Search

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare disease that can be caused by (likely) pathogenic germline genomic variants. In addition to the most prevalent disease gene, BMPR2 (bone morphogenetic protein receptor 2), several genes, some belonging to distinct functional classes, are also now known to predispose to the development of PAH. As a consequence, specialist and non-specialist clinicians and healthcare professionals are increasingly faced with a range of questions regarding the need for, approaches to and benefits/risks of genetic testing for PAH patients and/or related family members. We provide a consensus-based approach to recommendations for genetic counselling and assessment of current best practice for disease gene testing. We provide a framework and the type of information to be provided to patients and relatives through the process of genetic counselling, and describe the presently known disease causal genes to be analysed. Benefits of including molecular genetic testing within the management protocol of patients with PAH include the identification of individuals misclassified by other diagnostic approaches, the optimisation of phenotypic characterisation for aggregation of outcome data, including in clinical trials, and importantly through cascade screening, the detection of healthy causal variant carriers, to whom regular assessment should be offered., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: C.A. Eichstaedt reports lecture fees from MSD, outside the submitted work; and has a patent “Gene panel specific for pulmonary hypertension and its uses” (European Patent ID: EP3507380) issued. C. Belge reports consulting fees, participation on advisory boards and lecture honoraria from Janssen and MSD/Bayer; travel support from MSD/Bayer, outside the submitted work. W.K. Chung reports scientific advisory board participation with Regeneron Genetics Center, outside the submitted work. E. Grünig reports grants from Actelion, Bayer, GSK, United Therapeutics, Novartis, Bellerophon, OMT, Pfizer and REATA; lecture fees and consultancy fees from Actelion, Bayer/MSD and GSK; travel support from Janssen; advisory board participation with MSD and Ferrer, outside the submitted work; has a patent “Gene panel specific for pulmonary hypertension and its uses” (European Patent ID: EP3507380) issued; and has also served in leadership roles for ADue and pH e.V., outside the submitted work. D. Montani reports grants from Acceleron, Janssen and Merck; consulting fees from Acceleron; lecture honoraria from Bayer, Janssen and Merck, outside the submitted work. R.C. Trembath reports lecture fees from Clinical Cases, outside the submitted work. N.W. Morrell reports employment and stock/stock options from Centessa Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare and incurable chronic disease characterised by a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and right heart failure. Patient registries collecting observational data can be of great value in the understanding of clinical problems. While clinical trials provide data in selected patient populations, registries better depict real-life practice. This review aims to reflect the input of patient registries in the general knowledge of the disease. Advances in epidemiology of the different subgroups, including data on incidence and/or prevalence, increasing age at presentation and stagnating diagnostic delay are reported. The importance of haemodynamic definition criteria and cardiac comorbidities are underscored. The review also shows the major transformation that pulmonary arterial hypertension therapeutic management has undergone, with still insufficient use of combination therapies; consecutive improvement in outcome; upcoming evidence in disfavour of anticoagulation; and validity of the available risk-stratification tools derived from large registries. Product registries are also briefly presented. Finally, the benefits of registries and methodological aspects are discussed, including immortal time bias, registry data quality and recommendations from EU organisations (EUCERD and PARENT)., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: K. Swinnen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Quarck has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Godinas reports personal fees from Actelion and MSD, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C. Belge reports personal fees from Actelion and Bayer, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M. Delcroix reports grants and personal fees from Actelion, personal fees from Bayer, GSK, MSD, Reata, Bellerophon and Eli Lilly, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2019.)

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) for nonoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients during the initial experience of a single center., Methods: A total of 18 CTEPH patients (5 with residual pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy) were treated with BPA during the period 2014-2018 and were retrospectively reviewed. Mean age was 61 ± 19 years; 55% were female; mean pulmonary artery pressure was 44 ± 12 mmHg; cardiac output was 4.3 ± 1.0 l/min; and pulmonary vascular resistance was 8.4 ± 3.6 WU. Patients were evaluated by New York Heart Association functional class, 6-minute walk distance, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide, echocardiography, right heart catheterization, and before and after completions of BPA., Results: A total of 91 procedures were performed, with a median number of 4 BPA sessions per patient (range, 2-8). There were no deaths or major complications requiring extracorporeal support or (non)invasive ventilation. The most common complication was self-limiting hemoptysis (3%). According to Society of Interventional Radiology classification, 4 mild, 4 moderate, and 1 severe adverse events were noted. Invasive hemodynamics significantly improved, with a cardiac index increase of 15% (P = .0333), decrease of mean pulmonary artery pressure of 30% (P = .0013), and decrease of pulmonary vascular resistance of 45% (P = .0048). Stroke volume index (P = .0171) and pulmonary arterial compliance (P = .0004) were also significantly enhanced., Conclusions: BPA significantly improves cardiopulmonary hemodynamics with an acceptable safety profile. Further studies assessing the long-term efficacy of BPA are required., (Copyright © 2019 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Transplant type for end-stage pulmonary vascular disease remains debatable. We compared recipient outcome after heart-lung (HLT) versus double-lung (DLT) transplantation. Single-center analysis (38 HLT-30 DLT; 1991-2014) for different causes of precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH): idiopathic (22); heritable (two); drug-induced (nine); hepato-portal (one); connective tissue disease (four); congenital heart disease (CHD) (24); chronic thromboembolic PH (six). HLT decreased from 91.7% [1991-1995] to 21.4% [2010-2014]. Re-intervention for bleeding was higher after HLT; (P = 0.06) while primary graft dysfunction grades 2 and 3 occurred more after DLT; (P < 0.0001). Graft survival at 90 days, 1, 5, 10, and 15 years was 93%, 83%, 70%, 47%, and 35% for DLT vs. 82%, 74%, 61%, 48%, and 30% for HLT, respectively (log-rank P = 0.89). Graft survival improved over time: 100%, 93%, 87%, 72%, and 72% in [2010-2014] vs. 75%, 58%, 42%, 33%, and 33% in [1991-1995], respectively; P = 0.03. No difference in chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival was observed: 80% & 28% for DLT vs. 75% & 28% for HLT after 5 and 10 years, respectively; P = 0.49. Primary graft dysfunction in PH patients was lower after HLT compared to DLT. Nonetheless, overall graft and CLAD-free survival were comparable and improved over time with growing experience. DLT remains our preferred procedure for all forms of precapillary PH, except in patients with complex CHD., (© 2019 Steunstichting ESOT.)