Search

Abstract Background Changes to the food environment during the Covid-19 pandemic significantly influenced food acquisition and consumption, contributing to a higher prevalence of food insecurity. We assessed the perception of the food environment and its association with food insecurity in households of Brazilian schoolchildren during the Covid-19 pandemic. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey between March and May 2021 with adults (n = 475) responsible for purchasing and/or preparing food at the students' homes aged between 6 months and 17 years enrolled in public school from two Brazilian municipalities. We assessed outcomes using the Brazilian Food Insecurity Scale (EBIA). We measured perceptions of the food environment by evaluating the perceived availability, price, and quality of fruits and vegetables (FV) and ultra-processed foods (UPF) sold in the neighbourhood. Results The results indicate that 55.1% of respondents experienced mild food insecurity, and 14.5% experienced moderate or severe food insecurity. The perception of the ease of purchase (8.5% vs. 64.2%) and variety (78.9% vs. 57.9%) of UPF was higher at all levels of food security and insecurity compared to the same questions on FV. The level of food insecurity was associated with the perceived price of FV (p

Abstract Objective: To investigate whether the combined consumption of fresh/minimally processed and ultra-processed food is associated with food insecurity (FI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: Cross-sectional observational study was derived from a survey using a population-based search of a complex sample. FI was assessed using the validated Brazilian Food Insecurity Scale. Food consumption was assessed using a qualitative FFQ and the NOVA classification for fresh/minimally processed food and ultra-processed food. A scoring system was used to evaluate combined food consumption according to the extent and purpose of processing, considering the weekly consumption of the two groups (according to the NOVA classification). Higher punctuation reflects worse diet quality (higher consumption of ultra-processed foods and lower consumption of fresh/minimally processed foods). A theoretical causality model was constructed using a directed acyclic graph, and multivariate analysis was performed using Poisson regression to test the association between FI and food consumption. Setting: Ouro Preto and Mariana, Brazil, between October and December 2020. Participants: An epidemiological household survey was conducted with 1753 individuals selected through a stratified and clustered sampling design in three stages. Results: Those with food consumption scores in the fourth quartile had a 60 % higher prevalence ratio (PR) for FI (PR: 1·60 and 95 % CI: 1·06 - 2·40). Also, the increased consumption of fresh/minimally processed foods and low consumption of ultra-processed foods presented a 45 % lower prevalence ratio of FI (PR: 0·55 and 95 % CI: 0·40 – 0·80). Conclusion: These results indicate an inverse association between FI and diet quality.

Introdução: Os distúrbios alimentares são síndromes comportamentais que têm uma etiologia multifatorial envolvendo fatores genéticos, psicológicos e socioculturais. A preocupação com a imagem corporal e, como consequência, a maior incidência de distúrbios alimentares, tornou-se um grande fardo entre os profissionais de saúde. Objetivo: Avaliar a distorção e insatisfação da imagem corporal e o risco de distúrbios alimentares. Métodos: Estudo transversal, com 225 profissionais e estudantes dos últimos dois anos de cursos da área de saúde, de um município da Região Sudeste do Brasil. A distorção da imagem corporal e a insatisfação corporal foram medidas pela escala de silhuetas e comparadas com o índice de massa corporal real. O risco de distúrbios alimentares foi avaliado por meio do Teste de Atitude Alimentar (EAT-26). Resultados: A prevalência da distorção da imagem corporal no nível "percepção de ver-se maior" foi de 76,89%; 52,00% dos participantes desejavam perder peso, com a maior prevalência entre as mulheres (78,63%). Alguns fatores foram determinantes para estes resultados, entre eles, ser do sexo feminino, ter excesso de gordura corporal, maior circunferência da cintura e IMC. Ao avaliar o risco de desenvolver transtorno alimentar, os profissionais que se viam menores do que realmente são (20,51%) e aqueles que estavam satisfeitos com sua imagem corporal (22,64%) tinham o maior risco. Conclusão: Distorção e insatisfação com a imagem corporal foram altamente prevalentes entre os profissionais de saúde, especialmente os nutricionistas. A circunferência da cintura acima ou igual a 94 cm para homens e 80 cm para mulheres e o IMC elevado aumentaram as chances de distorção e insatisfação da imagem corporal.