Search

We retrospectively evaluated early clinical results of coronary revascularization using none but arterial grafts in patients aged 65 years and older. The cases of 449 consecutive patients who had undergone isolated myocardial revascularization were divided into 2 groups: the arterial conduit group (n=107) received a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft and 1 or both radial arteries (RAs), while the mixed-conduit group (n=342) received a LIMA graft and 1 or more saphenous vein grafts (SVGs), with or without an RA. There was no significant difference between the groups' rates of mortality. The arterial conduit group had a significantly shorter overall postoperative hospital stay than did the mixed-conduit group (mean, 6.6 +/- 0.9 vs 7.2 +/- 5 days; P=0.04). Linear regression analysis revealed that the presence of hypertension (beta=0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.054-0.759; P=0.02) and high EuroSCORE (beta=0.24; 95% CI, 0.053-0.283; P=0.004) were the major predicting factors for long hospital stay. Graft-harvest-site infection was statistically more frequent in the mixed-conduit group than in the arterial conduit group (6.4% vs 0, respectively; P=0.007). Angiography was performed postoperatively (mean, 24.9 +/- 16.3 mo; range, 11-65 mo) in 21 patients. In these patients, all LIMA grafts were patent, as were 86.9% of the SVGs and 90.9% of the RA grafts. Myocardial revascularization using all arterial grafts (at least 50% RAs) in patients aged 65 years and older is safe and reliable, produces short-term results equal to those of saphenous vein grafting, and can reduce graft-harvest-site infections.

Background: There is still controversy about which vasodilator solution is best for storing radial artery (RA) conduits prior to coronary artery bypass grafting. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate how 4 different topical vasodilators applied during RA harvesting affect blood flow with the vessel in situ., Materials and Methods: The subjects were 85 patients who underwent RA harvesting in preparation for coronary artery bypass grafting. Each case was assigned to 1 of 5 groups (17 RAs each) that were treated with different solutions: normal saline (control), nitroglycerin, diltiazem, papaverine, and adenosine. Standard clinical concentrations were used. The RA was partially harvested (pedicle attached proximally) and flow rates and hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure) were recorded at 2 time points: (1) pretreatment and (2) after 5 minutes of immersion in 60 mL of treatment solution. Results were compared within and between groups, and post-treatment-to-pretreatment ratios were calculated for each variable., Results: There were no significant differences among the groups' mean pretreatment flow rates (P = .979) or mean posttreatment flow rates (P = .069). All except the diltiazem group showed a significant rise in mean flow rate from pretreatment to posttreatment. The mean posttreatment-to-pretreatment ratios for RA flow rate were 1.28 +/- 0.39 in the saline group, 1.85 +/- 0.72 in the nitroglycerin group, 1.31 +/- 0.48 in the diltiazem group, 1.37 +/- 0.64 in the papaverine group, and 1.23 +/- 0.42 in the adenosine group. Only the mean flow ratio in the nitroglycerin group was significantly higher than that in the saline group (P = .003). The mean flow ratios in the other vasodilator groups were not statistically different from the flow ratio in the saline group., Conclusions: These preliminary results indicate that topical application of nitroglycerin solution effectively prevents perioperative spasm of the RA in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. The authors recommend this solution for preparation and storage of RA grafts. Randomized controlled trials with power analysis will give more definitive information.