Search

Inhalational therapy, today, happens to be the mainstay of treatment in obstructive airway diseases (OADs), such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and is also in the present, used in a variety of other pulmonary and even non-pulmonary disorders. Hand-held inhalation devices may often be difficult to use, particularly for children, elderly, debilitated or distressed patients. Nebulization therapy emerges as a good option in these cases besides being useful in the home care, emergency room and critical care settings. With so many advancements taking place in nebulizer technology; availability of a plethora of drug formulations for its use, and the widening scope of this therapy; medical practitioners, respiratory therapists, and other health care personnel face the challenge of choosing appropriate inhalation devices and drug formulations, besides their rational application and use in different clinical situations. Adequate maintenance of nebulizer equipment including their disinfection and storage are the other relevant issues requiring guidance. Injudicious and improper use of nebulizers and their poor maintenance can sometimes lead to serious health hazards, nosocomial infections, transmission of infection, and other adverse outcomes. Thus, it is imperative to have a proper national guideline on nebulization practices to bridge the knowledge gaps amongst various health care personnel involved in this practice. It will also serve as an educational and scientific resource for healthcare professionals, as well as promote future research by identifying neglected and ignored areas in this field. Such comprehensive guidelines on this subject have not been available in the country and the only available proper international guidelines were released in 1997 which have not been updated for a noticeably long period of over two decades, though many changes and advancements have taken place in this technology in the recent past. Much of nebulization practices in the present may not be evidence-based and even some of these, the way they are currently used, may be ineffective or even harmful. Recognizing the knowledge deficit and paucity of guidelines on the usage of nebulizers in various settings such as inpatient, out-patient, emergency room, critical care, and domiciliary use in India in a wide variety of indications to standardize nebulization practices and to address many other related issues; National College of Chest Physicians (India), commissioned a National task force consisting of eminent experts in the field of Pulmonary Medicine from different backgrounds and different parts of the country to review the available evidence from the medical literature on the scientific principles and clinical practices of nebulization therapy and to formulate evidence-based guidelines on it. The guideline is based on all possible literature that could be explored with the best available evidence and incorporating expert opinions. To support the guideline with high-quality evidence, a systematic search of the electronic databases was performed to identify the relevant studies, position papers, consensus reports, and recommendations published. Rating of the level of the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendation was done using the GRADE system. Six topics were identified, each given to one group of experts comprising of advisors, chairpersons, convenor and members, and such six groups (A-F) were formed and the consensus recommendations of each group was included as a section in the guidelines (Sections I to VI). The topics included were: A. Introduction, basic principles and technical aspects of nebulization, types of equipment, their choice, use, and maintenance B. Nebulization therapy in obstructive airway diseases C. Nebulization therapy in the intensive care unit D. Use of various drugs (other than bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids) by nebulized route and miscellaneous uses of nebulization therapy E. Domiciliary/Home/Maintenance nebulization therapy; public & health care workers education, and F. Nebulization therapy in COVID-19 pandemic and in patients of other contagious viral respiratory infections (included later considering the crisis created due to COVID-19 pandemic). Various issues in different sections have been discussed in the form of questions, followed by point-wise evidence statements based on the existing knowledge, and recommendations have been formulated., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors have none to declare., (Copyright © 2022 Tuberculosis Association of India. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Cardiac autonomic dysfunction is an independent determinant of adverse outcomes in many diseases. The available literature on the relative changes in sympathetic and parasympathetic components in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is equivocal, the clinical and physiological correlates are poorly defined and association with markers of systemic inflammation has not been explored. As both autonomic dysfunction and systemic inflammation may contribute to cardiovascular morbidity in COPD, we hypothesized that these may be associated. Sixty three stable patients of COPD and 36 controls underwent spirometry, estimation of diffusion capacity, six-minute walk test and measurements of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and high-sensitivity C-Reactive protein. Cardiac autonomic activity was evaluated by standard five-minute heart rate variability (HRV) recordings to obtain time- and frequency-domain indices and the averaged heart rate. We observed that HRV indices of overall autonomic modulation, the standard deviation of time intervals between consecutive normal beats (SDNN) and total power, were greater in patients with higher levels of indices of both parasympathetic and sympathetic activity. The heart rate was significantly higher in patients indicating an overall sympathetic dominance and was inversely correlated with diffusion capacity. Serum IL-6 was inversely correlated with pNN50, an index of parasympathetic activity, and positively with LF/HF ratio, a measure of sympathetic: parasympathetic balance. None of the HRV indices was significantly correlated with physiological measures of severity. It was concluded that patients with COPD have increased cardiac autonomic modulation with sympathetic dominance. This is associated with decreased lung diffusion capacity and systemic inflammation.

Chronotropic incompetence (CI; failure to reach the targeted heart rate (HR) on exercise) and a delayed HR recovery (HRR; ≤12 beats decline within the first minute after cessation) reflect autonomic dysfunction (AD) and predict adverse cardiac prognosis. As chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is known to be associated with AD, we hypothesized that these patients may manifest these responses on exercise. The prevalence and predictors of these responses in COPD and their association with its severity have not been evaluated. Normoxemic, stable male patients with COPD (n = 39) and 11 healthy controls underwent lung function testing and incremental leg ergometry. HR responses were monitored during exercise and recovery to compute the HRR and CI. Of all the patients, 33 (84.6%) had at least one of the two exercise responses as abnormal, with the majority (23, 58.9%) having both an abnormal HRR and CI. The frequency of abnormal responses increased with increasing Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage and body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnoea and exercise capacity index. After adjusting for smoking history and post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second, only a reduced diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide predicted abnormal HRR, though weakly. We concluded that abnormal HRR and CI are common in patients with COPD. These responses are observed with increasing frequency as the severity of disease increases.

The increasing focus on airway inflammation in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has led to development and evolution of tools to measure it. Direct assessment of airway inflammation requires invasive procedures, and hence, has obvious limitations. Non-invasive methods to sample airway secretions and fluids offer exciting prospects. Analysis of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is rapidly emerging as a novel non-invasive approach for sampling airway epithelial lining fluid and offers a convenient tool to provide biomarkers of inflammation. It has definite advantages that make it an attractive and a feasible option. It is a source of mediators and molecules that are the causes or consequences of the inflammatory process. Measurement of such markers is increasingly being explored for studying airway inflammation qualitatively and quantitatively in research studies and for potential clinical applications. These biomarkers also have the potential to develop into powerful research tools in COPD for identifying various pathways of pathogenesis of COPD that may ultimately provide specific targets for therapeutic intervention. The EBC analysis is still an evolving noninvasive method for monitoring of inflammation and oxidative stress in the airways. The limited number of studies available on EBC analysis in COPD have provided useful information although definite clinical uses are yet to be defined. Evolving technologies of genomics, proteomics, and metabonomics may provide deeper and newer insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of COPD.

Mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is more often due to cardiac rather than respiratory causes. The coexistence of heart failure (HF) and COPD is frequent but remains under-diagnosed. Both conditions share several similarities including the age of the population affected, a common risk factor in smoking and symptoms of exertional dyspnoea. There is also a strong possibility of COPD promoting atherosclerotic vascular disease through systemic inflammation. Both the conditions are punctuated by episodes of acute exacerbations of symptoms from time to time where differentiation between these two can be especially challenging. Although coexistence of the two is common, more often, only one of the two is diagnosed resulting in under-treatment and unsatisfactory response. Awareness of co-occurrence is essential among both pulmonologists and cardiologists and a high index of suspicion should be maintained. The coexistence of the COPD and HF also poses several challenges in management. Active search for the second disease using clinical examination supplemented with specialised investigations including plasma natriuretic peptides, lung function testing and echocardiography should be carried out followed by appropriate management. Issues such as adverse effects of drugs on cardiac or pulmonary function need to be sorted out by studies in coexistent COPD-HF patients. Caution is advised with use of beta2-agonists in COPD when HF is also present, more so in acute exacerbations. On current evidence, the beneficial effects of selective beta1-blockers should not be denied in stable patients who have coexistent COPD-HF. The prognosis of coexistent COPD and HF is poorer than that in either disease alone. A favourable response in the patient with coexistent COPD and HF depends on proper evaluation of the severity of each of the two and appropriate management with judicious use of medication.