Search

Introduction: Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, reduction of social activities and rapid adoption of telemedicine, decreasing face-to-face encounters seems to have negatively affected the timely Idiopathic Scoliosis (IS) referral with a spine specialist. We aim to document the progression of IS curves during COVID-19 pandemic reflected by the late presentation of patients at the initial visit with higher Cobb angles and to evaluate its influence on health-related quality of life scores., Materials and Methods: All IS patients scheduled for surgery between April 2019 and September 2021 were recruited in a prospective cohort study. The patients were divided into five cohorts of 6 month duration each according to their booking date: 2 periods before the 1st COVID-19 wave, one period during and two periods afterwards. In each cohort, patients were divided into 3: those who were scheduled for posterior spinal fusion (PSF) at 1st visit, those booked for vertebral body tethering (VBT) at 1st visit, and those scheduled for surgery but who have failed brace treatment. Variables included age, gender, Risser grade and preoperative SRS-22 scores. Chi 2 and ANOVA tests were used for comparison., Results: 173 patients were analyzed. 33 patients (13.1 ± 3 y.o.) were scheduled between Apr and Sept 2019; 38 (13.1 y.o. ± 2) between Oct 2019 and Mar 2020; 31 (13.4 ± 3 y.o.) between Apr and Sept 2020; 30 (14.3 ± 2 y.o.) between Sept 2020 and Mar 2021; and 41 patients (13.8 ± 2 y.o.) between Apr and Sept 2021. Non-statistically significant differences were found between periods before, during or after the COVID-19 first wave regarding patients' age, gender, Risser grade and SRS-22 scores. Average Cobb angles of patients at their 1st visit after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic were significantly higher than those before COVID-19 (52.2° ± 7° and 56.6° ± 13° vs 47.8° ± 12° and 45.2° ± 13°; p = 0.0001). More patients were booked for PSF (p < 0.0000) through the five evaluated periods, while the indication of VBT or surgery in patients previously braced progressively decreased., Conclusion: Patients presented at the scoliosis clinic for the 1st time after the 1st COVID-19 wave with significantly larger Cobb angles, and likely contributed to an increased proportion of PSF, as the potential window for bracing or VBT was missed due to a delayed consultation., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel technique of formal reduction and circumferential fusion for pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS)., Purpose: The safety and efficacy of formal reduction for high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) has never been thoroughly examined. This study reports the outcomes of 29 children with HGS who underwent a procedure of gradual reduction and circumferential fusion., Methods: 29 children (13 males, 16 females) were recruited between 2006 and 2010. Radiographic measurements (including % of slip, lumbosacral angle-LSA, pelvic incidence-PI, pelvic tilt-PT, sacral slope-SS, and proximal femoral angle-PFA) and quality of life assessment (SRS-22 questionnaire) were prospectively obtained at baseline and at the last post-operative follow-up (> 2 years post-op). Radiological measurements were used to classify patients according to the Spine Deformity Study Group (SDSG) classification., Results: Mean baseline slip % was 69.9 ± 16.5%. There were 13 patients with a balanced pelvic (SDSG Type 4) and 16 with an unbalanced pelvis (SDSG Type 5 and 6). On average, a reduction of 45.5 ± 15.3% (range 20-86%) was achieved safely with no major complication. In particular, of the 29 patients, only 3 had a L5 radiculopathy postoperatively that was self-resolved at follow-up. From a radiological standpoint, we observed a mean improvement of LSA from 80.3 ± 17.9° to 91.7 ± 13.6°. We also observed a statistically significant improvement in global HRQOL, and in the function and body image domains., Conclusion: This prospective study suggests that formal reduction of HGS followed by circumferential fusion is safe when using a standardized surgical technique based on gradual reduction. Performing this intervention could also help improve QOL in some patients., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Backgound Context: Abnormal proximal femoral angle (PFA) was recently found to be associated with deteriorating sagittal balance and quality of life (QoL) in high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS). However, the influence of PFA on the QoL of patients undergoing surgery remains unknown., Purpose: This study compares the pre- and postoperative measurements of sagittal balance including PFA in patients with lumbosacral HGS after surgery. It also determines if PFA is a radiographic parameter that is associated with QoL in patients undergoing surgery., Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Patient Sample: Thirty-three patients (mean age 15.6 ± 3.0 years) operated for L5-S1 HGS between July 2002 and April 2015. Thirteen had in situ fusion and 20 had reduction to a low-grade slip., Outcome Measures: The outcome measures included PFA and QoL scores measured from the Scoliosis Research Society SRS-30 QoL questionnaire., Methods: The minimum follow-up was 2 years. PFA and QoL were compared pre- and postoperatively. Statistical analysis used nonparametric Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests, Chi-square tests to compare proportions, and bivariate correlations with Spearman's coefficients., Results: A decreasing PFA correlated with less pain (r = -0.56, p = .010), improved function (r = -0.51, p = .022) and better self-image (r = -0.46, p = .044) postreduction. Reduction decreased PFA by 5.1° (p = .002), whereas in situ fusion did not alter PFA significantly. Patients with normal preoperative PFA had similar postoperative QoL regardless of the type of surgery, except for self-image, which improved further with reduction (3.73 ± 0.49 to 4.26 ± 0.58, p = .015). Patients with abnormal preoperative PFA tended to have a higher QoL in all domains after reduction., Conclusion: Decreasing PFA correlates with less pain, better function and self-image. Reduction of HGS decreases PFA. Reduction also relates to a better postoperative QoL when the preoperative PFA is abnormal. When the preoperative PFA is normal, in situ fusion is equivalent to reduction except for self-image, which is better improved after reduction., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Previous studies did not specifically assess the influence of proximal femoral angle (PFA) on sagittal balance in high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS). In addition, the relationship between PFA and quality of life (QOL) remains unknown. This study determines if increased PFA is associated with decreased QOL and sagittal balance in lumbosacral HGS., Methods: This retrospective case-control study was performed on a cohort of 56 normal subjects and 42 patients with HGS. Initially, PFA was measured twice by 3 raters in a random subset of 30 subjects (15 normal and 15 HGS) to determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of the measurement technique. PFA was then measured for all subjects. For the 42 patients with HGS, QOL was assessed from the SRS-22 questionnaire, in addition to the evaluation of the spino-pelvic balance., Results: The intrarater and interrater intraclass correlation coefficients for the measurement of PFA were, respectively, 0.951 and 0.958, suggesting excellent reliability. PFA was significantly higher in HGS patients (8.3° ± 6.7°; range - 5° to 24°) when compared to normal subjects (3.0° ± 3.1°; range - 6° to 10°). The PFA in HGS was 5.6° ± 5.6° (range - 5° to 18°), 8.9° ± 6.7° (range - 2° to 24°), and 14.0° ± 6.0° (range 7°-23°) in type 4 (balanced pelvis), type 5 (unbalanced pelvis/balanced spine), and type 6 (unbalanced pelvis and spine) subjects, respectively. There were, respectively, 23.5% (4/17), 26.3% (5/19), and 83.3% (5/6) of HGS patients with abnormal PFA ≥ 10° in type 4, type 5, and type 6 subgroups. Increased PFA in HGS patients was related with deteriorating self-image, pain, function and total SRS-22 score, as well as with increasing pelvic tilt and decreasing sacral slope., Conclusion: A PFA ≥ 10° is proposed as a criterion to define abnormal PFA. PFA was increased in HGS and increased along with deteriorating sagittal balance and QOL. PFA is a clinically relevant parameter of sagittal balance, and can be useful in the evaluation and management of patients with HGS.

Study Design: Prospective validation of the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire French-Canadian version (SRS-22fv) in adolescent patients with spondylolisthesis., Objective: To determine the measurement properties of the SRS-22fv., Summary of Background Data: The SRS-22 is widely used for the assessment of health-related quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and other spinal deformities. Spondylolisthesis has an important effect on quality of life. The instrument was previously used in this population, although its measurement properties remained unknown. We aim to determine its reliability, factorial, concurrent validity, and its discriminant capacity in an adolescent spondylolisthesis population., Methods: The SRS-22fv was tested in 479 subjects (272 patients with spondylolisthesis, 143 with AIS, and 64 controls) at a single institution. Its reliability was measured using the coefficient of internal consistency, concurrent validity by the short form-12 (SF-12v2 French version) and discriminant validity using multivariate analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and multivariate linear regression., Results: The SRS-22fv showed a good global internal consistency (spondylolisthesis: Cronbach α = 0.91, AIS: 0.86, and controls: 0.78) in all its domains for spondylolisthesis patients. It showed a factorial structure consistent with the original questionnaire, with 60% of explained variance under four factors. Moderate to high correlation coefficients were found for specifically corresponding domains between SRS-22fv and SF-12v2. Boys had higher scores than do girls, scores worsened with increasing age and body mass index. Analysis of covariance showed statistically significant differences between patients with spondylolisthesis, patients with AIS, and controls when controlling for age, sex, body mass index, pain, function, and self-image scores. In the spondylolisthesis group, scores on all domains and mean total scores were significantly lower in surgical candidates and in patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis. Low to moderate ceiling effects were shown in function (1.1%), self-image (10.7%), and pain (13.6%)., Conclusion: The SRS-22fv can discriminate between healthy and spondylolisthesis subjects. It can be used in spondylolisthesis patients to assess health-related quality of life., Level of Evidence: 4.

Background Context: Surgical intervention is generally indicated in a pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis to prevent the progression of deformity or neurologic deterioration and improve the quality of life. However, the outcome of the treatment on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis remains largely unknown., Purpose: To describe the changes in the HRQOL of patients with pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis after surgical and nonsurgical managements., Study Design: Observational case series with a minimal of 2-year follow-up., Patient Sample: Twenty-eight pediatric patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis from a single institution filled the inclusion criteria. Twenty-three patients were managed surgically and five were managed nonsurgically., Outcome Measures: Self-report measures: Scoliosis Research Society questionnaires (SRS-22). Neurologic examination, radiographic evaluation of slip grade., Methods: The SRS-22 questionnaire was collected at the baseline (initial presentation for the nonsurgical group and preoperative visit for the surgical group) and at the last follow-up. Differences between baseline and last follow-up were evaluated in both groups. Correlation between the baseline score of SRS-22 score and improvement in the SRS-22 score was determined in surgical patients., Results: In surgical patients, total SRS-22 scores were 3.31 ± 0.50 at the baseline and 4.26 ± 0.50 at the last follow-up. In nonsurgical patients, total SRS-22 scores were 4.12 ± 0.16 at the baseline and 4.14 ± 0.38 at the last follow-up. Therefore, variation in the SRS-22 total score was +0.94 ± 0.77 (p<.001) for surgical patients and +0.02 ± 0.35 (p=.854) for nonsurgical patients. Improvement of the SRS-22 score was correlated with a low baseline value of SRS-22 (R²=0.61; p<.001). There was no neurologic or slip deterioration during the follow-up for patients treated nonsurgically., Conclusions: The HRQOL improves after a surgical intervention for high-grade spondylolisthesis. Patients with lower baseline HRQOL scores are those who benefit the most from surgery. Close observation is a safe and feasible option in selected patients with a good baseline HRQOL and no neurologic impairment., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Global sagittal alignment is considered as an important aspect in the management of spinal disorders, but the evidence establishing its clinical impact in lumbosacral spondylolisthesis is still poor. This study evaluated the impact of global sagittal alignment on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with spondylolisthesis., Methods: A retrospective study of 149 consecutive unoperated children and adolescents presenting with lumbosacral spondylolisthesis (117 low-grade and 32 high-grade) was performed. Two global sagittal alignment parameters were measured on standing lateral radiographs: spinal tilt (ST) and C7 plumbline deviation (C7P deviation). All patients completed the SRS-22 questionnaire to assess HRQOL. Pearson's correlations were calculated between parameters of global sagittal alignment and HRQOL. Multiple regression analyses were also undertaken to account for slip percentage and lumbosacral kyphosis (LSK)., Results: Both global sagittal alignment parameters were correlated with the SRS-22 total score. When analyzed separately, the correlation was absent in patients with a low-grade slip but remained significant for patients with a high-grade slip (r = 0.35 for ST; r = -0.35 for C7P deviation). The relation was strengthened in high-grade spondylolisthesis when considering only patients with a C7P in front of the posterior corner of upper sacral endplate (r = 0.48 for ST; r = -0.48 for C7P deviation) and was also positive for the SRS-22 pain and appearance domains. For these last patients, the relationship with global sagittal alignment remained significant in the multiple regression analysis. HRQOL was particularly worse for high-grade patients with a C7P in front of the hip axis., Conclusions: In high-grade spondylolisthesis, an increasing positive sagittal alignment was related to a poorer SRS-22 total score, especially when the C7P is in front of the hip axis. Global sagittal alignment should particularly be assessed in patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis.

Study Design: A cross-sectional study of 96 patients with lumbosacral adolescent spondylolisthesis., Objective: To evaluate whether lumbosacral kyphosis (LSK) is associated with the quality of life of patients with spondylolisthesis and to identify reference values of LSK associated with significant impairments in quality of life., Summary of Background Data: LSK is considered an important aspect of deformity in adolescent spondylolisthesis, but its clinical impact is not known., Methods: Sixty-seven patients with low-grade and 29 with high-grade adolescent lumbosacral spondylolisthesis were evaluated. Three radiological parameters of LSK were measured: slip angle (SA), Dubousset lumbosacral angle (Dub-LSA), and lumbosacral joint angle (LSJA). All patients completed the Short Form Health Survey-12v2 questionnaire. Pearson correlations were calculated between each radiological parameter and the questionnaire scores., Results: Correlations of the 3 LSK parameters with the physical component summary of the Short Form Health Survey-12v2 were significant (r = -0.55 for SA, 0.52 for Dub-LSA, and -0.55 for LSJA). Correlations were even stronger when calculated for high-grade patients only (r = -0.62 for SA, 0.56 for Dub-LSA, and -0.63 for LSJA). Correlations also remained significant when controlling for slip percentage. Values of 30°, 80°, and 30° for SA, Dub-LSA, and LSJA were associated with an increased proportion of subjects with poor physical component scores., Conclusion: LSK is significantly correlated to the physical aspect of the quality of life of adolescents with spondylolisthesis. The implication of abnormal LSK is particularly evident in patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis. All evaluated LSK parameters seem equivalent to measure this effect. LSK should be routinely measured in adolescents with spondylolisthesis to fully appreciate the severity of the deformity and its clinical association with the quality of life of the patient.

Lumbosacral kyphosis (LSK) is considered to be an important aspect of the deformity in adolescent developmental spondylolisthesis, but its clinical impact is not known. The purpose of this study was to clarify if slip angle (SA), a parameter commonly used to measure LSK, has a significant impact on the quality of life of patient with spondylolisthesis. Eighty-six patients with lumbosacral developmental spondylolisthesis were evaluated. There were 67 low-grade and 19 high-grade spondylolisthesis. All patients completed the SF-12v2 questionnaires. The score of the mental and physical component summary (MCS and PCS) of SF-12v2 were correlated with the slip angle. The correlation of SA was only significant with PCS and not with MCS. PCS decreased significantly with increasing SA (Spearman's rho=-0.40, p<0.001). LSK has a significant impact on the physical aspect of the quality of life of adolescent with spondylolisthesis. LSK is an important part of the deformity in developmental spondylolisthesis and should be included in the routine radiological evaluation of patient with spondylolisthesis.

Study Design: Prospective validation study of a cross-cultural adaptation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Outcomes Questionnaire., Objective: To provide a French Canadian version of the SRS Outcomes Questionnaire and to empirically test its response in healthy adolescents and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients in Québec., Summary of Background Data: The SRS Outcomes Questionnaire is widely used for the assessment of health-related quality of life in AIS patients., Methods: French translation and back-translation of the SRS-22 (SRS-22-fv) were done by an expert committee. Its reliability was measured using the coefficient of internal consistency, construct validity with a factorial analysis, concurrent validity by using the short form-12 and discriminant validity using ANOVA and multivariate linear regression, on 145 AIS patients, 44 patients with non clinically significant scoliosis (NCSS), and 64 healthy patients., Results: The SRS-22-fv showed a good global internal consistency (AIS: Cronbach alpha = 0.86, NCSS: 0.81, and controls: 0.79) and in all of its domains for AIS patients. The factorial structure was coherent with the original questionnaire (47.4% of explained variance). High correlation coefficients were obtained between SRS-22-fv and short form-12 corresponding domains. Boys had higher scores than girls, scores worsened with age, and with increasing body mass index. Mean Total, Pain, Self-image, and Satisfaction scores, were correlated with Cobb angle. Adjusted regression models showed statistically significant differences between the AIS, NCSS, and control groups in the Total, Pain, and Function scores., Conclusion: The SRS-22-fv showed satisfactory reliability, factorial, concurrent, and discriminant validity. This study provides scores in a significant group of healthy adolescents and demonstrates a clear gradient in response between subjects with AIS, NCSS, and controls.

Purpose: The HRQoL after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is not affected by the presence of concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis non-surgically treated. Improvement in QoL after surgery was similar for AIS patients with and without concomitant spondylolisthesis. The purpose is to compare preoperative and postoperative Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) scores in operated AIS patients with and without concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis. Methods: A retrospective study of a prospective cohort of 464 individuals undergoing AIS surgery between 2008 and 2018 was performed. All patients undergoing surgery for AIS with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. We excluded patients with prior or concomitant surgery for spondylolisthesis. HRQoL scores were measured using the SRS-22 questionnaire. Comparisons were performed between AIS patients with versus without concomitant spondylolisthesis treated non-surgically. Results: AIS surgery was performed for 36 patients (15.2 ± 2.5 y.o) with concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis, and 428 patients (15.5 ± 2.4 y.o) without concomitant spondylolisthesis. The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles. Preoperative and postoperative HRQoL scores were similar between the two groups. HRQoL improved significantly for all domains in both groups, except for pain in patients with spondylolisthesis. There was no need for surgical treatment of the spondylolisthesis and no slip progression during the follow-up duration after AIS surgery. Conclusion: Patients undergoing surgical treatment of AIS with non-surgical management of a concomitant isthmic grade I spondylolisthesis can expect improvement in HRQoL scores, similar to that observed in patients without concomitant spondylolisthesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]