Search

Background Stress experienced in a marriage or committed relationship may be associated with worse patient-reported outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but little is known about this association in young adults (≤55 years) with AMI. Methods and Results We used data from VIRGO (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients), an observational cohort study that enrolled individuals aged 18 to 55 years with AMI (2008-2012). Marital stress was self-reported 1 month after AMI using the Stockholm Marital Stress Scale (categorized as absent/mild, moderate, and severe). Outcomes were physical/mental health (Short Form-12 ) , generic health status (EuroQol-5 Dimensions), cardiac-specific quality of life and angina (Seattle Angina Questionnaire), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and all-cause readmission 1 year after AMI. Regression models were sequentially adjusted for baseline health, demographics (sex, age, race or ethnicity), and socioeconomic factors (education, income, employment, and insurance). Sex and marital stress interaction was also tested. Among 1593 married/partnered participants, 576 (36.2%) reported severe marital stress, which was more common in female than male participants (39.4% versus 30.4%, P =0.001). Severe marital stress was significantly associated with worse mental health (beta=-2.13, SE=0.75, P =0.004), generic health status (beta=-3.87, SE=1.46, P =0.008), cardiac-specific quality of life (beta=-6.41, SE=1.65, P <0.001), and greater odds of angina (odds ratio [OR], 1.49 [95% CI, 1.06-2.10], P =0.023) and all-cause readmissions (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.04-2.00], P =0.006), after adjusting for baseline health, demographics, and socioeconomic factors. These associations were similar across sexes ( P -interaction all >0.05). Conclusions The association between marital stress and worse 1-year health outcomes was statistically significant in young patients with AMI, suggesting a need for routine screening and the creation of interventions to support patients with stress recovering from an AMI.

Background: Data on health status outcomes after spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) are limited., Methods and Findings: Using the Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients (VIRGO) study we compared patients with SCAD and other acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at presentation (baseline), 1-month, and-12 months using standardized health status instruments. Among 3572 AMI patients ≤ 55 years, 67 had SCAD. SCAD patients were younger (median age (IQR) 45 (40.5-51) years vs. 48 (44-52) in other AMI, p = 0.003), more often female (92.5% vs. 66.6%), have college education (73.1% vs. 51.7%) and household income >$100,000 (43.3% vs. 17.7% (All p<0.001). SCAD patients at baseline had higher mean ± SD Short Form-12 [SF-12] physical component scores [PCS] (48.7±10.2 vs. 43.8±12.1, p<0.001) and mental component scores [MCS] (49.6±12.4 vs. 45.4±12.5, p = 0.008), and at 12-months [PCS (50.1±9.0 vs. 44.3±12.3, p<0.001) and MCS (53±10.1 vs 50.2±11.0, p = 0.045)]. The Euro-Quality of Life Scale [EQ-5D] VAS and EQ-5D index scores were similar at baseline, but higher at 12-months for SCAD (EQ-5D VAS: 82.2±10.2 vs. 72.3±21.0, p<0.001; EQ-5D index scores; 90.2±15.3 vs. 83.7±19.8, p = 0.012). SCAD patients had better baseline Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ] physical limitation (88.8±20.1 vs. 81.2±25.4, p = 0.017). At 12-months SCAD patients had better physical limitation (98.0±8.5 vs. 91.4±18.8, p = 0.007), angina frequency (96.4±8.8 vs. 91.3±16.8, p = 0.018) and quality of life scores (80.7±14.7 vs 72.2±23.2, p = 0.005). Magnitude of change in health status from baseline to 12-months was not statistically different between the groups. After adjustment for time and comorbidities there remained no difference in most health status outcomes., Conclusions: SCAD patients fare marginally better than other AMI patients on most health status instruments and have similar 12-month health status recovery. Better pre-event health status suggests a need to modify exercise prescriptions and cardiac rehabilitation protocols to better assist this physically active population to recover., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a burdensome disease. It is unclear whether PAD cohorts enrolled in contemporary randomized control trials (RCT) are representative of the real-world PAD populations in terms of their patient characteristics., Methods: We compared baseline patient characteristics and health status (as measured by the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire [PAQ]) between the randomized CLEVER study, and the real-world PORTRAIT registry. CLEVER was an RCT of PAD patients enrolled from 29 centers across the US and Canada comparing revascularization with stenting versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) and supervised exercise therapy (SET) plus OMT. PORTRAIT was a multicenter, prospective study of patients with new or worsening PAD symptoms across ten sites in the US., Results: The final cohort consisted of 879 patients (n = 119 from CLEVER, n = 760 from PORTRAIT (24.5% black, 41.4% women). While CLEVER enrolled patients with aortoiliac disease, only 16.0% of the PORTRAIT cohort had isolated aortoiliac disease. Compared with CLEVER, patients from PORTRAIT were older (64.0 ± 9.5 versus 68.9 ± 9.5 yrs., p ≤0.001), had more severe disease as measured by the ankle brachial index (0.7 ± 0.2 versus 0.9 ± 0.2, p ≤0.001) and a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors including hyperlipidemia and diabetes (all p values<0.05). Both cohorts had similar disease-specific health status as measured by the PAQ summary score (47.4 ± 21.9 versus 43.6 ± 18.4, p = 0.07)., Conclusion: In this comparative study, real-world patients with PAD were older and sicker when compared to an RCT with similar indications. This gap may be bridged by improving enrollment of underrepresented high-risk patients in PAD trials testing strategies for PAD symptom relief., Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01419080?term=portrait&rank=1NCT01419080., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We examined sex differences in long-term health outcomes following acute myocardial infarction in China, including mortality, major adverse cardiac events and health status (symptoms, functioning, quality of life)., Methods: A total of 3415 acute myocardial infarction patients (23.2% women) aged ⩾18 years were enrolled across 10 geographic regions in China (2012-2014) in the China Patient-Centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events (PEACE) study. Clinical data was abstracted from medical records. Generic (Euro-Quality of Life Scale) and disease-specific (Seattle Angina Questionnaire) health status was obtained through interviews at baseline and one year., Results: At one year, women with acute myocardial infarction had a higher risk of death from all causes ( p<0.001), but had similar rates of major adverse cardiac events ( p=0.2). Women had lower mean generic (Euro-Quality of Life Scale utility index score: 0.90±0.13 vs 0.94±0.11) and disease specific health scores indicating poorer functioning (Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score: 75.3±11.4 vs 78.4±9.7) and higher rates of daily/weekly angina (Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency score ⩽60 vs >60: 9.1% vs 4.7%; all p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, there was a significant association between female sex and mortality (β=0.45, standard error=0.21, p=0.03) but not for major adverse cardiac events (β=-0.02, standard error=0.14, p=0.89). The association between female sex and worse generic health status persisted (β=-0.02, standard error=0.01, p=0.003), but was no longer significant between sexes for disease-specific health status (β=-0.82, standard error=0.58, p=0.154) or daily/weekly angina (odds ratio=1.39; 95% confidence interval 0.88-2.21)., Conclusion: Women in China have higher crude rates of all-cause/cardiovascular death versus men, as well as worse generic/disease specific health status at one-year post-acute myocardial infarction. The association between female sex and worse generic health status persisted following adjustment.

Background: Social support is an important predictor of health outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but social support varies by sex and age. Differences in social support could account for sex differences in outcomes of young patients with AMI., Methods and Results: Data from the Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients (VIRGO) study, an observational study of AMI patients aged ≤55 years in the United States and Spain, were used for this study. Patients were categorized as having low versus moderate/high perceived social support using the ENRICHD Social Support Inventory. Outcomes included health status (Short Form-12 physical and mental component scores), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire), and angina-related quality of life (Seattle Angina Questionnaire) evaluated at baseline and 12 months. Among 3432 patients, 21.2% were classified as having low social support. Men and women had comparable levels of social support at baseline. On average, patients with low social support reported lower functional status and quality of life and more depressive symptoms at baseline and 12 months post-AMI. After multivariable adjustment, including baseline health status, low social support was associated with lower mental functioning, lower quality of life, and more depressive symptoms at 12 months (all P<0.001). The relationship between low social support and worse physical functioning was nonsignificant after adjustment (P=0.6). No interactions were observed between social support, sex, or country., Conclusion: Lower social support is associated with worse health status and more depressive symptoms 12 months after AMI in both young men and women. Sex did not modify the effect of social support., (© 2014 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.)