1. How Well Does 4‐km WRF Model Predict Three‐Dimensional Reflectivity Structure Over China as Compared to Radar Observations?
- Author
-
Zhu, Kefeng, Xue, Ming, Yang, Nan, and Zhang, Chenyue
- Subjects
NUMERICAL weather forecasting ,METEOROLOGICAL research ,PRECIPITATION forecasting ,RADAR ,WEATHER forecasting ,THREE-dimensional modeling ,TROPICAL cyclones - Abstract
The performance of 4‐km Weather Research and Forecasting model in predicting reflectivity structure in China over three summer months is investigated using three‐dimensional (3D) reflectivity observations. Three verification domains, namely Southern China (SC), Central and Eastern China , and North China, that correspond to the three major rainfall centers of mainland China are selected. Results show that the forecasts reproduce the distribution and diurnal variation of precipitation well, but significant differences exist in the vertical distributions of the predicted and observed reflectivities. In observations, the highest frequency (of reflectivity ≥35 dBZ) occurs between 3 and 6 km, whereas it is at the surface in the forecast. The forecasts tend to over‐predict reflectivity intensity at the lower levels, especially in SC. Further evaluation using object‐based verification methods show that the forecasts greatly underestimate the afternoon peak frequency of precipitation clouds with reflectivity >30 dBZ. The forecasts fail to reproduce the diurnal variation of 35 dBZ mean and maximum height of the objects, producing less variation than observations. Analyses show that the failure in properly reproducing small‐scale reflectivity objects (with diameter <100 km) is primarily responsible for the underestimation of the mean and maximum object heights. Evaluation using additional 3D information show that the forecasts tend to produce a greater proportion of faster‐moving small‐scale objects. This study reveals that the simulation of the 3D structure of precipitation clouds in terms of reflectivity remains a great challenge, especially for smaller convective cells. Plain Language Summary: The simulation of precipitation clouds is associated carries the largest uncertainty in numerical weather prediction and climate models. With continued advancement in observations and numerical models, forecasts of horizontal distribution, intensity, diurnal variation and propagation of precipitation have been greatly improved. However, faithful representation of three‐dimensional (3D) cloud structure remains a great challenge, with the lack of systematic evaluations being one of the key causes. In this study, 3D gridded radar reflectivity observations are used to evaluate the precipitation clouds structure (with reflectivity ≥30 dBZ) predicted at a convection‐permitting‐resolution (CPR) over three summer months of 2016 in China. The evaluation reveals differences between the simulated and observed reflectivity structures, including the reflectivity intensity profile, the 35 dBZ mean and maximum height, the fraction of fast‐moving objects. CPR models still have difficulties in simulating 3D reflectivity structures especially for relatively small‐scale objects (with diameter <100 km). Key Points: Reflectivity structure predicted by the 4‐km Weather Research and Forecasting model are evaluated using 3D radar observationsThe model overpredicts the intensity of reflectivity at lower levels and fails to reproduce the diurnal variation of object heightThe failure to correctly reproduce the structure of smaller reflectivity objects is primarily responsible for the deviations [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF