Search

EXELS, a post-marketing observational study, is the largest prospective study of high-risk essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients, with an observation time of 5 years. EXELS found higher event rates of acute leukemia transformation in patients treated with hydroxycarbamide (HC). In the current analysis, we report age-adjusted rates of malignant transformation from 3460 EXELS patients exposed to HC, anagrelide (ANA), or both. At registration, 481 patients had ANA treatment without HC exposure, 2305 had HC without ANA exposure, and 674 had been exposed to both. Standard incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated using data from the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents database to account for differences in age-, gender-, and country-specific background rates. SIRs for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) were high in ET patients. SIRs for AML were high in HC-treated patients, but AML was rare in ANA-treated patients; no cases of AML were found in patients only treated with ANA. No statistically significant difference was seen between SIRs for ANA and HC treatment for AML or skin cancer. SIRs for other cancers were similar in the HC and ANA groups and close to 1, indicating little difference in risk. Although statistically inconclusive, this study strengthens concerns regarding possible leukemogenic risk with HC treatment. (NCT00202644)., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Evaluation of Anagrelide (Xagrid ® ) Efficacy and Long-term Safety, a phase IV, prospective, non-interventional study performed in 13 European countries enrolled high-risk essential thrombocythemia patients treated with cytoreductive therapy. The primary objectives were safety and pregnancy outcomes. Of 3721 registered patients, 3649 received cytoreductive therapy. At registration, 3611 were receiving: anagrelide (Xagrid ® ) (n=804), other cytoreductive therapy (n=2666), or anagrelide + other cytoreductive therapy (n=141). The median age was 56 vs. 70 years for anagrelide vs. other cytoreductive therapy. Event rates (patients with events/100 patient-years) were 1.62 vs. 2.06 for total thrombosis and 0.15 vs. 0.53 for venous thrombosis. Anagrelide was more commonly associated with hemorrhage (0.89 vs. 0.43), especially with anti-aggregatory therapy (1.35 vs. 0.33) and myelofibrosis (1.04 vs. 0.30). Other cytoreductive therapies were more associated with acute leukemia (0.28 vs. 0.07) and other malignancies (1.29 vs. 0.44). Post hoc multivariate analyses identified increased risk for thrombosis with prior thrombohemorrhagic events, age ≥65, cardiovascular risk factors, or hypertension. Risk factors for transformation were prior thrombohemorrhagic events, age ≥65, time since diagnosis, and platelet count increase. Safety analysis reflected published data, and no new safety concerns for anagrelide were found. Live births occurred in 41/54 pregnancies (76%). clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: 00567502., (Copyright© 2018 Ferrata Storti Foundation.)

In this prospective observational single-center study, 55 patients with essential thrombocythemia who were candidates for second line treatment with anagrelide (ANA) received a preliminary cardiovascular (CV) clinical, instrumental and biochemical evaluation (CV history and symptoms, CV risk factors, blood pressure, heart rate, ECG and ECHO-cardio parameters, Troponin I, NT-proBNP). After this in-depth CV screening, 54 out of 55 patients were deemed to be fit for ANA treatment. Thirty-eight of the 55 patients received ANA treatment for a median of 36 months (range 3-48), and were monitored using the same CV evaluation. Fourteen of these 38 patients manifested CV adverse events (10 palpitation, 4 edema, 2 arterial hypertension, 2 acute myocardial infarction) that were not predicted by the in-depth CV evaluation, and that led to ANA withdrawal in only one case (non-cardiac refractory edema). In conclusion, the planned in-depth CV evaluation did not appear to be necessary in ET patients to evaluate their suitability for ANA treatment, and, moreover, was not able to predict the occurrence of CV adverse events during ANA treatment. Nevertheless, the CV adverse events (mostly palpitations and edema) were easily managed by the hematologists, and required the cardiologist involvement in very few selected cases., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Available information is limited regarding the use of cytoreductive combination therapy in high-risk patients with essential thrombocythemia. This analysis aims to evaluate the clinical relevance and patterns of cytoreductive combination treatment in European high-risk patients with essential thrombocythemia in the Evaluation of Xagrid(®) Efficacy and Long-term Safety study. Of 3643 patients, 347 (9.5%) received combination therapy. Data were recorded at each 6-month update. Of 347 patients who received combination therapy, 304 (87.6%) received hydroxycarbamide + anagrelide. Monotherapies received before this combination were hydroxycarbamide (n=167, 54.9%) and anagrelide (n=123, 40.5%). Median weekly doses of hydroxycarbamide and anagrelide were: 7000 and 10.5 mg when used as prior monotherapy; 3500 and 7.0 mg when used as add-on treatment. Overall, median platelet counts were 581 × 10(9)/L and 411 × 10(9)/L before and after starting hydroxycarbamide + anagrelide, respectively. In patients with paired data (n=153), the number of patients with platelet counts less than 400 × 10(9)/L increased from 33 (21.6%) to 74 (48.4%; P<0.0001), and with platelet counts less than 600 × 10(9)/L, from 82 (53.6%) to 132 (86.3%; P<0.0001). Hydroxycarbamide + anagrelide was discontinued in 158 patients: 76 (48.1%) stopped hydroxycarbamide, 59 (37.3%) stopped anagrelide, 19 (12.0%) stopped both and 4 (2.5%) had another therapy added. The most frequent reasons for discontinuation were intolerance/side-effects, lack of efficacy, and therapeutic strategy. Combination therapy, usually hydroxycarbamide + anagrelide, is used in approximately 10% of all high-risk patients with essential thrombocythemia and may be a useful approach in treating patients for whom monotherapy is unsatisfactory. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier:NCT00567502).

EXELS is an ongoing phase IV non-interventional study; 3643 high-risk patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) were recruited across 13 European countries. We report patient characteristics and cytoreductive treatment patterns of ET across Europe. Hydroxycarbamide (HC; 64.3%) and anagrelide (22.0%) were the two main cytoreductive treatments prescribed. The proportions of patients taking either HC or anagrelide varied across countries, as did the number of patients receiving anti-aggregatory therapy in addition to cytoreductive treatment. This real-world evidence demonstrates that, generally, treatment patterns of ET across Europe adhere to expert recommendations, with some notable variations between countries., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The median age of patients diagnosed with essential thrombocythaemia (ET) is 65-70 years but the management of very elderly patients (aged >80 years) with ET has not been well characterized., Objective: This study aimed to document the treatment patterns of very elderly patients with ET in a multinational, real-world setting., Study Design: EXELS (Evaluation of Xagrid Efficacy and Long-term Safety) is a phase IV observational study, designed to monitor the efficacy and safety of cytoreductive therapies in clinical practice. In total, 3,598 high-risk patients with ET were recruited from May 2005 to April 2009, in 13 European countries. Data were collected at registration and every 6 months thereafter for 5 years. This analysis was performed on a data-cut taken approximately 2 years after the last patient was registered., Patients: In total, 395 patients aged >80 years at registration into EXELS were included in the analysis; of these, 42.2 % had experienced a previous thrombohaemorrhagic event., Results: At registration, the most frequently prescribed cytoreductive therapy for patients aged >80 years was hydroxycarbamide (HC), which accounted for 82.8 % of patients whereas anagrelide use was less frequent (8.6 %). Very elderly patients were more likely to be switched from anagrelide than from HC (47.1 vs. 17.4 %; 95 % confidence interval for difference in proportion 12.4-46.9; Chi-squared test p < 0.001). Median platelet count during treatment was ~430 × 10(9)/L. In patients aged >80 years, the main reason for switch was intolerance/side effects (34.1 %); 0/16 patients reported treatment with anagrelide was non-efficacious compared with 8/57 (14 %) patients receiving HC, and 7/16 (43.8 %) anagrelide patients switched because of intolerance versus 18/57 (31.6 %) patients receiving HC. At least one predefined clinical event (PDE) was experienced by 27.3 % of patients aged >80 years. The most common PDEs reported in the very elderly age group were death (non-PDE related; 11.1 %), other cardiovascular symptoms (5.8 %), haematological transformation (3.8 %), congestive heart failure (3.3 %), myocardial infarction and angina (2.8 %), and thromboembolic events (6.3 %)., Conclusion: Well-tolerated and effective cytoreductive therapy has been achieved in patients aged >80 years by following individual treatment modalities that appear in agreement with the recent European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines.

This retrospective study of the thrombocythemia Italian registry (RIT) documented that 71 (30.6%) out of 232 ET patients experienced 88 cardiovascular adverse events (CV-AEs) during anagrelide treatment (522 pt-y). The rate of CV-AEs was: 24.1% for palpitations, 4.3% for angina, 3.5% for arterial hypertension, 3.0% for congestive heart failure, 1.8% for arrhythmia, 0.9% for AMI, 0.4% for pericardial effusion. CV-AEs led to treatment discontinuation in nine (3.9%) patients, while in the remaining cases they were managed by pharmacological intervention and/or patient life style improvement. CV-AEs had no relationship with patient characteristics (including older age). A significant relationship was found only with a higher anagrelide induction dose. In the absence of any agreed protocol, a cardiovascular instrumental evaluation (CV-IE) was performed in 102 (44%) patients before commencement of anagrelide (with higher rate after the anagrelide/Xagrid EMA approval of 2004), and in 84 (36%) patients during treatment. Patients with and without CV-IEs, who resulted completely balanced for all their characteristics, did not significantly differ in the occurrence of CV-AEs. In conclusion, this study on ET patients treated with anagrelide shows that CV-AEs, equally distributed in younger and older subjects, were mostly mild and easily manageable, allowing safe treatment continuation in the majority of cases. Moreover, routinely performing a CV-IE did not appear to anticipate the occurrence of CV-AEs., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)