Search

Your search keyword '"Bernstein, Michael A."' showing total 28 results
Start Over Author "Bernstein, Michael A." Topic psychology
28 results on '"Bernstein, Michael A."'

1. A Video Introduction to Psychology: Enhancing Research Interest and Participation

Author

Sacco, Donald F. and Bernstein, Michael J.

Abstract

To assess the extent to which a video about psychological research would heighten introductory psychology students' interest and participation in research studies, we created a video about ongoing research at our university, the value of research participation, and course requirements for the research experience. Instructors in 4 courses (N = 471 students) verbally explained the research requirement and distributed a document detailing alternatives for completing it. In 2 of these courses, students also saw the video. Results indicated that students who viewed the video reported greater interest in research and completed more research participation hours than did students who did not view the video. We discuss the potential advantages of standardized, noncoercive procedures to encourage student participation in research. (Contains 4 footnotes and 1 table.)

Published
2010
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability

Author

Ebersole, Charles R, Mathur, Maya B, Baranski, Erica, Bart-Plange, Diane-Jo, Buttrick, Nicholas R, Chartier, Christopher R, Corker, Katherine S, Corley, Martin, Hartshorne, Joshua K, IJzerman, Hans, Lazarević, Ljiljana B, Rabagliati, Hugh, Ropovik, Ivan, Aczel, Balazs, Aeschbach, Lena F, Andrighetto, Luca, Arnal, Jack D, Arrow, Holly, Babincak, Peter, Bakos, Bence E, Baník, Gabriel, Baskin, Ernest, Belopavlović, Radomir, Bernstein, Michael H, Białek, Michał, Bloxsom, Nicholas G, Bodroža, Bojana, Bonfiglio, Diane BV, Boucher, Leanne, Brühlmann, Florian, Brumbaugh, Claudia C, Casini, Erica, Chen, Yiling, Chiorri, Carlo, Chopik, William J, Christ, Oliver, Ciunci, Antonia M, Claypool, Heather M, Coary, Sean, Čolić, Marija V, Collins, W Matthew, Curran, Paul G, Day, Chris R, Dering, Benjamin, Dreber, Anna, Edlund, John E, Falcão, Filipe, Fedor, Anna, Feinberg, Lily, Ferguson, Ian R, Ford, Máire, Frank, Michael C, Fryberger, Emily, Garinther, Alexander, Gawryluk, Katarzyna, Ashbaugh, Kayla, Giacomantonio, Mauro, Giessner, Steffen R, Grahe, Jon E, Guadagno, Rosanna E, Hałasa, Ewa, Hancock, Peter JB, Hilliard, Rias A, Hüffmeier, Joachim, Hughes, Sean, Idzikowska, Katarzyna, Inzlicht, Michael, Jern, Alan, Jiménez-Leal, William, Johannesson, Magnus, Joy-Gaba, Jennifer A, Kauff, Mathias, Kellier, Danielle J, Kessinger, Grecia, Kidwell, Mallory C, Kimbrough, Amanda M, King, Josiah PJ, Kolb, Vanessa S, Kołodziej, Sabina, Kovacs, Marton, Krasuska, Karolina, Kraus, Sue, Krueger, Lacy E, Kuchno, Katarzyna, Lage, Caio Ambrosio, Langford, Eleanor V, Levitan, Carmel A, de Lima, Tiago Jessé Souza, Lin, Hause, Lins, Samuel, Loy, Jia E, Manfredi, Dylan, Markiewicz, Łukasz, Menon, Madhavi, Mercier, Brett, Metzger, Mitchell, Meyet, Venus, Millen, Ailsa E, Miller, Jeremy K, and Montealegre, Andres

Subjects
Psychology, Cognitive and Computational Psychology, Applied and Developmental Psychology, Behavioral and Social Science, replication, reproducibility, metascience, peer review, Registered Reports, open data, preregistered, Applied and developmental psychology, Cognitive and computational psychology
Abstract

Replication studies in psychological science sometimes fail to reproduce prior findings. If these studies use methods that are unfaithful to the original study or ineffective in eliciting the phenomenon of interest, then a failure to replicate may be a failure of the protocol rather than a challenge to the original finding. Formal pre-data-collection peer review by experts may address shortcomings and increase replicability rates. We selected 10 replication studies from the Reproducibility Project: Psychology (RP:P; Open Science Collaboration, 2015) for which the original authors had expressed concerns about the replication designs before data collection; only one of these studies had yielded a statistically significant effect (p

Published
2020

4. A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol or Other Drug Use Disorders: Treatment Efficacy by Contrast Condition

Author

Magill, Molly, Ray, Lara, Kiluk, Brian, Hoadley, Ariel, Bernstein, Michael, Tonigan, J Scott, and Carroll, Kathleen

Subjects
Clinical and Health Psychology, Psychology, Rehabilitation, Substance Misuse, Mind and Body, Alcoholism, Alcohol Use and Health, Clinical Research, Brain Disorders, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions, 6.6 Psychological and behavioural, Mental health, Good Health and Well Being, Alcoholism, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Humans, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Substance-Related Disorders, alcohol treatment, cognitive behavioral, drug treatment, meta-analysis, relapse prevention, Clinical Psychology, Applied and developmental psychology, Clinical and health psychology, Social and personality psychology
Abstract

ObjectiveThis meta-analysis examined 30 randomized controlled trials (32 study sites; 35 study arms) that tested the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for alcohol or other drug use disorders. The study aim was to provide estimates of efficacy against three levels of experimental contrast (i.e., minimal [k = 5]; nonspecific therapy [k = 11]; specific therapy [k = 19]) for consumption frequency and quantity outcomes at early (1 to 6 months [kes = 41]) and late (8+ months [kes = 26]) follow-up time points. When pooled effect sizes were statistically heterogeneous, study-level moderators were examined.MethodThe inverse-variance weighted effect size was calculated for each study and pooled under random effects assumptions. Sensitivity analyses included tests of heterogeneity, study influence, and publication bias.ResultsCBT in contrast to minimal treatment showed a moderate and significant effect size that was consistent across outcome type and follow-up. When CBT was contrasted with a nonspecific therapy or treatment as usual, treatment effect was statistically significant for consumption frequency and quantity at early, but not late, follow-up. CBT effects in contrast to a specific therapy were consistently nonsignificant across outcomes and follow-up time points. Of 10 pooled effect sizes examined, two showed moderate heterogeneity, but multivariate analyses revealed few systematic predictors of between-study variance.ConclusionsThe current meta-analysis shows that CBT is more effective than a no treatment, minimal treatment, or nonspecific control. Consistent with findings on other evidence-based therapies, CBT did not show superior efficacy in contrast to another specific modality. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Published
2019

5. Technology‐Delivered Cognitive‐Behavioral Interventions for Alcohol Use: A Meta‐Analysis

Author

Kiluk, Brian D, Ray, Lara A, Walthers, Justin, Bernstein, Michael, Tonigan, Jeffery S, and Magill, Molly

Subjects
Clinical and Health Psychology, Psychology, Clinical Research, Mind and Body, Alcoholism, Alcohol Use and Health, Substance Misuse, Comparative Effectiveness Research, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Rehabilitation, Behavioral and Social Science, Brain Disorders, Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions, 6.6 Psychological and behavioural, Cancer, Mental health, Good Health and Well Being, Alcoholism, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Humans, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Alcohol Treatment, Cognitive-Behavioral, Computer-Based Treatment, Technology-Based Treatment, Meta-Analysis, Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences, Substance Abuse, Clinical sciences, Biological psychology, Clinical and health psychology
Abstract

BackgroundCognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has long-standing evidence for efficacy in the treatment of alcohol use, yet implementation in clinical practice has been challenging. Delivery of CBT through technology-based platforms, such as web-based programs and mobile applications, has the potential to provide widespread access to this evidence-based intervention. While there have been reviews indicating the efficacy of technology-based delivery of CBT for various psychiatric conditions, none have focused on efficacy for alcohol use. The current meta-analysis was conducted to fill this research gap.MethodsDescriptive data were used to characterize the nature of the literature on technology-delivered, CBT-based interventions for alcohol use ("CBT Tech"). Inverse-variance-weighted effect sizes were calculated, and random effects, effect sizes were pooled in 4 subgroups.ResultsFifteen published trials conducted primarily with at-risk or heavy drinkers were identified. Of these studies, 60% explicitly targeted alcohol use moderation. The content of CBT Tech programs varied, ranging from 4 to 62 sessions/exercises, with many programs combining elements of motivational interviewing (47%). With respect to efficacy, CBT Tech as a stand-alone treatment in contrast to a minimal treatment control showed a positive and statistically significant, albeit small effect (g = 0.20: 95% CI = 0.22, 0.38, kes  = 5). When CBT Tech was compared to treatment as usual (TAU), effects were nonsignificant. However, when CBT Tech was tested as an addition to TAU, in contrast to TAU only, the effect size was positive, significant (g = 0.30: 95% CI = 0.10, 0.50, kes  = 7), and stable over 12-month follow-up. Only 2 studies compared CBT Tech to in-person CBT, and this pooled effect size did not suggest superior efficacy.ConclusionsThese results show a benefit for technology-delivered, CBT-based interventions as a stand-alone therapy for heavy drinking or as an addition to usual care in specialty substance use settings.

Published
2019

6. Do what you say and say what you are going to do: A preliminary meta-analysis of client change and sustain talk subtypes in motivational interviewing

Author

Magill, Molly, Bernstein, Michael H, Hoadley, Ariel, Borsari, Brian, Apodaca, Timothy R, Gaume, Jacques, and Tonigan, J Scott

Subjects
Clinical and Health Psychology, Psychology, Behavioral and Social Science, Behavior, Addictive, Humans, Motivational Interviewing, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, motivational interviewing, change talk, sustain talk, technical hypothesis, meta-analysis, entrevista motivacional, hipótese técnica, meta-análise, mudança de conversa, sustentação de conversa, 動機式晤談, 後設分析, 技術性的假設, 有所改變的談話, 維持的談話, Clinical Sciences, Social Work, Clinical Psychology, Social work, Applied and developmental psychology, Clinical and health psychology
Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis examines the predictive validity of client change language subtypes in motivational interviewing (MI) sessions addressing addictive behavior change. Method: A systematic review identified k = 13 primary studies, contributing 16 MI conditions (N = 1556). The pooled correlation coefficient was used to assess the significance, direction, and strength of seven language subtypes (i.e., reason, desire, need, ability, commitment, taking steps, and other) by three valences (i.e., frequency positive or change talk, frequency negative or sustain talk, and proportion change talk) and their relationship to subsequent engagement in addictive behavior. Results: For frequency measures, more sustain talk related to reason, desire, ability, and other were associated with more addictive behavior at follow up. Other change talk was associated with MI outcomes but in an unexpected direction (i.e., more addictive behavior). Proportion measures showed more proportion change talk-reason and -other statements were associated with less addictive behavior at follow up. Sensitivity analyses indicated some heterogeneity and instability of effect sizes, but no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions: This preliminary meta-analysis suggests that aggregate measures of change and sustain talk are comprised of statement subtypes that are not equally meaningful in predicting outcome following MI for addictive behavior change.

Published
2019

7. Social interactions in daily life

Author

Bernstein, Michael J, Zawadzki, Matthew J, Juth, Vanessa, Benfield, Jacob A, and Smyth, Joshua M

Subjects
Mental Health, Depression, Mind and Body, Behavioral and Social Science, Neurosciences, Basic Behavioral and Social Science, Clinical Research, Pain Research, 2.3 Psychological, social and economic factors, Aetiology, Generic health relevance, Good Health and Well Being, Daily health, ecological momentary assessment, social interactions, Psychology, Social Psychology
Abstract

It is well established that individuals who engage in more positive social interactions report a broad array of benefit relative to those with fewer positive social interactions. Yet less is known about how, within individuals, naturally occurring social interactions in daily life relate to momentary indicators of health (e.g., mood, psychological, and physiological stress). The current study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine these within-person relationships, as well as complementary between-person relationships, among 115 adults (75% female; Mage = 41.21). Participants completed six EMA surveys per day for 3 days to report on whether they experienced any social interactions and whether the interactions were pleasant as well as on their mood, pain, tiredness, interest, and perceived stress; they also provided a salivary cortisol sample after each EMA survey. Multilevel modeling analyses showed that individuals felt more happiness and interest, and less sadness, tiredness, and pain, during moments when they were engaged in a social interaction versus when they were not. Individuals also reported less stress during more pleasant versus less pleasant social interactions. When examining between-person effects, we found evidence that people who gave more pleasant interactions generally reported more positive outcomes. This study presents evidence for intraindividual links between social interactions and momentary health indicators in daily life.

Published
2018

8. Observe, hypothesize, test, repeat: Luttrell, Petty and Xu (2017) demonstrate good science

Author

Ebersole, Charles R, Alaei, Ravin, Atherton, Olivia E, Bernstein, Michael J, Brown, Mitch, Chartier, Christopher R, Chung, Lisa Y, Hermann, Anthony D, Joy-Gaba, Jennifer A, Line, Marsha J, Rule, Nicholas O, Sacco, Donald F, Vaughn, Leigh Ann, and Nosek, Brian A

Subjects
Psychology, Applied and Developmental Psychology, Cognitive Sciences, Social Psychology, Social and personality psychology
Published
2017

9. Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication

Author

Ebersole, Charles R, Atherton, Olivia E, Belanger, Aimee L, Skulborstad, Hayley M, Allen, Jill M, Banks, Jonathan B, Baranski, Erica, Bernstein, Michael J, Bonfiglio, Diane BV, Boucher, Leanne, Brown, Elizabeth R, Budiman, Nancy I, Cairo, Athena H, Capaldi, Colin A, Chartier, Christopher R, Chung, Joanne M, Cicero, David C, Coleman, Jennifer A, Conway, John G, Davis, William E, Devos, Thierry, Fletcher, Melody M, German, Komi, Grahe, Jon E, Hermann, Anthony D, Hicks, Joshua A, Honeycutt, Nathan, Humphrey, Brandon, Janus, Matthew, Johnson, David J, Joy-Gaba, Jennifer A, Juzeler, Hannah, Keres, Ashley, Kinney, Diana, Kirshenbaum, Jacqeline, Klein, Richard A, Lucas, Richard E, Lustgraaf, Christopher JN, Martin, Daniel, Menon, Madhavi, Metzger, Mitchell, Moloney, Jaclyn M, Morse, Patrick J, Prislin, Radmila, Razza, Timothy, Re, Daniel E, Rule, Nicholas O, Sacco, Donald F, Sauerberger, Kyle, Shrider, Emily, Shultz, Megan, Siemsen, Courtney, Sobocko, Karin, Sternglanz, R Weylin, Summerville, Amy, Tskhay, Konstantin O, van Allen, Zack, Vaughn, Leigh Ann, Walker, Ryan J, Weinberg, Ashley, Wilson, John Paul, Wirth, James H, Wortman, Jessica, and Nosek, Brian A

Subjects
Biological Psychology, Psychology, Clinical Research, Behavioral and Social Science, Social psychology, Cognitive psychology, Replication, Participant pool, Individual differences, Sampling effects, Situational effects, Cognitive Sciences, Social Psychology, Social and personality psychology
Abstract

The university participant pool is a key resource for behavioral research, and data quality is believed to vary over the course of the academic semester. This crowdsourced project examined time of semester variation in 10 known effects, 10 individual differences, and 3 data quality indicators over the course of the academic semester in 20 participant pools (N = 2696) and with an online sample (N = 737). Weak time of semester effects were observed on data quality indicators, participant sex, and a few individual differences—conscientiousness, mood, and stress. However, there was little evidence for time of semester qualifying experimental or correlational effects. The generality of this evidence is unknown because only a subset of the tested effects demonstrated evidence for the original result in the whole sample. Mean characteristics of pool samples change slightly during the semester, but these data suggest that those changes are mostly irrelevant for detecting effects.

Published
2016

10. Behavioral Science Needs to Return to the Basics.

Author

BLESKE-RECHEK, APRIL, BERNSTEIN, MICHAEL H., and DEANER, ROBERT O.

Subjects
*PSYCHOLOGY, *DIVERSITY & inclusion policies, *SCIENCE, *DATA, *EXPERIENCE
Abstract

The article focuses on the need for behavioral science, particularly psychology, to return to basic scientific principles, especially in the context of issues related to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). It critiques the current state of behavioral science, highlighting failures to adhere to fundamental scientific principles such as prioritizing objective data over lived experience, ensuring quality measurement, and distinguishing appropriately between correlation and causation.

Published
2024

11. Investigating variation in replicability: A 'Many Labs' Replication Project

Author

Klein, Richard, Ratliff, Kate, Nosek, Brian, Vianello, Michelangelo, Pilati, Ronaldo, Cemalcilar, Zeynep, Chandler, Jesse, Devos, Thierry, Galliani, Elisa, Brandt, Mark, van 't Veer, Anna, Levitan, Carmel, Kurtz, Jaime, Joy-Gaba, Jennifer, Ehrlinger, Joyce, Bernstein, Michael, Morris, Wendy, Vaughn, Leigh Ann, Wichman, Aaron, Rutchick, Abraham, Kappes, Heather, Brumbaugh, Claudia, Nelson, Anthony, Eisner, Matthew, Smith, Robert, Woodzicka, Julie, Bocian, Konrad, Frankowska, Natalia, Schmidt, Kathleen, Skorinko, Jeanine, Storbeck, Justin, Thompson, Donna, Packard, Grant, van Swol, Lyn, Nier, Jason, Cheong, Winnee, Davis, William, Mallett, Robyn, Huntsinger, Jeffrey, Bahník, Štěpán, Vranka, Marek, Hasselman, Fred, IJzerman, Hans, and Krueger, Lacy

Subjects
replication, psychology
Abstract

We will attempt to replicate 12 effects in a single experimental package across numerous labs. Variations between lab conditions and sample characteristics will be analyzed to investigate how these factors might influence replication success.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Sample and Setting

Author

Salomon , Erika, Smith-Castro , Vanessa, Chang , Jen-Ho, Collisson , Brian, Malingumu , Winfrida, Karick , Haruna, Cambier , Fanny, Eller , Anja, Coleman , Jennifer, Kovacs , Carrie, Williams , Lisa, Pinter , Brad, Vranka , Marek, Packard , Grant, Zelenski , John, Sundfelt , Oskar, Hall , Michael, Thomae , Manuela, Schmidt , Kathleen, Haigh , Matthew, Finck , Carolyn, Galliani , Elisa, Steiner , Troy, Bernstein , Michael, Ebersole , Charles, Tybur , Joshua, Dunham , Yarrow, Stouten , Jeroen, Coen , Sharon, Smith , Michael, Gnambs , Timo, Hicks , Joshua, Giessner , Steffen, Osowiecka , Malgorzata, Devos , Thierry, Mallett , Robyn, English , Alexander, Nelson , Anthony, Cheong , Winnee, Petrovic , Boban, Ujhelyi , Adrienn, Gonzalez , Roberto, Berkics , Mihaly, Graham , Jesse, Nichols , Austin, Dozo , Nerisa, Tang , Andrew, Szumowska , Ewa, Skorinko , Jeanine, Rosa , Anna, Haines , Elizabeth, Myachykov , Andriy, Carmichael , Cheryl, Maitner , Angela, Vega , Diego, Van Der Hulst , Marije, Oikawa , Masanori, Ghoshal , Tanuka, Frankowska , Natalia, Saavedra , Patricio, Keller , Victor, Torres-Fernández , David, Huntsinger , Jeffrey, Sirlopu , David, ODonnell , Susan, Bialobrzeska , Olga, Levitan , Carmel, Berry , Daniel, Spachtholz , Philipp, Curran , Paul, Traczyk , Jakub, Kurapov , German, Kurtz , Jaime, Lakens , Daniel, Sacco , Airi, Corker , Katherine, Durrheim , Kevin, Chandler , Jesse, Cai , Huajian, Jimenez-Leal , William, Easterbrook , Matthew, Maassen , Esther, Saeri , Alexander, Brandt , Mark, Cantarero , Katarzyna, Hai , Kakul, Heffernan , Marie, Kende , Anna, Doğulu , Canay, Karabati , Serdar, Freyre , Miguel-Ángel, Voermans, Ingrid, Huynh , Ho, Busching , Robert, Nosek , Brian, Woodzicka , Julie, John , Melissa-Sue, Orosz , Gabor, Coen, Sharon, Van T Veer , Anna, Joy-Gaba , Jennifer, Dukes , Kristin, Marotta , Satia, Welch , Cheryl, Tear , Morgan, Lazarevic , Ljiljana, Kamiloglu , Roza, Van Assen , Marcel, Međedović , Janko, Podesta , Lysandra, Pollmann , Monique, Schönbrodt , Felix, Theriault , Jordan, De Bruijn , Maaike, Sekerdej , Maciek, Ms Ms, Alexandra, Pr. Pr., Nicolas, Grahe , Jon, Neto , Felix, Conway , Morgan, Klein , Richard, Mcintyre , Jason, Murphy , Sean, Adams Jr., Reginald, Kappes , Heather, Cushman , Fiery, Street , Chris, Wichman , Aaron, Lewis Jr., Neil, Babalola , Mayowa, Alper , Sinan, Hasselman , Fred, Aveyard , Mark, Saavedra, Patricio, Babalola, Mayowa, Torres-Fernández, David, Vianello , Michelangelo, Adams , Byron, Barlow , Fiona, Axt , Jordan, Bahník , Štěpán, Young , Liane, Sowden, Walter, Knezevic , Goran, Verschoor , Mark, Tanzer , Norbert, Edlund , John, De Vries, Marieke, Vaughn , Leigh, Morris , Wendy, Lins , Samuel, Rutchick , Abraham, Krueger , Lacy, Ijzerman , Hans, Green , Eva, Davis , William, Inbar , Yoel, Sobkow , Agata, Cicero , David, Bocian , Konrad, Houdek , Petr, Chatard , Armand, Gomez , Angel, Innes-Ker , Åse, Dalgar , Ilker, Echeverría , Alejandro, Milfont , Taciano, Cemalcilar , Zeynep, Wronska , Marta, Gill , Tripat, Verniers , Catherine, Pilati , Ronaldo, Friedman , Mike, Grahek , Ivan, Chen , Eva, Neijenhuijs , Koen, Pérez , Rolando, Kappes , Andreas, and Coen, S

Subjects
manylabs, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, replication, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Personality and Social Contexts, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Quantitative Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Quantitative Methods, psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology, WEIRD, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognitive Psychology
Abstract

We conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance to examine variation in effect magnitudes across sample and setting. Each protocol was administered to approximately half of 125 samples and 15,305 total participants from 36 countries and territories. Using conventional statistical significance (p < .05), fifteen (54%) of the replications provided evidence in the same direction and statistically significant as the original finding. With a strict significance criterion (p < .0001), fourteen (50%) provide such evidence reflecting the extremely high powered design. Seven (25%) of the replications had effect sizes larger than the original finding and 21 (75%) had effect sizes smaller than the original finding. The median comparable Cohen’s d effect sizes for original findings was 0.60 and for replications was 0.15. Sixteen replications (57%) had small effect sizes (< .20) and 9 (32%) were in the opposite direction from the original finding. Across settings, 11 (39%) showed significant heterogeneity using the Q statistic and most of those were among the findings eliciting the largest overall effect sizes; only one effect that was near zero in the aggregate showed significant heterogeneity. Only one effect showed a Tau > 0.20 indicating moderate heterogeneity. Nine others had a Tau near or slightly above 0.10 indicating slight heterogeneity. In moderation tests, very little heterogeneity was attributable to task order, administration in lab versus online, and exploratory WEIRD versus less WEIRD culture comparisons. Cumulatively, variability in observed effect sizes was more attributable to the effect being studied than the sample or setting in which it was studied.\ud \ud Data, materials and code available at: https://osf.io/8cd4r/

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Within-person effects of inclusion and exclusion on well-being in daily life

Author

Bernstein, Michael, Neubauer, Andreas B., Benfield, Jacob A., Potter, Lindsey, and Smyth, Joshua M.

Subjects
Emotionaler Zustand, Selbstwertgefühl, Social exclusion, Soziale Interaktion, Well-being, Emotions, Angst, Wohlbefinden, Everyday life, Mehrebenenanalyse, Interpersonal relations, Anxiety, Social interaction, Wirkung, ddc:150, Well being, Psychology, Male student, Hierarchical Linear Modelling, Interpersonal relation, Multi-level analysis, Emotion, Inclusion, Human relations, Depression, Alltag, Social relations, Ausgrenzung, Befragung, Zwischenmenschliche Beziehung, Psychologie, 150 Psychologie, Soziale Beziehung, Student, 150 Psychology, Inklusion
Abstract

Personal relationships 28 (2021) 4, S. 940-960, Whether exclusion hurts or inclusion feels good is debated within social psychology, and research designs often compare people who are excluded from those who are included. Here, we examined how participants differ when they are excluded or included relative to when they are not engaging in social interactions. Participants completed an ecological momentary assessment study (7 days, six measures a day). Participants indicated if they were having a social interaction, whether the interaction was inclusionary or exclusionary, and their mood and basic needs. We found that when people were excluded, relative to no interaction, they had lower basic needs and worsened mood; the reverse was true during inclusion episodes. We also found that the within-person effect of exclusion was larger than the within-person effect of inclusion and that exclusion experiences were relatively uncommon (≈10% of all reported social interactions). Future research and the importance of examining within-person effects are discussed. (DIPF/Orig.)

Published
2021

14. Social Exclusion Enhances Affiliative Signalling

Author

Philipp, Michael, Bernstein, Michael, Vanman, Eric, and Johnston, Lucy

Subjects
PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology|Social Cognition, Social Psychology, Biological Psychology, education, social exclusion, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology|Nonverbal Behavior, facial electromyography, Social and Behavioral Sciences, humanities, FOS: Psychology, stomatognathic diseases, smiles, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, EMG, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Physiology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Psychology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Social Psychology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Personality and Social Contexts, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Emotion, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology, bepress|Life Sciences|Physiology
Abstract

Reciprocating others’ smiles is important for maintaining social connections as it both signals affiliative to others and also elicits affiliative reactions from others. Feelings of social exclusion may increase affiliative mimicry to improve affiliative bonds with others. In this study we examined whether social exclusion leads people to selectively mimic the facial expressions of more affiliative-looking smiles. Participants (N=48) first wrote about either a time they were excluded or a neutral event. They then classified a series of 20 smiling faces–half spontaneous enjoyment smiles and half posed smiles. Facial electromyography recorded muscle activity involved in smiling. Excluded participants distinguished the two smile types better than controls. Excluded participants also showed greater zygomaticus major (mouth smiling) activity toward enjoyment smiles compared to posed smiled; control participants did not. Orbicularis oculi (eye crinkle) activity matched that of the smile type viewed, but did not vary by exclusion condition. Affiliative social regulation is discussed as a possible explanation for these effects.

Published
2018

15. Social interactions in daily life: Within-person associations between momentary social experiences and psychological and physical health indicators

Author

Bernstein, Michael J, Zawadzki, Matthew J, Juth, Vanessa, Benfield, Jacob A, and Smyth, Joshua M

Subjects
Social Psychology, Depression, Pain Research, Neurosciences, ecological momentary assessment, Basic Behavioral and Social Science, Mental Health, Clinical Research, 2.3 Psychological, Generic Health Relevance, Behavioral and Social Science, Psychology, social interactions, social and economic factors, Mind and Body, Daily health
Abstract

It is well established that individuals who engage in more positive social interactions report a broad array of benefit relative to those with fewer positive social interactions. Yet less is known about how, within individuals, naturally occurring social interactions in daily life relate to momentary indicators of health (e.g., mood, psychological, and physiological stress). The current study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to examine these within-person relationships, as well as complementary between-person relationships, among 115 adults (75% female; Mage = 41.21). Participants completed six EMA surveys per day for 3 days to report on whether they experienced any social interactions and whether the interactions were pleasant as well as on their mood, pain, tiredness, interest, and perceived stress; they also provided a salivary cortisol sample after each EMA survey. Multilevel modeling analyses showed that individuals felt more happiness and interest, and less sadness, tiredness, and pain, during moments when they were engaged in a social interaction versus when they were not. Individuals also reported less stress during more pleasant versus less pleasant social interactions. When examining between-person effects, we found evidence that people who gave more pleasant interactions generally reported more positive outcomes. This study presents evidence for intraindividual links between social interactions and momentary health indicators in daily life.

Published
2018

16. The affiliative consequences of same-race and cross-race mimicry.

Author

Majka, Elizabeth A., White, Michael W., Bowling, LaVaun A., Garcia, Rosa M., Skinner, Taylor L., Bennett, Kyle F., Bernstein, Michael J., and Sim, Jessica J.

Subjects
IMITATIVE behavior, PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL marginality, SOCIAL control
Abstract

Few studies have replicated and extended the classic mimicry → liking effect. The present research sought to (a) replicate the affiliative consequences of mimicry; (b) test whether the affiliative consequences hold in a context where mimicry may not be normative (i.e., cross-race interactions); and (c) investigate how excluded individuals respond to same- versus cross-race mimicry and non-mimicry. Participants wrote about a control topic or social exclusion and then engaged in a brief laboratory interaction in which they were mimicked or not mimicked by a confederate who was either same-race or cross-race. Then they reported how much they liked the confederate. Within the control condition, the effect of mimicry on affiliation depended on the race of the confederate – but this pattern did not emerge for excluded individuals. The study was unable to conclusively replicate and extend previous findings. The authors make recommendations to promote a more cumulative science of behavioral mimicry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

17. Putting the 'Art' Into the 'Art of Medicine': The Under-Explored Role of Artifacts in Placebo Studies.

Author

Bernstein, Michael H., Locher, Cosima, Kube, Tobias, Buergler, Sarah, Stewart-Ferrer, Sif, and Blease, Charlotte

Subjects
PLACEBOS, CLASSICAL conditioning, SOCIAL psychology, PSYCHOLOGICAL research, INTERIOR decoration
Abstract

Research in social psychology demonstrates that physical environmental factors – or "artifacts" such as provider clothing and office décor – can influence health outcomes. However, the role of artifacts in augmenting or diminishing health outcomes is under-explored in the burgeoning discipline of placebo studies. In this paper, we argue that a careful consideration of artifacts may carry significant potential in informing how placebo effects can be maximized, and nocebo effects minimized in clinical settings. We discuss the potential mechanisms, including classical conditioning, response expectancy, and mindsets, by which artifacts might enhance or diminish these effects. Next, we propose testable hypotheses to investigate how placebo and nocebo effects might be elicited by artifacts in care settings, and conclude by providing innovative research designs to advance this novel research agendum. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

18. Computerization and the future of primary care: A survey of general practitioners in the UK.

Author

Blease, Charlotte, Bernstein, Michael H., Gaab, Jens, Kaptchuk, Ted J., Kossowsky, Joe, Mandl, Kenneth D., Davis, Roger B., and DesRoches, Catherine M.

Subjects
*PRIMARY care, *HEALTH surveys, *INDIVIDUALIZED medicine, *MEDICAL technology, *CROSS-sectional method, *PUBLIC health
Abstract

Objective: To describe the opinions of British general practitioners regarding the potential of future technology to replace key tasks carried out in primary care. Design: Cross sectional online survey. Participants: 1,474 registered GPs in the United Kingdom. Main outcome measures: Investigators measured GPs’ opinions about the likelihood that future technology will be able to fully replace–not merely aid–the average GP in performing six primary care tasks; in addition, if GPs considered replacement for a particular task likely, the survey measured opinions about how many years from now this technological capacity might emerge. Results: A total of 720 (49%) responded to the survey. Most GPs believed it unlikely that technology will ever be able to fully replace physicians when it comes to diagnosing patients (489, 68%), referring patients to other specialists (444, 61%), formulating personalized treatment plans (441, 61%), and delivering empathic care (680, 94%). GPs were not in agreement about prognostics: one in two participants (380, 53%) considered it likely that technology will be fully capable of replacing physicians in performing this task, nearly half (187, 49%) of whom believed that the technological capacity will arise in the next ten years. Against these findings, the majority of GPs (578, 80%) believed it likely that future technology will be able to fully replace humans to undertake documentation; among them 261 (79%) estimated that the technological wherewithal would emerge during the next ten years. In general, age and gender were not correlated with opinions; nor was reported burnout and job satisfaction or whether GPs worked full time or part time. Conclusions: The majority of UK GPs in this survey were skeptical about the potential for future technology to perform most primary care tasks as well as or better than humans. However, respondents were optimistic that in the near future technology would have the capacity to fully replace GPs’ in undertaking administrative duties related to patient documentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Sample and Setting

Author

Klein, Richard, Vianello, Michelangelo, Hasselman, Fred, Adams, Byron, Adams, Reginald, Alper, Sinan, Vega, Diego, Aveyard, Mark, Axt, Jordan, Babalola, Mayowa, Bahník, Štěpán, Barlow, Fiona, Berkics, Mihaly, Bernstein, Michael, Berry, Daniel, Bialobrzeska, Olga, Bocian, Konrad, Brandt, Mark, Busching, Robert, Cai, Huajian, Cantarero, Katarzyna, Carmichael, Cheryl, Cemalcilar, Zeynep, Chandler, Jesse, Chang, Jen-Ho, Chatard, Armand, CHEN, Eva, Cheong, Winnee, Cicero, David, Coen, Sharon, Coleman, Jennifer, Collisson, Brian, Conway, Morgan, Corker, Katherine, Curran, Paul, Cushman, Fiery, Dalgar, Ilker, Davis, William, de Bruijn, Maaike, de Vries, Marieke, Devos, Thierry, Doğulu, Canay, Dozo, Nerisa, Dukes, Kristin, Dunham, Yarrow, Durrheim, Kevin, Easterbrook, Matthew, Ebersole, Charles, Edlund, John, English, Alexander, Eller, Anja, Finck, Carolyn, Freyre, Miguel-Ángel, Frankowska, Natalia, Friedman, Mike, Galliani, Elisa, Ghoshal, Tanuka, Giessner, Steffen, Gill, Tripat, Gnambs, Timo, Gonzalez, Roberto, Govia, Ishtar, Grahe, Jon, Grahek, Ivan, Green, Eva, Hai, Kakul, Haigh, Matthew, Haines, Elizabeth, Hall, Michael, Heffernan, Marie, Hicks, Joshua, Houdek, Petr, Huntsinger, Jeffrey, Huynh, Ho, IJzerman, Hans, Inbar, Yoel, Innes-Ker, Åse, Gomez, Angel, John, Melissa-Sue, Jimenez-Leal, William, Joy-Gaba, Jennifer, Kamiloglu, Roza, Kappes, Andreas, Kappes, Heather, Karabati, Serdar, Karick, Haruna, Keller, Victor, Kende, Anna, Kervyn, Nicolas, Knezevic, Goran, Krueger, Lacy, Kurapov, German, Kurtz, Jaime, Lakens, Daniel, Lazarevic, Ljiljana, Levitan, Carmel, Lewis, Neil, Lins, Samuel, Maassen, Esther, Maitner, Angela, Malingumu, Winfrida, Mallett, Robyn, Marotta, Satia, McIntyre, Jason, Međedović, Janko, Milfont, Taciano, Morris, Wendy, Myachykov, Andriy, Murphy, Sean, Nelson, Anthony, Neto, Felix, Nichols, Austin, O'Donnell, Susan, Oikawa, Masanori, Orosz, Gabor, Packard, Grant, Pérez, Rolando, Petrovic, Boban, Pilati, Ronaldo, Pinter, Brad, Pollmann, Monique, Dalla Rosa, Anna, Ruggs, Enrica, Rutchick, Abraham, Sacco, Airi, Saeri, Alexander, Salomon, Erika, Schmidt, Kathleen, Schönbrodt, Felix, Sekerdej, Maciek, Sirlopu, David, Skorinko, Jeanine, Smith, Michael, Smith-Castro, Vanessa, Sobkow, Agata, Sowden, Walter, Steiner, Troy, Stouten, Jeroen, Street, Chris, Sundfelt, Oskar, Tang, Andrew, Tear, Morgan, Theriault, Jordan, Thomae, Manuela, Torres-Fernández, David, Traczyk, Jakub, Tybur, Joshua, Ujhelyi, Adrienn, van Assen, Marcel, van 't Veer, Anna, Vásquez-Echeverría, Alejandro, Vaughn, Leigh Ann, Vázquez, Alexandra, Verniers, Catherine, Verschoor, Mark, Vranka, Marek, Welch, Cheryl, Wichman, Aaron, Williams, Lisa, Woodzicka, Julie, Wronska, Marta, Young, Liane, Zelenski, John, and Nosek, Brian

Subjects
replication, psychology
Abstract

In Many Labs 2, we will employ an expanded version of the Many Labs paradigm to investigate a substantial number of new effects and further examine the findings from Many Labs 1.

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

20. Investigating variation in replicability: A 'Many Labs' replication project

Author

Klein, Richard, Ratliff, Kate, Vianello, Michelangelo, Adams, Reginald, Bahník, Štěpán, Bernstein, Michael, Bocian, Konrad, Brandt, Mark, Brooks, Beach, Brumbaugh, Claudia, Cemalcilar, Zeynep, Chandler, Jesse, Cheong, Winnee, Davis, William, Devos, Thierry, Eisner, Matthew, Frankowska, Natalia, Furrow, David, Galliani, Elisa, Hasselman, Fred, Hicks, Joshua, Hovermale, James, Hunt, S., Huntsinger, Jeffrey, IJzerman, Hans, John, Melissa-Sue, Joy-Gaba, Jennifer, Kappes, Heather, Krueger, Lacy, Kurtz, Jaime, Levitan, Carmel, Mallett, Robyn, Morris, Wendy, Nelson, Anthony, Nier, Jason, Packard, Grant, Pilati, Ronaldo, Rutchick, Abraham, Schmidt, Kathleen, Skorinko, Jeanine, Smith, Robert, Steiner, Troy, Storbeck, Justin, van Swol, Lyn, Thompson, Donna, van 't Veer, Anna, Vaughn, Leigh Ann, Vranka, Marek, Wichman, Aaron, Woodzicka, Julie, Nosek, Brian, and Department of Social Psychology

Subjects
replication, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, corelabdat, Learning and Plasticity, Sample (statistics), Replicate, psychology, Conservatism, reproductability, manylabs, Variation (linguistics), cross-cultural, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Replication (statistics), Generalizability theory, variation, Psychology, Priming (psychology), Social psychology, generalizability, General Psychology, Prejudice (legal term)
Abstract

Contains fulltext : 131506.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Although replication is a central tenet of science, direct replications are rare in psychology. This research tested variation in the replicability of 13 classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants. In the aggregate, 10 effects replicated consistently. One effect – imagined contact reducing prejudice – showed weak support for replicability. And two effects - flag priming influencing conservatism and currency priming influencing system justification - did not replicate. We compared whether the conditions such as lab versus online or US versus international sample predicted effect magnitudes. By and large they did not. The results of this small sample of effects suggest that replicability is more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect. 11 p.

Published
2014

21. Ostracized but why? Effects of attributions and empathy on connecting with the socially excluded.

Author

Bernstein, Michael J., Chen, Zhansheng, Poon, Kai-Tak, Benfield, Jacob A., and Ng, Henry K. S.

Subjects
*EMPATHY, *LIFE sciences, *SOCIAL sciences, *ORAL communication, *SOCIAL perception
Abstract

The present research examined people’s responses towards others’ exclusion experience. The authors predicted that both causal attributions and empathy would mediate whether people affiliate with a victim of an ambiguous exclusion experience. Perceivers observing another’s exclusion (relative to inclusion) without clearly announced reasons chose to affiliate with the target and this was mediated by increased external attributions for the exclusion (Studies 1a, 1b, 2). When the attributions people made for the exclusion of a target was experimentally manipulated, internal attributions decreased desire for affiliation relative to external or ambiguous attributions, and this was mediated by differences in empathy for the target (Study 3). Further, external attributions arisen from perceiving a causally unclear exclusion leads to an empathetic response which results in an increased desire to affiliate with the target (Study 4). Future directions on perceptions of those who have been excluded are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

22. The self as a central tenet of our psychology: New perspectives on the self.

Author

Bernstein, Michael J. and Elizabeth, Haines

Subjects
*PSYCHOLOGY, *SOCIAL perception, *SELF-perception, *THOUGHT & thinking, *COGNITION
Abstract

The self is fundamental to psychology and yet it is as broad as it is foundational. Numerous concepts fall into the examination of the self and has resulted in many reviews of those individual aspects but few of the self as a whole. In this special issue, we offer an avenue for authors to engage in reviews of those such individual aspects to try to draw attention to new and novel approaches to what is an integral component of our psychology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

23. Hostility and Cigarette Use: A Comparison Between Smokers and Nonsmokers in a Matched Sample of Adolescents.

Author

Bernstein, Michael H., Colby, Suzanne M., Bidwell, L. Cinnamon, Kahler, Christopher W., and Leventhal, Adam M.

Subjects
*SMOKING & psychology, *CIGARETTE smokers, *TOBACCO use, *TEENAGERS, *SUBSTANCE use of teenagers, *HOSTILITY, *HUMAN information processing, *PSYCHOLOGY, RISK factors
Abstract

Introduction: We examined the association between hostility—a personality trait reflective of negativity and cynicism toward others—and smoking in adolescents, by measuring: (a) several subcomponents of hostility, and (b) facial emotion processing ability, which has been previously linked to hostility. Methods: Participants (N = 241, aged 14–19) were 95 smokers and 95 demographically matched nonsmokers, as well as 51 nonmatched smokers. All participants completed the Cook–Medley (C-M) hostility scale, which provides a general hostility score and three component scores (cynicism, hypersensitivity, and aggressive responding), and a facial emotion processing task. This task, designed to assess emotion recognition, requires quickly identifying the emotion of faces that gradually morph from neutral to high intensity happy, angry, or fearful. Results: Independent sample t tests indicated that matched smokers scored significantly higher in cynicism and aggressive responding than nonsmokers. Among smokers, age of smoking onset was negatively correlated with general hostility and aggressive responding. All hostility scales were positively correlated with the intensity needed to recognize happy faces. Counterintuitively, smokers required a greater intensity to recognize angry faces than nonsmokers. No other relations between hostility/smoking status and facial emotion processing were observed. Conclusions: Aspects of hostility, particularly aggressive responding, may be a risk factor for early onset smoking. Although hostile participants exhibited a deficiency in their ability to recognize happiness in facial pictures, these results did not translate to differences in smoking status. This study elucidates some of the complex interrelations between hostility, emotion processing, and adolescent smoking, which may have implications for teen smoking prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

24. Social Exclusion and Stereotyping: Why and When Exclusion Fosters Individuation of Others.

Author

Claypool, Heather M. and Bernstein, Michael J.

Subjects
*SOCIAL marginality, *STEREOTYPES, *AFFILIATION (Psychology), *PSYCHOLOGICAL judgment -- Social aspects, *SOCIAL groups, *SOCIAL isolation, *OTHERING, *PSYCHOLOGY
Abstract

Exclusion triggers a desire to re-capture connections with others. To facilitate this goal, excluded individuals typically process social information especially carefully. One implication of this is that exclusion may foster judgments of others that are reliant on a careful consideration of their idiosyncratic behaviors rather than on more superficial features. We predicted, therefore, that excluded individuals should individuate more and stereotype less than non-excluded individuals and that such effects should be in service of identifying appropriate re-affiliation candidates. In 3 replications of Experiment 1, excluded (compared to non-excluded) individuals rendered less stereotypic judgments of occupational and racial group members described with mildly or ambiguously counter-stereotypic information. Confirming such processes aid with re-affiliation, Experiments 2 and 3 showed that these effects occurred for social targets that represented reasonable sources of re-affiliation, but not for offensive social targets (i.e., Skinheads) or non-social agents. Experiment 4 underscored that excluded participants process presented social information more carefully (individuate), showing greater differentiation in judgments of highly stereotype-consistent and stereotype-inconsistent targets. Implications for the social exclusion literature are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

25. Differences in Anticipated Interaction Drive Own Group Biases in Face Memory.

Author

Wilson, John Paul, See, Pirita E., Bernstein, Michael J., Hugenberg, Kurt, and Chartier, Christopher

Subjects
MEMORY bias, CATEGORIZATION (Psychology), SOCIAL psychology, COGNITIVE psychology, INGROUPS (Social groups), INTERPERSONAL relations, MENTAL health
Abstract

According to much research, the Own Group Bias (OGB) in face memory occurs as a consequence of social categorization – ingroup members are more likely than outgroup members to be encoded as individuals and remembered well. The current work is an examination of the role of anticipated future interaction in the OGB. We conducted two studies showing that anticipated interaction influences group-based face memory. In Study 1, we provided correlational evidence that beliefs about the amount and importance of future interaction one will have with racial outgroup members is associated with the OGB, such that people expecting more interaction with outgroup members show a reduced OGB. In Study 2, we manipulated expectations about future interactions with lab-created groups and observed that high levels of anticipated future interaction with the outgroup eliminated the OGB. Thus, social group categorization drives face memory biases to the extent that group membership affords the expectation of interpersonal interaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

26. Rejection and Pain Sensitivity: Why Rejection Sometimes Hurts and Sometimes Numbs

Author

Bernstein, Michael J.

Subjects
Psychology, ostracism, social rejection, pain sensitivity, group affiliation, social exclusion
Abstract

Some research indicates that social rejection leads to increased pain sensitivity, whereas other work indicates that rejection causes physical-pain numbing. This research sought to examine potential moderators and mediators of these effects. In Study 1, the paradigm used to manipulate social rejection was found to be a moderator of the social rejection-pain sensitivity relationship: Cyberball rejection led to pain hypersensitivity whereas future-life rejection led to pain numbing. The former was fully mediated by threats to belonging. In Study 2, I further examined why the rejection paradigm itself acts as a moderator. I speculated that future-life rejection may be a much more intense experience than is a Cyberball rejection and that more intense social rejection experiences might lead to numbing whereas less intense manipulations might lead to hypersensitivity. In Study 2, I subjected participants to either the standard future-life rejection manipulation or a newly-created less-intense version. Supporting my hypothesis, the standard (highly intense) future-life rejection led to physical pain numbing, whereas the less-intense future-life rejection resulted in hypersensitivity. Implications of these results for understanding the rejection-pain relation and other rejection effects are discussed.

Published
2010

27. Predicting attitudinal and behavioral responses to COVID-19 pandemic using machine learning

Author

Tomislav Pavlović, Flavio Azevedo, Koustav De, Julián C Riaño-Moreno, Marina Maglić, Theofilos Gkinopoulos, Patricio Andreas Donnelly-Kehoe, César Payán-Gómez, Guanxiong Huang, Jaroslaw Kantorowicz, Michèle D Birtel, Philipp Schönegger, Valerio Capraro, Hernando Santamaría-García, Meltem Yucel, Agustin Ibanez, Steve Rathje, Erik Wetter, Dragan Stanojević, Jan-Willem van Prooijen, Eugenia Hesse, Christian T Elbaek, Renata Franc, Zoran Pavlović, Panagiotis Mitkidis, Aleksandra Cichocka, Michele Gelfand, Mark Alfano, Robert M Ross, Hallgeir Sjåstad, John B Nezlek, Aleksandra Cislak, Patricia Lockwood, Koen Abts, Elena Agadullina, David M Amodio, Matthew A J Apps, John Jamir Benzon Aruta, Sahba Besharati, Alexander Bor, Becky Choma, William Cunningham, Waqas Ejaz, Harry Farmer, Andrej Findor, Biljana Gjoneska, Estrella Gualda, Toan L D Huynh, Mostak Ahamed Imran, Jacob Israelashvili, Elena Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, André Krouwel, Yordan Kutiyski, Michael Laakasuo, Claus Lamm, Jonathan Levy, Caroline Leygue, Ming-Jen Lin, Mohammad Sabbir Mansoor, Antoine Marie, Lewend Mayiwar, Honorata Mazepus, Cillian McHugh, Andreas Olsson, Tobias Otterbring, Dominic Packer, Jussi Palomäki, Anat Perry, Michael Bang Petersen, Arathy Puthillam, Tobias Rothmund, Petra C Schmid, David Stadelmann, Augustin Stoica, Drozdstoy Stoyanov, Kristina Stoyanova, Shruti Tewari, Bojan Todosijević, Benno Torgler, Manos Tsakiris, Hans H Tung, Radu Gabriel Umbreș, Edmunds Vanags, Madalina Vlasceanu, Andrew J Vonasch, Yucheng Zhang, Mohcine Abad, Eli Adler, Hamza Alaoui Mdarhri, Benedict Antazo, F Ceren Ay, Mouhamadou El Hady Ba, Sergio Barbosa, Brock Bastian, Anton Berg, Michał Białek, Ennio Bilancini, Natalia Bogatyreva, Leonardo Boncinelli, Jonathan E Booth, Sylvie Borau, Ondrej Buchel, Chrissie Ferreira de Carvalho, Tatiana Celadin, Chiara Cerami, Hom Nath Chalise, Xiaojun Cheng, Luca Cian, Kate Cockcroft, Jane Conway, Mateo A Córdoba-Delgado, Chiara Crespi, Marie Crouzevialle, Jo Cutler, Marzena Cypryańska, Justyna Dabrowska, Victoria H Davis, John Paul Minda, Pamala N Dayley, Sylvain Delouvée, Ognjan Denkovski, Guillaume Dezecache, Nathan A Dhaliwal, Alelie Diato, Roberto Di Paolo, Uwe Dulleck, Jānis Ekmanis, Tom W Etienne, Hapsa Hossain Farhana, Fahima Farkhari, Kristijan Fidanovski, Terry Flew, Shona Fraser, Raymond Boadi Frempong, Jonathan Fugelsang, Jessica Gale, E Begoña García-Navarro, Prasad Garladinne, Kurt Gray, Siobhán M Griffin, Bjarki Gronfeldt, June Gruber, Eran Halperin, Volo Herzon, Matej Hruška, Matthias F C Hudecek, Ozan Isler, Simon Jangard, Frederik Jørgensen, Oleksandra Keudel, Lina Koppel, Mika Koverola, Anton Kunnari, Josh Leota, Eva Lermer, Chunyun Li, Chiara Longoni, Darragh McCashin, Igor Mikloušić, Juliana Molina-Paredes, César Monroy-Fonseca, Elena Morales-Marente, David Moreau, Rafał Muda, Annalisa Myer, Kyle Nash, Jonas P Nitschke, Matthew S Nurse, Victoria Oldemburgo de Mello, M Soledad Palacios-Galvez, Yafeng Pan, Zsófia Papp, Philip Pärnamets, Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, Silva Perander, Michael Pitman, Ali Raza, Gabriel Gaudencio Rêgo, Claire Robertson, Iván Rodríguez-Pascual, Teemu Saikkonen, Octavio Salvador-Ginez, Waldir M Sampaio, Gaia Chiara Santi, David Schultner, Enid Schutte, Andy Scott, Ahmed Skali, Anna Stefaniak, Anni Sternisko, Brent Strickland, Jeffrey P Thomas, Gustav Tinghög, Iris J Traast, Raffaele Tucciarelli, Michael Tyrala, Nick D Ungson, Mete Sefa Uysal, Dirk Van Rooy, Daniel Västfjäll, Joana B Vieira, Christian von Sikorski, Alexander C Walker, Jennifer Watermeyer, Robin Willardt, Michael J A Wohl, Adrian Dominik Wójcik, Kaidi Wu, Yuki Yamada, Onurcan Yilmaz, Kumar Yogeeswaran, Carolin-Theresa Ziemer, Rolf A Zwaan, Paulo Sergio Boggio, Ashley Whillans, Paul A M Van Lange, Rajib Prasad, Michal Onderco, Cathal O'Madagain, Tarik Nesh-Nash, Oscar Moreda Laguna, Emily Kubin, Mert Gümren, Ali Fenwick, Arhan S Ertan, Michael J Bernstein, Hanane Amara, Jay Joseph Van Bavel, Brain and Cognition, Public Administration, Pavlovic, Tomislav, Avezedo, Flávio, De, Koustav, Maglić, Marina, Donnelly-Kehoe, Patricio Andreas, Payán-Gómez, César, Van Bavel, Jay J., Schmid, Petra Claudia, Crouzevialle, Marie, Willardt, Robin, et al., Ivo Pilar Institute of Social Sciences, University of Cambridge [UK] (CAM), University of Kentucky (UK), Universidad El Bosque [Bogota], University of Crete [Heraklion] (UOC), Universidad del Rosario [Bogota], Universidad Nacional de Colombia [Bogotà] (UNAL), City University of Hong Kong [Hong Kong] (CUHK), Universiteit Leiden, University of Greenwich, University of St Andrews [Scotland], Middlesex University [London], Pontifical Xavierian University, Duke University [Durham], Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez [Santiago], University of California (UC), Trinity College Dublin, Stockholm School of Economics (SSE), University of Belgrade [Belgrade], Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (VU), Universidad Mayor de San Andrés (UMSA), Aarhus University [Aarhus], University of Kent [Canterbury], Stanford University, Macquarie University, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities (SWPS), University of Birmingham [Birmingham], University of Oxford, Catholic University of Leuven - Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), Vysšaja škola èkonomiki = National Research University Higher School of Economics [Moscow] (HSE), University of Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (UvA), Sunway University [Malaysia], University of the Witwatersrand [Johannesburg] (WITS), University of Toronto, National University of Sciences and Technology [Islamabad] (NUST), Comenius University in Bratislava, Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts [Skopje, North Macedonia] (MASA), Universidad de Huelva, University of Southampton, BRAC University, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem (HUJ), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Kieskompas, Helsingin yliopisto = Helsingfors universitet = University of Helsinki, University of Vienna [Vienna], Reichman University [Herzliya], Aalto University, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México = National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), National Taiwan University [Taiwan] (NTU), HEMS School, BI Norwegian Business School [Oslo], University of Limerick (UL), Karolinska Institutet [Stockholm], University of Agder (UIA), Lehigh University [Bethlehem], Monk Prayogshala, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität = Friedrich Schiller University Jena [Jena, Germany], Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich - Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zürich (ETH Zurïch), University of Bayreuth, National School of Political and Administrative Studies (SNSPA), Plovdiv University 'Paisii Hilendarski', Indian Institute of Management Indore (IMM Indore), Institute of Social Sciences Belgrade, Queensland University of Technology [Brisbane] (QUT), Royal Holloway [University of London] (RHUL), University of London [London], National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, University of Latvia (LU), New York University [New York] (NYU), NYU System (NYU), University of Canterbury [Christchurch], Hebei University of Technology [Tianjin], Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique [Ben Guerir] (UM6P), AnsuR Technologies [Fornebu], Université Cheikh Anta Diop [Dakar, Sénégal] (UCAD), Victoria University [Melbourne], University of Wrocław [Poland] (UWr), IMT Institute for Advanced Studies [Lucca], Université de Florence, Università degli Studi di Firenze = University of Florence (UniFI), London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), TBS Education, Slovak Academy of Science [Bratislava] (SAS), Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), University of Bologna/Università di Bologna, Tribhuvan University, Shenzhen Univerisity [Shenzhen], University of Virginia, Université Toulouse Capitole (UT Capitole), Université de Toulouse (UT), University of Western Ontario (UWO), Université de Rennes 2 (UR2), Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive (LAPSCO), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA), University of British Columbia (UBC), University of Queensland [Brisbane], Pennsylvania State University (Penn State), Penn State System, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster = University of Münster (WWU), The University of Sydney, University of Waterloo [Waterloo], University of North Carolina [Chapel Hill] (UNC), University of North Carolina System (UNC), University of Colorado [Boulder], University of Regensburg, Kyiv School of economic (KSE), Linköping University (LIU), Monash University [Clayton], Ansbach University of Applied Sciences, Ludwig Maximilian University [Munich] (LMU), Department of Management - London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), Questrom School of Business, Boston University [Boston] (BU), Dublin City University [Dublin] (DCU), University of Auckland [Auckland], Maria Curie-Sklodowska University (UMCS), City University of New York [New York] (CUNY), University of Alberta, Australian National University (ANU), University of Silesia in Katowice, Universidad Complutense de Madrid = Complutense University of Madrid [Madrid] (UCM), Zhejiang University, Mackenzie Presbyterian University [São Paulo] (UPM), NYU Department of Psychology [New-York University], NYU System (NYU)-NYU System (NYU), University of Turku, City College of New York [CUNY] (CCNY), University of Groningen [Groningen], Carleton University, Département d'Etudes Cognitives - ENS Paris (DEC), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), Faculté de Gouvernance, Sciences Économiques et Sociales [UM6P] (FGSES), University College of London [London] (UCL), Susquehanna University, University of Antwerp (UA), University of Exeter, University of Koblenz-Landau, Nicolaus Copernicus University [Toruń], University of California [San Diego] (UC San Diego), Kyushu University, Kadir Has University (KHAS), Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Vidyasagar College For Women, Koç University, Hult International Business School, Boǧaziçi üniversitesi = Boğaziçi University [Istanbul], Penn State Abington, Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE)-Penn State System, Communication Science, Network Institute, Communication Choices, Content and Consequences (CCCC), Social Psychology, IBBA, A-LAB, University of St Andrews. Philosophy, University of St Andrews. School of Psychology and Neuroscience, Pavlović, Tomislav [0000-0002-4470-3715], Azevedo, Flavio [0000-0001-9000-8513], De, Koustav [0000-0001-9562-0672], Riaño-Moreno, Julián C [0000-0003-4182-0550], Maglić, Marina [0000-0002-6851-4601], Gkinopoulos, Theofilos [0000-0003-1070-6245], Donnelly-Kehoe, Patricio Andreas [0000-0002-3738-9537], Payán-Gómez, César [0000-0002-0633-1332], Huang, Guanxiong [0000-0002-8588-1454], Kantorowicz, Jaroslaw [0000-0002-1186-5427], Birtel, Michèle D [0000-0002-2383-9197], Schönegger, Philipp [0000-0001-9930-487X], Capraro, Valerio [0000-0002-0579-0166], Santamaría-García, Hernando [0000-0001-9422-3579], Yucel, Meltem [0000-0002-7274-5971], Ibanez, Agustin [0000-0001-6758-5101], Rathje, Steve [0000-0001-6727-571X], Wetter, Erik [0000-0002-5821-6651], Stanojević, Dragan [0000-0002-3667-2461], van Prooijen, Jan-Willem [0000-0001-6236-0819], Hesse, Eugenia [0000-0002-9077-9833], Elbaek, Christian T [0000-0002-7039-4565], Franc, Renata [0000-0002-1909-2393], Pavlović, Zoran [0000-0002-9231-5100], Mitkidis, Panagiotis [0000-0002-9495-7369], Cichocka, Aleksandra [0000-0003-1703-1586], Alfano, Mark [0000-0001-5879-8033], Ross, Robert M [0000-0001-8711-1675], Sjåstad, Hallgeir [0000-0002-8730-1038], Nezlek, John B [0000-0003-4963-3637], Cislak, Aleksandra [0000-0002-9880-6947], Lockwood, Patricia [0000-0001-7195-9559], Abts, Koen [0000-0001-8546-8347], Agadullina, Elena [0000-0002-1505-1412], Amodio, David M [0000-0001-7746-0150], Apps, Matthew AJ [0000-0001-5793-2202], Aruta, John Jamir Benzon [0000-0003-4155-1063], Besharati, Sahba [0000-0003-2836-7982], Bor, Alexander [0000-0002-2624-9221], Choma, Becky [0000-0002-8286-8983], Ejaz, Waqas [0000-0002-2492-4115], Farmer, Harry [0000-0002-3684-0605], Findor, Andrej [0000-0002-5896-6989], Gjoneska, Biljana [0000-0003-1200-6672], Gualda, Estrella [0000-0003-0220-2135], Huynh, Toan LD [0000-0002-6653-7447], Imran, Mostak Ahamed [0000-0002-5101-3149], Israelashvili, Jacob [0000-0003-1289-223X], Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, Elena [0000-0001-8128-7290], Krouwel, André [0000-0003-0952-6028], Kutiyski, Yordan [0000-0003-0889-4232], Laakasuo, Michael [0000-0003-2826-6073], Lamm, Claus [0000-0002-5422-0653], Levy, Jonathan [0000-0003-1007-2393], Leygue, Caroline [0000-0002-0355-1030], Lin, Ming-Jen [0000-0002-7174-2226], Mansoor, Mohammad Sabbir [0000-0002-6541-3506], Marie, Antoine [0000-0002-7958-0153], Mayiwar, Lewend [0000-0003-1404-4779], Mazepus, Honorata [0000-0002-5005-9399], McHugh, Cillian [0000-0002-9701-3232], Olsson, Andreas [0000-0001-5272-7744], Otterbring, Tobias [0000-0002-0283-8777], Packer, Dominic [0000-0001-8420-6548], Palomäki, Jussi [0000-0001-6063-0926], Perry, Anat [0000-0003-2329-856X], Petersen, Michael Bang [0000-0002-6782-5635], Puthillam, Arathy [0000-0003-2426-8362], Rothmund, Tobias [0000-0003-2979-5129], Schmid, Petra C [0000-0002-9990-5445], Stadelmann, David [0000-0002-1211-9936], Stoica, Augustin [0000-0003-0585-1114], Stoyanov, Drozdstoy [0000-0002-9975-3680], Stoyanova, Kristina [0000-0001-8362-6444], Tewari, Shruti [0000-0003-1903-7252], Todosijević, Bojan [0000-0002-6116-993X], Torgler, Benno [0000-0002-9809-963X], Tsakiris, Manos [0000-0001-7753-7576], Tung, Hans H [0000-0001-5332-7582], Umbreș, Radu Gabriel [0000-0002-6121-4518], Vanags, Edmunds [0000-0003-1932-936X], Vlasceanu, Madalina [0000-0003-2138-1968], Vonasch, Andrew J [0000-0002-2784-5420], Zhang, Yucheng [0000-0001-9435-6734], Abad, Mohcine [0000-0002-4964-5411], Adler, Eli [0000-0002-9005-5536], Mdarhri, Hamza Alaoui [0000-0001-9831-6561], Antazo, Benedict [0000-0001-9993-8960], Ay, F Ceren [0000-0003-4444-2268], Ba, Mouhamadou El Hady [0000-0002-2707-1242], Barbosa, Sergio [0000-0003-1989-158X], Bastian, Brock [0000-0003-4619-3322], Berg, Anton [0000-0001-7143-762X], Białek, Michał [0000-0002-5062-5733], Bilancini, Ennio [0000-0002-2027-3992], Bogatyreva, Natalia [0000-0002-6024-2322], Boncinelli, Leonardo [0000-0003-0626-5133], Booth, Jonathan E [0000-0002-8563-4613], Borau, Sylvie [0000-0003-1564-0695], Buchel, Ondrej [0000-0002-0139-5513], de Carvalho, Chrissie Ferreira [0000-0002-1369-6188], Celadin, Tatiana [0000-0002-7743-3117], Cerami, Chiara [0000-0003-1974-3421], Chalise, Hom Nath [0000-0002-9301-6890], Cian, Luca [0000-0002-8051-1366], Cockcroft, Kate [0000-0002-6166-8050], Conway, Jane [0000-0003-3883-349X], Córdoba-Delgado, Mateo A [0000-0002-2264-7388], Crespi, Chiara [0000-0002-7851-9887], Crouzevialle, Marie [0000-0002-5538-6030], Cutler, Jo [0000-0003-1073-764X], Cypryańska, Marzena [0000-0001-9234-562X], Dabrowska, Justyna [0000-0002-8821-7161], Davis, Victoria H [0000-0002-7207-4629], Minda, John Paul [0000-0002-4081-010X], Dayley, Pamala N [0000-0001-8955-9502], Delouvée, Sylvain [0000-0002-4029-597X], Denkovski, Ognjan [0000-0002-9739-4100], Dezecache, Guillaume [0000-0002-9366-6287], Dhaliwal, Nathan A [0000-0002-4667-0689], Di Paolo, Roberto [0000-0002-6081-6656], Dulleck, Uwe [0000-0002-0953-5963], Ekmanis, Jānis [0000-0003-1781-1785], Etienne, Tom W [0000-0002-4299-6593], Farkhari, Fahima [0000-0002-8484-5128], Fidanovski, Kristijan [0000-0002-9006-0140], Flew, Terry [0000-0003-4485-9338], Fraser, Shona [0000-0003-1505-0652], Frempong, Raymond Boadi [0000-0002-4603-5570], Fugelsang, Jonathan [0000-0002-6342-7023], Gale, Jessica [0000-0001-5677-8629], García-Navarro, E Begoña [0000-0001-6913-8882], Gray, Kurt [0000-0001-5816-2676], Griffin, Siobhán M [0000-0002-3613-2844], Gronfeldt, Bjarki [0000-0001-9941-7903], Gruber, June [0000-0002-7789-1353], Halperin, Eran [0000-0002-3379-2935], Herzon, Volo [0000-0001-7781-1651], Hruška, Matej [0000-0002-4521-3697], Hudecek, Matthias FC [0000-0002-7696-766X], Isler, Ozan [0000-0002-4638-2230], Jangard, Simon [0000-0002-7876-4161], Jørgensen, Frederik [0000-0002-5461-912X], Keudel, Oleksandra [0000-0001-6322-3103], Koppel, Lina [0000-0002-6302-0047], Koverola, Mika [0000-0001-8227-6120], Kunnari, Anton [0000-0002-2951-6399], Leota, Josh [0000-0002-7714-4630], Lermer, Eva [0000-0002-6600-9580], Li, Chunyun [0000-0001-5909-0889], Longoni, Chiara [0000-0002-4945-4957], McCashin, Darragh [0000-0003-2686-2111], Mikloušić, Igor [0000-0002-6539-2901], Monroy-Fonseca, César [0000-0003-4696-8159], Morales-Marente, Elena [0000-0002-1227-9606], Moreau, David [0000-0002-1957-1941], Muda, Rafał [0000-0003-4953-6642], Myer, Annalisa [0000-0002-2363-4757], Nash, Kyle [0000-0003-0461-3835], Nitschke, Jonas P [0000-0002-3244-8585], Nurse, Matthew S [0000-0003-1787-5914], de Mello, Victoria Oldemburgo [0000-0003-2867-8529], Palacios-Galvez, Maria Soledad [0000-0002-6802-6202], Pan, Yafeng [0000-0002-5633-8313], Papp, Zsófia [0000-0001-6257-0568], Pärnamets, Philip [0000-0001-8360-9097], Paruzel-Czachura, Mariola [0000-0002-8716-9778], Perander, Silva [0000-0001-6711-8079], Pitman, Michael [0000-0001-5532-5388], Raza, Ali [0000-0002-2438-6054], Rêgo, Gabriel Gaudencio [0000-0003-3304-4723], Robertson, Claire [0000-0001-8403-6358], Rodríguez-Pascual, Iván [0000-0002-5385-3643], Saikkonen, Teemu [0000-0001-9619-3270], Salvador-Ginez, Octavio [0000-0002-1652-8788], Sampaio, Waldir M [0000-0002-6066-4314], Santi, Gaia Chiara [0000-0002-9253-6122], Schultner, David [0000-0003-2253-4065], Schutte, Enid [0000-0002-6653-5409], Scott, Andy [0000-0002-3294-0078], Skali, Ahmed [0000-0002-4753-3280], Stefaniak, Anna [0000-0002-1706-7784], Sternisko, Anni [0000-0002-2507-3076], Strickland, Brent [0000-0002-7573-3722], Thomas, Jeffrey P [0000-0002-5939-5559], Tinghög, Gustav [0000-0002-8159-1249], Tucciarelli, Raffaele [0000-0002-0342-308X], Tyrala, Michael [0000-0001-5268-8319], Ungson, Nick D [0000-0003-2494-4498], Uysal, Mete Sefa [0000-0002-8698-9213], Van Rooy, Dirk [0000-0003-2525-5408], Västfjäll, Daniel [0000-0003-2873-4500], Vieira, Joana B [0000-0001-7335-4588], von Sikorski, Christian [0000-0002-3787-8277], Walker, Alexander C [0000-0003-1431-6770], Watermeyer, Jennifer [0000-0001-7918-8832], Willardt, Robin [0000-0002-2495-3450], Wohl, Michael JA [0000-0001-6945-5562], Wójcik, Adrian Dominik [0000-0002-7073-6019], Wu, Kaidi [0000-0001-6881-7437], Yamada, Yuki [0000-0003-1431-568X], Yilmaz, Onurcan [0000-0002-6094-7162], Yogeeswaran, Kumar [0000-0002-1978-5077], Ziemer, Carolin-Theresa [0000-0002-0794-7702], Zwaan, Rolf A [0000-0001-9967-7879], Boggio, Paulo Sergio [0000-0002-6109-0447], Van Lange, Paul AM [0000-0001-7774-6984], Prasad, Rajib [0000-0003-0913-1624], Onderco, Michal [0000-0001-9911-3782], O'Madagain, Cathal [0000-0002-4086-524X], Nesh-Nash, Tarik [0000-0002-5532-9095], Kubin, Emily [0000-0003-0606-8594], Gümren, Mert [0000-0002-3298-6295], Fenwick, Ali [0000-0002-5412-9745], Ertan, Arhan S [0000-0001-9730-8391], Bernstein, Michael J [0000-0002-8083-9839], Amara, Hanane [0000-0003-0732-2320], Van Bavel, Jay Joseph [0000-0002-2520-0442], Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, Sociale Psychologie (Psychologie, FMG), ASCoR Other Research (FMG), Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto-yliopisto, Department of Digital Humanities, Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Cognitive Science, High Performance Cognition group, Mind and Matter, and Department of Computer Science

Subjects
Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi, Economics, COVID-19, social distancing, hygiene, policy support, public health measures, J Political Science, [SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology, psychology, Settore SECS-P/02 - Politica Economica, Q1, H Social Sciences, [STAT.ML]Statistics [stat]/Machine Learning [stat.ML], SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, RA0421, RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine, Machine learning, Psychology, Nationalekonomi, Settore SECS-P/01 - Economia Politica, MCC, Computer. Automation, Psykologi (exklusive tillämpad psykologi), DAS, Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy, [SHS.SCIPO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science, Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology), machine learning, Settore SECS-P/03 - Scienza delle Finanze, 5171 Political Science, Human medicine, COVID-19, social distancing, hygiene, policy support, public health measures
Abstract

At the beginning of 2020, COVID-19 became a global problem. Despite all the efforts to emphasize the relevance of preventive measures, not everyone adhered to them. Thus, learning more about the characteristics determining attitudinal and behavioral responses to the pandemic is crucial to improving future interventions. In this study, we applied machine learning on the multinational data collected by the International Collaboration on the Social and Moral Psychology of COVID-19 (N = 51,404) to test the predictive efficacy of constructs from social, moral, cognitive, and personality psychology, as well as socio-demographic factors, in the attitudinal and behavioral responses to the pandemic. The results point to several valuable insights. Internalized moral identity provided the most consistent predictive contribution—individuals perceiving moral traits as central to their self-concept reported higher adherence to preventive measures. Similar results were found for morality as cooperation, symbolized moral identity, self-control, open-mindedness, and collective narcissism, while the inverse relationship was evident for the endorsement of conspiracy theories. However, we also found a non-neglible variability in the explained variance and predictive contributions with respect to macro-level factors such as the pandemic stage or cultural region. Overall, the results underscore the importance of morality-related and contextual factors in understanding adherence to public health recommendations during the pandemic., PNAS Nexus, 1 (3), ISSN:2752-6542

Published
2022

28. Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication.

Author

Ebersole, Charles R., Atherton, Olivia E., Belanger, Aimee L., Skulborstad, Hayley M., Allen, Jill M., Banks, Jonathan B., Baranski, Erica, Bernstein, Michael J., Bonfiglio, Diane B.V., Boucher, Leanne, Brown, Elizabeth R., Budiman, Nancy I., Cairo, Athena H., Capaldi, Colin A., Chartier, Christopher R., Chung, Joanne M., Cicero, David C., Coleman, Jennifer A., Conway, John G., and Davis, William E.

Subjects
*ACADEMIC achievement, *CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, *INDIVIDUAL differences, *BEHAVIORAL research, *REPLICATION (Experimental design), *DATA quality, *PSYCHOLOGY
Abstract

The university participant pool is a key resource for behavioral research, and data quality is believed to vary over the course of the academic semester. This crowdsourced project examined time of semester variation in 10 known effects, 10 individual differences, and 3 data quality indicators over the course of the academic semester in 20 participant pools ( N = 2696) and with an online sample ( N = 737). Weak time of semester effects were observed on data quality indicators, participant sex, and a few individual differences—conscientiousness, mood, and stress. However, there was little evidence for time of semester qualifying experimental or correlational effects. The generality of this evidence is unknown because only a subset of the tested effects demonstrated evidence for the original result in the whole sample. Mean characteristics of pool samples change slightly during the semester, but these data suggest that those changes are mostly irrelevant for detecting effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results