Search

Rationale: High-dose levofloxacin (L) (1,000 mg) was as active as moxifloxacin (M) (400 mg) in an early bactericidal activity trial, suggesting these fluoroquinolones could be used interchangeably. Whether pyrazinamide (Z) contributes sterilizing activity beyond the first 2 months in fluoroquinolone-containing second-line regimens remains unknown., Objectives: We compared the efficacy of M and high-dose L alone or in combination with ethionamide (Et), amikacin (A), and Z given for 2 or 7 months., Methods: A pharmacokinetic study was performed to determine the L dose equivalent to 1,000 mg in humans. Treatment started 2 weeks after aerosol infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Mice received M or L alone or in combination with 2 months of EtZA followed by 5 months of Et or EtZ., Measurements and Main Results: After 2 months of treatment, lung colony-forming unit (CFU) counts were similar in mice receiving either fluoroquinolone alone, but, after 4 and 5 months, CFU counts were 2 log10 lower in mice receiving M. Mice receiving 2MEtZA/3MEt and 2LEtZA/3LEt had 1.0 and 2.7 log10 lung CFUs, respectively. When Z was given throughout, both regimens rendered mice culture negative by 5 months, and most mice did not relapse after 7 months of treatment, with fewer relapses observed in the M group after 6 and 7 months of treatment., Conclusions: In murine tuberculosis, M had superior efficacy compared with L despite lower serum drug exposures and may remain the fluoroquinolone of choice for second-line regimens. Z contributed substantial sterilizing activity beyond 2 months in fluoroquinolone-containing second-line regimens, largely compensating for L's weaker activity.

Objectives: We aim to further define the impact of the mechanism of fluoroquinolone resistance and inoculum load on the pharmacodynamic effects of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin on Streptococcus pneumoniae., Methods: The antibacterial effects of and emergence of resistance (EoR) to moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily) or levofloxacin (750 mg once daily or 500 mg twice daily) were compared using five S. pneumoniae strains containing no known resistance mechanisms, efflux resistance mechanisms, a parC mutation or parC and gyrA mutations, at high (10(8) cfu/mL) and low (10(6) cfu/mL) inocula. An in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used and simulations were performed over 96 h. After drug exposure, isolates were tested for the presence of efflux pumps and mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions., Results: A high inoculum diminished the antibacterial effect of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin. Levofloxacin at both dosages produced EoR with all strains. Levofloxacin regimens with AUC/MIC ratios <100 produced EoR. Moxifloxacin produced EoR with the parC strain only., Conclusions: Levofloxacin dosing regimens with low AUC/MIC ratios select for efflux pump overexpression, leading to fluoroquinolone resistance. Levofloxacin dosing may select for gyrA mutations, inducing moxifloxacin resistance. These data confirm that a fluoroquinolone AUC/MIC ratio of >100 is required for prevention of EoR.

Introduction: Achieving high antibiotic concentrations is important for preventing and treating postoperative infections. However, no study has simultaneously compared the achieved concentrations of moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and levofloxacin in the human cornea and aqueous humor. The authors therefore performed a randomized study to determine the concentrations of 0.5% moxifloxacin, 0.3% gatifloxacin, and 0.5% levofloxacin in the corneal tissue and aqueous humor after topical instillation in patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty., Methods: Patients who required penetrating keratoplasty were eligible for this study. The topical preparations of 0.5% moxifloxacin, 0.3% gatifloxacin, and 0.5% levofloxacin used in the study were preservative free (Japanese formulations). Patients were randomly assigned to one of three sequential drug groups, in which each drug was administered three times before surgery. In each administration cycle, the patients received two drops of each drug at 2-minute intervals. Samples of corneal tissue and aqueous humor were collected during surgery. The concentrations of each drug in the samples were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography., Results: A total of 63 patients across eight centers in Japan were enrolled in the study. Overall, 61 corneal and 58 aqueous humor samples were evaluated. The concentration (mean±standard deviation) of moxifloxacin in corneal tissues was 12.66±8.93 μg/g, which was significantly higher than that of gatifloxacin (4.71±3.39 μg/g; P<0.0001) and levofloxacin (5.95±4.02 μg/g; P<0.0001). The mean concentration of moxifloxacin in aqueous humor samples was 1.40±1.17 μg/mL, which was significantly higher than that of gatifloxacin (0.65±0.80 μg/mL; P=0.0001) and levofloxacin (0.89±0.86 μg/mL; P<0.05). The sequence of drug administration did not significantly affect the results., Conclusion: These results show that 0.5% moxifloxacin achieved superior ocular concentration than both 0.3% gatifloxacin and 0.5% levofloxacin.

A literature search was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of the respiratory fluoroquinolones (gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin) and their efficacy and safety in the management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Data show that CAP is a common presentation in primary care practice, and is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, particularly in the elderly. Although the causative pathogens differ depending on treatment setting and patient factors, Streptococcus pneumoniae is the primary pathogen in all treatment settings. As a class, the respiratory fluoroquinolones have a very favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Pharmacodynamic criteria suggest that moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin are more potent against S. pneumoniae, which may have the added benefit of reducing resistance selection and enhancing bacterial eradication. The respiratory fluoroquinolones are also generally well tolerated, and are first-line options for outpatient treatment of CAP in patients with comorbidities or previous antibiotic use.

Wide-spectrum quinolones such as moxifloxacin and levofloxacin as well as high-order cephalosporins such as cefoperazone and cefepime have increased antimicrobial activity. However, little is known about their distribution in fetal blood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to measure and compare maternal and fetal blood levels of these agents. For the measurement of blood levels, 9 pregnant women received cefepime hydrochloride, 10 received cefoperazone, 10 received moxifloxacin and 12 received levofloxacin intravenously. Maternal and umbilical cord blood samples were drawn during delivery. Antibiotic levels were analysed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Mean transplacental passage rates of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, cefepime and cefoperazone were 74.84%, 66.53%, 23.21% and 12.68%, respectively, and mean transfetal passage rates were 90.78%, 84.22%, 79.17% and 79.78%, respectively. The transplacental passage rate for either quinolone was significantly higher than that of either cephalosporin, and the transplacental passage rate of cefoperazone was lower than that of cefepime. In conclusion, both quinolones have high transplacental passage rates. Cefepime and cefoperazone have a lower transplacental passage rate and thus may be used as prophylaxis in situations where transplacental passage is undesirable., (Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To characterize the effects of levofloxacin on QT interval in healthy subjects and the most appropriate oral positive control treatments for International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E14 QT/QTc studies., Methods: Healthy subjects received a single dose of levofloxacin (1000 or 1500 mg), moxifloxacin (400 mg) or placebo in a four-period crossover design. Digital 12-lead ECGs were recorded in triplicate. Measurement of QT interval was performed automatically with subsequent manual onscreen over-reading using electronic callipers. Blood samples were taken for determination of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin concentrations., Results: Mean QTcI (QT interval corrected for heart rate using a correction factor that is applicable to each individual) was prolonged in subjects receiving moxifloxacin 400 mg compared with placebo. The largest time-matched difference in QTcI for moxifloxacin compared with placebo was observed to be 13.19 ms (95% confidence interval 11.21, 15.17) at 3.5 h post dose. Prolonged mean QTcI was also observed in subjects receiving levofloxacin 1000 mg and 1500 mg compared with placebo. The largest time-matched difference in QTcI compared with placebo was observed at 3.5 h post dose for both 1000 mg and 1500 mg of levofloxacin [mean (95%) 4.42 ms (2.44, 6.39) in 1000 mg and 7.44 ms (5.47, 9.42) in 1500 mg]. A small increase in heart rate was observed with levofloxacin during the course of the study. However, moxifloxacin showed a greater increase compared with levofloxacin., Conclusions: Both levofloxacin and moxifloxacin can fulfil the criteria for a positive comparator. The ICH E14 guidelines recommend a threshold of around 5 ms for a positive QT/QTc study. The largest time-matched difference in QTc for levofloxacin suggests the potential for use in more rigorous QT/QTc studies. This study has demonstrated the utility of levofloxacin on the assay in measuring mean QTc changes around 5 ms.

This article reviews the characteristics of the main fluoroquinolones used in dentistry (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin), including pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic parameters, susceptibility profiles of oral bacteria and clinical trials on their efficacy in dental practice. It seems that some of these antibiotics might represent a safe alternative in patients with allergy, intolerance, or lack of response to beta-lactams.

A high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method with fluorescence detection was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantification of ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin in human plasma. Sarafloxacin was used as internal standard. Chromatography was carried out using a Waters XBridge C(18) HPLC column and a gradient mobile phase consisting of CH(3)CN/MeOH/0.025M TBA.Cl/TFA (eluent A at 75/25/899/1 (v/v); eluent B at 150/50/799/1 (v/v); both at pH 3.5). Excitation/emission wavelengths were 279/442nm for ciprofloxacin and 290/500nm for ofloxacin, moxifloxacin and internal standard. Prior to chromatography, plasma samples were treated with acetonitrile for protein precipitation, followed by evaporation of the liquid layer and reconstitution in eluent A. The method was validated for the three fluoroquinolones over the clinically relevant concentration range from 0.02 to 7.50mug/ml. The method showed acceptable linearity with correlation coefficients, r(2)>0.995, as well as high precision (RSD% <7% in each case), accuracy (90.4-105.4%) and selectivity. The limit of quantification for the three fluoroquinolones was established at 0.02mug/ml. Ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin were extracted from plasma with a mean recovery of 95%, 86.4% and 94.2%, respectively. During validation, the concentration of the three fluoroquinolones was found to be stable after 3 freeze-thaw cycles and for at least 15h after extraction. This bio-analytical method was finally applied to the analysis of samples which have been obtained from patients, participating in a pharmacokinetic study on moxifloxacin.

Objectives: Since levofloxacin at high doses was the best therapy in staphylococcal tissue-cage model of foreign-body infection, we hypothesized that moxifloxacin with higher ratio of area under the concentration-time curve to the MIC (AUC/MIC) would provide better results., Methods: MICs, MBCs, MPCs (mutant prevention concentration) and 24h kill-curves were determined in the log and stationary phases. Using the aforementioned model, we tested the efficacy of levofloxacin 100mg/kg/d, moxifloxacin 40mg/kg/d and moxifloxacin 80mg/kg/d; they were equivalent to human levels for 1000mg/d, 400mg/d and 800mg/d, respectively. We screened for the appearance of resistant strains., Results: MICs and MBCs in logarithmic and stationary phases and MPCs of levofloxacin were 0.5, 1 and 4, 0.8microg/ml, respectively, and those of moxifloxacin 0.12, 0.25 and 2, 0.25microg/ml. AUC/MIC were 234 (levofloxacin), 431 (moxifloxacin 40) and 568 (moxifloxacin 80). Bacterial counts decreases in tissue-cage fluids (means of logCFU/ml) were -1.81 (n=25), -1.31 (23), and -1.46 (20), respectively; for controls it was 0.24 (22). All groups were better than controls (p<0.05); no differences between them existed., Conclusions: Moxifloxacin with higher AUC/MIC ratio did not improve the efficacy of high doses of levofloxacin.

Activity of levofloxacin, lomefloxacin and moxifloxacin against 20 FI+ and 20 FI- strains of Yersinia pestis was studied. It was shown that the strains were highly susceptible to the fluoroquinolones. In the experiments on mice subcutaneously infected with suspension of strains 231 FI+ and 231 FI- of Y. pestis in a dose of about 1000 LD50 (10(4) microbial cells) the ED50 of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin was 5.5-14.0 mg/kg independent of the infective culture phenotype and that of lomefloxacin was 18.5 mg/kg. Estimation of the impact of the pathogen infective dose value on the results of the experimental plague treatment with the therapeutic dose equivalent to the human one showed high efficacy of the fluoroquinolones (efficacy index of 10(4)). The treatment for 7 days provided 90-100-percent survival of the animals. The prophylactive use of lomefloxacin (in 5 hours - 5 days) was less efficient (70-80% of the survivals) in the animals infected with the antigen-changed (FI-) variant of the pathogen. Levofloxacin and moxifloxacin provided 90-100-percent survival of the animals treated for a course of 5 days independent of the pathogen phenotype. The study demonstrated that the use oflevofloxacin, lomefloxacin and moxifloxacin was prospective for the prophylaxis and therapy of experimental plague.

A highly selective, sensitive and accurate HPLC method has been developed and validated for the estimation of three fluoroquinolones (FQs) viz., gatifloxacin (GFC), sparfloxacin (SFC) and moxifloxacin (MFC) with 500 microL human plasma using levofloxacin (LFC) as an internal standard (IS). The sample preparation involved simple liquid-liquid extraction of GFC, SFC, MFC and IS from human plasma with ethyl acetate. The resolution of peaks was achieved with phosphate buffer (pH 2.5)-acetonitrile (80:20, v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min on a Kromasil C(18) column. The total chromatographic run time was 18.0 min and the simultaneous elution of GFC, SFC, MFC and IS occurred at approximately 10.8, 12.8, 17.0 and 6.0 min, respectively. The method proved to be accurate and precise at linearity range of 100-10,000 ng/mL with a correlation coefficient (r) of > or =0.999. The limit of quantitation for each of the FQs studied was 100 ng/mL. The intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy values found to be within the assay variability limits as per the FDA guidelines. The developed assay method was applied to a pharmacokinetic study in human volunteers following oral administration of 400 mg GFC tablet.

The objective of this study was to determine the population pharmacokinetic parameters of levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin following multiple oral doses. Twenty-nine patients with tuberculosis at the University Hospital in Vitória, Brazil, participated. Subjects received multiple doses of one drug (levofloxacin, 1,000 mg daily, or gatifloxacin or moxifloxacin, 400 mg daily) as part of a 7-day study of early bactericidal activity. Serum samples were collected over 24 h after the fifth dose and assayed using validated high-performance liquid chromatography assays. Concentration-time data were analyzed using noncompartmental, compartmental, and population methods. The three drugs were well tolerated. Levofloxacin produced the highest maximum plasma concentrations (median, 15.55 microg/ml; gatifloxacin, 4.75 microg/ml; moxifloxacin, 6.13 microg/ml), largest volume of distribution (median, 81 liters; gatifloxacin, 79 liters; moxifloxacin, 63 liters), and longest elimination half-life (median, 7.4 h; gatifloxacin, 5.0 h; moxifloxacin, 6.5 h). A one-compartment model, with or without weight as a covariate, adequately described the data. Postmodeling simulations using median population parameter estimates closely approximated the median values from the original data. Area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratios for free drug were high. All three quinolones showed favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic indices, with the most favorable results in this population being seen with levofloxacin at the comparative doses used.

Levofloxacin binds topoisomerase IV, whereas moxifloxacin preferentially binds DNA gyrase. Most 1st-step pneumococcal mutants have alterations in the parC gene of topoisomerase IV. Because of differential binding affinity, moxifloxacin may have superior activity against 1st-step mutants compared with levofloxacin. The purpose of this work was to compare rates and extent of bacterial killing of genetically characterized Streptococcus pneumoniae with moxifloxacin and levofloxacin. Four strains of S. pneumoniae were used: a wild type, 2 first-step parC mutants, and a pump mutant. Using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model run in duplicate, we exposed bacteria to unbound moxifloxacin and levofloxacin peaks of 2 and 4.5 mg/L, respectively, which emulated clinical dosing. Additional experiments were done in which the area under the curve (AUC)/MIC ratio of 1 agent was matched to the competing drug's clinical dose AUC/MIC ratio. Time kill curves were analyzed for rate and extent of bacterial kill and regrowth. Pre- and postexposure MIC and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing were done. Moxifloxacin and levofloxacin displayed similar rates and extent of bacterial kill for the wild type, efflux pump type, and parC mutant 27-1361B. Moxifloxacin initially achieved a faster rate of kill, regardless of the AUC/MIC ratio, against parC mutant 7362 (P < 0.05) but not an advantage in time to 3 log kill. Postexposure MIC values were elevated for strain 7362 in 2 moxifloxacin experiments and 1 levofloxacin experiment. Post-PCR analysis revealed new gyrA mutations for all 3 isolates. Both moxifloxacin and levofloxacin are effective against multiple strains of S. pneumoniae.

Penetration of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin into cancellous and cortical bone was studied using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in 16 patients who underwent routine total hip arthroplasty. Our results demonstrate a good degree of penetration into bone for both quinolones. The mean cancellous penetration was 53.86% for moxifloxacin and 54.13% for levofloxacin. The penetration into cortical bone was 41.59% and 34.26% respectively. The concentrations for both quinolones were above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC(90s)) for the most common pathogens, so they can be used for the treatment of osteomyelitis.

Purpose: To investigate the penetration of ofloxacin and moxifloxacin into the aqueous and vitreous after topical administration one hour before vitrectomy surgery., Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind case series study., Methods: Twenty-seven patients undergoing vitrectomy were randomized to receive either topical ofloxacin 0.3% or moxifloxacin 0.5% every 10 minutes for one hour before surgery. Aqueous and vitreous samples were obtained and analyzed using high-performance liquidation chromatography., Results: The moxifloxacin aqueous (1.576 +/- 0.745 microg/ml) and vitreous (0.225 +/- 0.013 microg/ml) levels were significantly higher than the ofloxacin aqueous (0.816 +/- 0.504 microg/ml) (P = .0009) and vitreous (0.225 +/- 0.013 microg/ml) [P = .0054] levels, respectively. The mean moxifloxacin aqueous and vitreous levels exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% of isolates (MIC(90)) for a wide variety of bacteria implicated in endophthalmitis. In contrast, the aqueous level of ofloxacin exceeded the MIC(90) of only a few organisms., Conclusions: Moxifloxacin applied every 10 minutes during the hour before vitrectomy penetrated the eye significantly better than ofloxacin.

We compared the serum bactericidal activity (SBA) of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in 12 healthy volunteers. Each subject received 3 days of oral moxifloxacin 400 mg daily and levofloxacin 750 mg daily, respectively, with a 2- to 4-week washout period between regimens. Blood was drawn at 6 time points after the third dose of each antibiotic. Mean serum bactericidal titers (MSBTRs) for moxifloxacin were 4-fold higher than the mean titers for levofloxacin at each time point. For each drug, MSBTRs at each time point were the same or within one 2-fold dilution when analyzed according to the penicillin susceptibility of the strains or the sex of the subjects. The difference in SBA of the 2 drugs may have implications for the emergence of resistance and clinical outcome.

Members of the fluoroquinolone class are being actively evaluated for inclusion in tuberculosis chemotherapy regimens, and we sought to determine the best in vitro and pharmacodynamic predictors of in vivo efficacy in mice. MICs for Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv were 0.1 mg/liter (sparfloxacin [SPX]) and 0.5 mg/liter (moxifloxacin [MXF], ciprofloxacin [CIP], and ofloxacin [OFX]). The unbound fraction in the presence of murine serum was concentration dependent for MXF, OFX, SPX, and CIP. In vitro time-kill studies revealed a time-dependent effect, with the CFU reduction on day 7 similar for all four drugs. However, with a J774A.1 murine macrophage tuberculosis infection model, CIP was ineffective at up to 32x MIC. In addition, MXF, OFX, and SPX exhibited less activity than had been seen in the in vitro time-kill study. After demonstrating that the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration of drug in plasma were proportional to the dose in vivo, dose fractionation studies with total oral doses of 37.5 to 19,200 mg/kg of body weight (MXF), 225 to 115,200 mg/kg (OFX), 30 to 50,000 mg/kg (SPX), and 38 to 100,000 mg/kg (CIP) were performed with a murine aerosol infection model. MXF was the most efficacious agent (3.0+/-0.2 log10 CFU/lung reduction), followed by SPX (1.4+/-0.1) and OFX (1.5+/-0.1). CIP showed no effect. The ratio of the AUC to the MIC was the pharmacodynamic parameter that best described the in vivo efficacy. In summary, a lack of intracellular killing predicted the lack of in vivo activity of CIP. The in vivo rank order for maximal efficacy of the three active fluoroquinolones was not clearly predicted by the in vitro assays, however.

Background and Objective: Current North American guidelines advocate the use of respiratory fluoroquinolones for the empirical management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). While community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) has emerged as a pathogen frequently encountered in skin and skin structure infections, it has also now been recognised as a causative pathogen in CAP. Since fluoroquinolones may be used empirically to treat unsuspected CA-MRSA pneumonia, the objective of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial properties of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin using human simulated drug exposures in epithelial lining fluid (ELF)., Methods: An in vitro model was used to simulate the ELF concentrations, previously determined in older adults receiving multiple doses, of levofloxacin 500 mg once daily and moxifloxacin 400mg once daily. Four CA-MRSA isolates were studied at a starting inoculum of 10(6) colony-forming units (CFU)/mL; selected isolates were also studied at 10(8) CFU/mL. Bacterial density and resistance were quantitatively assessed over 48 hours. Drug exposure (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) was confirmed using validated drug assays., Results: At a standard 10(6) starting inoculum, sustained bacterial kill (3.6-4.5 log) with both fluoroquinolones was noted for CA-MRSA isolates 27 and 44 (AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] = 383-3923). Despite an MIC of 8 microg/mL (AUC/MIC = 25) for isolate 3, levofloxacin displayed a 2.8 log kill, while moxifloxacin (MIC 1 microg/mL) sustained a 4.5 log kill (AUC/MIC = 207) over 48 hours. Against isolate 59, levofloxacin displayed no antibacterial effect (AUC/MIC = 3), while moxifloxacin with an MIC of 8 microg/mL (AUC/MIC = 31) killed 4.6 log. At a high inoculum (10(8)), both fluoroquinolones showed 5.2-5.6 log kill for the susceptible isolate (44), while moxifloxacin showed no antibacterial activity against isolate 59. Drug exposure (AUC/MIC) appeared to correlate well (r(2) = 0.99) with the change in log CFU/mL. Maximal activity was observed for both drugs at an AUC/MIC of approximately 30., Conclusion: When evaluated at human simulated ELF concentrations, both levofloxacin and moxifloxacin appeared to demonstrate sustained antibacterial activity for CA-MRSA isolates with MICs

Extended daily dialysis (EDD) is increasingly popular in the treatment of acute renal failure (ARF). EDD could remove drugs to a much different degree compared with intermittent standard hemodialysis or continuous renal replacement therapies; however, there are only scarce data on how EDD influences the pharmacokinetics of frequently used drugs. The aim of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of two quinolone antibiotics in patients who had anuric ARF and were being treated with EDD. Adult patients who were in the intensive care unit at a tertiary care university hospital and receiving moxifloxacin (n = 10) or levofloxacin (n = 5) therapy were included. The antibiotics were administered intravenously 8 h (400 mg of moxifloxacin) or 12 h (500 mg of levofloxacin) before EDD to study pharmacokinetics off and on EDD. Treatment lasted 8 h; blood and dialysate flow rates were 160 ml/min. In addition to standard pharmacokinetic parameters, the total dialysate concentration of both drugs was measured using a technically simple single-pass batch dialysis system for EDD. Moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients who had ARF and were undergoing EDD were similar to those in healthy subjects without renal impairment. Levofloxacin, although removed by EDD, had a lower total clearance compared with healthy subjects. According to these findings, anuric critically ill patients who are undergoing EDD should be treated with the standard dosage of moxifloxacin (400 mg/d intravenously). The levofloxacin dosage, however, should be reduced according to the intensity of renal replacement therapy.

Objectives: To compare in an in vitro kinetic model the pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin with a concentration-time profile simulating the human free non-protein bound concentrations of 400 mg moxifloxacin intravenous (iv) once daily, 500 mg levofloxacin iv once daily and 750 mg levofloxacin iv once daily against strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli with variable susceptibility to fluoroquinolones., Methods: The strains used in the study included S. pneumoniae ATCC 6306 (native strain), S. pneumoniae 19397 (double mutation; gyrA and parC), S. pneumoniae 4241 (single mutation; parC), S. aureus ATCC 13709 (native strain), S. aureus MB5 (single mutation; gyrA), E. coli M12 (single mutation; gyrA), E. coli ATCC 25922 (native strain) and K. pneumoniae ATCC 29655 (native strain). The strains were exposed to moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in an in vitro kinetic model simulating the free human serum concentration-time profile of moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily, levofloxacin 500 mg once daily and 750 mg once daily. Repeated samples were taken regularly during 24 h and viable counts were carried out., Results and Conclusions: A correlation was seen between both the area under the serum concentration curve and MIC (AUC/MIC) and the peak concentration/MIC (Cmax/MIC) versus area under the bactericidal killing curve (AUBKC) or Deltalog0-24 cfu/mL. Compiling all data, an AUC/MIC of approximately 100 and a Cmax/MIC of 10 gave a maximal bactericidal effect for both levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. In accordance with the results from others, our study indicated that a lower AUC/MIC was needed for S. pneumoniae in comparison with the Gram-negative bacteria studied. Moxifloxacin yielded higher AUC/MIC and Cmax/MIC against the investigated Gram-positive bacteria in comparison with levofloxacin 500 mg once daily and 750 mg once daily.

Objectives: The increasingly recognized prevalence of first-step parC mutants in Streptococcus pneumoniae and the development of de novo resistance while on fluoroquinolone therapy are of concern. Previous work by our group demonstrated the ability of moxifloxacin, but not levofloxacin, to eradicate parC mutants. The objective of this experiment was to determine whether these fluoroquinolone antibiotics provided equivalent bacterial kill when similar AUC/MICs were examined., Methods: An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to simulate the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations following oral administration of levofloxacin 500 mg once daily and moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily in older adults. In addition, a range of AUC/MICs were also modelled, including levofloxacin 750 mg once daily. Five different S. pneumoniae containing first-step parC mutations and one isolate without mutations were tested for 48 h and time-kill curves were constructed. Samples at 0, 24 and 48 h were collected for phenotypic and genotypic profiling. HPLC was used to verify that target exposures were achieved., Results: The isolate without a parC mutation displayed a 4 log reduction in cfu after treatment with levofloxacin 500 mg and did not select for resistance. In all five isolates containing first-step parC mutations, resistance emerged within 48 h with a > or =16-fold increase in MIC and the acquisition of a gyrA mutant. Increasing the exposure of levofloxacin to approximately 750 mg dose still led to > or =16-fold increase in MIC at 48 h in two of the four isolates containing parC mutations. On the other hand, moxifloxacin 400 mg sustained bacterial killing against the two isolates tested without the selection of resistant mutants. It appears that the critical AUC/MIC necessary to prevent the acquisition of resistance for levofloxacin is 200 and approximately 400 for moxifloxacin., Conclusions: Due to suboptimal exposures, once-daily oral regimens of levofloxacin at both 500 and 750 mg inconsistently led to bactericidal activity and the frequent acquisition of a second-step gyrA mutation in S. pneumoniae isolates already containing a first-step parC mutation. Conversely, once-daily moxifloxacin 400 mg provides exposures that vastly exceed the apparent efficacy breakpoint and did not select for second-step mutants until exposures were decreased 4-fold. As a result of these data and the emerging literature involving mutations in the pneumococcus, caution should be exercised when the respiratory fluoroquinolones are used to treat patients infected with S. pneumoniae suspected of having parC mutations.

An HPLC method with fluorescence detection suitable for routine determination of levofloxacin in plasma and dialysate has been validated. Sample preparation was assured by one-step protein precipitation for plasma or direct injection of the dialysate solution, respectively. Separation occurred on an YMC Pro C18 RP column (150 mm x 2 mm) with an acidic binary gradient mobile phase and detection at excitation and emission wavelengths of 296 and 504 nm. The assay was linear between 0.1 and 6 microg/ml for plasma and 0.1 and 5 microg/ml for dialysate with intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy lower than 10%. No degradation of levofloxacin was observed under the applied conditions for both matrices. The method was successfully applied to an in vitro pharmacokinetic study and patient samples as well.

In vitro and in vivo models were developed to evaluate the efficacy of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin against three serotype 3 pneumococcal strains with different susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones (wild-type, parC mutant, and parC, parE and gyrA mutant). Levofloxacin and moxifloxacin reduced the bacterial burden in the in vitro pharmacodynamic and animal models for the wild-type strain but had very little activity against the fully resistant strain (parC, parE and gyrA mutant). Levofloxacin showed very little activity both in the in vitro pharmacodynamic model and in the animal model for the strain having a mutation in parC (levofloxacin and moxifloxacin minimum inhibitory concentrations, 2mg/L and 0.25mg/L, respectively). However, moxifloxacin still had a significant in vitro and in vivo activity against this strain.

Fluoroquinolones are known to penetrate well into the infectious foci such as lung mucosa, epithelial lining fluid and alveolar macrophages achieving higher target site concentrations than the corresponding serum levels. In order to integrate the in vitro antibacterial activity and pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin, their bactericidal efficacy was assessed by simulating human serum and lung tissue concentrations using Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae as indicator organisms. The bacteria were exposed to fluctuating moxifloxacin and levofloxacin concentrations simulating the drug levels in serum, lung mucosa, epithelial lining fluid and alveolar macrophages. The following parameters were deduced from the kill curves: area under the bactericidal kill curve normalized to the initial inoculum (AUBKC norm), the time needed to reduce the inoculum by 3 log(10) titers, and the initial bactericidal activity. In general, all these three parameters were for all the bacterial isolates having been exposed to moxifloxacin concentration dependent. In contrast, beyond a levofloxacin concentration of optimal bactericidal effect, higher drug concentrations did not further augment the bactericidal activity of levofloxacin. These data demonstrate that not all fluoroquinolones share the same pharmacodynamic targets needed to maximize their antibacterial effect.

Moxifloxacin has been suggested as an option for monotherapy of intra-abdominal infections. Recent data support the use of a once-daily metronidazole regimen. The purpose of this study was to investigate the activity of levofloxacin (750 mg every 24 h [q24h]) plus metronidazole (1,500 mg q24h) compared with that of moxifloxacin (400 mg q24h) monotherapy in a mixed-infection model. By using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model in duplicate, Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis were exposed to peak concentrations of 8.5 mg of levofloxacin/liter q24h, 32 mg of metronidazole/liter q24h, and 2 mg for moxifloxacin/liter q24h for 24 h. The activities of levofloxacin, metronidazole, moxifloxacin, and levofloxacin plus metronidazole were evaluated against E. coli, B. fragilis, and E. coli plus B. fragilis. The targeted half-lives of levofloxacin, metronidazole, and moxifloxacin were 8, 8, and 12 h, respectively. Time-kill curves were analyzed for time to 3-log killing, slope, and regrowth. Pre- and postexposure MICs were determined. The preexposure levofloxacin, metronidazole, and moxifloxacin MICs for E. coli and B. fragilis were 0.5 and 1, >64 and 0.5, and 1 and 0.25 mg/liter, respectively. Levofloxacin and moxifloxacin achieved a 3-log killing against E. coli and B. fragilis in all experiments, as did metronidazole against B. fragilis. Metronidazole did not decrease the starting inoculum of E. coli. The area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratios for E. coli and B. fragilis were 171.7 and 85.9, respectively, for levofloxacin and 26 and 103.9, respectively, for moxifloxacin. Levofloxacin plus metronidazole exhibited the fastest rates of killing. The levofloxacin and moxifloxacin MICs for B. fragilis increased 8- to 16-fold after the organism was exposed to moxifloxacin. No other changes in the postexposure MICs were found. Levofloxacin plus metronidazole administered once daily exhibited activity similar to that of moxifloxacin against the mixed E. coli and B. fragilis infection. A once-daily regimen of levofloxacin plus metronidazole looks promising for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

The degree of penetration of newer quinolones into the pleural fluid has not been studied. The objective of the present study was to determine the degree to which moxifloxacin and levofloxacin penetrate into empyemic pleural fluid using a new rabbit model of empyema. An empyema was created via the intrapleural injection of turpentine (1 mL), followed 24 h later by instillation of 2 mL (1 x 10(10)) Escherichia coli bacteria (ATCC 35218) into the pleural space of New Zealand white rabbits. After an empyema was verified by thoracentesis and pleural fluid analysis, moxifloxacin and levofloxacin (25 mg.kg(-1) for both, i.v.) were administered. Antibiotic levels were determined in samples of pleural fluid and in blood collected serially over 12 h. Antibiotic levels were measured using HPLC. Each of the antibiotics penetrated well into the empyemic pleural fluid. Antibiotic penetration was the greatest for moxifloxacin (area under the curve (AUC) for pleural fluid/blood (AUCPF/AUCblood) ratio=1.37) followed by levofloxacin (ratio=1.13). The time to equilibration between the pleural fluid and blood antibiotic levels was more rapid for moxifloxacin (3.9 h) than for levofloxacin (4.4 h). With moxifloxacin, the peak pleural fluid concentration (Cmax,PF) was 2.77 microg.mL(-1) and occurred at a time to maximum pleural fluid concentration (Tmax,PF) of 6 h after infusion and decreased thereafter. The peak blood concentration (Cmax,blood) was 4.81 microg.mL(-1) at 1 h after administration. With levofloxacin, the peak pleural fluid level (Cmax,PF=1.39 microg.mL(-1)) occurred at 6 h (Tmax,PF=6 h) after infusion. The Cmax,blood was 1.88 microg.mL(-1) at 1 h after administration. In conclusion, differences were found in the degree of penetration of the two quinolones into infected pleural fluid in rabbits. The clinical significance of these differences is unknown. More studies are needed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters in the pleural space in humans.

For some pneumococci the fluoroquinolone MICs are low but the mutant prevention concentrations (MPCs) are high; this difference defines in vitro the mutant selection window (MSW). We investigated in vivo the bacterial reduction and the occurrence of resistant mutants with moxifloxacin (MFX; 400 mg once daily) or levofloxacin (LVX; 500 mg twice daily) in treatments similar to those in humans with experimental pneumonia due to pneumococci (expPP) exhibiting various MICs and MPCs. The MIC/MPC for MFX and LVX and genotypes were as follows: strain 16089, 0.125/0.125 and 0.5/0.5 (wild type); strain MS1A, 0.25/0.25 and 1/2 (efflux); strain MS2A, 0.25/4 and 1.75/28 (parC79); strain MR3B4, 0.25/4 and 2/32 (parC79); strain M16, 0.5/2 and 8/32 (parC83); strain Gyr-1207, 1.5/3 and 8/16 (gyrA); and strain MQ3A, 4/4 and 16/64 (parC and gyrA). Both drugs were efficient with wild type-expPP, but only MFX was efficient with efflux-expPP. No bacterial reduction was observed for parC-expPPs due to mutants observed in 18 to 100% of animals, depending on the strain and the drug tested. These mutants showed unbound area under the concentration-time curve and MICs of from 50 to 164 for MFX. The in vivo pharmacodynamic boundaries of the MSW were different for MFX and LVX. We conclude that, after LVX or MFX treatment, mutants occur in vivo if there is a preexisting parC mutation, since the drug concentrations fall below the MPCs of these strains. Since the MPC determination cannot be routinely determined, these phenotypes or genotypes should be detected by simple tests to guide the therapeutic options.

Recent clinical failures associated with levofloxacin treatment for Streptococcus pneumoniae infections and growing evidence of frequent mutations in the isolate population have led to increased concerns regarding fluoroquinolone resistance. Our objective was to characterize the efficacies of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin against various genotypes of S. pneumoniae after simulated bronchopulmonary exposures. An in vitro model was used to simulate a levofloxacin concentration of 500 mg and a moxifloxacin concentration of 400 mg, which were previously determined to be the concentrations in the epithelial lining fluid of older adults receiving once-daily dosing. The effects of the drugs were tested against six S. pneumoniae containing various mutations. Bacterial density and resistance were quantitatively assessed over 48 h. The S. pneumoniae isolate with no mutation displayed a 4-log reduction in CFU after treatment with both agents and did not develop resistance. Isolates containing the parC or parE mutation or both mutations regrew and developed resistance when they were exposed to levofloxacin, despite an unbound area under the concentration-time curve (AUC):MIC ratio of approximately 100. When the isolate containing the parC and gyrA mutations was exposed to levofloxacin, there was a half-log reduction in the number of CFU compared to that for the control, but the isolate subsequently regrew. Likewise, levofloxacin did not kill the isolate containing the parC, gyrA, and parE mutations. Moxifloxacin sustained the killing of all bacterial isolates tested without the development of resistance. Levofloxacin did not sustain bacterial killing and did not prevent the emergence of further resistance in mutants with the parC or parE mutation or both mutations, even though an unbound AUC:MIC ratio for exposure well above the breakpoint of 30 to 40 established in the literature for S. pneumoniae was maintained. Moxifloxacin was effective against all isolates tested, despite the presence of isolates with two- and three-step mutations, for which the MICs were increased.

Study Objective: To determine the steady-state, extracellular, and intracellular pulmonary disposition of moxifloxacin (MXF), levofloxacin (LEVO), and azithromycin (AZI) relative to that of the plasma over a 24-h dosing interval., Design: Randomized, multicenter, open-label investigation., Patients: Forty-seven older adults (mean [+/- SD] age, 62 +/- 13 years) undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy., Interventions: Oral administration of MXF, 400 mg, LEVO, 500 mg daily for five doses, or AZI, 500 mg for one dose, then 250 mg daily for four doses. BAL and venipuncture were completed at 4, 8, 12, or 24 h following the administration of the last dose., Measurements and Results: Steady-state MXF, LEVO, and AZI concentrations were determined in the plasma, epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and alveolar macrophages (AMs). The concentrations of all three agents were greatest in the AMs followed by the ELF compared to the plasma. Plasma concentrations were similar to those previously reported with these agents. The mean ELF concentrations at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h were as follows: MXF, 11.7 +/- 11.9, 7.8 +/- 5.1, 10.5 +/- 3.7, and 5.7 +/- 6.3 micro g/mL, respectively; LEVO, 15.2 +/- 4.5, 10.2 +/- 6.7, 6.9 +/- 4.4, and 2.9 +/- 1.7 micro g/mL, respectively; and AZI, 0.6 +/- 0.4, 0.7 +/- 0.4, 0.9 +/- 0.5, and 0.9 +/- 0.7 micro g/mL, respectively. The AM concentrations at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h were as follows: MXF, 47.7 +/- 47.6, 123.3 +/- 126.4, 26.2 +/- 19.4, and 32.8 +/- 16.5 micro g/mL, respectively; LEVO, 28.5 +/- 30.2, 26.1 +/- 15.7, 28.3 +/- 12.6, and 8.2 +/- 6.1 micro g/mL, respectively; and AZI, 71.8 +/- 50.1, 73.8 +/- 75.3, 155.9 +/- 81.3, and 205.2 +/- 256.3 micro g/mL, respectively., Conclusions: The intrapulmonary concentrations of MXF, LEV, and AZI were superior to those obtained in the plasma. The AM concentrations of all agents studied were more than adequate relative to the minimum concentration required to inhibit 90% of the organism population (MIC(90)) of the common intracellular pathogens (< 1 micro g/mL). These data indicate that attainable extracellular concentrations of AZI are insufficient to reliably eradicate Streptococcus pneumoniae, based on the agent's current minimum inhibitory concentration profile, whereas the mean concentrations of MXF and LEVO in the ELF exceed the MIC(90) of the S pneumoniae population. Moreover, MXF concentrations exceeded the S pneumoniae susceptibility breakpoint (1.0 micro g/mL) at all time points, while 2 of 15 concentrations (13%) failed to maintain LEVO concentrations above the breakpoint (2.0 micro g/mL) throughout the dosing interval.

An in vitro pharmacodynatnic modeling apparatus (PDMA) generated specific bacterial kill profiles for single-dose regimens of gatifloxacin (GT), gemifloxacin (GM), moxifloxacin (MX) and levofloxacin (LV) against isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae with specific QRDR profiles: SP-WT (no modifications); SP-C (changes in parC); and SP-AC (changes in both parC and gyrA). No differences in 3-log reduction time or total log reduction were observed among the four agents for SP-WT; however, LV failed to achieve a 3-log reduction in SP-C and SP-AC, and total log reduction after 12 hrs was minimal compared to the other agents. GM and MX required less time for 3-log reduction of SP-AC compared to GT, but total log reductions in SP-AC were similar among the three newer quinolone agents (GM > MX > GT). The study isolates with QRDR modifications greatly reduced LV activity. GM and MX maintained the greatest degree of activity against all study isolates and their activity was not adversely influenced by the genetic modifications in SP-C and SP-AC. The dual targeting characteristic of GM was also assessed, but did not offer significant advantages relative to MX and GT.

Most integral endpoints of antimicrobial effect, including area between the control growth and time-kill curves (ABBC), area above the curve (AAC) and area under the time-kill curve (AUBC) are determined over a dosing interval (tau), regardless of the actual effect duration. Unlike these tau-related endpoints, the intensity of antimicrobial effect (I(E)) considers the area between the control growth and time-kill curves from time zero to the time when bacterial counts on the regrowth curve achieve the same maximal numbers as in the absence of antibiotic, even if this time is greater than tau. Recently, important differences between ABBC-, AAC-, AUBC- and I(E)-AUC/MIC relationships were reported in single-dose simulations. The present study was designed to examine these relationships in multiple-dose simulations. A clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus was exposed to simulated pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin (MIC = 0.37 mg/L) and levofloxacin (MIC = 0.6 mg/L), simulating three consecutive 24 h doses, which varied over a 32-fold range in the 24 h AUC/MIC ratio (AUC(tau)/MIC: 14-444 h and 15-484 h, respectively). The cumulative effect of each treatment was expressed by I(E), determined from time zero to the time after the third dose when the effect could no longer be detected, and by ABBC, AAC and AUBC calculated over a 72 h period (i.e. over three dosing intervals). With all four endpoints, systematic AUCtau/MIC increase-induced changes in effect-an increase in I(E), ABBC and AAC, or a decrease in AUBC-were observed and the log AUC(tau)/MIC-response curves were fitted by an E(max) model. Using I(E), the effects of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin could be distinguished over a wider range of AUC(tau)/MIC ratios than with ABBC and AUBC, whereas no differences between the fluoroquinolones could be seen based on the AAC-AUC(tau)/MIC curves. Although ABBC and AUBC were more descriptive than AAC, these two endpoints distinguished the fluoroquinolone effects only over a relatively narrow AUC(tau)/MIC range ( approximately 40-100 h), which includes therapeutically achievable values for levofloxacin but not for moxifloxacin. Similar limitations of the tau-related endpoints might be critical in comparative studies with other new fluoroquinolones where therapeutic AUCtau/MIC ratios are >100 h.

Purpose: To evaluate the penetration of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin into the aqueous humor after oral administration., Setting: Alcorcon Hospital, Madrid, Spain., Methods: Forty-two patients having cataract surgery were randomly divided into 3 groups the day before surgery. The first group received 2 oral 500 mg doses of ciprofloxacin at 12-hour intervals. The second group received a single oral 500 mg dose of levofloxacin. The third group received a single oral 400 mg dose of moxifloxacin. At the time of surgery, 0.1 mL aqueous fluid was aspirated from the anterior chamber just before the operation and immediately stored at -80 degrees C. Drug concentrations were measured using a biological assay., Results: The mean aqueous level of ciprofloxacin was 0.50 microg/mL +/- 0.25 (SD); of levofloxacin, 1.50 +/- 0.50 microg/mL; and of moxifloxacin, 2.33 +/- 0.85 microg/mL. The mean aqueous levels of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin were above the 90% minimum inhibitory concentration for most of the common microorganisms that cause endophthalmitis., Conclusions: Therapeutic concentrations of fluoroquinolones, mainly levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, were reached with oral administration. These antibiotics may be effective for prophylaxis and adjuvant therapy of bacterial endophthalmitis.

The accumulation of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and ofloxacin by Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv was determined with a modified fluorescence method. The time to achieve a steady-state concentration (SSC) of each agent in M. tuberculosis was 60-240 s. Moxifloxacin was accumulated to the lowest concentration and ciprofloxacin to the highest. However, ciprofloxacin took longer to achieve an SSC than the other four agents; levofloxacin reached steady state in the shortest time. Larger fluoroquinolones accumulated to the lowest concentration and more slowly. Although all five agents had low hydrophobicity values (P(app) < or =0.11), those with the lowest values accumulated to the higher concentrations.

An in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to compare the pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against 3 Staphylococcus aureus and 3 Staphylococcus epidermidis strains. Logarithmic-phase cultures were inoculated into the peripheral compartment of hollow-fiber cartridges and exposed to the peak serum concentrations achieved in humans with oral doses of moxifloxacin (400 mg) and levofloxacin (500 mg). Drugs were added at 0 and 24 h, elimination kinetics were simulated, and changes in viable bacterial counts were evaluated over the course of 36 h. Moxifloxacin was bactericidal against all 6 staphylococci (times to 99.9% kill, 1-3 h). Against most strains, bacterial killing continued through 36 h, with total kills exceeding 5.5 logs. Levofloxacin was bactericidal against 5 of the strains, with similar times to 99.9% kill. In contrast to moxifloxacin, however, resistant subpopulations emerged in 4 strains during therapy with levofloxacin, and this could have important implications for treatment of staphylococcal infections. These in vitro observations warrant the clinical evaluation of moxifloxacin in the treatment of staphylococcal infections.

The role of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin pharmacokinetics (PK) in antimicrobial efficacy and in the selection of fluoroquinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains was investigated using the rabbit tissue cage abscess model. A rabbit tissue cage was created by insertion of sterile Wiffle balls in the dorsal cervical area. Animals orally received a range of moxifloxacin or levofloxacin doses that simulate human PK for 7 days 48 h after the Wiffle balls were inoculated with fluoroquinolone-sensitive S. pneumoniae (10(7) CFU). Abscess fluid was collected on a daily basis over 14 days to measure bacterial density and MICs. Moxifloxacin regimens produced a range of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratios ranging from 9.2 to 444 and peak/MIC ratios ranging from 1.3 to 102. Levofloxacin doses produced AUC/MIC ratios of 5.1 to 85.5 and peak/MIC ratio of 0.9 to 14.8. Moxifloxacin at 6.5, 26, and 42 mg/kg reduced the bacterial log CFU per milliliter in abscess fluid (percentage of that in a sterile animal) by 4.2 +/- 2.2 (20%), 5.8 +/- 0.4 (100%), and 5.4 +/- 0.4 (100%), respectively, over the dosing period. Levofloxacin at 5.5, 22, and 32 mg/kg reduced the log CFU per milliliter in abscess fluid (percentage of that in a sterile animal) by 2.8 +/- 0.7 (20%), 5.1 +/- 1.3 (80%), and 4.6 +/- 1.3 (60%), respectively. Moxifloxacin has a greater bactericidal rate as determined by regression of log CFU versus time data. The AUC/MIC and peak/MIC ratios correlated with the efficacy of both drugs (P < 0.05). Resistance to either drug did not develop with any of the doses as assessed by a change in the MIC. In conclusion, data derived from this study show that moxifloxacin and levofloxacin exhibit rapid bactericidal activity against S. pneumoniae in vivo, and moxifloxacin exhibits enhanced bactericidal activity compared to levofloxacin, with AUC/MIC and peak/MIC ratios correlated with antimicrobial efficacy for both drugs. The development of fluoroquinolone-resistant S. pneumoniae was not observed with either drug in this model.

To demonstrate the impact of the different pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin on their antimicrobial effects (AMEs), killing and regrowth kinetics of two clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and one each of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were studied. With each organism, a series of monoexponential pharmacokinetic profiles of single doses of moxifloxacin (T:1/2 = 12.1 h) and levofloxacin (T:(1/2) = 6.8 h) were simulated. The respective eight-fold ranges of the ratios of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to the MIC were 58-475 and 114-934. Species- and strain-independent linear relationships observed between the intensity of AME (I:(E)) and log AUC/MIC were not superimposed for moxifloxacin and levofloxacin (r(2) = 0.99 in both cases). The predicted AUC/MIC ratios for moxifloxacin and levofloxacin that might be equivalent to Schentag's AUC/MIC breakpoint for ciprofloxacin (125) were estimated at 80 and 130, respectively. The respective equivalent MIC breakpoints were 0.41 mg/L (for a 400 mg dose of moxifloxacin) and 0.35 mg/L (for a 500 mg dose of levofloxacin). Based on the I:(E)-log AUC/MIC relationships, equiefficient 24 h doses (D:(24)s) of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin were calculated for hypothetical strains of S. aureus, E. coli and K. pneumoniae with MICs equal to the respective MIC50s (weighted geometric means of reported values). To provide an 'acceptable' I:(E) = 200 (log cfu/mL)*h, the D:(24)s of moxifloxacin for all three organisms were much lower (150, 30 and 60 mg, respectively) than the clinically proposed 400 mg dose. Although the usual dose of levofloxacin (500 mg) would be in excess for E. coli and K. pneumoniae (D:(24) = 36 and 220 mg, respectively), it might be insufficient for S. aureus (the estimated D:(24) = 850 mg). Moreover, to provide the same effect as a 400 mg D:(24) of moxifloxacin against staphylococci, levofloxacin would have to be given in a 5000 mg D:(24), which is 10-fold higher than its clinically accepted dose. The described method of generalization of data obtained with specific organisms to other representatives of the same species might be useful to predict the AMEs of new quinolones.