Search

Significance: Pulmonary vein isolation with catheter-based radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is carried out frequently to treat atrial fibrillation. However, RFA lesion creation is only guided by indirect information (e.g., temperature, impedance, and contact force), which may result in poor lesion quality (e.g., nontransmural) and can lead to reoccurrence or complications. Aim: The feasibility of guiding intracardiac RFA with an integrated polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PSOCT)-RFA catheter in the right atria (RA) of living swine is demonstrated. Approach: In total, 12 sparse lesions were created in the RA of three living swine using an integrated PSOCT-RFA catheter with standard ablation protocol. PSOCT images were displayed in real time to guide catheter-tissue apposition. After experiments, post-processed PSOCT images were analyzed to assess lesion quality and were compared with triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) lesion quality analysis. Results: Five successful lesions identified with PSOCT images were all confirmed by TTC analysis. In two ablations, PSOCT imaging detected gas bubble formation, indicating overtreatment. Unsuccessful lesions observed with PSOCT imaging were confirmed by TTC analysis. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that the PSOCT-RFA catheter provides real-time feedback to guide catheter-tissue apposition, monitor lesion quality, and possibly help avoid complications due to overtreatment, which may enable more effective and safer RFA treatment.

Abdominal surgeries carry considerable risk of gastrointestinal and intra-abdominal hemorrhage, which could possibly cause patient death. Photoacoustic imaging is one solution to overcome this challenge by providing visualization of major blood vessels during surgery. We investigate the feasibility of in vivo blood vessel visualization for photoacoustic-guided liver and pancreas surgeries. In vivo photoacoustic imaging of major blood vessels in these two abdominal organs was successfully achieved after a laparotomy was performed on two swine. Three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging with a robot-controlled ultrasound (US) probe and color Doppler imaging were used to confirm vessel locations. Blood vessels in the in vivo liver were visualized with energies of 20 to 40 mJ, resulting in 10 to 15 dB vessel contrast. Similarly, an energy of 36 mJ was sufficient to visualize vessels in the pancreas with up to 17.3 dB contrast. We observed that photoacoustic signals were more focused when the light source encountered a major vessel in the liver. This observation can be used to distinguish major blood vessels in the image plane from the more diffuse signals associated with smaller blood vessels in the surrounding tissue. A postsurgery histopathological analysis was performed on resected pancreatic and liver tissues to explore possible laser-related damage. Results are generally promising for photoacoustic-guided abdominal surgery when the US probe is fixed and the light source is used to interrogate the surgical workspace. These findings are additionally applicable to other procedures that may benefit from photoacoustic-guided interventional imaging of the liver and pancreas (e.g., biopsy and guidance of radiofrequency ablation lesions in the liver).

There is increasing interest in the endoscopic treatment of Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopic treatment has been utilized for many years, but in the past, no specific method has emerged as an appealing treatment option with appropriate safety, efficacy and ease of treatment for both patients and physicians. Recently there has been a growing literature related to the endoscopic ablation of Barrett’s esophagus using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (Halo® system). In order to discuss when RFA is indicated for Barrett’s, one needs to know: (1) What is the ‘histology’ of the Barrett’s? Does the patient have intestinal metaplasia, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma? (2) What are the endoscopic options to be considered as opposed to RFA? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each? (3) What additional variables need to be examined?