3 results on '"James J. L. Mateka"'
Search Results
2. Assessing Patient and Provider Perceptions of Factors Associated with Patient Engagement in Asthma Care
- Author
-
Jeffrey D. Carter, Laura Simone, Nicola A. Hanania, James J. L. Mateka, Kathleen Moreo, Laurence Greene, and Tamar Sapir
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ,Quality management ,Attitude of Health Personnel ,Decision Making ,Patient engagement ,Treatment goals ,Asthma care ,Medication Adherence ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Provider perceptions ,Nursing ,Patient-Centered Care ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Asthma ,business.industry ,Collaborative learning ,Survey research ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Quality Improvement ,United States ,Self Care ,030228 respiratory system ,Family medicine ,Female ,Patient Participation ,business ,Needs Assessment - Abstract
National quality improvement initiatives emphasize building partnerships between patients and providers by promoting patient engagement through communication, shared decision-making, and self-care skills. Efforts to promote patient engagement are especially important for people with asthma. To cultivate effective partnerships in asthma care, patients and providers may benefit from understanding each other's values and perceptions regarding treatment goals, shared decision-making, as well as barriers to optimal care and outcomes.We conducted a survey study to assess and compare asthma patient and provider perceptions of factors that are associated with effective partnerships and patient engagement.Surveys were administered to adult patients with poorly controlled asthma (n = 328) and their physicians (n = 40) before they participated in collaborative learning sessions held in 40 allergy and immunology practices across the United States. The surveys included items for both groups to report their asthma-related treatment goals and perceptions about information needs and knowledge, shared decision-making, and barriers to medication adherence.Providers rated their knowledge about different aspects of their patients' health status (on a scale from 1 = poor knowledge to 5 = excellent knowledge). The lowest percentages of ratings 4 and 5 were for knowledge about patients' financial status (29%), adherence (42%), lifestyle (46%), and workplace situation (46%). The highest percentages of ratings 4 and 5 were for knowledge about patients' exacerbation history (75%), smoking status (76%), hospitalization history (79%), and comorbidities (79%). The percentages of patients and providers, respectively, who indicated the following treatment goals as important differed significantly: preventing exacerbations (62% and 83%; P = 0.01), preventing emergency department visits (44% and 76%; P 0.01), and improving ability to perform daily activities (69% and 48%; P 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in percentages of provider-reported goals and goals that providers estimated their patients would indicate as important. Disconnects were also observed for perceived barriers to asthma medication adherence.The observed disconnects in patient and provider perceptions may inform strategies for cultivating effective partnerships and patient engagement to improve care quality and outcomes for people with asthma.
- Published
- 2017
3. Real-world practice patterns in community U.S. oncology practices: A quality improvement approach in HER2-positive breast cancer
- Author
-
Sara A. Hurvitz, Kathleen Moreo, Tamar Sapir, Laura Simone, Jeffrey D. Carter, and James J. L. Mateka
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Quality management ,Practice patterns ,business.industry ,medicine.disease ,Breast cancer ,Oncology ,Chart ,HER2 Positive Breast Cancer ,Family medicine ,Cohort ,Medicine ,Disease characteristics ,business ,Cancer staging - Abstract
e18196 Background: In breast cancer (BC), quality measures related to care coordination (CC), HER2 testing (testing) and use of HER2-targeted therapy (Tx), provide parameters for assessing care quality. We assessed the influence of quality improvement education (QIE) on alignment with BC quality indicators. Methods: 20 community oncologists participated in an IRB-approved QIE program. At baseline, 200 randomly selected charts of women with HER2+ invasive BC were retrospectively reviewed for adherence to quality measures pertaining to testing, Tx and CC. The cohort participated in accredited QIE activities for developing action plans for improvement. Follow-up chart reviews were completed 6 months after the QIE. Results: Patient and disease characteristics were generally similar across the 2 cohorts. At baseline, documentation of cancer staging was 90%, ECOG functional status assessment was 67% and cardiac testing was 33%. Treatment in the adjuvant setting was most common, followed by neoadjuvant, and metastatic. Documentation of CC varied greatly across specialties, and was highest for primary care physicians. At follow-up, randomly selected charts (n=60 to date) revealed increases in documentation of patient assessments and care coordination. A shift towards increased treatment in the neoadjuvant setting was also observed. Conclusions: QIE interventions that engaged oncology teams showed a positive impact on documentation across several parameters. A complete analysis of follow-up charts (n=200) will be presented. [Table: see text]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.