Search

Background: Asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) are complex and heterogeneous diseases that share clinical characteristics (phenotypes) and molecular mechanisms (endotypes). Whilst physicians make clinical decisions on diagnostic groups, for some such as ACO there is no commonly accepted criteria. An alternative approach is to evaluate phenotypes and endotypes that are considered to respond well to a specific type of treatment ("treatable traits") rather than diagnostic labels., Purpose: The prospective, longitudinal, and observational TRAIT study will evaluate disease characteristics, including both phenotypes and endotypes, in relation to the presentation of obstructive respiratory disease characteristics in patients diagnosed with asthma, COPD, or ACO in Japan, with the aim of further understanding the clinical benefit of a treatable traits-based approach., Patients and Methods: A total of 1500 participants will be enrolled into three cohorts according to their treating physician's diagnosis of asthma, COPD, or ACO at screening. Part 1 of the study will involve cross-sectional phenotyping and endotyping at study enrollment. Part 2 of the study will evaluate the progression of clinical characteristics, biomarker profiles, and treatment over a 3-year follow-up period. The follow-up will involve three annual study visits and three telephone calls scheduled at 6-month intervals. A substudy involving 50 participants from the asthma cohort (in which the ratio will be approximately 1:1 including 25 participants with a smoking history of ≥10 pack-years and 25 participants with no smoking history), 100 participants from the ACO cohort, and 100 participants from the COPD cohort will evaluate disease phenotypes using inspiratory and expiratory computed tomography scans., Conclusion: TRAIT will describe clinical characteristics of patients with obstructive respiratory diseases to better understand potential differences and similarities between clinical diagnoses, which will support the improvement of personalized treatment strategies., Competing Interests: This is a prospective, three-group cohort study with no study treatment intervention administered to participants. Nobuyuki Hizawa received scholarship donation (research grant) from GSK in 2018 and lecture fees from GSK, AstraZeneca, and Novartis. Koichi Fukunaga received personal fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim. Hisatoshi Sugiura received lecture fees from GSK, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Yasutaka Nakano received personal fees from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Novartis, Shionogi, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Eisai, Olympus, and AstraZeneca. Motokazu Kato received lecture fees from GSK. Yutaro Sugiyama and Tomohiro Hanazawa are GSK employees. Toshihiko Kaise, Paul W Jones, Neil Barnes, Chris Compton, and Takeo Ishii are GSK employees and hold stocks/shares in GSK. Ruth Tal-Singer was a GSK employee at the time of the study, holds stocks/shares in GSK, and received personal fees from Immunomet, Vocalis Health, Teva, and Ena Respiratory and Ena Therapeutics. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2021 Hizawa et al.)

Purpose: The Informing the Pathway of COPD Treatment (IMPACT) study demonstrated that single-inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) reduces moderate/severe exacerbation rates and improves lung function and health status versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI dual therapy in patients with symptomatic COPD and a history of exacerbations. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of FF/UMEC/VI in patients enrolled in Japan., Patients and Methods: IMPACT was a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study comparing FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg with FF/VI 100/25 µg or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg in patients ≥40 years with symptomatic COPD and ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the previous year. Endpoints included annual rate of on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbations (primary endpoint), time-to-first on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation and change from baseline at Week 52 in trough FEV 1 , post-bronchodilator FEV 1 , St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, and COPD Assessment Test score. Safety was also assessed., Results: The Japan subgroup accounted for only 4% (378/10,355) of the overall IMPACT intent-to-treat (ITT) population. In the Japan subgroup, FF/UMEC/VI reduced the annual rate of on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbations by 15% (95% CI: -20, 40) versus FF/VI (compared with 15% [10, 20] in the ITT) and 36% (95% CI: 6, 57) versus UMEC/VI (compared with 25% [19, 30] in the ITT). FF/UMEC/VI reduced moderate/severe exacerbation risk (time-to-first), improved lung function and health status at Week 52 versus both dual therapies. These results were in the same direction and of a generally similar magnitude to those seen in the overall ITT population. No new safety signals were identified in the Japan subgroup compared with the ITT population. Pneumonia incidence was higher with FF/UMEC/VI and FF/VI versus UMEC/VI., Conclusion: These results highlight the favorable benefit-risk profile of FF/UMEC/VI single-inhaler triple therapy compared with FF/VI or UMEC/VI dual therapy in patients in Japan with symptomatic COPD and ≥1 exacerbation in the prior year., Competing Interests: Motokazu Kato has received lecture honoraria from GSK, AstraZeneca, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novartis Pharma. Keisuke Tomii has received lecture honoraria from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, GSK, Novartis Pharma, and Teijin Pharma. Kenichi Hashimoto, Takeo Ishii, C. Elaine Jones, Sally Kilbride, Annette S. Gross, Christine S. Clifton, and David A. Lipson are GSK employees and hold stock/shares in GSK. Yasuko Nezu is an employee of GSK. Ellipta is owned by or licensed to the GSK Group of Companies. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2019 Kato et al.)

Background: The efficacy and safety of benralizumab, an interleukin-5 receptor alpha-directed cytolytic monoclonal antibody, for the prevention of exacerbations in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are not known., Methods: In the GALATHEA and TERRANOVA trials, we enrolled patients with COPD (at a ratio of approximately 2:1 on the basis of eosinophil count [≥220 per cubic millimeter vs. <220 per cubic millimeter]) who had frequent exacerbations despite receiving guideline-based inhaled treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to receive benralizumab (30 or 100 mg in GALATHEA; 10, 30, or 100 mg in TERRANOVA) every 8 weeks (every 4 weeks for the first three doses) or placebo. The primary end point was the treatment effect of benralizumab, measured as the annualized COPD exacerbation rate ratio (benralizumab vs. placebo) at week 56 in patients with baseline blood eosinophil counts of 220 per cubic millimeter or greater. Safety was also assessed., Results: In GALATHEA, the estimates of the annualized exacerbation rate were 1.19 per year (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.36) in the 30-mg benralizumab group, 1.03 per year (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.19) in the 100-mg benralizumab group, and 1.24 per year (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.42) in the placebo group; the rate ratio as compared with placebo was 0.96 for 30 mg of benralizumab (P = 0.65) and 0.83 for 100 mg of benralizumab (P = 0.05). In TERRANOVA, the estimates of the annualized exacerbation rate for 10 mg, 30 mg, and 100 mg of benralizumab and for placebo were 0.99 per year (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.13), 1.21 per year (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.37), 1.09 per year (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.23), and 1.17 per year (95% CI, 1.04 to 1.32), respectively; the corresponding rate ratios were 0.85 (P = 0.06), 1.04 (P = 0.66), and 0.93 (P = 0.40). At 56 weeks, none of the annualized COPD exacerbation rate ratios for any dose of benralizumab as compared with placebo reached significance in either trial. Types and frequencies of adverse events were similar with benralizumab and placebo., Conclusions: Add-on benralizumab was not associated with a lower annualized rate of COPD exacerbations than placebo among patients with moderate to very severe COPD, a history of frequent moderate or severe exacerbations, and blood eosinophil counts of 220 per cubic millimeter or greater (Funded by AstraZeneca [GALATHEA and TERRANOVA] and Kyowa Hakko Kirin [GALATHEA]; GALATHEA and TERRANOVA ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02138916 and NCT02155660.)., (Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: The Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease strategy document for COPD recommends treatment changes according to the persistence of symptoms or exacerbations. This study assessed the feasibility and outcomes of a structured step-up/step-down treatment approach in a randomized controlled clinical trial setting., Methods: Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomized to blinded, double-dummy treatment with twice-daily fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) 250/50 µg or once-daily tiotropium bromide (TIO) 18 µg for 24 weeks (dual bronchodilator was not available). At 4-weekly intervals, patients remaining symptomatic (COPD Assessment Test score >10) or experiencing an exacerbation were offered the option to use triple therapy. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients remaining on randomized therapy., Results: In total, 406 patients participated (mean FEV 1 59%±13% predicted; COPD Assessment Test 12±6). Of these, 204 and 201 patients were included in the FP/SAL and TIO groups, respectively, of whom 67% and 63% continued treatment throughout the study; this difference was not statistically significant. Time to first therapy switch was longer with FP/SAL, but not significantly ( P =0.21). More patients in Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (2011 criteria) groups C/D switched (FP/SAL 55%, TIO 63%) than in groups A/B (FP/SAL 27%, TIO 27%)., Conclusion: Given the choice, patients with more symptoms or those experiencing an exacerbation will agree to step-up therapy. Effectiveness of disease management pathways can be tested using double-blind studies., Competing Interests: Disclosure AK is a GSK employee. MJ and HH are also GSK employees and have GSK stock options. TH was a GSK employee during the conduct of this study and development of this manuscript and is now employed by Pfizer Japan Inc., Japan. GH previously worked for GSK and received a consultancy fee from GSK during the conduct of this study and development of this manuscript. PWJ discloses being now employed by GSK; prior to this and during the conduct of the study, he received personal fees from GSK for engagement with this study and from AstraZeneca and Novartis, outside of the submitted work, but in related fields. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Background: The efficacy and safety of once-daily tiotropium+olodaterol (T+O) (2.5/5µg or 5/5µg) for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been demonstrated in the large, multinational, randomized, Phase III studies TONADO ® 1 and 2, which included 413 Japanese patients (~80 in each group). This study was conducted to supplement the TONADO ® study data to assess long-term safety in ≥100 Japanese patients treated for 1 year in compliance with International Conference on Harmonisation guidelines. Efficacy was evaluated descriptively as a secondary end point., Methods: Patients were randomized to 52 weeks of double-blind treatment with once-daily T+O (2.5/5 or 5/5µg) or O (5µg) monotherapy via the Respimat ® inhaler. We report the safety and efficacy data descriptively., Results: The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was comparable in the T+O 2.5/5µg (75.0%), T+O 5/5µg (85.4%), and O 5µg (80.5%) groups, with drug-related AEs being reported in 5.0%, 7.3%, and 4.9% of patients, respectively. Serious AEs were reported in 14 patients (11.5%). The change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV 1 ) area under the curve from 0 to 3h and trough FEV 1 were numerically higher in the T+O treatment groups than in the O monotherapy group throughout the study period. Overall safety of T+O was comparable to that in the TONADO ® studies., Conclusions: No safety concerns for long-term T+O treatment were identified in Japanese patients with COPD. A numerical improvement in lung function was observed with T+O treatment compared to O monotherapy., (Copyright © 2016 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: The Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Committee has proposed a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment framework focused on symptoms and on exacerbation risk. This study will evaluate a symptom and exacerbation risk-based treatment strategy based on GOLD in a real-world setting in Japan. Optimal management of COPD will be determined by assessing symptoms using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and by assessing the frequency of exacerbations., Methods: This study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01762800) is a 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. It aims to recruit 400 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Patients will be randomized to receive treatment with either salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SFC) 50/250 μg twice daily or with tiotropium bromide 18 μg once daily. Optimal management of patients will be assessed at four-weekly intervals and, if patients remain symptomatic, as measured using the CAT, or experience an exacerbation, they have the option to step up to treatment with both drugs, ie, SFC twice daily and tiotropium once daily (TRIPLE therapy). The primary endpoint of the study will be the proportion of patients who are able to remain on the randomized therapy., Results: No data are available. This paper summarizes the methodology of the study in advance of the study starting., Conclusion: The results of this study will help physicians to understand whether TRIPLE therapy is more effective than either treatment strategy alone in controlling symptoms and exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. It will also help physicians to understand the GOLD recommendation work in Japan.

Background: Indacaterol is an investigational, novel, inhaled once-daily ultra-long-acting beta-2 agonist for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study evaluated the 24-h bronchodilatory efficacy and safety of indacaterol in Japanese patients with COPD., Methods: This Phase-II, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover study comprised four double-blind, single-dose treatment periods (washout between periods: 14-28 days). Japanese patients aged 40-75 years with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomised to receive single doses of indacaterol (150, 300, or 600 microg) or placebo via a single-dose dry-powder inhaler. Efficacy (primary endpoint: standardised FEV(1)AUC(22-24h)) and safety were assessed for 24 h post-dose in each treatment period., Results: Of the 50 patients randomised (92% male; mean age, 67.2 years), 45 completed the study. Standardised FEV(1)AUC(22-24h) was significantly higher for all indacaterol doses as compared with placebo, with clinically relevant differences of 130, 160, and 170 mL for 150, 300, and 600 microg, respectively (P < 0.001). The improvement in FEV(1) was seen as early as 5 min post-dose with indacaterol and sustained for 24 h (P < 0.001 vs placebo at all time points). All indacaterol doses were well tolerated and showed no clinically meaningful effect on pulse rate, blood pressure, QTc interval, and laboratory parameters when compared with placebo., Conclusions: In the Japanese COPD population studied, single doses of indacaterol (150, 300, and 600 microg) provided sustained 24-h bronchodilation, with onset of action within 5 min post-dose. All doses were well tolerated. These results are consistent with data from Caucasian populations.