1. Erectile dysfunction and the internet: drug company manipulation of public and professional opinion.
- Author
-
Read J and Mati E
- Subjects
- Adult, Advertising ethics, Conflict of Interest, Erectile Dysfunction etiology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Piperazines therapeutic use, Purines therapeutic use, Sildenafil Citrate, Sulfonamides therapeutic use, Attitude of Health Personnel, Consumer Health Information ethics, Erectile Dysfunction drug therapy, Erectile Dysfunction psychology, Ethics, Pharmacy, Internet ethics, Machiavellianism, Public Opinion
- Abstract
Given that the Internet is now a major source of information regarding health and mental health problems, and that it is in the interest of the pharmaceutical industry to influence public and professional opinion, this study evaluated 70 websites about erectile dysfunction. The 31 drug company-funded websites (44%) were, compared with the 39 websites that are not industry funded, significantly more biased toward biological factors in general, and toward medication in particular (p < .01). The high proportion of websites that are industry sponsored, and the bias of those websites, confirms previous studies on depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and demonstrates that drug companies are using their financial might to manipulate public and professional opinion on the Internet.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF