14 results on '"Sorce, Gabriele"'
Search Results
2. Adverse upgrading and/or upstaging in contemporary low-risk prostate cancer patients
- Author
-
Flammia, Rocco S., Hoeh, Benedikt, Hohenhorst, Lukas, Sorce, Gabriele, Chierigo, Francesco, Panunzio, Andrea, Tian, Zhe, Saad, Fred, Leonardo, Costantino, Briganti, Alberto, Antonelli, Alessandro, Terrone, Carlo, Shariat, Shahrokh F., Anceschi, Umberto, Graefen, Markus, Chun, Felix K. H., Montorsi, Francesco, Gallucci, Michele, and Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy vs external beam radiotherapy in high-risk Hispanic/Latino prostate cancer patients
- Author
-
Hoeh, Benedikt, Hohenhorst, Jan L., Flammia, Rocco, Horlemann, Benedikt, Sorce, Gabriele, Chierigo, Francesco, Tian, Zhe, Saad, Fred, Graefen, Markus, Gallucci, Michele, Briganti, Alberto, Terrone, Carlo, Shariat, Shahrokh F., Kluth, Luis A., Becker, Andreas, Chun, Felix K. H., and Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Survival after radical prostatectomy vs. radiation therapy in ductal carcinoma of the prostate
- Author
-
Chierigo, Francesco, Borghesi, Marco, Würnschimmel, Christoph, Flammia, Rocco Simone, Horlemann, Benedikt, Sorce, Gabriele, Höh, Benedikt, Tian, Zhe, Saad, Fred, Graefen, Markus, Gallucci, Michele, Briganti, Alberto, Montorsi, Francesco, Chun, Felix K. H., Shariat, Shahrokh F., Mantica, Guglielmo, Suardi, Nazareno, Terrone, Carlo, and Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Transitioning from Da Vinci Si to Xi: assessing surgical outcomes at a high-volume robotic center.
- Author
-
Bravi, Carlo A., Mottaran, Angelo, Sarchi, Luca, Piro, Adele, Paciotti, Marco, Nocera, Luigi, Piramide, Federico, Balestrazzi, Eleonora, Peraire, Maria, Farinha, Rui, Sorce, Gabriele, Collà-Ruvolo, Claudia, Rebuffo, Silvia, De Backer, Pieter, D'Hondt, Frederiek, De Groote, Ruben, De Naeyer, Geert, and Mottrie, Alexandre
- Subjects
SURGICAL margin ,NEPHRECTOMY ,BLOOD loss estimation ,ROBOTICS ,ACUTE kidney failure ,RADICAL prostatectomy - Abstract
Purpose: In the emerging field of robotics, only few studies investigated the transition between different robotic platforms in terms of surgical outcomes. We aimed at assessing surgical outcomes of patients receiving robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) at a high-volume robotic center during the transition from Si to Xi Da Vinci surgical systems. Methods: We analyzed data of 1884 patients undergoing RARP (n = 1437, 76%) and RAPN (n = 447, 24%) at OLV hospital (Aalst, Belgium) between 2011 and 2021. For both procedures, we assessed operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and positive surgical margins. For RARP, we investigated length of catheterization and PSA persistence after surgery, whereas warm ischemia time, clampless surgery, and acute kidney injury (AKI) were assessed for RAPN. Multivariable analyses (MVA) investigated the association between robotic platform (Si vs. Xi) and surgical outcomes after adjustment for patient- and tumor-related factors. Results: A total of 975 (68%) and 462 (32%) patients underwent RARP performed with the Si vs. Xi surgical system, respectively. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. On MVA, we did not find evidence of a difference between the groups with respect to operative time (estimate: 1.07) or estimated blood loss (estimate: 32.39; both p > 0.05). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) length of stay was 6 (3, 6) and 4 (3, 5) days in the Si vs. Xi group, respectively (p < 0.0001). On MVA, men treated with the Xi vs. Si robot had lower odds of PSM (Odds ratio [OR]: 0.58; p = 0.014). A total of 184 (41%) and 263 (59%) patients received RAPN with the Si and Xi robotic system, respectively. Baseline characteristics, including demographics, functional data, and tumor-related features did not differ between the groups. On MVA, operative time was longer in the Xi vs. Si group (estimate: 30.54; p = 0.006). Patients treated with the Xi vs. Si system had higher probability of undergoing a clampless procedure (OR: 2.56; p = 0.001), whereas the risk of AKI did not differ between the groups (OR: 1.25; p = 0.4). On MVA, patients operated with the Xi robot had shorter length of stay as compared to the Si group (estimate: − 0.86; p = 0.003), whereas we did not find evidence of an association between robotic system and PSM (OR: 1.55; p = 0.3). Conclusion: We found that the Xi robot allowed for improvements in peri-operative outcomes as compared to the Si platform, with lower rate of positive margins for RARP and higher rate of off-clamp procedures for RAPN. Hospital stay was also shorter for patients operated with the Xi vs. Si robot, especially after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Awaiting future investigations—in particular, cost analyses—these results have important implications for patients, surgeons, and healthcare policymakers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. The association of the type and number of D'Amico high-risk criteria with rates of pathologically non-organ-confined prostate cancer.
- Author
-
Chierigo, Francesco, Flammia, Rocco Simone, Sorce, Gabriele, Hoeh, Benedikt, Hohenhorst, Lukas, Zhe Tian, Saad, Fred, Gallucci, Michele, Briganti, Alberto, Montorsi, Francesco, Chun, Felix K. H., Graefen, Markus, Shariat, Shahrokh F., Guano, Giovanni, Mantica, Guglielmo, Borghesi, Marco, Suardi, Nazareno, Terrone, Carlo, and Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
- Subjects
PROSTATE cancer risk factors ,RADICAL prostatectomy ,PROSTATE-specific antigen ,LYMPHADENECTOMY ,GLEASON grading system ,TUMOR classification - Abstract
Introduction The aim of this study was to assess the association between the type and number of D'Amico high-risk criteria (DHRCs) with rates of pathologically non-organ-confined (NOC) prostate cancer in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND). Material and methods In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2016), we identified 12961 RP and PLDN patients with at least one DHRC. We relied on descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models. Results Of 12 961 patients, 6135 (47%) exclusively harboured biopsy Gleason score (GS) 8-10, 3526 (27%) had clinical stage ≥T2c, and 1234 (9.5%) had prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 ng/mL. Only 1886 (15%) harboured any combination of 2 DHRCs. Finally, all 3 DHRCs were present in 180 (1.4%) patients. NOC rates increased from 32% for clinical T stage ≥T2c to 49% for either GS 8-10 only or PSA >20 ng/mL only and to 66-68% for any combination of 2 DHRCs, and to 84% for respectively all 3 DHRCs, which resulted in a multivariable logistic regression OR of 1.00, 2.01 (95% CI 1.85-2.19; p <0.001), 4.16 (95% CI 3.69-4.68; p <0.001), and 10.83 (95% CI 7.35-16.52; p <0.001), respectively. Conclusions Our study indicates a stimulus-response effect according to the type and number of DHRCs. Hence, a formal risk-stratification within high-risk prostate cancer patients should be considered in clinical decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Contemporary Pathological Stage Distribution After Radical Prostatectomy in North American High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients.
- Author
-
Chierigo, Francesco, Borghesi, Marco, Würnschimmel, Christoph, Flammia, Rocco Simone, Sorce, Gabriele, Hoeh, Benedikt, Hohenhorst, Lukas, Zhe Tian, Saad, Fred, Tilki, Derya, Gallucci, Michele, Briganti, Alberto, Montorsi, Francesco, Chun, Felix K. H., Shariat, Shahrokh F., Mantica, Guglielmo, Suardi, Nazareno, Terrone, Carlo, and Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
- Subjects
RADICAL prostatectomy ,PROSTATE cancer treatment ,CANCER diagnosis ,PROSTATE biopsy ,CLINICAL trials - Abstract
Our study aimed to illustrate the relationship between clinical characteristics and pathological stage after radical prostatectomy in NCCN high-risk patients, which represent 17% to 31% of newly diagnosed prostate cancers. Our results show increasingly higher rates of non-organ-confined disease with increasingly less favorable clinical characteristics. These lookup tables may be used in the preoperative counselling of highrisk prostate cancer patients. Purpose: To investigate pathological stage at radical prostatectomy (RP) using the "Partin tables" approach in NCCN high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Materials and Methods: Within the SEER 2010 to 2016 database, we identified 7,718 NCCN HR PCa patients. Cross-tabulation was used to illustrate the distribution of organ confined disease (OC, pT2), extra-prostatic extension (EPE, pT3a), seminal vesicles invasion (SVI, pT3b), lymph node invasion (LNI, pT2N1), extra-prostatic and lymph node invasion (EPE + LNI, pT3aN1), and seminal vescicale and lymph node invasion (SVI + LNI, pT3bN1), according to preoperative cr iter ia, which consisted in PSA, clinical T stage, biopsy Gleason Score (GS). Binomial 95%CI was constructed for the reported proportions. Results: Median (IQR) PSA levels was 9 (6-20) ng/ml. The majority of patient harbored cT1c (51%) followed by cT2 (35%) and cT3 (14%) stage. Most patients exhibited GS 4 + 4 (43%). Overall, 87 vs. 15 vs. 2% of patients harbored only 1 vs. 2 vs. all 3 HR cr iter ia. At RP, OC, EPE, SVI, and LNI rates were respectively 36%, 27%, 17%, and 19%. Highest levels of OC were recorded for cT1c, PSA < 10 ng/mL and biopsy GS4 + 4. Conversely, EPE, SVI and LNI were the highest in patients with cT3, PSA ≥20 ng/mL and GS 5 + 5. After stratification according to clinical stages, OC rates decreased with increasing PSA levels and GS. Conversely, EPE, SVI and LNI rates increased with increasing PSA and GS. Conclusion: We provide a lookup table to illustrate the relationship between clinical and pathological characteristics in NCCN HR PCa patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. PD50-09 A NOMOGRAM TO PREDICT LYMPHNODE INVOLVEMENT IN CANDIDATES TO ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH IT3 PROSTATE CANCER ON PREOPERATIVE MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI AS UNIQUE HIGH-RISK FEATURE.
- Author
-
Bravi, Carlo Andrea, Paciotti, Marco, Balestrazzi, Eleonora, Piro, Adele, Piramide, Federico, Peraire, Maria, Sorce, Gabriele, Ruvolo, Claudia Colla, Frego, Nicola, Ticonosco, Marco, Belmonte, Mario, Alessandro, Pissavini, Rebuffo, Silvia, Groote, Ruben, De Naeyer, Geert, Dell'Oglio, Paolo, Minervini, Andrea, Di Maida, Fabrizio, Porpiglia, Francesco, and Schiavina, Riccardo
- Subjects
PROSTATE cancer ,RADICAL prostatectomy ,SURGICAL robots ,NOMOGRAPHY (Mathematics) ,MAGNETIC resonance imaging ,GLEASON grading system - Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. PD45-05 WHEN DOES SYSTEMATIC BIOPSY INFORMATION MATTER THE MOST? IDENTIFYING INDEPENDENT PREDICTORS OF DISEASE DOWNGRADING AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN HIGH GRADE PROSTATE CANCER BASED ON A LARGE MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL SERIES.
- Author
-
Sorce, Gabriele, Stabile, Armando, Longoni, Mattia, Scilipoti, Pietro, Ploussard, Guillaume, Marra, Giancarlo, Valerio, Massimo, Campi, Riccardo, Minervini, Andrea, Serni, Sergio, Moschini, Marco, Marquis, Alessandro, Beauval, Jean Baptiste, Rakauskas, Arnas, van den Bergh, Roderick, Rahota, Razvan-George, Soeterik, Timo F. W., Roumiguié, Mathieu, Guo, Hongqian, and Mattei, Agostino
- Subjects
PROSTATE cancer ,RADICAL prostatectomy ,BIOPSY ,ANDROGEN deprivation therapy - Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. MP37-20 THE EFFECT OF PENILE REHABILITATION AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ON URINARY CONTINENCE AND ERECTILE FUNCTION RECOVERY. RESULTS FROM a HIGH-VOLUME, SINGLE-SURGEON SERIES.
- Author
-
Longoni, Mattia, Scilipoti, Pietro, Quarta, Leonardo, Cannoletta, Donato, Luigi, Nocera, Zaurito, Paolo, Ciabattini, Margherita, Mannazzu, Alice, Stabile, Armando, Mazzone, Elio, Sorce, Gabriele, De Angelis, Mario, Francesco, Pellegrino, Barletta, Francesco, Scuderi, Simone, Gandaglia, Giorgio, Karakiewicz, Pierre I., Montorsi, Francesco, Salonia, Andrea, and Briganti, Alberto
- Subjects
RETROPUBIC prostatectomy ,RADICAL prostatectomy ,SURGICAL robots ,REHABILITATION ,PHOSPHODIESTERASE-5 inhibitors ,PHOSPHODIESTERASE inhibitors - Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate underestimates tumour volume of small visible lesions.
- Author
-
Sorce, Gabriele, Stabile, Armando, Lucianò, Roberta, Motterle, Giovanni, Scuderi, Simone, Barletta, Francesco, Pellegrino, Francesco, Cucchiara, Vito, Gandaglia, Giorgio, Fossati, Nicola, De Cobelli, Francesco, Montorsi, Francesco, Jeffrey Karnes, R., Guccini, Ilaria, and Briganti, Alberto
- Subjects
- *
DIGITAL rectal examination , *MAGNETIC resonance imaging , *PROSTATE cancer , *PROSTATE , *PROSTATE-specific antigen , *RADICAL prostatectomy , *GLEASON grading system - Abstract
Objective: To assess the relationship between the volume of the index lesion (IL) measured at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI; MRIvol) and at radical prostatectomy (RPvol), stratifying it according to Prostate Imaging‐Reporting and Data System (PI‐RADS) score. Patients and Methods: We identified 332 men with a positive mpMRI (single lesion with PI‐RADS ≥3) who underwent systematic plus targeted biopsy and subsequent RP at two tertiary referral centres between 2013 and 2018. All mpMRIs were reviewed by experienced radiologists using PI‐RADS scores. The study outcome was to assess the relationship between MRIvol (based on planimetry from MRI sequence best showing tumour) and RPvol (based on tumour involved area of each RP pathology slice). To achieve this endpoint, we performed a multivariable linear regression analysis (LRA) to predict RPvol using PI‐RADS, prostate‐specific antigen level, prostate volume, age, digital rectal examination, Gleason score at MRI‐targeted biopsy, biopsy history and time from mpMRI to RP as covariates. Non‐parametric locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) function was used to graphically explore the relationship between MRIvol and RPvol, stratifying for PI‐RADS score. Results: Overall, 24%, 49% and 27% of men had visible PI‐RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions at mpMRI. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) MRIvol and RPvol were 0.67 (0.29–1.76) mL and 1.39 (0.58–4.23) mL. At LRA, MRIvol was significantly correlated with a RPvol underestimation (slope: 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1–46.3). The non‐parametric LOESS analysis showed a non‐linear relationship between MRIvol and RPvol. Significant underestimation was reported across all volumes with the highest differences between MRIvol and RPvol in the low volume range (<2 mL), where RPvol almost doubled MRIvol. A similar effect was observed across all PI‐RADS scores subgroups. Conclusions: In the present study, mpMRI significantly underestimated the exact volume of the IL, especially for small visible lesions, regardless of PI‐RADS score. This should be considered when planning tailored focal therapy approaches often delivered to men with smaller prostatic lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Age and gleason score upgrading between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy: Is this still true in the multiparametric resonance imaging era?
- Author
-
Mazzone, Elio, Stabile, Armando, Sorce, Gabriele, Pellegrino, Francesco, Barletta, Francesco, Motterle, Giovanni, Scuderi, Simone, Cirulli, Giuseppe Ottone, Cucchiara, Vito, Brembilla, Giorgio, Esposito, Antonio, Gandaglia, Giorgio, Fossati, Nicola, De Cobelli, Francesco, Montorsi, Francesco, Karnes, R. Jeffrey, Guccini, Ilaria, and Briganti, Alberto
- Subjects
- *
RADICAL prostatectomy , *PROSTATE cancer , *MAGNETIC resonance imaging , *PROSTATE biopsy , *GLEASON grading system , *OLDER men , *PROSTATECTOMY , *BIOPSY , *AGE distribution , *PROSTATE tumors , *TUMOR grading - Abstract
Introduction: Several studies have invariably shown that the risk of Grade Group (GG) upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) is higher in elderly men. Whether this is due to a real biological effect or to a diagnostic bias is still unknown. We hypothesized that the introduction of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has improved the diagnostic accuracy of PCa detection in older men thus reducing the risk of GG upgrading at RP reported in the pre-MRI era.Materials and Methods: We selected 424 men who received a systematic plus targeted biopsy for a positive MRI and subsequent RP at two referral centers between 2013 and 2019. Upgrading was defined as an increase in GG at final pathology as compared to biopsy. Multivariable logistic regressions tested the risk of upgrading over increasing age according to any upgrading definition and after stratifying definitions according to GG group and biopsy type. Non-parametric functions explored the relationship between age and upgrading rate.Results: Median rate of upgrading was 17%. In multivariable models, while age was not associated with increased risk of GG upgrading (p=0.4). At non-parametric analyses, probability of upgrading slightly decreased with age, without reaching statistical significance. In subgroup analyses according to different upgrading definition and to biopsy type, age did not predict higher risk of upgrading regardless of outcome definitions (GG 1 to 2 P = 0.1; GG 2 to 3 P = 0.2; GG 3 to 4-5 P = 0.2) and in GG detected at TBx (OR 0.998, P = 0.8).Conclusions: We showed that use of MRI has obliterated the association between older age and increased risk of upgrading mainly due to improved diagnostic approaches in this group of men. Therefore, it is likely that the effect of age and GG upgrading reported in previous studies in elderly men was due to misdiagnosis and lead-time bias in the pre-MRI era. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Non-organ confined stage and upgrading rates in exclusive PSA high-risk prostate cancer patients
- Author
-
Benedikt Hoeh, Rocco S. Flammia, Lukas Hohenhorst, Gabriele Sorce, Francesco Chierigo, Zhe Tian, Fred Saad, Michele Gallucci, Alberto Briganti, Carlo Terrone, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Markus Graefen, Derya Tilki, Luis A. Kluth, Philipp Mandel, Andreas Becker, Felix K.H. Chun, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Tilki, Derya, Hoeh, Benedikt, Flammia, Rocco S., Hohenhorst, Lukas, Sorce, Gabriele, Chierigo, Francesco, Tian, Zhe, Saad, Fred, Gallucci, Michele, Briganti, Alberto, Terrone, Carlo, Shariat, Shahrokh F., Graefen, Markus, Kluth, Luis A., Mandel, Philipp, Becker, Andreas, Chun, Felix K. H., Karakiewicz, Pierre, I, Koç University Hospital, and School of Medicine
- Subjects
Male ,Prostatectomy ,non-organ confined stage ,Urology ,Prostate ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Gleason grade group ,Non-organ confined stage ,Radical prostatectomy ,Upgrading ,Upstaging ,Prostate-Specific Antigen ,gleason grade group ,radical prostatectomy ,upgrading ,upstaging ,Endocrinology and metabolism ,Urology and nephrology ,Oncology ,Humans ,Neoplasm Grading ,Neoplasm Staging - Abstract
Background: the pathological stage of prostate cancer with high-risk prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, but otherwise favorable and/or intermediate risk characteristics (clinical T-stage, Gleason Grade group at biopsy [B-GGG]) is unknown. We hypothesized that a considerable proportion of such patients will exhibit clinically meaningful GGG upgrading or non-organ confined (NOC) stage at radical prostatectomy (RP). Materials and methods: within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results: database (2010-2015) we identified RP-patients with cT1c-stage and B-GGG1, B-GGG2, or B-GGG3 and PSA 20-50 ng/ml. Rates of GGG4 or GGG5 and/or rates of NOC stage (>= pT3 and/or pN1) were analyzed. Subsequently, separate univariable and multivariable logistic regression models tested for predictors of NOC stage and upgrading at RP. Results Of 486 assessable patients, 134 (28%) exhibited B-GGG1, 209 (43%) B-GGG2, and 143 (29%) B-GGG3, respectively. The overall upgrading and NOC rates were 11% and 51% for a combined rate of upgrading and/or NOC stage of 53%. In multivariable logistic regression models predicting upgrading, only B-GGG3 was an independent predictor (odds ratio [OR]: 5.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.21-14.19; p < 0.001). Conversely, 33%-66% (OR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.42-3.95; p = 0.001) and >66% of positive biopsy cores (OR: 4.85; 95% CI: 2.84-8.42; p < 0.001), as well as B-GGG2 and B-GGG3 were independent predictors for NOC stage (all p, Stiftung Giersch; Projekt DEAL
- Published
- 2022
14. Treatment patterns and rates of upgrading and upstaging in prostate cancer patients with single GGG1 positive biopsy core.
- Author
-
Hoeh, Benedikt, Flammia, Rocco Simone, Hohenhorst, Lukas, Sorce, Gabriele, Chierigo, Francesco, Tian, Zhe, Saad, Fred, Gallucci, Michele, Briganti, Alberto, Terrone, Carlo, Shariat, Shahrokh F., Graefen, Markus, Tilki, Derya, Kluth, Luis A., Mandel, Philipp, Chun, Felix K.H., and Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
- Abstract
Objective: Not infrequently patients are diagnosed with clinically localized prostate based on a single positive biopsy core exhibiting Gleason grade group 1 (GGG1) with variable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. We investigated treatment patterns and hypothesized that regardless of PSA in cT1- to cT2-stage patients, presence of GGG3/GGG4/GGG5 and/or non-organ confined stage will rarely be identified.Materials and Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2015), clinically localized prostate cancer (CaP) patients with PSA ≤ 50 ng/ml and a single positive GGG1 biopsy core were identified. Overall treatment rates were examined, estimated annual percentage changes and logistic regression analyses were fitted to test for no-local treatment. Subsequently, rates of upgrading (GGG3/GGG4/GGG5) and/or upstaging (≥pT3 and/or pN1) were investigated in radical prostatectomy patients.Results: 13,342 clinically localized CaP patients harbored single GGG1 positive biopsy core at diagnosis. No local treatment was recorded in 5,235 (53.0%) cT1-stage vs. in 1,039 (49.0%) cT2-stage patients. No local treatment rates increased over time from 35.0% to 67.0% vs. 34.0% to 63.0% in cT1 vs. cT2 patients, observations were confirmed in logistic regression analyses (cT1: multivariable odds ratio [mOR]: 1.39; cT2: mOR: 1.33). In radical prostatectomy treated cT1-patients (n = 2,293) and cT2-patients (n = 659), upgrading vs. upstaging vs. upgrading/upstaging combined was 6.1%, 6.5%, 11.0% and 6.2%, 5.0%, 9.9% respectively.Conclusions: In single GGG1 positive biopsy core CaP patients, the combined proportion of upgrading and upstaging should be expected in one tenth. In consequence, the overwhelming majority harbors favorable grade and stage that is compatible with no local treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.