Search

Enlargement of the sinus of Valsalva (SOV) is common in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs), and management at the time of aortic valve replacement (AVR) and concomitant ascending aorta replacement/repair is controversial.Between January 2000 and July 2017, 400 patients with BAVs underwent AVR and concomitant ascending aorta repair (graft replacement, 79%; aortoplasty, 21%). To assess the impact of the initial SOV dimension on future dilatation and outcomes, patients were stratified into 2 groups: SOV of less than 40 mm (SOV40 mm) (n = 209) and SOV of 40 mm or larger (SOV≥40 mm) (n = 191).Patients with SOV≥40 mm were older and more often male. At a median follow-up of 8.1 years (interquartile range, 7.4-9.1 years), 6 patients underwent reoperations on the ascending or sinus portion of the aorta due to aneurysmal dilatation, and enlargement of the sinus was the primary indication for operation in 1 patient. Adjusted analysis showed that baseline SOV and SOV dimension over time were not associated with late outcomes. A gradual increase in SOV diameter over time was identified (P = .004). Patients with smaller baseline SOV diameters showed an initial early decrease in diameter, followed by gradual increase, whereas those with larger baseline diameters had a stable early phase, followed by gradual dilatation.Ascending aorta replacement may lead to an initial remodeling/stabilizing effect on the spared bicuspid aortic root, which is more pronounced in patients with lower SOV diameters. In addition, our data demonstrate that the retained aortic sinuses enlarge slowly, and within the limited follow-up of our study, SOV diameter was not a risk factor for survival or reoperation.

Background The anomalous circumflex coronary artery (ACCA) from the right coronary artery or sinus of Valsalva lies in proximity to the aortic valve annulus. This study sought to determine the prevalence of injury to the ACCA during surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Methods We queried the databases of the Departments of Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiovascular Diseases of Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota for all patients who underwent SAVR in the setting of an ACCA. The study investigators identified 31 patients operated on from September 2002 through December 2018. The end point was myocardial ischemia in the distribution of the ACCA. Results The patients’ mean age was 69 ± 11 years, sex was female in 8 patients (26%), and ejection fraction was 62% (interquartile range, 59% to 68%). No patient underwent exploration of the ACCA, but 5 (16%) had a coronary artery bypass graft to the ACCA. No patient demonstrated myocardial infarction or underwent perioperative intervention on the ACCA; however, discharge echocardiography showed new lateral wall motion abnormality in 5 (16%) patients that was associated with a reduction in ejection fraction of −11% from baseline (P = .007). Coronary artery bypass graft to the ACCA was not protective of new lateral wall motion abnormality (P = .968). Mortality was 34% ± 10% at 10 years and was not associated with new lateral wall motion abnormality (log-rank test P = .183). Conclusions Clinically apparent myocardial infarction was not identified after SAVR, but echocardiographic evidence of myocardial ischemia in the distribution of the ACCA was identified in 16% of patients. Protective adjuvant intervention on the ACCA may be indicated. Further study is warranted.

Endovascular repair has been introduced to decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with open surgical repair of aortic arch pathology. This case illustrates a 71-year-old male patient with an asymptomatic saccular aortic arch aneurysm treated by total endovascular aortic repair using 3-vessel inner branch stent graft. Postoperative course was unremarkable, and the patient was discharge home on postoperative day 3. Total endovascular aortic arch repair is a suitable alternative in higher-risk patients with aortic arch aneurysms who are not ideally suited for open surgical repair.

Previous studies suggest that patients with prior or current hematologic malignancy are at increased risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications when undergoing cardiac surgery. The aim of this review was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with a history of hematologic malignancy to those of similar patients with no known blood dyscrasia.From January 1993 to June 2017, 37,839 patients underwent elective cardiac surgery at Mayo Clinic. We matched 612 patients (1.6%) with a history of hematologic malignancy to 612 controls, and compared operative details, early postoperative complications, and late survival.The median age of matched patients with hematologic malignancy was 71 years (interquartile range [IQR], 62 to 77) and 71 years (IQR, 62 to 77) for patients without cancer. Patients with prior diagnosis of malignancy had lower hemoglobin levels, 12.8 (IQR, 11.5 to 13.8) vs 13.5 (IQR, 12.2 to 14.6; P.001), but similar platelet counts, 195 (IQR, 147 to 263) vs 203 (IQR, 170 to 245; P = .533). Patients with malignancy were at greater risk of receiving postoperative blood transfusions (47.4% vs 35.6%, P.001). However, reoperations for postoperative bleeding (4.7% vs 3.3%, P = .253) and stroke (1.3% vs 1.3%, P.999) were similar. Thirty-day mortality was 3.3% among patients with hematologic malignancy and 1.5% among matched controls (P = .061). Overall survival among patients with cancer was reduced (P.0001).Although late survival is reduced in patients with hematologic malignancies, early outcomes are generally similar to those of matched controls. Therefore, surgery should not be withheld from patients with a diagnosis of hematologic malignancy who would benefit from cardiac procedures.

OBJECTIVES Approximately 10% of lung transplant recipients have had previous cardiothoracic surgery. We sought to determine if previous surgery affects outcomes after lung transplant at a national level. METHODS The United Network for Organ Sharing database was analysed from 2005 to 2019 to include adult patients who underwent lung transplant who had previous cardiac surgery and previous thoracic surgery. T-test and chi-squared analysis were used to compare perioperative outcomes. Long-term survival comparison was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method in an unadjusted and propensity-matched analysis. RESULTS Out of 24 784 lung transplants, 691 (2.7%) had previous cardiac surgery and 1321 (6.5%) had previous thoracic surgery. Operative mortality was worse in previous cardiac surgery [42 (6.1%)] versus no previous cardiac surgery [740 (3.1%), P CONCLUSIONS Previous cardiac surgery prior to lung transplant results in worse survival related to cardiovascular death and malignancies. Previous thoracic surgery worsens perioperative outcomes but does not affect long-term survival.

There is limited evidence evaluating valve function and right heart remodeling after tricuspid valve replacement (TVR), as well as whether the choice of prosthesis has an impact on these outcomes.We reviewed 1043 consecutive adult patients who underwent first-time TVR; 33% had previous aortic and/or mitral valve operations. Severe tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) was the indication for surgery in 94% patients. A mechanical valve was used in 149 (14%) patients and a bioprosthetic valve in 894 (86%). Concomitant major cardiac procedures were performed in 57% of patients.The median age of the cohort was 68.8 (range, 25-94) years, and 57% were female. Overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 50% and 31%, respectively. Adjusted survival and cumulative incidence of reoperation after TVR were similar in patients with bioprosthetic and mechanical valves. Overall, right ventricular (RV) function and dilation improved postoperatively with the estimated proportion of patients with moderate or greater RV systolic dysfunction/dilatation decreasing by around 20% at 3 years follow-up. After adjusting for preoperative degree of dysfunction/dilatation, valve type had no effect on late improvement in RV function and dilation. Bioprosthetic TVR was associated with greater rates of recurrence of moderate or greater TR over late follow-up. Overall, a slight decline in tricuspid valve gradients was observed over time.Mechanical and bioprosthetic valves provide comparable survival, incidence of reoperation, and recovery of RV systolic function and size after TVR. Bioprosthetic valves develop significant TR over time, and mechanical valves may have an advantage for younger patients and those needing anticoagulation.

Type A aortic dissection most often requires emergent surgery to prevent malperfusion, stroke, and/or rupture of aorta. To achieve the structural goals of the operation, the conduct of the surgery is targeted from it inception at restoring true lumen flow. In this regard, institution of cardiopulmonary bypass and circulation management is key to allow adequate systemic flow, perfusion of brain and visceral organs and comprehensive systemic cooling to achieve circulatory arrest when needed. Different strategies have been used to establish adequate true lumen perfusion with varying success rates, with the most common still being femoral cannulation. More recently axillary and central cannulation strategies have shown satisfactory results by allowing more reliable true lumen flow. Cannulation approach should, therefore, depend on individual patient characteristics, presentation, and true lumen anatomy.

Congenital Aortic arch malformations are rare in adults. Often they present with hypertension or tracheoesophageal compression. The involved anatomy is dependent on the sidedness of the aortic arch and the variable development of the primitive pharyngeal arches. Sternotomy and thoracotomy are usually required for surgical repair, while need for circulatory arrest is not uncommon. With caution and adequate planning, surgery can be carried out with satisfactory results.

OBJECTIVESFunctional tricuspid regurgitation (fTR) has been amenable to tricuspid valve repair (TVr), with fewer patients needing tricuspid valve replacement (TVR). We sought to review our experience of tricuspid valve surgery for fTR.METHODSA retrospective analysis of adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent primary tricuspid valve surgery for fTR (n = 926; mean age 68.6 ± 12.5 years; 67% females) from January 1993 through June 2018 was conducted. There were 767 (83%) patients who underwent TVr (ring annuloplasty, 67%; purse-string annuloplasty, 33%) and 159 (17%) underwent TVR (bioprosthetic valves, 87%; mechanical valves, 13%). The median follow-up was 8.2 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.2–8.9 years].RESULTSA greater proportion of patients who underwent TVR had severe right ventricular dysfunction (P CONCLUSIONSTricuspid repair for fTR appears to have better early and late outcomes. Since previous MV surgery and TVR are identified as independent risk factors for late mortality, concomitant TVr at the time of index MV surgery may be considered. Early referral before the onset of advanced heart failure may improve outcomes.

To evaluate expansion of degenerative thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) and compare results between ascending and descending TAAs.Among patients with diagnosis of degenerative TAA (1995-2015) in Olmsted County, we studied those having at least 2 computed tomography scans of TAA throughout the follow-up. Patients were classified as ascending or descending groups according to the segment where the maximal aortic diameter was measured. Primary end points were expansion rates and factors associated with TAA growth.We investigated 137 patients, 70 (51.1%) of whom were women; 78 (56.9%) were in the ascending and 59 (43.1%) were in the descending group. Median baseline maximal aortic diameter was 48.5 mm (interquartile range, 47.0-49.9 mm) for ascending and 42.4 mm (interquartile range, 40.0-45.4 mm) for descending group (P .001). Median expansion rate was higher in the descending than the ascending group (2.0 mm/year [interquartile range, 0.9-3.2 mm/year] vs 0.2 mm/year [IQR, 0.1-0.6 mm/year]; P .001). Aneurysm in the descending aorta and larger baseline maximal aortic diameter were independently associated with TAA expansion. Advanced age and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease but not aneurysm size or location were independently associated with overall mortality (P .05). Aneurysm in the descending aorta was associated with aortic-related events (P .05).Degenerative TAAs under surveillance expand slowly. Descending TAA and larger baseline maximal aortic diameter were independently associated with more rapid TAA expansion, but these factors did not influence all-cause mortality.

The Ross procedure has several advantages, but the need for reintervention is inevitable. The aim of this study was to examine the complexity and outcomes of reoperation after the Ross procedure.Retrospective chart review was performed of patients with a prior Ross procedure who underwent reoperation at our institution from September 1991 to January 2021. Demographic, echocardiographic, surgical, and perioperative data were collected. Descriptive statistical and regression analyses were performed.A total of 105 patients underwent a reoperation at Mayo Clinic after the initial Ross procedure performed at our institution (n = 16; 16.2%) or elsewhere (n = 83; 83.8%). Mean age at the Ross procedure was 27 ± 17 years, and mean age at reoperation at our institution was 37 ± 19 years. Indications for surgical procedure varied, but 64% had autograft regurgitation as 1 of their indications for reoperation. Autograft interventions were performed in 78 patients (74.2%). Pulmonary valve or conduit replacement was performed in 56 patients (53.3%). Double root replacement was performed in 11 patients (10.5%). Aortic reconstruction was performed in 37 patients (38.4%). There were 5 early deaths (5%). During a median follow-up of 6.25 years (3 months-24 years), late deaths occurred in 14 patients (13.1%). Patients with ejection fraction30% on preoperative echocardiography had shorter duration between the Ross procedure and subsequent reoperation (P = .03).Reoperations after the Ross procedure are performed for a wide range of indications, with most due to autograft dysfunction. The number of early deaths is not low. Reoperation after the Ross procedure should be advised before left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of direct cannulation of the ascending aorta in comparison with cannulating peripheral arteries. METHODS We retrospectively analysed type A dissection patients [n = 107; median (interquartile range [IQR]) age, 64 [53–73] years] from January 2008 to March 2018. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: direct ascending aorta cannulation (group A, n = 47; median [IQR] age, 69 [54–74] years; 34% female) and non-aortic cannulation (group B, n = 60; median [IQR] age, 62 [52–72] years; 20% female). Postoperative outcomes and long-term survival were compared. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the 2 groups, except for higher creatinine in group B (median 0.9 vs 1.1, P = 0.028) and higher prevalence of dyslipidaemia in group A (58.7% vs 38.3%, P = 0.037). Overall early mortality was 12.1% (n = 13); 12.8% (n = 6) in group A and 11.7% (n = 7) in group B (P = 0.863). The incidence of stroke was 10.6% (n = 5) in group A and 6.7% (n = 4) in group B (P = 0.463). After adjusting for CPB and circulatory arrest times, there was no group difference in the length of ICU (P = 0.257) or hospital stay (P = 0.118), all-cause reoperation (P = 0.709), peak postoperative creatinine (P = 0.426) and lactate values (n = 60; P = 0.862). Overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 84%, 78% and 73%, respectively, with no difference between the 2 groups after adjustment (P = 0.629). CONCLUSIONS Direct cannulation of the ascending aorta is a safe cannulation strategy for type A dissection repair, offering the opportunity for rapid arterial cannulation and antegrade perfusion.

An 87-year-old man with a hostile ascending aorta who underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using a 26-mm Sapien 3 valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) 2 years earlier presented with chronic type A aortic dissection, which was retrospectively caused by the edge of the pusher of the TAVR implantation system. Redo sternotomy and extraction of the Sapien valve, followed by replacement of the ascending aorta and the aortic valve, were performed successfully. Retrospective image analysis showed the importance of respecting the anatomy of the ascending aorta before considering transfemoral TAVR.

Little information exists regarding the use of arch operations for repair of acute type A aortic dissections (AADs) despite increasing interest in this strategy and its potential impact on outcomes. We aimed to determine the relationship between extent of aortic repair, US geographic regions, and outcome.We queried The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database for patients who underwent AAD repair from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2016 and grouped patients by ascending-only operations and operations involving the arch.We identified 25,462 patients (mean age, 59.8 ± 14.2; 66.7% men) who underwent AAD repair. Operations involving the ascending aorta only were performed in 54% of patients; 46% had repair additionally involving the arch. The 30-day mortality was 18.9% for patients who underwent ascending-only operations vs 19.8% for patients who underwent arch operations (P = .09). In multivariable analysis older age (P.001), earlier year of operation (P.001), diabetes mellitus (P.001), severe chronic lung disease (P.001), prior cerebrovascular disease (P.001), and longer bypass time (P.001) were independently associated with 30-day mortality. There was regional variation in 30-day mortality (P.001), and incidence of arch repair varied from 38.6% to 52.6% in 9 geographic regions (P.001).In this analysis of cardiac surgical practice in the United States, repair of AADs included a portion of the aortic arch in 46% of patients. Early mortality remained high throughout the current era regardless of extent of aortic resection. Regional variation in perioperative mortality may signal an opportunity for practice improvement.

Background Limited data exist on the management of vascular rings (VR) in adults. We reviewed our experience of surgical treatment of these patients. Methods All adult patients with VR (n = 65) who underwent VR repair (mean age, 45 ± 16 years; 33 women [51%]) from January 1972 to January 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Anatomic variants were right arch with aberrant left subclavian artery (SA) and Kommerell diverticulum (KD) in 22 (34%), left arch with aberrant right SA and KD in 20 (31%), double aortic arch in 12 (18%), right arch with mirror imaging and persistent ligamentum off KD in 7 (11%), and others in 4 (6%). Indications for operation included dysphagia in 43 (63%), respiratory symptoms in 28 (43%), aneurysmal KD in 12 (18%), and dissection/rupture in 7 (11%). Results KD was found in 51 patients (78%). The surgical approach included left thoracotomy in 50 (77%), right thoracotomy in 7 (11%), sternotomy in 5 (8%), and hybrid repair in 3 (5%). A 2-stage repair with carotid-SA transposition, followed by transthoracic KD excision, was done in 51% of aberrant SA (n = 23). There was 1 early death. Morbidity included recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in 5 (8%) and chylothorax in 3 (5%). Symptomatic improvement occurred in 97%. Survival was 96.1%, 85.0%, and 73.4% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Dysphagia recurred in 9 (14%), which included 7 (11%) with esophageal dysmotility. Conclusions Repair of VR in adults can be performed safely. Dysphagia is the most common symptom and improves in most after repair. Excision of the KD and aberrant vessel is the preferred approach to prevent acute aortic events or recurrent symptoms. Early operation should be considered with esophageal compression to avoid late dysmotility.

BACKGROUND Pericardiectomy for postradiation constrictive pericarditis has been reported to generally have unfavorable outcomes. This study sought to evaluate surgical outcomes in a large cohort of patients undergoing pericardiectomy for radiation-associated pericardial constriction. METHODS A retrospective analysis of all patients (≥18 years) who underwent pericardiectomy for a diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis with a prior history of mediastinal irradiation from June 2002 to June 2019 was conducted. There were 100 patients (mean age 57.2 ± 10.1 years, 49% females) who met the inclusion criteria. Records were reviewed to look at the surgical approach, the extent of resection, early mortality, and late survival. RESULTS The overall operative mortality was 10.1% (n = 10). The rate of operative mortality decreased over the study period; however, the test of the trend was not statistically significant (p = .062). Hodgkin's disease was the most common malignancy (64%) for which mediastinal radiation had been received. Only 27% of patients had an isolated pericardiectomy, and concomitant pericardiectomy and valve surgery were performed in 46% of patients. Radical resection was performed in 50% of patients, whereas 47% of patients underwent subtotal resection. Prolonged ventilation (26%), atrial fibrillation (21%), and pleural effusion (16%) were the most common postoperative complications. The overall 1, 5-, and 10-years survival was 73.6%, 53.4%, and 32.1%, respectively. Increasing age (hazard ratio, 1.044, 95% confidence interval 1.017-1.073) appeared to have a significant negative effect on overall survival in the univariate model. CONCLUSION Pericardiectomy performed for radiation-associated constrictive pericarditis has poor long-term outcomes. The early mortality, though high (~10%), has been showing a decreasing trend in the test of time.

PURPOSE The impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival is not well characterized. We sought to study the prevalence of postoperative complications after cardiac surgery and their impact on long-term survival. METHODS Operative survivors (n = 26,221) who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n = 13,054, 49.8%), valve surgery (n = 8667, 33.1%) or combined CABG and valve surgery (n = 4500, 17.2%) from 1993 to 2019 were included in the study. Records were reviewed for postoperative complications and long-term survival. Propensity-match analysis was performed between patients who did and did not have a postoperative complication. The associations between postoperative complications and survival were assessed using a Cox-proportional model. RESULTS Complications occurred in 17,463 (66.6%) of 26,221 operative survivors. A total of 17 postoperative complications were analyzed. Postoperative blood product use was the commonest (n = 12,397, 47.3%), followed by atrial fibrillation (n = 8399, 32.0%), prolonged ventilation (n = 2336, 8.9%), renal failure (n = 870, 3.3%), reoperation for bleeding (n = 859, 3.3%) and pacemaker/ICD insertion (n = 795, 3.0%). Stroke (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-1.77), renal failure (HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.33-1.58) and pneumonia (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.11-1.36) had the strongest impact on long-term survival. Long-term survival decreased as the number of postoperative complications increased. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative complications after cardiac surgery significantly impact outcomes that extend beyond the postoperative period. Stroke, renal failure, and pneumonia are particularly associated with poor long-term survival.

Background There are limited data on the impact of isolated tricuspid valve (TV) surgery on recovery of right ventricular (RV) function and RV reverse remodeling. Methods Among 223 patients who had isolated TV procedures between 2001 and 2017, 60 (27%) underwent TV repair and 163 (73%) received TV replacement. Indication for surgery was functional tricuspid valve regurgitation in 64%, lead induced in 18%, and primary leaflet dysfunction in 18%. RV reverse remodeling was assessed by echocardiography at a median of 11.3 months (interquartile range [IQR] 5.9-13.5) post-dismissal. Results Mean age was 67.3 ± 13.7 years, and 57% were female. Overall 30-day mortality was 2.7%. After a median follow-up period of 9.5 years (IQR 3.6-12.9), adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed comparable survival for TV repair and replacement and identified older age, and presence of RV dysfunction (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-2.98; P = .01), as independent predictors of poor survival. Patients who exhibited RV reverse remodeling within 18 months postoperatively had significantly improved survival compared with those who did not (log-rank P = .005), and reverse remodeling was independently associated with improved survival (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.24-0.74; P = .003). Lower preoperative right atrial pressure (odds ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.94; P = .004) was predictive of early RV reverse remodeling. Conclusions Isolated TV surgery can be performed with acceptable outcomes (early mortality 2.7%), and overall survival is best in patients who receive the operation before developing RV systolic dysfunction. Adjusted survival was similar for patients undergoing TV repair or replacement. Early reverse remodeling of RV after surgery is associated with survival benefit.

Background Mitral annular calcification (MAC) is associated with worse outcomes after mitral valve replacement (MVR). With limited data available on long-term outcomes, we reviewed our experience of MVR in presence of MAC. Methods A retrospective review of 1,710 consecutive patients who underwent MVR between January 2000 and December 2015 was performed. Patients with isolated primary MVR (n = 496) were included, whereas patients with concomitant cardiac surgery (n = 1,068), previous MVR (n = 110), and mitral valve (MV) endocarditis (n = 36) were excluded. MV calcification was classified as MAC present in anterior/posterior annulus and vertically at the level of leaflets/subvalvular apparatus. A conservative approach towards annular debridement was followed. Results Our sample's mean age was 64.4 ± 14.1 years, and included 279 (56%) women. MV calcification was observed in 169 (34%) patients with MAC in 115 (23%). Older age, higher ejection fraction, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, dialysis, and previous aortic valve surgery were associated with increased prevalence of MAC. Patients with MV calcification had higher stroke rate (p = 0.040), patients with anterior leaflet and commissural calcification had higher pacemaker implantation (p = 0.010, p = 0.001, respectively), and patients with circumferential MAC had higher postoperative dialysis (p = 0.006). Operative mortality was not significantly different (p = 0.466) between MAC (n = 1, 1%) and non-MAC (n = 9, 2%) patients. MAC was associated with late mortality (unadjusted hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 2.18), though on multivariable analysis age, diabetes, dialysis, hypertension, previous aortic valve surgery, previous coronary artery bypass grafting, and MVR with a bioprosthetic valve were found to be independent risk factors for mortality whereas MAC was not. Conclusions A conservative approach to treat MAC achieves satisfactory results. Patients with MAC have significant comorbidities contributing to a worse survival, though MAC in itself is not a risk factor for mortality.

Patients with active aortitis who undergo repair of ascending aortic aneurysms have an increased risk of late reoperation and decreased late survival. We aimed to determine the reasons for these poor outcomes and the influence of medical management.We reviewed records of 186 patients (median age 73.9 years; 120 women) with noninfectious aortitis after elective ascending aortic aneurysm repair (January 1955 through December 2012). Landmark analysis was used to compare outcomes in patients with isolated aortitis versus with systemic sequelae of aortitis along with outcomes of treatment with glucocorticoids.At 15 years, the overall mortality was 88.3%; at 10 years, the overall reoperation rate was 28.2%. Long-term mortality increased with older age at surgery (hazard ratio [HR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25 to 2.11, p0.001), coronary artery disease (HR 1.94, 95% CI: 1.25 to 3.01, p = 0.003), peripheral vascular disease (HR 1.79, 95% CI: 1.09 to 2.94, p = 0.02), and preoperative suspicion of aortitis (HR 4.90, 95% CI: 1.96 to 12.26, p0.001). Increased reoperation rate was associated with coronary artery disease (HR 2.69, 95% CI: 1.17 to 6.17, p = 0.02) and peripheral vascular disease (HR 3.92, 95% CI: 1.71 to 8.94, p = 0.001). Among patients free of reoperation at 6 months, systemic sequelae of aortitis were found to be significant, with an unadjusted hazard ratio of 3.59 (95% CI: 1.40 to 9.18, p = 0.008). Treatment with glucocorticoids was not associated with subsequent mortality or reoperation.The development of systemic illness secondary to aortitis was associated with increased risk of late aortic reoperations. However, glucocorticoid treatment of noninfectious aortitis did not clearly influence survival or need for reoperation.

Purpose Historically, lung transplant for scleroderma-related failure has resulted in poor outcomes. We sought to determine if lung transplant in patients with scleroderma affected peri-operative complications and survival in the modern era. Methods The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried from 2005- 2019 to include adult patients who underwent lung transplantation. Patients were excluded if they underwent multi-organ or re-transplant. Patients were then identified for a diagnosis of autoimmune disease and divided into two groups: scleroderma (S, n=401) and non-scleroderma (NS, n=1105). Outcomes were analyzed using idiopathic fibrosis as a surrogate. T-test and chi-square analysis was used to compare peri-operative outcomes. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results There was no difference in survival between S, NS, and all other indications for lung transplant (p=0.356, Figure 1). Short term outcomes demonstrated that a significantly higher number of patients with S were intubated at 72 hours post-transplantation (p=0.005). However, there was no difference in the use of inhaled nitric oxide, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, PaO2, or FiO2 at 72 hours after transplantation between the two groups. The effect of pulmonary hypertension (PH) at the time of transplant was analyzed in patients with S (n=273) and pulmonary fibrosis not due to S (n=10,400). There was no significant difference in survival between these two groups (p=0.109). Finally, there was no difference in survival between S patients with (n=286) and without PH (n=90, p=0.527). Conclusion The results of this analysis suggest that selected patients with scleroderma have equivalent survival outcomes when compared to patients with non-scleroderma autoimmune disease and other thoracic diagnoses. Despite a selection bias, the data support favorable outcomes after lung transplant in patients with scleroderma. Therefore, a diagnosis of scleroderma should not be a deterrent to lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVES Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a life-threatening disease, despite the improvement in diagnostic and therapeutic measures. We reviewed our outcomes for all adults who underwent surgery for endocarditis at our centre. METHODS Between January 1995 and December 2013, 801 patients [586 men (73%)] underwent surgery for IE. Mean age was 60 ± 14.7 years. Native endocarditis (NE) was present in 372 patients (46%), and 379 (47%) patients had active IE. The mean follow-up period was 4.6 ± 4.75 years (maximum 20 years). RESULTS Single-valve endocarditis was present in 551 (69%) patients (392 aortic and 159 mitral). Multivalve involvement was present in 250 (31%) patients. Preoperative stroke was present in 149 (19%) patients, while 62 (8%) patients were on dialysis prior to surgery. Valve repair was possible in 122 (15%) patients, while 679 (85%) patients underwent valve replacement. Mechanical valves were used in 312 (39%) patients. Aortic homografts were used in 84 (10%) patients. Early mortality occurred in 64 (8%) patients. Overall survival at 5, 10 and 20 years was 68%, 45% and 8.4%, respectively. Postoperative stroke occurred in 16 (2%) patients, while 59 (7%) patients required new dialysis postoperatively. Multivariate analysis revealed active IE (P = 0.002), preoperative dialysis (P = 0.007), previous coronary artery bypass grafting (P = 0.001), root abscess (P = 0.006) and tricuspid valve or multivalve involvement (P = 0.002) to be predictors of early mortality. The need for dialysis (P

OBJECTIVES Our goal was to compare the rates of in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) including death, stroke, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization in patients with multivessel disease undergoing multiarterial (MultArt) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with the left internal mammary artery/saphenous vein (LIMA/SV) CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS From 1 January 1993 to 31 December 2009, 12 615 consecutive patients underwent isolated primary CABG (n = 6667) with LIMA/SV (n = 5712) or MultArt (n = 955) or were treated by PCI (n = 5948) with balloon angioplasty (n = 1020), bare metal stent (n = 3242), and drug-eluting stent (n = 1686). We excluded patients with acute myocardial infarction. We matched the CABG group with the 3 PCI subgroups, and the PCI group with the 2 CABG subgroups. Multivariable analyses were used to evaluate the impact of CABG versus PCI and their subgroups on early MACCE. RESULTS Unadjusted early MACCE were lower for MultArt (1.5%) than for LIMA/SV (4.5%, P

Objective Retention of the native aortic valve when performing aortic root surgery for aneurysmal disease has become a more common priority. We reviewed our experience in valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) to evaluate the long-term outcomes and the risk factors for reoperation. Methods From January 1994 through June 2017, 342 patients (mean age 47.8 ± 15.5 years, 253 [74%] male) underwent VSARR. The most common etiologies were connective tissue disease (n = 143, 42%) followed by degenerative aortic aneurysm (n = 131, 38%). Aortic regurgitation (moderate or greater) was present in 35% (n = 119). Results Reimplantation technique was used in 90% patients (n = 308). Valsalva graft was used in 38% patients (n = 131) and additional cusp repair was done in 15% (n = 50). Operative mortality was 1% (n = 5). The median follow-up time was 8.79 years (interquartile range, 4.08-13.51). The cumulative incidence of reoperation (while accounting for the competing risk of death) was 8.4%, 12.8%, and 17.1% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. There were no differences in survival and incidence of reoperation between root reimplantation and remodeling. Larger preoperative annulus diameter was associated with greater risk of reoperation (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.19, P = .01). The estimated probability of developing severe aortic regurgitation after VSARR was 8% at 10 years postoperatively. Operative mortality, residual aortic regurgitation at dismissal, and survival improved in recent times with more experience. Conclusions VSARR is a viable and safe option with good long-term outcomes and low rates of late aortic valve replacement. Dilated annulus preoperatively was associated with early repair failure.

The ideal surgical reconstruction of the aortic root in patients with complex endocarditis is controversial. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes between mechanical valves, bioprostheses, and homografts.We identified all patients undergoing an operation for active complex aortic endocarditis at our institution between 2003 and 2017. We grouped patients according to those who received a mechanical valve, bioprosthesis, or homograft. We used multiple logistic regression and proportional hazards models. To minimize confounding by indication, we used marginal risk adjustment to simulate that every patient would undergo (contrary to fact) all 3 operations.Of 159 patients with complex active endocarditis, 48 (30.2%) had a valve plus patch reconstruction, and 85 (53.4%) had a root replacement. Of all, 50 (31.5%) had a mechanical valve, 56 (35.2%) had a bioprosthesis, and 53 (33.3%) had a homograft. The groups were similar in age, sex, body mass index, comorbid conditions, organism, abscess location, and mitral involvement (all P.05). However, patients receiving mechanical reconstructions were more likely to have native valve endocarditis (46% vs 37.5% vs 17%; P = .005) and less likely to undergo root replacement (32% vs 28.6% vs 100%; P.001). Marginal risk-adjusted operative mortality was lowest for mechanical valves (4.8%) and highest for homografts (16.9%; P = .041). Long-term survival after root replacement was worse with homografts than with mechanical valve conduits (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.9; P = .045).In patients with complex endocarditis, mechanical valves are associated with similar, if not better, short- and long-term outcomes compared with homografts, even after adjusting for important baseline characteristics and limiting the analysis to root replacements only.

OBJECTIVE: A number of factors limit the effectiveness of current aortic arch studies in assessing optimal neuroprotection strategies, including insufficient patient numbers, heterogenous definitions of clinical variables, multiple technical strategies, inadequate reporting of surgical outcomes and a lack of collaborative effort. We have formed an international coalition of centres to provide more robust investigations into this topic. METHODS: High-volume aortic arch centres were identified from the literature and contacted for recruitment. A Research Steering Committee of expert arch surgeons was convened to oversee the direction of the research. RESULTS: The International Aortic Arch Surgery Study Group has been formed by 41 arch surgeons from 10 countries to better evaluate patient outcomes after aortic arch surgery. Several projects, including the establishment of a multi-institutional retrospective database, randomized controlled trials and a prospectively collected database, are currently underway. CONCLUSIONS: Such a collaborative effort will herald a turning point in the surgical management of aortic arch pathologies and will provide better powered analyses to assess the impact of varying surgical techniques on mortality and morbidity, identify predictors for neurological and operative risk, formulate and validate risk predictor models and review long-term survival outcomes and quality-of-life after arch surgery.

Background In acute DeBakey I aortic dissection presenting with malperfusion syndromes, we assessed whether standard open repair with concomitant antegrade stent grafting (thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair; TEVAR) of the descending thoracic aorta (DTA) improves outcomes compared with standard repair alone. Methods From 2005 to 2012, 277 patients with acute DeBakey I dissection underwent emergent operation. Of these, 104 patients (37%) presenting with end-organ malperfusion were divided into those undergoing standard distal repair entailing transverse hemiarch replacement (Standard group, n = 65) versus standard repair with concomitant DTA TEVAR during circulatory arrest (TEVAR group, n = 39). Prospectively maintained aortic dissection database was retrospectively reviewed. Results Demographic characteristics and preoperative comorbidities were similar. Circulatory arrest (56 ± 12 versus 34 ± 14 minutes, p p = 0.001) times were longer in the TEVAR group. Overall, postoperative stroke rate (5% [n = 2] versus 6% [n = 4], p = 1), paraplegia rate (5% [n = 2] versus 5% [n = 3], p = 1.0), and renal failure rate (10% [n = 4] versus 22% [n = 14], p = 0.2) were similar. In-hospital/30-day mortality rate was lower in the TEVAR group but was not significant (18% (n = 7) versus 34% [n = 22], p = 0.1). In patients presenting with malperfusion involving greater than one end-organ system, the mortality rate was significantly improved in the TEVAR group (28% [n = 6] versus 58% [n = 14], p = 0.05). Conclusions Standard repair with antegrade TEVAR of the DTA for acute DeBakey I aortic dissection presenting with malperfusion syndromes can be safely performed. Further, true lumen stabilization achieved through DTA TEVAR may provide a survival benefit in patients with distal multiorgan malperfusion.

From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Surgery and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Disclosures: Authors have nothing to disclose with regard to commercial support. Received for publication Jan 8, 2016; accepted for publication Jan 15, 2016. Address for reprints: Alduz S. Cabasa, MD, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (E-mail: cabasa.alduz@mayo.edu). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;-:1-4 0022-5223/$36.00 Copyright 2016 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.01.027

Objectives Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve insertion may be performed in a catheterization laboratory (ie, the minimalist approach). It seems reasonable when considering this approach to avoid it in patients at risk for intraoperative morbidity that would require surgical intervention. We hypothesized that it would be possible to associate baseline characteristics with such morbidity, which would help heart teams select patients for the minimalist approach. Methods We reviewed the records of 215 consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve insertion with a current commercially available device from November 2008 through July 2015. Demographic characteristics of the patients included a mean age of 78.9 ± 10.6 years, female sex in 73 patients (34.0%), and a mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality of 8.7% ± 5.4%. Valve prostheses were balloon-expandable in 126 patients (58.6%) and self-expanding in 89 patients (41.4%). Results Significant intraoperative morbidity occurred in 22 patients (10.2%) and included major vascular injury in 12 patients (5.6%), hemodynamic compromise requiring cardiopulmonary bypass support in 4 patients (1.9%), cardiac tamponade requiring intervention in 3 patients (1.4%), ventricular valve embolization in 2 patients (0.9%), and inability to obtain percutaneous access requiring open vascular access in 1 patient (0.5%). Intraoperative morbidity was similarly distributed across all valve types ( P = .556) and sheath sizes ( P = .369). There were no baseline patient characteristics predictive of intraoperative morbidity. Conclusions Patient and valve characteristics are not predictive of significant intraoperative morbidity during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve insertion. The finding has implications for patient selection for the minimalist approach.

BACKGROUND: It is controversial if extension of aortic dissection into arch branches should be an indication for replacement of the arch and its branches in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). METHODS: From 2008-April 2018, 399 patients underwent open repair for an ATAAD, 190 patients had known innominate and/or left common carotid artery dissection without malperfusion syndrome, including: no arch procedure (n=1)/hemiarch replacement (n=109) and zone 1/2/3 arch replacement (n=80) with replacement of 1–4 arch branch vessels. RESULTS: The median age was 58-years-old. Preoperative comorbidities were similar between groups except for the hemiarch group having more coronary artery disease (22% vs. 3%, p=0.0002). Both groups underwent similar aortic root procedures and other concomitant procedures with equivalent cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times. The zone 1/2/3 group had longer hypothermic circulatory arrest times with greater use of antegrade cerebral perfusion (all p

OBJECTIVES Limited literature is available on the best management strategy for tricuspid valve (TV) disease in adults. We sought to review our long-term outcomes of TV surgery with regard to survival and reoperation. METHODS A retrospective analysis of all patients ≥18 years of age [n = 2541, aged 67 ± 13years, 1433 (56%) females] who underwent first-time TV surgery between January 1993 and December 2013 was done. There were 1735 patients who received TV repair and 806 patients underwent replacement. A gradient boosting machine model was used to derive a propensity score for predicting replacement using 27 preoperative characteristics. Four hundred and eighteen propensity-matched pairs of TV repair and replacement were identified. Cox proportional hazard regression was used on the matched subset to determine the effect of replacement. RESULTS Functional TV regurgitation was present in 54% (n = 1369). A bioprosthesis was used in 84% (n = 680) of replacements, while 54% (n = 934) of TV repairs were ring annuloplasties. Operative mortality was 8% (n = 212). Overall survival was 54%, 29% and 13% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. After propensity score matching, replacement was significantly associated with increased mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18–2.00; P = 0.001]. The cumulative incidence of TV reoperation was similar between the 2 groups when accounting for the competing risk of death [Fine–Gray HR 1.56, 95% CI 0.9–2.8; P = 0.144]. CONCLUSIONS TV surgery is associated with poor outcomes due to multiple patient comorbidities. TV repair results in better survival compared to replacement in patients with similar comorbidities with no increased risk of getting a reoperation.

Background A number of intraoperative tools are used for brain monitoring in aortic arch surgery. We rely on intraoperative electroencephalogram (EEG) to guide deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Methods Between July 2012 and June 2014, 157 patients underwent aortic arch surgery with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest performed by a single surgeon. Intraoperative EEG was used in 141 patients (89.8%). Our intraoperative strategy was to continue systemic cooling until no electrical waves were observed on the EEG. Once we confirmed electroencephalographic silence, we induced deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for aortic arch reconstruction. Retrograde cerebral perfusion was also used during hemiarch and distal arch replacements. Antegrade cerebral perfusion was added to total arch replacements. Results Patients’ mean age was 59.1 ± 14.6 years. Hemiarch replacement was performed in 100 (63.7%), total arch replacement in 28 (17.8%), and distal arch replacement in 29 (18.5%). There were 30 urgent or emergency cases (19.1%). Circulatory arrest time was 28.8 ± 15.3 minutes. Thirty-day mortality occurred in four patients (2.5%). Postoperative stroke was diagnosed in five patients (3.2%). Major stroke led to 30-day mortality in two patients whose intraoperative EEG had shown abnormal recovery after systemic rewarming. One hundred thirty-five patients (95.7%) had normal recovery of EEG. Of these, three (2.2%) developed minor stroke consisting of minor hemiplegia. Conclusions Intraoperative EEG is a reliable monitoring tool for safe circulatory arrest. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12723 (J Card Surg 2016;31:216–219)

Objectives For acute DeBakey I aortic dissection with arch tear, conventional distal reconstruction entails total arch replacement (TAR). Some surgeons at our institution have utilized an alternative reconstructive strategy-primary arch tear repair and transverse hemiarch reconstruction (THR) with concomitant antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). We assessed early and mid-term outcomes comparing these two surgical strategies for arch tear management. Methods A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained institutional aortic dissection database was carried out to compare early and mid-term outcomes for patients undergoing intervention for DeBakey I aortic dissection with arch tear. Hemiarch reconstruction with concomitant antegrade TEVAR was compared against conventional TAR. Arch tear at the origin of great vessels or greater curve was primarily repaired with interrupted sutures in TEVAR patients. Results From 2006 to 2013, 61 of 284 DeBakey I aortic dissection patients undergoing intervention for arch tear were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-one patients had TAR (TAR group) and 30 patients had hemiarch + TEVAR (TEVAR group). Demographics and clinical presentation were similar. TEVAR group had more patients presenting in cardiogenic shock [3% (n = 1) vs 13% (n = 4), P = 0.2] and tamponade [10% (n = 3) vs 23% (n = 7), P = 0.2]. Intraoperatively, TEVAR group had lower cardiopulmonary bypass (239 ± 34 vs 313 ± 80 min, p0.001) and circulatory arrest (60 ± 15 vs 78 ± 45 min, P = 0.04) times. TAR group had higher in-hospital/30-day mortality [26% (n = 8) vs 13% (n = 4), P = 0.3], but stroke rates were similar [6% (n = 2) vs 7% (n = 2), P = 1]. One-year (80 ± 7.3 vs 71 ± 8.3%), 3-year (73 ± 8.3 vs 67 ± 8.6%) and 5-year (73 ± 8.3 vs 67 ± 8.6%) actuarial survival were improved in TEVAR group, although not significantly (log-rank, P = 0.56). TEVAR promoted increased false lumen thrombosis (43 vs 85%, P = 0.002). Conclusion In treating DeBakey I aortic dissection with arch tear, hemiarch replacement with primary tear repair and concomitant TEVAR is a safe alternative to conventional TAR, with improved distal aortic remodelling.

To determine outcomes of repair of ascending aortic aneurysms in patients with histopathologic diagnoses of aortitis.We reviewed histopathologic findings and outcomes of elective repair of ascending aortic aneurysms between January 1, 1955, and December 31, 2012. Noninfectious aortitis was identified in 186 patients, and we compared outcomes for these patients with outcomes for others operated on at the same time with diagnoses of medial degeneration (n = 317) or atherosclerosis (n = 232).Early mortality (30 days postoperatively) for patients with aortitis was 2%, and overall 10-year survival was 45%, compared with 66% for patients with medial degeneration, and 45% for patients with atherosclerosis (P .001 vs medial degeneration). In addition to histopathologic diagnosis, overall mortality was influenced by older age at operation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.060; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.046-1.077; P .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR: 1.560; 95% CI: 1.136-2.136; P = .006); concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (HR: 1.980; 95% CI: 1.520-2.600; P .001); and use of circulatory arrest (HR: 1.500; 95% CI: 1.148-1.960; P = .003). Risk of aortic reoperation at 10 years was 21% for aortitis patients, compared with 11% for those with medial degeneration, and 19% for patients with atherosclerosis (P = .028).Patients with repaired ascending aneurysms secondary to noninfectious aortitis have low early mortality, but late risks of death and aortic reoperation are increased, compared with these outcomes for patients with aneurysms that result from medial degeneration.

Midterm outcomes are unknown for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a Mitroflow bovine pericardial prosthesis (Sorin Group, Inc) and without anticalcification treatment. Recent reports warn of early senescence in younger adults.From January 2004 through December 2011, 1,003 adults underwent Mitroflow AVR. The mean follow-up time was 25.0 (standard deviation [20.6]) months (total, 2,060 patient-years; maximum, 9 years). The patients were stratified for analysis according to age at implantation: group A,60 years (n = 63, 6.3%); group B, 60-69 years (n = 173, 17.2%); group C, 70-79 years (n = 432, 43.1%); and group D, 80 years or older (n = 335, 33.4%).The mean age was 74.8 years (SD 9.8), and 609 patients (60.7%) were men. Aortic valve stenosis was present in 912 patients (90.9%), and 113 (11.3%) had severe aortic regurgitation. There were 27 (2.7%) early deaths, 15 of 431 (3.5%) underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting while 12 of 572 (2.1%) did not (p = 0.18), and 151 patients (15.1%) died during follow-up. Nineteen AVRs (1.9%) required re-replacement through August 2013; 12 (63.2%) were associated with structural valve deterioration. The overall rates of freedom from valve-related reoperation at 3 and 5 years were 98.3% and 93.8%, respectively. Group A had the greatest number of reoperations (6/63; p0.001). The overall survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 91.2% and 67.3%, respectively. Independent predictors of mortality were poorer New York Heart Association functional class (hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; p0.001), atrial fibrillation (HR, 1.8; p = 0.002), and prior cardiac operation (HR, 1.8; p = 0.003).Midterm follow-up shows acceptable hemodynamic performance of the Mitroflow biologic aortic valve prosthesis in selected patients 60 years old and older. Ongoing follow-up will be necessary to understand long-term performance and outcomes.

Redo aortic valve replacement (AVR) performed simultaneously with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation carries potential for increased mortality rates. Although transcatheter AVR has been used for patients with previous LVAD placement, no literature reports concomitant valve-in-valve transcatheter AVR and LVAD implantation. Our patient had severe aortic prosthetic valve deterioration and advanced heart failure. Given the risks associated with reoperative aortic valve surgery, we chose transcatheter AVR at the time of LVAD implantation. Transthoracic echocardiography results showed severe aortic prosthetic valve deterioration with moderate aortic regurgitation as well as severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction, 11%). After redosternotomy, we performed transcatheter AVR via the ascending aorta and subsequent LVAD implantation. The postoperative course was uneventful. Generally, patients with structural deterioration of a bioprosthetic valve who report for LVAD therapy present considerable challenges to the surgeon. Concomitant transcatheter AVR offers a less-invasive alternative to surgical AVR that minimizes ischemic injury to myocardium.

Debate remains regarding optimal cerebral circulatory management during relatively noncomplex, short arch reconstructive times. Both retrograde cerebral perfusion with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (RCP/DHCA) and antegrade cerebral perfusion with moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (ACP/MHCA) have emerged as established techniques. The aim of the study was to evaluate perioperative outcomes between antegrade and retrograde cerebral perfusion techniques for elective arch reconstruction times less than 45 minutes.Between 1997 and September 2008, 776 cases from two institutions were reviewed to compare RCP/DHCA and ACP/MHCA perfusion techniques. At the University of Pennsylvania, 682 were treated utilizing RCP/DHCA cerebral protection. At the University of Bologna, 94 were treated with ACP/MHCA and bilateral cerebral perfusion.Mean cerebral ischemic time and visceral ischemic time differed between RCP/DHCA and ACP/MHCA (p0.001). Multivariate analysis showed age more than 65 years, atherosclerotic aneurysm, and cross-clamp time as predictors of the composite endpoint of mortality, neurologic event, and acute myocardial infarction. There was no significant difference in permanent neurologic deficit, temporary neurologic dysfunction, or renal failure, between RCP/DHCA and ACP/MHCA. Mortality was comparable across both techniques.Both RCP/DHCA and ACP/MHCA have emerged as effective techniques for selected aortic arch operations with low morbidity and mortality. Univariate analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes between techniques for aortic reconstruction times less than 45 minutes. Data from this study demonstrate that selective use of either RCP/DHCA or ACP/MHCA provides excellent cerebral and visceral outcomes for elective open aortic surgery with short arch reconstructive times.

Objective Calcification of the ascending aorta complicates aortic valve replacement. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is an alternative procedure in this situation, but it requires manipulation through the hostile area in the ascending aorta. We reviewed our transcatheter aortic valve insertion experience to better understand the surgical mortality risk of valve insertion in patients with extensive calcification of the ascending aorta. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of 665 consecutive patients who received transcatheter aortic valve insertion from November 2008 through December 2015. We defined a hostile ascending aorta on the basis of preoperative computed tomography scan documenting significant aortic calcification that the surgeon believed precluded safe aortic cross-clamp application. There were 36 patients (5%) who met our definition of a hostile ascending aorta (hostile aorta group) and 629 (95%) who did not (control group). Results Surgical mortality occurred in 2 patients (6%) in the hostile aorta group and in 18 (3%) in the control group (P = .296). There were no strokes in the hostile aorta group, whereas there were 15 (2%) in the control group (P = 1.00). There was no difference in mortality at 3 years for patients in the hostile aorta (48.5% ± 9.0%) and control groups (35.9% ± 2.3%; P = .484). Alternative access was associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.82; P = .009). Conclusions Transcatheter aortic valve insertion can be performed with low procedure-related morbidity and mortality in patients with hostile calcification of the ascending aorta. Our data support a transfemoral-first paradigm in this patient population.

Background Outcome data on aortic valve replacement in patients with amyloidosis are limited. To address this issue, we reviewed our experience of patients with amyloidosis who underwent aortic valve replacement. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of 16 patients with amyloidosis who underwent aortic valve replacement between May 2000 and February 2017. Results The cohort comprised 11 males (69%) and 5 females (31%). The median patient age was 76 years (interquartile range [IQR], 71-82 years), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted rate of mortality was 5.0% (IQR, 2.4%-8.7%). Amyloidosis type was immunoglobulin light chain in 6 patients (38%), age-related in 6 (38%), and localized in 4 (25%). The operation was surgical aortic valve replacement in 11 patients (69%) and balloon-expandable transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve insertion in the other 5. There was no procedure-related stroke, need for new-onset dialysis or pacemaker, or death within 30 days of surgery. The median length of hospital stay was 1 day (IQR, 1-2 days) in the transcatheter valve insertion group and 6 days (IQR, 6-8 days) in the surgical group ( P = .002). Follow-up was available for all patients at a median of 1.9 years (IQR, 1.2-4.8 years). During the follow-up period, there were 4 deaths, all occurring >1 year after surgery. Conclusions Aortic valve replacement can be performed with low risk of operative morbidity and mortality in patients with amyloidosis. Transcatheter valve insertion has the advantage of reduced hospital length of stay. The 1-year survival is excellent.

We evaluated the safety profile of a central cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) cannulation strategy for repair of extent I thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) with chronic type B dissection in comparison to traditional peripheral CPB cannulation strategies.Patients undergoing extent I TAAA repair for chronic type B dissection from 2002 to 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped by their CPB cannulation strategy. Patients in Group I underwent central aortic cannulation (n = 28) through a left thoracotomy incision. The true lumen of the descending thoracic aorta was cannulated using an echocardiogram-guided Seldinger wire technique. The right atrium was directly accessed for venous drainage. In Group II (n = 31), arterial and venous cannulation of the femoral vessels was achieved using a left-sided groin incision. All patients underwent deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for proximal aortic reconstruction.Preoperative aortic dimensions (6.5 ± 0.79 cm in Group I vs 7.0 ± 1.15 cm in Group II p = 0.8) were similar between groups. CPB time (240 ± 37 min in Group I vs 174 ± 68 min in Group II p 0.01) was significantly higher in the central cannulation group whereas circulatory arrest times (43 ± 5 min Group I vs 37 ± 7 min in Group II p = 0.1) were similar between the two groups. In-hospital 30-day mortality (N = 0, 0% in Group I; N = 2, 6.5% in Group II), stroke (N = 1, 3.5% in Group I; N = 0, 0% in Group II), paraplegia (N = 1, 3.5% in Group I; N = 1, 3.2% in Group II), reoperation for bleeding (N = 1, 3.5% in Group I; N = 1, 3.2% Group II), tracheostomy rate (N = 2, 7% in Group I; N = 3, 9.7% Group II), and mean length of stay (19 days in Group I vs 17 days in Group II) were similar (p 0.05). Median follow-up was 3.6 ± 2.0 in Group I and 5.6 ± 2.6 years in Group II. Actuarial survival at 5 years was 84.6 % for Group I and 77.6% for Group II (p = 0.52).Central true lumen cannulation through a left thoracotomy incision for repair of extent I TAAA with chronic type B dissection is an acceptable approach with equivalent early and midterm outcomes compared to more standard femoral cannulation techniques. It may provide a safe alternative cannulation site for patients with diseased femoral vessels.

We sought to identify the trends in bilateral internal thoracic artery use and determine the degree to which the survival advantage of bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization persists among perceived "high-risk" patients, compared with the use of left internal thoracic artery alone.A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease at the Mayo Clinic between January 2000 and December 2015. Propensity score matching was performed between patients with bilateral internal thoracic artery and left internal thoracic artery alone grafts (1011 matched pairs). Effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery use on survival in "high-risk" patients (ejection fraction40%, body mass index ≥30, age ≥70 years, diabetes, chronic lung disease, cerebrovascular accident) was evaluated.A total of 6468 isolated coronary artery bypass grafts were performed (5431 using left internal thoracic artery alone, 1037 using bilateral internal thoracic artery). There was an increasing trend in bilateral internal thoracic artery use (P value for linear trend = .005), with the percentage of coronary artery bypass grafting cases with bilateral internal thoracic artery doubling over the last 4 years (13% in 2012 to 27% in 2015). Propensity-matched comparisons showed a survival advantage for bilateral internal thoracic artery (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.99; P = .043). Risk of deep sternal wound infection, although higher in the bilateral internal thoracic artery group, was not significant (1.2% vs 0.5%; P = .088). None of the "high-risk" subsets of patients showed an adverse effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery on survival.Bilateral internal thoracic artery use in coronary artery bypass grafting is increasing over time. There is a consistent survival benefit with bilateral internal thoracic artery use, extending to patients with higher-risk comorbidities, suggesting the need for further expansion in use of this technique.

Objective Open arch interventions after previous cardiac surgery are considered high risk. We reviewed our outcomes in patients requiring aortic arch reconstruction after previous cardiovascular surgery. Methods From March 2000 to March 2014, the data from 168 patients with previous sternotomy requiring aortic arch replacement were reviewed. The indications for surgery, perioperative data, and outcomes of reoperation were analyzed. Results The mean age was 61 ± 14 years, and 119 were men (70%). The indications for reoperation were aneurysm (57%), valvular disease (13%), impending rupture (12%), aortic dissection (9.0%), and endocarditis (7.7%). The median time from the previous operation to reoperation was 7 years. The mean aortic diameter was 55 mm. Total or partial arch replacement was performed in 38% and 62% of patients, respectively. Fifty-five patients (32.7%) had undergone previous ascending dissection repair and 45 (26.8%) had previous coronary bypass surgery. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was used in all. Selective cerebral perfusion was used in 39% and retrograde cerebral perfusion in 14%. The incidence of permanent stroke was 5.4%. Operative mortality (30-day) was 8.3%. Older age (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.10; P = .04), New York Heart Association class III/IV (odds ratio, 3.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-9.86; P = .04), and extracorporeal circulation time (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.02; P = .001) were predictors of perioperative death. The median follow-up was 3.0 years. Survival was 85%, 78%, and 68% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Conclusions Reoperations to address the aortic arch have acceptable mortality and morbidity. Open repair under circulatory arrest is the benchmark to which endovascular therapies should be compared.

Objective To review the early results of a less invasive, single-stage hybrid arch procedure involving replacement of the ascending aorta, arch debranching, and zone 0 antegrade stent graft deployment. Methods Between May 2007 and January 2012, 20 patients with both acute and chronic aortic pathology were managed at 2 institutions with a type 2 hybrid arch procedure. Indications included diffuse atherosclerotic aneurysm, false lumen expansion of chronic aortic dissections, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, and acute type A dissection. Mean age was 67 ± 16.8 years with a mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score of 29.5 ± 19.4. Postoperative clinical and imaging follow-up was complete to a mean 18.5 ± 15.3 months. Results Successful zone 0 stent graft deployment was achieved in all cases. There was 1 in-hospital mortality (5%). A second death occurred at 40 days postoperation. Other complications included a permanent neurologic deficit in 1 patient (5%), transient paraplegia in 4 patients (20%), and 3 patients had respiratory complications (15%). There were no cases of renal failure requiring dialysis. Stent-related complications were identified in 4 patients (20%), including 3 type I endoleaks, none of which were at zone 0. There was 1 type II endoleak and a case of stent infolding. Two patients required a second successful endografting procedure. Conclusions This single-stage hybrid arch procedure offers an alternative approach to complex diffuse aortic pathology involving the arch. Replacement of the ascending aorta provides a safe location for zone 0 stent graft deployment, eliminating complications of proximal deployment in a native diseased aorta.

Background Acute type A aortic dissection frequently occurs in patients with normally sized aortic roots. The aim of this investigation was to describe the durability of aortic valve resuspension and root repair with a novel technique of reconstruction in type A dissection. Methods From 1993 to 2013, among 629 patients operated on for acute type A dissection 489 (62% male, median age 62 years (53; 73) underwent aortic valve resuspension and reinforcement of the sinus of Valsalva with a Teflon felt neomedia. The median follow-up time was 4.1 years (1.3; 6.8) (2075 patient-years). Results In-hospital mortality was 11% (56/489). Survival was 69% ± 2%, 50% ± 3%, and 36% ± 5% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Freedom from moderate or severe aortic regurgitation was not influenced by the aortic regurgitation grade at the initial operation ( p = 0.131). Freedom from proximal aortic reoperation was 96% ± 1%, 92% ± 2%, and 89% ± 4% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Seventeen patients (3%) required proximal reoperation: 10 for aortic regurgitation, including 3 with concomitant pseudoaneurysm and 2 with root aneurysm; 6 for pseudoaneurysm; and 1 for graft infection. Conclusions Aortic root neomedia reconstruction and valve resuspension can be successfully performed in the majority of patients with type A dissection. The in-hospital mortality is low, and the results are durable.