Search

A subset of severe COVID19 patients develop pulmonary fibrosis, but the pathophysiology of this complication is still unclear. We previously described the possibility to isolate lung mesenchymal cells (LMC) by culturing broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) cells from patients with pulmonary fibrosis or chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Aim of this study was to investigate the possibility to isolate and characterize LMC from BAL of patients that, two months after discharge for severe COVID19, show CT signs of post-COVID19 fibrosis (Post-COVID) and in some cases has been considered transplant indication. Results were compared with those from BAL of patients with collagen tissue disease-associated interstitial fibrosis (CTD-ILD). BAL fluid levels of TGFβ, VEGF, TIMP2, RANTES, IL6, IL8, and PAI1 were assessed. LMC were cultured and expanded, phenotyped by flow cytometry, and tested for osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. Finally, we tested immunomodulatory and proliferative capabilities, collagen I production + /- TGF-beta stimulation. BAL cytokine and growth factor levels were comparable in the two groups. Efficiency of isolation from BAL was 100% in post-COVID compared to 63% in CTD-ILD. LMC from post-COVID were positive for CD105, CD73, CD90, and negative for CD45, CD34, CD19 and HLA-DR as in CTD-ILD samples. Post-COVID LMC displayed higher collagen production with respect to CTD-ILD LMC. Immunomodulatory capacity towards lymphocytes was very low, while Post-COVID LMC significantly upregulated pro-inflammatory cytokine production by healthy PBMCs. Our preliminary data suggest that LMC from post-COVID19 fibrosis patients share several features with CTD-ILD ones but might have a higher response to fibrogenic signals and pro-inflammatory profile. [Display omitted] • Characterization of lung mesenchymal cells from patients with post-COVID fibrosis. • Compare them with collagen tissue disease-associated interstitial fibrosis cells. • Upregulation of local inflammatory milieu and TGF-β release in post-COVID fibrosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The prevalence and natural history of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (PF-ILDs), and their response to commonly used treatments in real life are largely unknown. Objectives: The aim of the study was to describe the prevalence, clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of PF-ILD patients attending 2 Italian referral centers (San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, and San Giuseppe Hospital, Milan) from January 1, 2011, to July 31, 2019. Methods: From a cohort of non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis fibrosing ILD patients with at least 2-year follow-up, we selected only those with progressive disease, defined as per the INBUILD trial, collecting their demographical, clinical, and functional data. Results: Out of the 245 fibrosing ILD patients, 75 (31%) were classified as PF-ILDs (median age 66 years, 60% males), most frequently idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (28%), followed by connective tissue disease-associated ILD (20%), chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and sarcoidosis (17% each). Most patients (81%) were categorized as PF-ILDs because of forced vital capacity (FVC) decline ≥10%, while 19% experienced a marginal FVC decline (between 5 and 10%) associated with worsening respiratory symptoms or increasing extent of fibrotic changes on high-resolution computed tomography. Disease progression occurred after a median of 18 months from ILD diagnosis. The vast majority (93%) of PF-ILD patients received prednisolone, alone (40%) or associated with steroid-sparing agents (52%), and 35% of treated patients developed treatment-related adverse events. After ILD progression, the median survival was 3 (interquartile range (IQR) 2–5) years, with a 2- and 3-year mortality rate of 4 and 20%, respectively. Conclusions: In a real-life setting, approximately one-third of the fibrosing ILD patients showed a progressive course despite treatment. Studies aimed to better phenotype this subgroup of patients are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) comprise a wide group of pulmonary parenchymal disorders. These patients may experience acute respiratory deteriorations of their respiratory condition, termed "acute exacerbation" (AE). The incidence of AE-ILD seems to be lower than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but prognosis and prognostic factors are largely unrecognized. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 158 consecutive adult patients hospitalized for AE-ILD in two Italian university hospitals from 2009 to 2016. Patients included in the analysis were divided into two groups: non-IPF (62%) and IPF (38%). Among ILDs included in the non-IPF group, the most frequent diagnoses were non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (42%) and connective tissue disease (CTD)-ILD (20%). Mortality during hospitalization was significantly different between the two groups: 19% in the non-IPF group and 43% in the IPF group. AEs of ILDs are difficult-to-predict events and are burdened by relevant mortality. Increased inflammatory markers, such as neutrophilia on the differential blood cell count (HR 1.02 (CI 1.01–1.04)), the presence of pulmonary hypertension (HR 1.85 (CI 1.17–2.92)), and the diagnosis of IPF (HR 2.31 (CI 1.55–3.46)), resulted in negative prognostic factors in our analysis. Otherwise, lymphocytosis on the differential count seemed to act as a protective prognostic factor (OR 0.938 (CI 0.884–0.995)). Further prospective, large-scale, real-world data are needed to support and confirm the impact of our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the most lethal form of interstitial pneumonia of unknown cause, is associated with a specific radiological and histopathological pattern (the so-called "usual interstitial pneumonia" pattern) and has a median survival estimated to be between 3 and 5 years after diagnosis. However, evidence shows that IPF has different clinical phenotypes, which are characterized by a variable disease course over time. At present, the natural history of IPF is unpredictable for individual patients, although some genetic factors and circulating biomarkers have been associated with different prognoses. Since in its early stages, IPF may be asymptomatic, leading to a delayed diagnosis. Two drugs, pirfenidone and nintedanib, have been shown to modify the disease course by slowing down the decline in lung function. It is also known that 5–10% of the IPF patients may be affected by episodes of acute and often fatal decline. The acute worsening of disease is sometimes attributed to identifiable conditions, such as pneumonia or heart failure; but many of these events occur without an identifiable cause. These idiopathic acute worsenings are termed acute exacerbations of IPF. To date, clinical biomarkers, diagnostic, prognostic, and theranostic, are not well characterized. However, they could become useful tools helping facilitate diagnoses, monitoring disease progression and treatment efficacy. The aim of this review is to cover molecular mechanisms underlying IPF and research into new clinical biomarkers, to be utilized in diagnosis and prognosis, even in patients treated with antifibrotic drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]