fatigue as well as significant improvements in psychological and spiritual well-being, meaning and post-traumatic growth in the IG compared to CG 6 months after baseline. Discussion: Our study will contribute important statistical evidence on whether CALM can reduce depression and existential distress in a German sample of advanced and highly distressed cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.