Search

Aims: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment option for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Reconnection of pulmonary veins (PVs) is the predominant cause for recurrence of PAF. However, treatment of patients with recurrence of PAF despite isolated PV in the absence of extra-PV foci remains challenging.Methods and Results: Of 265 patients undergoing repeat catheter ablation (CA) for recurrence of PAF 21 (8%) patients (14 men, age 58 ± 14 years) showed no reconnection of PV. Therefore, inducibility of sustained atrial arrhythmias was tested. If sustained atrial fibrillation (AF) or sustained atrial tachycardia (AT) was induced, patients underwent CA. During follow-up (FU), Holter- and Tele-electrocardiogram were performed. In 19 (91%) of 21 patients, sustained atrial arrhythmias [16 (84%) AF; 3 (15%) patients AT] were induced. One patient showed PAF. Eighteen patients underwent CA aiming for termination of induced arrhythmia. In 14 (77%) patients, termination into sinus rhythm was achieved. Despite extensive CA, three (16%) patients were externally cardioverted. No periprocedural complications occurred. During 21.2 ± 6.8-month FU, 10 (53%) patients were free of any arrhythmia. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurred in 4 (21%) and AT in 5 (26%) patients. One patient showed persistent AF. Repeat CA was scheduled and successfully performed for these patients.Conclusion: In patients with recurrence of PAF despite isolated PV, termination of induced atrial arrhythmias can be achieved in most patients by defragmentation and AT ablation. Moreover, this ablation strategy results in favourable mid-term outcome results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Loss of Pace Capture and Dormant Conduction in PVI Introduction Permanent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains an essential goal of ablation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. Aim of this study was the intraindividual comparison of unexcitability to pacing along the ablation line versus dormant conduction (DC) as additional procedural endpoints. Methods A total of 58 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) underwent PVI by circumferential ablation of ipsilateral pulmonary veins (PVs), followed by testing for DC by adenosine administration. Irrespective of the presence of DC, pacing along the ablation line for left atrium capture was performed and additional radio frequency energy applied if necessary. PVs with initial DC were retested after achieving unexcitability. Results PVI was achieved in 224 of 224 PVs. In 33 of 224 PVs (15%) DC was revealed. At 92 of 112 ablation lines (82%) sites of excitability were found. Three (9%) of the initial 33 PVs with DC showed further DC after achieving unexcitability at repeated testing. Thirty-two of 33 assumed areas of unmasked PV-LA reconduction as revealed by DC-testing showed a corresponding site of excitability on the ablation line. After a follow-up of 11.6 ± 3.4 months 79% of patients were free of arrhythmia. Conclusions Pacing for unexcitability can safely identify potential sites of DC and even sites that would have not been detected by testing for DC. Unexcitability, therefore, serves as a suitable and safe procedural endpoint not only for patients with contraindications to adenosine administration. Our data suggest that adenosine may be expendable when achieving unexcitability along the ablation line. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Robotic Remote Ablation for AF. Aims: A robotic navigation system (RNS, Hansen™) has been developed as an alternative method of performing ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite the growing application of RNS-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), its consequences and mechanisms of subsequent AF recurrences are unknown. We investigated the acute procedural success and persistence of PVI over time after robotic PVI and its relation to clinical outcome. Methods and Results: Sixty-four patients (60.7 ± 9.8 years, 53 male) with paroxysmal AF underwent robotic circumferential PVI with 3-dimensional left atrial reconstruction (NavX™). A voluntary repeat invasive electrophysiological study was performed 3 months after ablation irrespective of clinical course. Robotic PVI was successful in all patients without complication (fluoroscopy time: 23.5 [12-34], procedure time: 180 [150-225] minutes). Fluoroscopy time demonstrated a gradual decline but was significantly reduced after the 30th patient following the introduction of additional navigation software (34 [29-45] vs 12 [9-17] minutes; P < 0.001). A repeat study at 3 months was performed in 63% of patients and revealed electrical conduction recovery in 43% of all PVs. Restudied patients without AF recurrence (n = 28) showed a significantly lower number of recovered PVs (1 (0-2) vs 2 (2-3); P = 0.006) and a longer LA-PV conduction delay than patients with AF recurrences (n = 12). Persistent block of all PVs was associated with freedom from AF in all patients. At 3 months, 67% of patients were free of AF, while reablation of recovered PVs led to an overall freedom from AF in 81% of patients after 1 year. Conclusion: Robotic PVI for PAF is safe, effective, and requires limited fluoroscopy while yielding comparable success rates to conventional ablation approaches with PV reconduction as a common phenomenon associated with AF recurrences. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1079-1084) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study was conducted to determine if an additional procedural endpoint of unexcitability (UE) to pacing along the ablation line reduces recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT) after radiofrequency catheter ablation. Background: AF/AT recurrence is common after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods: We included 102 patients from 2 centers (age 63 ± 10 years; 33 women; left atrium 38 ± 7 mm; left ventricular ejection fraction 61 ± 6%) with symptomatic paroxysmal AF. A 3-dimensional mapping system and circumferential mapping catheter were used in all patients for PVI. In group 1 (n = 50), the procedural endpoint was bidirectional block across the ablation line. In group 2 (n = 52), additional UE to bipolar pacing at an output of 10 mA and 2-ms pulse width was required. The primary endpoint was freedom from any AF/AT (>30 s) after discontinuation of antiarrhythmic drugs. Results: Procedural endpoints were successfully achieved in all patients. Procedure duration was significantly longer in group 2 (185 ± 58 min vs. 139 ± 57 min; p < 0.001); however, fluoroscopy times were not different (23 ± 9 min vs. 23 ± 9 min; p = 0.49). After a follow-up of 12 months in all patients, 26 patients (52%) in group 1 versus 43 (82.7%) in group 2 were free from any AF/AT (p = 0.001) after a single procedure. No major complications occurred. Conclusions: The use of pacing to ensure UE along the PVI line markedly improved near-term single-procedure success, compared with demonstration of bidirectional block alone. This additional endpoint significantly improved patient outcomes after PVI. (Unexcitability Along the Ablation as an Endpoint for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation; NCT01724437) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]