Search

Background: Patients with d-transposition of the great arteries (d-TGA) who have undergone an arterial switch operation (ASO) can develop right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) dysfunction with pulmonary regurgitation (PR) or stenosis. In these patients, treatment may include transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR). Coronary compression is a contraindication occurring in 5% of typical TPVR cases. After ASO, there are various anatomical considerations that can confound TPVR, including potential coronary artery compression. Our goal is to understand feasibility of TPVR in patients following ASO., Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with RVOT dysfunction after ASO who underwent cardiac catheterization with intention to perform TPVR from 2008 to 2020., Results: Across nine centers, 33 patients met inclusion criteria. TPVR was successful in 22 patients (66%), 19 receiving a Melody valve and 3 a SAPIEN valve. RVOT stenosis in isolation or with PR dictated need for TPVR in nearly all patients. One serious adverse event occurred with valve embolization. After TPVR, the RVOT peak gradient decreased from 43 to 9 mm Hg (p < 0.001); PR was trivial/none in all but one patient, in whom it was mild. Coronary compression prohibiting TPVR occurred in eight patients (24%) and two patients (6%) had severe aortic regurgitation from aortic root deformation precluding TPVR. Seven patients underwent RVOT reintervention a median of 5.3 years post-TPVR., Conclusions: TPVR in patients with d-TGA after ASO is feasible, but in this cohort, coronary compression or aortic root distortion precluded TPVR in one-third of patients. The rate of RVOT reintervention after TPVR was higher in this cohort of ASO patients than in prior studies., (© 2024 The Author(s). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Congenital heart disease patients that develop secondary pulmonary regurgitation require a pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) in their follow-up. The indications for PVR in asymptomatic patients are debated. Most guidelines consider a RV end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) over 150 ml/m(2) as an indication for PVR. We analyzed clinical, echocardiographic and MRI variables of patients that underwent a surgical PVR between September 2006 and February 2013. The included patients were asymptomatic, without pulmonary stenosis and with both pre- and post-surgery MRI. Thirty-five patients (74.3 % males) were included. Mean age at PVR was 25.8 years (SD = 7.18), and weight was 64.5 Kg (SD = 12.03). The main diagnosis was tetralogy of Fallot (n = 28), pulmonary atresia (n = 2), primary pulmonary regurgitation (n = 2) and pulmonary regurgitation after percutaneous treatment (n = 2). The maximal RVEDV pre-PVR was 267 ml/m(2), and right ventricular end-systolic volume (RVESV) was 183 ml/m(2). RV size and function were established by MRI: Pre-PVR Post-PVR p RVEDV (ml/m(2)) 162 (SD = 39.1) 94 (SD = 23.6) <0.001 RVESV (ml/m(2)) 87 (SD = 28.9) 44 (SD = 15.7) <0.001 RVEF 44.8 % (SD = 8.17) 52 % (SD = 9.9) <0.001 Patients with a RVEDV under 170 ml/m(2) combined with a RVESV under 90 ml/m(2) had a favorable RV remodeling, defined as RVEDV under 110 ml/m(2) (sensitivity 87.5 %), RVESV under 55 ml/m(2) (sensitivity 100 %) and RVEF over 50 % (sensitivity 100 %). When deciding the optimal PVR timing in asymptomatic patients, both RVEDV and RVESV should be considered. Our results suggest that higher volumes than used in the clinical practice can achieve a good remodeling. Therefore, PVR could be performed later in the follow-up reducing the number of cardiac interventions.