Search

Arterial stiffness is an indicator of vascular health, influenced by both pathological conditions and physiological determinants, noticeably age. Augmentation index (AI) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) are used among others to assess arterial stiffness. Several risk factors may contribute to pathologically increase arterial stiffness and produce early vascular aging. Our study aims to assess the impact of individual risk factors on vascular health, evaluating the distribution of PWV and AI values in a cohort of adult people without modifiable cardiovascular risk factors while analyzing their role in accelerating vascular ageing. We performed a secondary analysis of a Swiss population-based research project, which took place in 2017 and 2018. Of the 1202 participants originally enrolled, 1097 were included in the final sample. The population was divided into without (n=388) and with risk factors (n=709), based on the presence of the following: smoking, diabetes, previous cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic kidney disease stage 3 or more, LDL cholesterol ≥ 4.11 or treatment with hypolipidemic drugs, hypertension or treatment with antihypertensive drugs, and metabolic syndrome. Tonometric and oscillometric devices were employed to assess PWV, and the 75th percentiles of PWV and AI in the population without risk factors were calculated to identify cut-offs for the logistic regression analysis. We developed nomograms by assigning a numerical score to each independent prognostic factor; the total score estimating the probability of PWVs and AIs being over the defined cut-offs. Patients with hypertension, diabetes, and obesity showed higher PWV values (p < 0.001). In the univariate logistic regression, factors predictive for higher PWV values were diabetes, CVDs, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension, while CVDs, antihyperlipidemic treatment, hypertension, and increased BMI were predictive in the multivariate logistic regression. Smoking did not significantly influence arterial stiffness parameters. The present study provides reference values for PWV and AI in subjects without modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and, through nomograms, a risk score stratification to assess the impact of individual risk factors on vascular health.

Background: Oscillometric pulse wave velocity (o-PWV) represents an attractive, non invasive and non operator-dependent method to estimate arterial stiffness. Tonometric carotid-femoral measurements (cf-PWV),are considered the gold-standard for non-invasive aortic stiffness assessment. To date, no studies in the general population comparing the two methods have been performed., Methods and Results: 1162 subjects were analysed. O-PWV and cf-PWV showed a mean difference of -0.31 m/sec( p  ≤ 0.001). No significant differences between cf-PWV and o-PWVs were observed in patients without cardiovascular risk factors. The Bland and Altman analysis showed a moderate agreement between 24 h-o-PWV and cf-PWV (mean difference -0.99, LoA 4.23 to -6.22m/s). O-PWVs underestimate and overestimate arterial stiffness under and over 50 years respectively( p  ≤ 0.001). Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and age differently impact cf-PWV and in office o-PWV variability ( r 2 0.35 and 0.88 respectively). In younger subjects a strong relationship between o-PWV and SBP reducing as age increases was found. Analysing the impact of age, an opposite trend was noticed., Conclusions: Oscillometric PWV estimates provide reliable values in the general population. An o-PWV tendency to underestimate arterial stiffness in younger subjects and in subjects with diseases known to increase arterial stiffness and to overestimate it with increasing age was found, even if scarcely relevant in clinical perspective. Overall the present findings underline an acceptable and satisfactory agreement between oscillometric and tonometric methods for the PWV assessment. KEY MESSAGES Oscillometric and tonometric PWV estimates showed a good and satisfactory agreement in the general population, above all in subjects without cardiovascular risk factors or a documented vascular damage. In comparison with tonometric values, oscillometric PWV estimates showed, however, the tendency to underestimate arterial stiffness in younger subjects and to overestimate it with increasing age, while diverging when diseases known to increase arterial stiffness are present. The magnitude of differences in PWV estimates between tonometric and oscillometric methods found in the general population appears most likely not to be significant in everyday clinical practice.

The effects of chronic coffee consumption on the cardiovascular system are still under debate. Aortic stiffness, wave reflections, and central and peripheral blood pressure (BP) are milestone indicators of cardiovascular-risk. We sought to investigate the association between coffee and caffeine consumption, arterial stiffness, and central/peripheral BP. Aortic stiffness was evaluated via pulse wave velocity (PWV); wave reflections with the augmentation index (AIx);peripheral systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and central BP (cSBP/cDBP) were non-invasively assessed. Coffee and caffeine consumption was ascertained using a questionnaire. A linear inverse relationship between coffee and caffeine consumption and arterial stiffness and central and peripheral BP was found.Light coffee and caffeine consumers showed β-coefficients for PWV–0.15, SBP–3.61, DBP–2.48, cSBP–3.21, and cDBP-2.18 (all p values < 0.05).Present findings suggest that coffee and caffeine consumption is inversely associated with arterial stiffness and central and peripheral BP in a large population sample. Interventional prospective studies are needed to demonstrate the causal association [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]