Search

犯罪被害者支援に携わった警察官を対象にしてアンケート調査をし,そのストレス状況(CIS・PTSD傾向の二次受傷など)および予防,ストレス緩和要因について臨床心理学的視点から検討をした。警察・被害者支援室の協力を得て,2006年に実施した426名について分析した。その結果, a)ストレスヘの対処は,バランスが大切であること, b)PTSD傾向者への援助や予防は,画一的におこなうのではなく,その人のもつコーピング・スタイル(coping Style)に応じたものが有効であること, c)女性警察官や既婚者への支援はより手厚くする必要があること,などが,明らかになった。二次受傷(secondary traumatic stress)の先行研究でも支援者保有が有効であることは,多々指摘されており,これらの観点を活かして職場での精神的支えをどのように作るかが,犯罪被害者支援を左右する鍵となるだろうと考察された。, A questionnaire survey was carried out in 2006 for the police officers who took part in support activities for crime victims. We analyzed the results of 426 cases collected by Crime Victims Branch of A Police Office, concerning the stress situation(CIS, Secondary traumatic stress etc.), its prevention, and stress coping factors from the point of view of Clinical psychology. As the result, fo1lowing points became clear: a)'Balance' is important to cope with stress. b) It is more effective for the person with PTSD tendency to be given support and preventive help according to his/her own stress coping style. c)Female police officers and married police officers need to be supported with greater care. As the many previous researches on Secondary traumatic stress indicate, this investigation also seems to prove that the key in supporting crime victims is for the helpers themselves to have means of mental support at their workplaces.

本研究では心的外傷(トラウマ)のパーソナリティに及ぼす影響が,ロールシャッハ反応にどのように表出するのか, その現れを探索した。 研究対象としてPTSDの事例8ケース, トラウマとの関係が深いとされるBPDの事例11ケース, 統制群として健康群10ケースのロールシャッハ・プロトコルを用い, 名古屋大学式技法によるスコアの量的分析と,反応の質的分析を行なった。結果として,「血液反応」(Bl)の多さ, Positive feeling%の少なさ, 色彩優位の反応の多さ(FC, This research is to investigate quantitatively and qualitatively how trauma effects the Rorschach responses of a group of people with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and those with Borderline Personality Disorder who had traumatic experiences, applying Nagoya University Method.We made a quantitative comparison between Rorschach protocols of the following groups. Firstly between PTSD group (n=8) and control group (N=10), secondly BPD group (n=11) and control group, and lastly PTSD group and BPD group. The significant differences seen commonly in the Rorschach responses of the BPD group and those of the PTSD group were following: (a) high frequency of 'blood' response, (b)low Positive feeling%, (c)a predominance of color-dominated(CF and C) over form-dominated color(FC) responses.Through qualitative investigation, common characteristics were seen in subdivision of Affective Symbolism. Both high Anxiety feelings of PTSD and BPD were consisted of 'threatening percepts', 'disgusting percepts', and 'depressive gloomy percepts'. The elements commonly seen in the BPD group and those seen in the PTSD group reflected the difference of traumatic experiences both groups went through. Moreover, the responses indicating "re-experiencing of the traumatic event" which is one of the main symptoms of PTSD were seen in many cases of both FTSD and BPD.These results seem to suggest that trauma can influence Rorschach responses in the ways shown above.