Search

Background Patient-reported control of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) symptoms is associated with the quality of life impact of CRS. We sought to determine if 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score is predictive of patient-perceived CRS symptom control. Methods Prospective cross-sectional study of 202 patients with CRS. Participants were asked to rate their CRS symptom control as 'not at all,' 'a little,' 'somewhat,' 'very,' and 'completely.' The severity of patient CRS symptomatology was measured using the SNOT-22. The relationship between SNOT-22 score and patient-reported CRS symptom control was determined using regression, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results SNOT-22 was negatively associated with patient-reported CRS symptom control (adjusted β = −0.03; 95% CI, −0.04 to −0.02; p < 0.001), after controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics. There was a significant difference in SNOT-22 scores of participants reporting each level of symptom control ( p < 0.001) with the greatest differences between participants who rated their CRS symptom control as 'not at all,' 'a little,' and 'somewhat,' which we deem poor CRS symptom control, and the group who described their level of CRS symptom control described as 'very' and 'completely,' which we deem well-controlled CRS symptoms. These results were true across all SNOT-22 subdomains scores as well. Using ROC analysis, a SNOT-22 score of 35 identified patients reporting poor vs well-controlled CRS symptom control with 71.4% sensitivity and 85.5% specificity. Conclusion SNOT-22 score is associated with how well patients feel their CRS symptomatology is controlled. Moreover, SNOT-22 score can be used to accurately distinguish patients with poor vs well-controlled CRS symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the 22‐item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) in individuals undergoing medical management for their chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Academic, tertiary care centre. Participants: A total of 247 adults undergoing medical management for CRS. Main outcome measure: At enrolment, participants completed a SNOT‐22. At a subsequent follow‐up visit, 2‐12 months after enrolment, participants also completed a SNOT‐22. At follow‐up, participants also rated the change in their sinus symptoms and general health as “Much worse,” “A little worse,” “About the same,” “A little better” or “Much better” compared with enrolment; these two questions were used as sinus symptom and general health anchor questions, respectively. The SNOT‐22 MCID was calculated using distribution‐based, anchor‐based and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve‐based methods. Results: Using the distribution‐based method, the SNOT‐22 MCID was 11.6. Using the sinus symptom anchor question, the SNOT‐22 MCID was 10.5; applying the ROC method to the sinus symptom anchor yielded an MCID of 12.5. In comparison, using the general health anchor question, the SNOT‐22 MCID was 8.3; applying the ROC method to the sinus symptom anchor yielded an MCID of 17.5. In all cases, the calculated MCID had a sensitivity of approximately 50‐60% and specificity of approximately 80‐90%. Conclusions: Based on our results, we propose a SNOT‐22 MCID of 12 in medically managed patients with CRS. The MCID, while specific, was not sensitive for identifying patients with CRS experiencing a noticeable improvement in sinus symptoms or general health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgeons commonly prescribe prophylactic antibiotics after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), yet minimal data exist to support this practice. In this study we aimed to assess the impact of post‐ESS antibiotics on infection, quality of life (QOL), and endoscopic scores. Methods: This was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, noninferiority trial comparing amoxicillin‐clavulanate vs placebo after ESS (NCT01919411, ClinicalTrials.gov). Adults (N = 77) with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) refractory to appropriate medical therapy who underwent ESS were randomized to antibiotics (N = 37) or placebo (N = 40) and followed clinically (mean ± standard deviation: 1.3 ± 0.3 and 8.8 ± 3.9 weeks postoperatively). At baseline and follow‐up, QOL was measured with 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test questionnaires and Lund‐Kennedy endoscopic scores were evaluated. Outcomes were analyzed with repeated‐measures analysis of variance and analysis of covariance and z tests for proportions. Results: Placebo was noninferior to antibiotic prophylaxis with regard to postoperative SNOT‐22 scores (β = 0.18, 2‐tailed p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the antibiotic and placebo groups in LK score trajectories over time (p = 0.63) or in postoperative infection rates (2.6% vs 2.4%, respectively; p = 0.96). The rate of diarrhea was significantly higher in the antibiotic group (24.3% vs 2.5%; relative risk = 10.8; p = 0.02). Conclusion: Although statistically underpowered, the results suggest placebo was noninferior to prophylactic antibiotics after ESS for CRS regarding postoperative sinonasal‐specific QOL. There were no significant differences in postoperative endoscopic scores or rates of infection, but the rate of diarrhea was significantly higher in the antibiotic group. These findings add to the growing evidence that routine use of prophylactic postoperative antibiotics does not improve outcomes post‐ESS and significantly increases the rate of diarrhea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of bilateral inferior turbinate reduction (BITR) on patient‐reported quality of life (QOL) following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Methods: This was a prospective cohort study. Patients with CRS, who were recruited from 10 different otolaryngologic practices between 2011 and 2014, completed the 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22), Chronic Sinusitis Survey (CSS), and EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ‐5D) survey at baseline, and at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after ESS. A total of 113 patients who underwent ESS with BITR were compared to 788 patients who underwent ESS without BITR. Results: Significant demographic and comorbid differences between BITR and non‐BITR cohorts included age (41 vs 49 years, p < 0.0001), presence of asthma (19% vs 36%, p < 0.0001), prior sinus surgery (22% vs 53%, p < 0.0001), and concurrent septoplasty (80% vs 53%, p < 0.0001), respectively. On univariate analysis, patients who underwent ESS with or without BITR were found to have statistically significant improvement in disease‐specific (SNOT‐22 and CSS) and general (EQ‐5D) QOL scores at years 1 through 4 (p < 0.05). On multivariate regression, however, the performance of BITR was not associated with any improvements in these outcome measures. Conclusion: Patients undergoing ESS achieve similar long‐term improvement in both disease‐specific and general QOL regardless of the performance of concurrent BITR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) may arise due to odontogenic etiologies. However, it is unknown whether odontogenic CRS has a differential impact on patients’ quality of life (QOL) compared to standard, inflammatory (but non-odontogenic) CRS. The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in the impact of sinonasal symptomatology on general health-related QOL in odontogenic CRS compared to non-odontogenic CRS. This was a retrospective review of 21 odontogenic CRS patients who visited our tertiary care center. The severity of sinonasal symptomatology and CRS-specific QOL detriment was measured using the 22-item Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22) and general health-related QOL was measured using the health utility index from the 5-item EuroQol survey (EQ-5D HUV). Compared to non-odontogenic CRS, odontogenic CRS was not associated with a difference in SNOT-22 score [linear regression coefficient (β) = − 1.57, 95% CI − 12.47 to 9.32, p = 0.777] but was significantly associated with decreased EQ-5D HUV (β = − 0.10, 95% CI − 0.17 to − 0.03, p = 0.008). We also found that the magnitude of association (β) between SNOT-22 and EQ5D-HUV was greater for odontogenic CRS patients compared to non-odontogenic CRS patients (p = 0.045). Our findings suggest sinonasal symptoms may have a greater impact on general QOL in odontogenic CRS compared to non-odontogenic CRS. The reason for this remains unknown, but deserves further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The need for objective assessment of patient outcomes is becoming an essential component of clinical practice for both private and academic otolaryngologists. The purpose of this study is to describe the implementation of an online model for collection of clinical outcomes data in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Methods Patients completed the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Chronic Sinusitis Survey (CSS), and EuroQol 5-dimension assessment (EQ-5D), before and after sinus surgery. One year after initial patient enrollment, an online tool was developed to facilitate collection of postoperative data. Response rates preimplementation and postimplementation of online data collection were compared. Results A total of 520 sinus surgery patients provided outcomes data from the practices of 7 private practice (n = 308) and 4 academic otolaryngologists (n = 212). With implementation of the online collection instrument, the response rate at 3 months increased from 67% to 78.8% ( p = 0.004). The overall follow-up rate at 3 months was higher in patients recruited from private as compared to academic practices (77.9% vs 69.8%, respectively, p = 0.04). Conclusion Quality of life data can be effectively collected from CRS patients in both the private and academic practice setting. The addition of an online data collection tool can significantly increase response rates, and allow a comprehensive capture of meaningful clinical outcomes. Such a model is not difficult to implement and has increasing relevance as payers begin to request outcome data from providers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]