83 results on '"Peer Review methods"'
Search Results
2. Beyond peer review: rethinking scientific publishing with artificial intelligence.
3. Author Guide for Addressing Animal Methods Bias in Publishing.
4. Integrity measures take its toll: Introducing a complete supplement issue with retractions only.
5. Publish or Perish: Five Steps to Navigating a Less Painful Peer Review.
6. Peer-Review and Rejection Causes in Submitting Original Medical Manuscripts.
7. Evaluation of intervention reporting in published emergency medicine clinical trials.
8. Science that Inspires.
9. A single, open access journal may prevent the primary publishing problems in the life sciences.
10. Avoiding predatory journals: Quick peer review processes too good to be true.
11. The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.
12. Reemphasizing the value of query letters in the digital age.
13. New Online Manuscript Submission System of Balkan Medical Journal
14. Preprints: Facilitating early discovery, access, and feedback.
15. Will research preprints improve healthcare for patients?
16. Recognition for Reviewers: PUBLONS!
17. Reviewing scientific manuscripts.
18. The Pipeline From Abstract Presentation to Publication in Pediatric Hospital Medicine.
19. More than 1000 new manuscripts in 2017.
20. Peer review: A critical cog in the scholarship wheel.
21. Civil Discourse and Peer Review.
22. Better Serving Our Readers.
23. Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Peer Review.
24. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison.
25. Peer Review.
26. Section Editor's Notebook: Mentoring, Academic Careers, and Manuscript Reviewing.
27. A new template for referees and guidance on writing high quality papers.
28. Publons.com: credit where credit is due.
29. Post Publication Peer Review: Is it Coming to Your Nursing Journal?
30. How can I reduce the chances of my paper being rejected?
31. How to Review a Manuscript.
32. Response to letter Dr Rezaeian: journals should review articles, not protocols.
33. Are Private Interests Clouding the Peer-Review Process of the WHO Bulletin? A Case Study.
34. Reducing publication bias in biomedical research: reviewing and registering protocol with a suitable journal.
35. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models.
36. Advancing the Rigour and Integrity of Our Science: The Registered Reports Initiative.
37. Reviewers: The unsung heroes of publication.
38. Reference accuracy: authors', reviewers', editors', and publishers' contributions.
39. How to get published and how to review.
40. Trainees in peer review: our experience.
41. The history and practice of peer review.
42. Thumbs down, thumbs up: by Caveman.
43. The academic welfare state: making peer-review count.
44. A two-step manuscript submission process can reduce publication bias.
45. To blind or not to blind? That remains the question.
46. Peer review: purpose, process and publication.
47. Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals.
48. Submitting a manuscript to the ASRT.
49. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors.
50. Manuscript peer review: a guide for advanced practice nurses.
Catalog
Books, media, physical & digital resources
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.