Search

Aim: Despite their emphasis on engagement, there has been little research on patients' and families' experiences of care in early intervention services for psychosis. We sought to compare patients' and families' experiences of care in two similar early psychosis services in Montreal, Canada and Chennai, India. Because no patient- or family-reported experience measures had been used in a low- and middle-income context, we created a new measure, Show me you care. Here we present its development and psychometric properties., Methods: Show me you care was created based on the literature and stakeholder inputs. Its patient and family versions contain the same nine items (rated on a 7-point scale) about various supportive behaviours of treatment providers towards patients and families. Patients (N = 293) and families (N = 237) completed the measure in French/English in Montreal and Tamil/English in Chennai. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, convergent validity, and ease of use were evaluated., Results: Test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients) ranged from excellent (0.95) to good (0.66) across the patient and family versions, in Montreal and Chennai, and in English, French, and Tamil. Internal consistency estimates (Cronbach's alphas) were excellent (≥0.87). The measure was reported to be easy to understand and complete., Conclusion: Show me you care fills a gap between principles and practice by making engagement and collaboration as central to measurement in early intervention as it is to its philosophy. Having been co-designed and developed in three languages and tested in a low-and-middle-income and a high-income context, our tool has the potential for global application., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: Given the paucity of functional recovery measures for young people with psychosis, we developed and conducted psychometric testing of the Functional Outcomes Interview (FOI) and the Roles and Aspirations Among Youth scale (RAY; a much-needed patient-reported outcome measure)., Method: Both measures were developed in English, Tamil, and French through discussions with professionals, participants, and families at early psychosis programs in Canada and India. The FOI assesses the number and tenure of functional roles and allows the nuanced assessment of each role in terms of performance, need for support, and quality of social contacts. The roles include work, school, household responsibilities, parenting/caregiving, and efforts to return to work/school. The RAY is a self-report of current roles and future aspirations. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, factorial validity, and concurrent validity for the RAY; and inter-rater reliability (IRR), internal consistency, and concurrent validity for the FOI were assessed., Results: The RAY had adequate internal consistency and temporal stability and was unidimensional in factor analysis. The FOI had acceptable IRR and internal consistency, as evinced by comparable performance ratings across functional roles. Significant associations between our novel measures and well-established measures of functioning and negative symptoms indicate concurrent validity., Conclusions and Implications for Practice: The FOI and RAY were designed to be youth friendly, assess aspirations, and acknowledge individuals as desiring and holding multiple roles. They thus represent a significant advancement in assessing functional recovery in first-episode psychosis. Having been tested in two distinct settings, these measures show promise for wider deployment across geo-cultural contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Aim: To compare social, recreational and independent functioning among persons with psychosis across two geo-cultural contexts, we adapted the well-established Social Functioning Scale (SFS) and translated it into French and Tamil. We present the development and psychometric testing of this adaptation, the SFS-Early Intervention., Methods: Sixteen items were added to reflect contemporary youth activities (e.g., online games) and 31 items adapted to enhance applicability and/or include context-specific examples (e.g., 'church activity' replaced with 'religious/spiritual activity'). Psychometric properties and participant feedback were evaluated., Results: Test-retest reliability (ICCs) ranged from 0.813 to 0.964. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α) ranged from .749 to .936 across sites and languages. Correlations with original subscales were high. The scale was rated easy to complete and understand., Conclusions: The SFS-Early Intervention is a promising patient-reported measure of social, recreational and independent functioning. Our approach shows that conceptually sound existing measures are adaptable to different times and contexts., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Specialized early intervention programs for individuals experiencing a first episode of psychosis prioritize service engagement, generally operationalized as attendance, treatment completion, therapeutic alliance, and treatment adherence. However, there are critical theoretical and methodological gaps in understanding how service users experience and define their engagement with the service., Objectives: This study aimed to explore how current and former service users define their engagement with a specialized early intervention program., Design: A qualitative descriptive approach was used to explore service users' decisions to use, remain involved with, and/or leave early intervention services., Setting: This study took place in an early intervention service for psychosis in Montreal, Canada., Participants: Twenty-four participants who had experienced a first episode of psychosis and had been engaged in the service to varying degrees (fully engaged, partially engaged, disengaged) took part in in-depth interviews., Methods: In-depth interviews were employed to collect rich insights into participants' experiences and perceptions. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis, beginning with an inductive approach and completing the analysis using a theoretical approach. During the analysis, our original notions of engagement and disengagement were challenged by theorizing engagement in terms of agency and structure. Researchers engaged in reflexive practices to maintain and promote research rigor and trustworthiness., Results: Participants' narratives were thematically analyzed and organized into three themes: fluidity and temporality of engagement and disengagement; engagement as an ongoing negotiation; and critical structures and agency. Participants described engagement in a variety of ways, some of which were broader than service use and focused on self-care and commitment to recovery. These conceptions were subject to change as the individuals' perceptions of their needs changed. As needs changed, individuals also negotiated and renegotiated their care needs with themselves and with their treatment team. These exercises of agency were constrained by key structures: the treatment team, family and friends, and societal conceptions of mental health., Conclusions: Our study findings argue for an expanded definition of engagement which prioritizes individuals' experience and acknowledges the steps towards recovery that they may make outside of the purview of the service. It also underlines the importance of a treatment structure which aligns with individuals' needs for both support and autonomy., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Dr. Malla reports research funding for an investigator-initiated project from BMS Canada and honoraria for lectures and consulting activities with Lundbeck and Otsuka. All of these are unrelated to the present work.The other authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Varying perceptions of who should be responsible for supporting individuals with mental health problems may contribute to their needs remaining unmet. A qualitative descriptive design was used to explore these perceptions among key stakeholders. Focus groups were conducted with 13 service users, 12 family members, and 18 treatment providers from an early psychosis intervention program in Montreal, Canada. Individual interviews were conducted with six mental health policy-/decision-makers. Participants across stakeholder groups assigned a range of responsibilities to individuals with mental health problems, stakeholders in these individuals' immediate and extended social networks (e.g., families), macro-level stakeholders with influence (e.g., government), and society as a whole. Perceived failings of the health care system and the need for greater sharing of roles and responsibilities also emerged as important themes. Our findings suggest that different stakeholders should collectively assume certain responsibilities and that systems-level failings may contribute to unmet needs for mental health support.

Aim: To better understand cultural competence in early intervention for psychosis, we compared service users' and service providers' perceptions of the importance of providers being culturally competent and attentive to aspects of culture., Methods: At a Canadian early intervention programme, a validated scale was adapted to assess service user (N = 51) and provider (N = 30) perceptions of service providers' cultural competence and the importance accorded thereto., Results: Analyses of variance revealed that the importance of service providers being culturally competent was rated highest by service providers, followed by visible minority service users, followed by white service users. Providers rated themselves as being more interested in knowing about service users' culture than service users perceived them to be., Conclusions: Service users accorded less import to service providers' cultural competence than providers themselves, owing possibly to varied socialization. A mismatch in users' and providers' views on providers' efforts to know their users' cultures may influence mental healthcare outcomes., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: Although the negative consequences associated with first-episode psychosis (FEP) have been well investigated, relatively less is known about positive changes that people may experience after FEP. Existing literature is disparate and in need of synthesis. Such a synthesis can inform the design of mental health services that foster strengths, hope, and optimism. The objective of this study was to synthesize the literature on how positive change is experienced after FEP by affected persons and their families and friends and to delineate the individual, social, and structural factors facilitating positive change., Methods: A librarian-assisted systematic review of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies published in English between 1970 and 2015 was conducted. Articles identified from three databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase) and through additional search strategies were screened. Results sections were open coded and analyzed by using thematic synthesis., Results: Of the 2,777 studies identified, 40 were retained. The synthesis of findings showed that after FEP, service users and their families and friends experienced positive changes at the individual (for example, more insight and clarity), interpersonal (for example, improved relationships), and spiritual levels (for example, greater religiosity). In addition to being facilitated by mental health services, these positive changes were enabled by personal (for example, motivation), social (for example, family support), and spiritual (for example, prayer) factors., Conclusions: Suffering is a core experience of FEP from which a range of positive changes can follow among service users and their families and friends. It may be beneficial for mental health services to specifically strive to promote these positive changes.

Objective: Diagnostic stability is an important indicator of the reliability and validity of psychiatric diagnoses and has implications in clinical practice and research. While several studies have investigated the diagnostic stability of first-episode psychosis (FEP) disorders, less is known about psychiatric comorbidity in FEP and the persistence of such comorbid conditions over time. Our study aimed to confirm the diagnostic stability of FEP disorders and determine the variation in persistence of comorbid substance use disorders (SUDs), mood disorders, and anxiety disorders over 1 year., Method: The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders-Patient Edition was conducted at first presentation and repeated after 1 year (or reconstructed) for 214 FEP patients at the Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychoses-Montreal., Results: Psychotic disorder diagnoses were retained by 76.2% of patients at 1 year, schizophrenia being the most stable diagnosis (92.1%). Most diagnostic shifts were to schizophrenia and schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Comorbid SUDs, anxiety disorders, and mood disorders persisted for 50.7%, 64.0%, and 16.7% of patients, respectively. Many new cases of each of these disorders also emerged at 1-year follow-up., Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the stability of primary psychotic disorder diagnoses and greater fluidity of comorbid psychiatric diagnoses, with anxiety disorders persisting as comorbid conditions more than mood disorders and SUDs. These results highlight the importance of repeating a structured diagnostic assessment longitudinally, especially for consideration of comorbid conditions.