Search

Introduction: Quality-of-life and severity scores are both popular measures in medicine. For deep venous obstruction, the VEINES-QOL/Sym and venous clinical severity score (VCSS) are widely used. Combining a patient-reported outcome with a clinical severity score should give a more sensitive outcome for treatment results. To establish and compare their suitability for deep venous disease, we compared the outcomes of both scores in a group of patients who were interventionally treated for deep venous disease., Methods: The venous clinical severity scores and VEINES-QOL/Sym scores of a group of patients who had received interventional treatment for deep venous obstruction more than 12 months ago were compared at T0 and T12., Results: Both the Spearman's rho and Pearson's r show a very weak, negative correlation (statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05)), between the venous clinical severity score and VEINES-QOL at T12 and between the venous clinical severity score and the VEINES-SYM at both T0 and T12. T0 VCSS-VSYM: rho = -0.219 (p = 0.052), r = -0.236 (p = 0.037), T12 VCSS-VQOL: rho = -0.459 (p = 0.007), r = -0.379 (p = 0.030), T12 VCSS-VSYM: rho = -0.463 (p = 0.007), r = -0.432 (p = 0.012). This negative correlation was not statistically (p ≥ 0.05) confirmed for T0 VCSS-VSYM., Conclusion: The physician-scored venous clinical severity score of patients treated for deep venous obstruction does not correlate well with their self-reported quality-of-life and symptom scores., (© The Author(s) 2016.)

Introduction: New developments in the treatment of complex deep venous disease have become available in the last decade. Besides analysing patencies as a surrogate outcome for these treatments we analysed the Quality-of-Life (QoL) changes for successful and failed deep venous treatments., Materials and Methods: Patients with proven venous occlusive disease, referred to our department of Venous Surgery at the Maastricht University Medical Centre, were included. After inclusion patients were treated by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting and when indicated endophlebectomy with an arteriovenous fistula. QoL was assessed with the disease specific VEINES-QOL/Sym and the generic Short-Form (SF)-36 questionnaires preoperatively at baseline and post-operatively after 3, 12 and 24 months., Results: One hundred fifty-three interventions were analysed, showing a primary, assisted primary and secondary patency of respectively 65%, 78% and 89% at 24 months. The VEINES-QOL and Sym scores improved at 3, 12 and 24 months. The overall improvement at 24 months is 22.7 for QoL and 18.18 for Sym with respective p values of 0.013 and 0.016. The improvement of the VEINES-QOL and Sym scores after a successful (patent) treatment remained highly significant (QoL: p < 0.001, Sym: p = 0.004). Also the generic QoL (Short-Form 36v2) shows significant improvement after 12 months for physical functioning (p = 0.004) and role physical (p = 0.004) scales., Conclusions: The overall patencies of interventions for deep venous pathology are exceptionally good after two years. Concomitantly the VEINES-Sym and VEINES-QOL scores improve significantly for 3, 12, and 24 months when compared to the baseline (T0) after treatment. Successful interventions showed, as expected, a significant greater QoL improvement between T0 and T3, T12, T24 for both VEINES-QOL and VEINES-Sym scores when compared to the failed interventions. The one-year linear improvement of two SF-36 scales (PF and RP) is also significant., (© The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.)