Search

Since its inception, psychiatry has undergone several periods of radical identity transformation. Initially limited to psychotherapy alone, the advent of medications stimulated an era of biological psychiatry. For years, medications served as the mainstay of biological treatments, paralleled by a rise in treatment resistance. Brain stimulation therapies are psychiatry's newest arm of intervention and represent an area ripe for exploration. These techniques offer new hope to treatment-resistant patients, but in a manner often dissociated from psychoanalytic conceptualization and the practice of psychotherapy. There is growing interest in bridging this divide. In this article, we continue the efforts at interweaving what may seem to be disparate approaches through the topic of treatment resistance. This article aims to engage interventional psychiatrists in considering psychosocial dimensions of their treatments and to provide education for psychoanalytic clinicians on the history, mechanism of action, and applications of brain stimulation technologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the years, the psychiatric inpatient treatment paradigm has shifted to more brief stays focused on acute stabilization and psychopharmacologic-focused interventions, rather than individual psychotherapeutic engagement. Unfortunately, this has allowed patients with complex interpersonal dynamics, particularly borderline personality disorder, to slip through the cracks of effective treatment. This can contribute to repeated inpatient admissions, where both patients and clinicians feel trapped in a maladaptive, unhelpful cycle. In this article, we examine the evolution of inpatient treatment with de-emphasized psychotherapy practices, review the particular dynamics that patients with borderline personality disorder may evoke within an interdisciplinary treatment team, and provide a framework of clinically based vignettes for scenarios that may arise within inpatient treatment of this patient population. With attention to countertransference patterns and common pitfalls of communication, we offer alternative approaches and conversations with the hopes of improving outcomes and alliances in a new landscape of psychiatric practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]