Search

Life balance is a new and important concept in occupational therapy. New measurements are needed to assess and evaluate life balance and interventions aimed to achieve this concept. This article describes the test-retest reliability of three life balance measures: the Activity Calculator (AC), Activity Card Sort (ACS-NL(18-64)) and Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11-NL). Data collection took place among 50 participants with neuromuscular diseases: facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD, n = 25) or mitochondrial myopathy (MM, n = 25). The AC, the ACS-NL(18–64) and the OBQ11-NL were assessed twice with an interval of one week. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC-agreement) were applied to examine test-retest reliability. The ICC of the AC-average total day score was.95 (95% CI.91-.97), whereas the ICC of the weights allocated to each activity was 0.80 (95% CI.77–0.82). The ICC of the ACS-NL(18–64) percentage retained activities was 0.92 (95% CI 0.86 − 0.96) and the ICC of the importance score per activity was-.76 (95% CI. 0.68–0.89). The ICC of the OBQ11-NL total score was.76 (95% CI 0.62–0.86). All three tools showed good to excellent test-retest reliability in a sample of patients with FSHD or MM, which is promising for its use in clinical practice and research. The AC, ACS-NL(18–64) and the OBQ11-NL are promising, reliable measures of life balance in patients with neuromuscular diseases. The development of three new instruments for life balance enlarges the possibility for health professionals to measure life balance in clinical practice and research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: To report the predictive validity of the perceived limitations in activities and need questionnaire (PLAN-Q), a screening instrument to support neurologists to select patients with neuromuscular disorders (NMD) for referral for a one-off consultation by occupational therapist (OT), physical therapist (PT) and speech therapist (ST). Methods: In a cross-sectional validation study, 102 patients with various NMD participated. Patients received a one-off consultation by an expert OT, PT and ST and filled out the PLAN-Q. Therapists rated the appropriateness of the one-off consultations based on need, available treatment and patient’s motivation. Receiver Operation Characteristic analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to obtain a PLAN-Q based prediction model for the appropriateness of the one-off consultations. Results: Probability for a one-off OT consultation increased from 64% to 78% (95% CI: 69–85%). Prior test probability for a one-off ST consultation increased from 44% to 61% (95% CI: 48–73%). Prior test probability for one-off PT consultation could not be increased. Conclusion: Screening patients with NMD using the PLAN-Q may assist neurologists in selecting the appropriate patients for a one-off consultation by OT and ST. Unlike our expectations the screening did not guide referral for a one-off consultation by PT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]