Search

Background: Delivering cancer treatment to elderly patients with dementia is often challenging. We describe performing palliative surface mold brachytherapy (SMBT) in an elderly patient with advanced dementia for pain control using music therapy to assist with agitation. Case Description: The patient was a 97-year-old Japanese woman with advanced dementia. Exudate was observed from her tumor, and she complained of Grade 2 severity pain using Support team assessment schedule (STAS), especially when undergoing would dressings. Given her advanced dementia, she was not considered a candidate for radical surgery or external beam radiotherapy. We instead treated her with high-dose-rate (HDR) SMBT. Due to her advanced dementia associated with agitation, she could not maintain her position. She was able to remain calm while listening to traditional Japanese enka music, which enables our team to complete her radiation without using anesthetics or sedating analgesics. Her localized pain severity decreased ≤21 days and the exudate fluid disappeared ≤63 days after HDR-SMBT. Her tumor was locally controlled until her death from intercurrent disease 1 year after HDR-SMBT. Discussion: Single fraction palliative HDR-SMBT was useful for successful treatment of skin cancer in an elderly patient. Traditional Japanese music helped reduce her agitation to complete HDR-SMBT. For elderly patients with agitation associated with dementia, we should consider using music and music therapy to facilitate radiation therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study assessed the significance of hands-on-training (HoT) and questionnaire-based surveys on 3D image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT) and a combination of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy, the so-called 'hybrid' BT (HBT), in uterine cervical cancer. In October 2023, 29 radiation oncologists, nurses, radiologic technologists and medical physicists from 10 Japanese facilities participated in an HoT on 3D-IGBT and HBT. Questionnaires were distributed to each participant before and after the HoT, and feedback was obtained through online channels. The questionnaire response rate was 83% (24/29), with at least one participant responding from each facility. 'Insertion of applicators and needles', 'human resource shortage' and 'pain relief and sedation' were the primary concerns of radiation oncologists. 'Applicator reconstruction', ' optimization of dwell positions', ' treatment planning' and ' human resource shortages ' were the primary concerns of radiological technologists and medical physicists. The HoT content was adjusted according to the results of preliminary surveys. The concerns expressed by the participants were addressed during the lectures and practical training. Significant reductions in anxiety were observed toward all items of the 10-point self-assessment after the HoT, regardless of the profession. The average score on satisfaction with the HoT (on a 10-point scale) was 9.52 (minimum of 8 and maximum of 10). In conclusion, HoT tailored in response to a pre-questionnaire-based survey effectively reduced participants' anxiety regarding the implementation of 3D-IGBT and HBT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In general, brachytherapy (BT) improves biochemical control in intermediate-to high-risk prostate cancer. We previously reported that importance of very high-risk factors (VHR: T3b–4 or Gleason score 9–10) and patients with double VHR (VHR-2) showed the worst prognosis among high-risk groups. We explored the role of BT-boost in patients with VHR and compared it to intermediate- and other high-risk groups. We confirmed that BT-boost improved prostate-specific antigen (PSA) control but resulted in equivalent overall survival rates for the intermediate- and high-risk groups, except for the patients with VHR. In the VHR-1 group (single VHR), BT-boost showed superior PSA control to conventional-dose RT (EQD2 ≤ 72 Gy) but not to the dose-escalated radiotherapy group (EQD2 ≥ 74 Gy). In the VHR-2 group, BT-boost did not improve the biochemical control rate of either Conv RT or DeRT. BT-boost showed no benefit over modern DeRT in the patients with VHR. This study examined the role of brachytherapy boost (BT-boost) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer, especially in patients with very high-risk factors (VHR: T3b–4 or Gleason score 9–10) as patients with double very high-risk factors (VHR-2: T3b–4 and Gleason score 9–10) previously showed worst prognosis in localized prostate cancer. We retrospectively reviewed multi-institutional data of 1961 patients that were administered radiotherapy (1091 BT-boost and 872 EBRT: 593 conventional-dose RT (Conv RT: equivalent to doses of 2 Gy per fraction = EQD2 ≤ 72 Gy) and 216 dose-escalating RT (DeRT = EQD2 ≥ 74 Gy). We found that BT-boost improved PSA control and provided an equivalent overall survival rate in the intermediate- and high-risk groups, except for patients within the VHR factor group. In the VHR-1 group (single VHR), BT-boost showed a superior biochemical control rate to the Conv RT group but not to the DeRT group. In the VHR-2 group, BT-boost did not improve outcomes of either Conv RT or DeRT groups. In conclusion, BT-boost showed no benefit to modern DeRT in the patients with VHR; therefore, they are not good candidates for BT-boost to improve outcome and may be amenable to clinical trials using multimodal intensified systemic treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It has been postulated that the combination of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (IC/IS) is effective and safe for large and irregularly shaped uterine cervical cancer patients. However, due to its invasiveness compared to conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT), it has to be said that the implementation speed of IC/IS is slow. Until now, there have been no guidelines for required equipment, human resources, and procedural guide focusing solely on IC/IS. The purpose of this guideline is to provide radiation oncologists and medical physicists who wish to start IC/IS with practical and comprehensive guidance for a safe IC/IS introduction and to help accelerate the spread of the utilization of IC/IS nationwide. This is the English translation of the Japanese IC/IS Guidelines, and it was created in an effort to share the Japanese approach to the management of locally advanced uterine cervical cancer worldwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• This study is a retrospective multicenter chart review conducted for reirradiation for gynecologic cancer using HDR brachytherapy. • Reirradiation with HDR brachytherapy for recurrent gynecologic cancer is effective, especially in cases with a long interval before reirradiation. • A higher cumulative EQD2 (α/β = 3) was significantly associated with severe complications. The aim of the study is to examine the present status of reirradiation with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for recurrent gynecologic cancer in Japan and to determine the role of this therapy in clinical practice. A retrospective multicenter chart review was performed for reirradiation for gynecologic cancer using HDR brachytherapy. Each center provided information on patient characteristics, treatment outcomes, and complications. The study included 165 patients treated at 9 facilities from 2000 to 2018. The analysis of outcomes included 142 patients treated with curative intent. The median follow-up time for survivors was 30 months (range 1–130 months). The 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) rates were 53 % (95 %CI: 42–63 %), 44 % (35–53 %), and 61 % (50–70 %) for cervical cancer; 100 % (NA), 64 % (30–85 %), and 70 % (32–89 %) for endometrial cancer; and 54 % (13–83 %), 38 % (6–72 %), and 43 % (6–78 %) for vulvar and vaginal cancer, respectively. In multivariate analysis, interval to reirradiation (<1 year) was a significant risk factor for OS, PFS and LC; Gross Tumor Volume (≥25 cm3) was a significant risk factor for OS. Toxicities were analyzed in all enrolled patients (n = 165). Grade ≥ 3 late toxicities occurred in 49 patients (30 %). A higher cumulative EQD2 (α/β = 3) was significantly associated with severe complications. Reirradiation with HDR brachytherapy for recurrent gynecologic cancer is effective, especially in cases with a long interval before reirradiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To compare gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF) or brachytherapy [BT; low dose rate, LDR or high dose rate (HDR) with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)]. We compared 253 UHF and 1664 BT ± EBRT groups. The main outcomes were the incidence and severity of acute and late GU and GI toxicities. The secondary endpoint was biochemical control rate. Cumulative late actuarial GU toxicity did not differ for grade ≥ 2 (8.6% at 5-years in UHF and 13.3% in BT ± EBRT, hazard ratio [HR], 0.7066; 95% CI, 0.4093–1.22, p = 0.2127). Actuarial grade ≥ 2 late GI toxicity was higher in UHF (5.8% at 5-years, HR: 3.619; 95% CI, 1.774–7.383, p < 0.001) than in BT ± EBRT (1.1%). In detailed subgroup analyses, the high-dose UHF group (H-UHF) using BED ≥ 226 Gy1.5, showed higher GI toxicity profiles than the other subgroups (HDR + EBRT, LDR + EBRT, and LDR monotherapy, and L-UHF BED < 226 Gy1.5) with equivalent GU toxicity to other modalities. With a median follow-up period of 32 months and 75 months, the actuarial biochemical control rates were equivalent between the UHF and BT ± EBRT groups. UHF showed equivalent efficacy, higher GI and equivalent GU accumulated toxicity to BT ± EBRT, and the toxicity of UHF was largely dependent on the UHF schedule. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As several recent researches focus on the importance of Gleason 9–10, we examine the role of radiotherapy dose escalation in those patients. We analyzed 476 patients with Gleason score 9–10 prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy. Of them, 127 patients were treated with conventional-dose external beam radiotherapy (Conv RT) and 349 patients were treated with high-dose radiotherapy (HDRT; 249 patients received high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost + external beam radiotherapy [HDR boost] and 100 patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT]). We compared these treatment groups using multi-institutional retrospective data. The patients had a median follow-up period of 66.3 months. HDRT showed superior biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) rate (85.2%; HDR boost 84.7% and IMRT 86.6%) to Conv RT (71.1%, p < 0.0001) at 5 years, with a hazard ratio of 0.448. There were borderline difference in prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM; 4.3% and 2.75%, p = 0.0581), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; 94.4% and 89.6%, p = 0.0916) rates at 5-years between Conv RT and HDRT group. Dose escalated radiotherapy showed better bDFS, borderline improvement in PCSM, and equivocal outcome in DMFS in with clinically localized Gleason 9–10 prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To compare the outcomes of localized prostate cancer treatment with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT), we examined 924 patients treated with HDR-BT + external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and 500 patients treated with LDR-BT ± EBRT using multi-institutional retrospective data. The HDR-BT treated advanced disease with more hormonal therapy than LDR-BT. To reduce background selection bias, we performed inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis using propensity scores and excluded patients with T3b-4 disease/ initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels > 50 ng/ml. The actuarial 5-year biochemical control rates (5y-bNED) were 96.3% and 95.7% in the HDR-BT and LDR-BT groups, respectively. The corresponding values were 100% and 96.5% in the low-risk group; 97.4% and 97.1% in the intermediate-risk group (97.2% and 97% in the higher titer group and 97.5% and 94.6% in the lower titer group, respectively); and 95.7% and 94.9% in the selected high-risk group, respectively. IPTW correction indicated no significant difference among the groups. The 5y-bNED in the HDR-BT + EBRT, LDR-BT + EBRT, and LDR-BT alone groups were 96.3%, 95.5%, and 97%, respectively (P = 0.3011). The corresponding values were 97.4%, 94.7%, and 96.6% (P = 0.1004) in the intermediate-risk group (97.5%, 100%, and 94.5% in the lower titer group [P = 0.122] and 97.2%, 96.2%, and 100% [P = 0.664] in the higher titer group, respectively) and 95.7%, 95.5%, and 100% (P = 0.859) in the high-risk group, respectively. The HDR-BT group showed a lower incidence of acute grade ≥ 2 genitourinary toxicities; the incidence of other early and late grade ≥ 2 toxicities were similar between the HDR-BT and LDR-BT groups. Acute genitourinary toxicity predicted the occurrence of late genitourinary toxicity. EBRT increased the risk of grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal toxicity. HDR-BT + EBRT is a good alternative to LDR-BT ± EBRT for low-, intermediate-, and selected high-risk patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Perirectal hyaluronate gel injection (HGI) appears to be a promising technique for healthy tissue dose sparing in pelvic radiotherapy. In this analysis, we report our initial experience of HGI in gynecologic brachytherapy, focusing on its safety and effectiveness for dose reduction to the rectum. Between July 2013 and May 2014, 36 patients received HGI for primary/salvage gynecologic brachytherapy. Dosimetric effect analysis was based on pre- and post-HGI computed tomography dataset registration with corresponding dose–volume histogram evaluation. The maximum dose to the most exposed 0.1 cm3 (D0.1cm3) and 2.0 cm3 (D2.0cm3) were used as index values for rectum and bladder dose evaluation. The dose indexes for target volume (TV) coverage were TV D90/V100. In all cases, HGI was well tolerated, with no acute or late adverse events documented at a median follow-up of 220 days (range, 18–1046 days). Rectum D2.0cm3 and D0.1cm3 were significantly decreased by HGI (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively), with no significant impact on dosimetric parameters of bladder and TV coverage. Factors correlating negatively with the dosimetric effect of HGI were an increasing number of interstitial catheters (P = 0.003) as well as Lcranial100% (P = 0.014) and Lcranial80% (P = 0.001) [i.e. the length from the anal verge to the most cranial point at which the 100% and 80% isodose lines, respectively, crossed the rectum]. The concept of HGI for gynecologic brachytherapy is plausible, and our initial experience indicates it to be an effective technique for rectal dose reduction in radiotherapy of intrapelvic tumours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Kochi Oxydol Radiation Therapy for Unresectable Carcinoma (KORTUC) is a novel radiosensitizer invented by Professor Ogawa at Kochi University (Japan) in 2006. The current study aimed to report the experience of the present authors with the use of KORTUC treatment in combination with interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT), with or without external beam (EB) radiotherapy (RT), in patients with locally recurrent cervical cancer (LRCC), who were likely to have a high risk of poor prognosis. Between April 2012 and January 2020, 14 female patients (15 tumoral lesions) with LRCC underwent KORTUC with ISBT. Their previous treatments included surgery (n=4), radiation therapy (n=8) and surgery plus RT (n=3). The primary lesions were located in the vaginal stump (n=5), pelvic wall (n=3), cervix (n=3), vaginal wall (n=2) and lymph nodes (n=2). At 2 h before RT, KORTUC was injected intratumorally via direct colposcopy. The dose of KORTUC ranged from 4–12 ml, adjusted for the tumor size. For patients who underwent ISBT, KORTUC was administered before and after insertion of the applicator before irradiation. Intratumoral injection of KORTUC was completed without any technical or safety issues in all 15 patients; it was well tolerated with no adverse events observed. KORTUC also showed preferable efficacy; a clinical complete response was observed in 87% of patients and the initial response rate was 100%. The 2-year local control rate in patients who underwent ISBT + KORTUC was 79%, whereas it was 63% in the re-irradiation group which was significantly lower (P=0.02) than that in the non-irradiation group (100%). Based on this finding, KORTUC with external irradiation is considered to be an optimal treatment strategy for patients with newly diagnosed LRCC this disease. Additionally, KORTUC may be an effective radiation response enhancer in multiple cancer types in which locoregional control after RT alone remains poor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the tolerability, safety and efficacy of KORTUC Intratumoral injection with brachytherapy in unresectable recurrent cervical cancer. A novel radiosensitizer KORTUC (Kochi Oxydol Radiation Therapy for Unresectable Carcinoma) was invested by Dr. Yasuhiro Ogawa at Kochi University (Japan) in 2006 and was developed for the treatment of malignant solid tumours that contain numerous hypoxic cancer cells and/or large quantities of antioxidative enzymes. Hydrogen peroxide is the only agent known to be capable of inactivating antioxidative enzymes and producing oxygen simultaneously when applied to tumour tissues. KORTUC is a solution that contains 3% hydrogen peroxide with 1% sodium hyaluronate. Hydrogen peroxide is the active ingredient for this radiosensitizer. Sodium hyaluronate viscosity sustains the hydrogen peroxide in the tumour as well as delays decomposition of hydrogen peroxide and maintains a high concentration of oxygen in the tumour. Injecting the two components together at a particular ratio is the key feature of this product. Currently Phase 2 clinical trial for locally advanced and recurrent breast cancer has been conducted in the United Kingdom and India. Our institution, (Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Japan) has conducted single-arm clinical research of KORTUC since May 2010, we dosed KORTUC more than 250 patients of various solid cancers including more than 40 patients of the gynecological tumors treated with brachytherapy as of today. In this study we report our experiences of KORTUC with brachytherapy in recurrent local advanced cervical cancer patients who are likely the high risk of poor prognosis.From April 2012 to January 2020, 15 female patients with recurrent cervical cancer received KORTUC with brachytherapy. Previous treatments of 15 recurrent patients were surgery (n=4), radiation therapy (n=8), surgery + radiation therapy (n=3). The primary lesion of these 15 patients were vaginal stump (n=5), pelvic wall (n=3), cervix (n=3), vaginal wall (n=2), and lymph node (n=2). KORTUC was injected intratumorally under direct vision of colposcopy prior to radiation therapy. The dose of KORTUC ranged from 4 to 12 mL adjusted by tumor size. For patients who had the Interstitial brachytherapy, KORTUC was administered before and after the applicator insertion prior to irradiation. Intratumoral injection of KORTUC was completed without any technical and safety issues in all 15 patients. KORTUC was well tolerated and no adverse events judged to be related to KORTUC injection were observed, except the transient local pain at the injection site in some patients. KORTUC also showed efficacy in local control in recurrent patients. Based on this result, we would like to confirm in a future study, KORTUC's efficacy with external irradiation as well as brachytherapy for the newly diagnosed unresectable locally advanced cervical cancer with high risk factors of poor prognosis. KORTUC may have potential as an effective radiation response enhancer in multiple cancer types in which locoregional control after RT alone remains poor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We conducted a multi-institutional prospective study on accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using interstitial brachytherapy. The clinical results over a minimum follow-up period of 30 months are presented here.Materials and Methods: Forty-six patients with breast cancer were treated with breast-conserving surgery and postoperative APBI. After confirmation of negative surgical margins and negative lymph nodes, a high-dose-rate brachytherapy protocol of 36 Gy/6 fractions was carried out. All clinical data were prospectively collected using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ver. 3.0.Results: No recurrence was observed. Cumulative rates of grade 2 or higher late sequelae were 25% for fibrosis, 2% for fractures, 9% for pain, and 9% for soft tissue necrosis. Rates of excellent or good cosmetic results as assessed by the physician and patient were 93 and 89% at the 12-month follow-up and 76 and 74% at the 30-month follow-up, respectively. Large volumes of resected tissue in small breasts were associated with fibrosis of grade 2 or higher.Conclusion: APBI in Japanese women provides satisfactory clinical results except for cosmetic outcomes. There is some difficulty with the assessment of fibrosis and cosmetic outcomes, especially in patients with small breasts.Clinical Trial Registration Number: UMIN000001677. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose To choose the optimal brachytherapeutic modality for uterine cervical cancer, we performed simulation analysis. Methods and Materials For each high-risk clinical target volume (HR CTV), we compared four modalities [classical conventional intracavitary brachytherapy ( Conv ICBT), Image-guided ICBT (IGICBT), intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (ICISBT), and interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) with perineal approach] using dose-volume histograms using eight sizes of HR CTV (2 × 2 × 2 cm to 7 × 4 × 4 cm) and organs at risk model. Results In Conv ICBT, the doses covered 90% of the HR CTV [ D 90 (HR CTV)] decreased from 197% prescribed dose (PD) for the HR CTV size (2 × 2 × 2 cm) to 73% PD for 5 × 4 × 4 cm, whereas the other three modalities could achieve 100% PD for all HR CTV sizes. The minimum doses received by the maximally irradiated 2-cm 3 volumes for organs at risks of IGICBT demonstrated lower values than those of Conv ICBT for the HR CTV size of 4 × 3 × 3 cm or smaller. ICISBT demonstrated lower values than those of IGICBT for 4 × 3 × 3 cm or larger. ISBT demonstrated lowest values for 5 × 4 × 4 cm or larger. Conclusions HR CTV size of 4 × 3 × 3 cm seems to be a threshold volume in this simulation analysis, and IGICBT is a better choice for smaller HR CTV than the threshold volume. On larger HR CTV, ICISBT or ISBT is the better choice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: We investigated daily needle applicator displacement during high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy. Methods and Materials: Ten patients with previously untreated uterine cervical cancer received 30Gy in five fractions during 3 days of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy using our unique ambulatory technique. To analyze displacement, we obtained daily computed tomography (CT) images for 147 flexible needle applicators at 21 and 45h after implantation. The distance was defined as the length between the center of gravity of titanium markers and the needle applicator tips along the daily CT axis. We adapted dwell positions of the treatment source to cover clinical target volume with a 15-mm cranial margin. Results: The median displacement was 1mm (range, −6 to 12mm) at 21h and 2mm (range, −9 to 14mm) at 45h, respectively. Statistically significant caudal displacement was observed only between the displacement at 0 and 21h (p <0.0001), and not between the displacement at 21 and 45h (p =0.1). In cases with displacement of 3mm or more, we changed dwell positions to correct the treatment plan. We corrected 45 applicators (31%) at 21h and 67 (46%) at 45h. Conclusions: We investigated needle applicator displacement in our ambulatory technique using daily CT examination and considered that a 15-mm cranial margin was sufficient to cover clinical target volume. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To investigate the feasibility of our novel image-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) for uterine cervical cancer, we evaluated the dose–volume histogram (DVH) according to the recommendations of the Gynecological GEC-ESTRO Working Group for image-based intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT). Methods and Materials: Between June 2005 and June 2007, 18 previously untreated cervical cancer patients were enrolled. We implanted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-available plastic applicators by our unique ambulatory technique. Total treatment doses were 30–36 Gy (6 Gy per fraction) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Treatment plans were created based on planning computed tomography with MRI as a reference. DVHs of the high-risk clinical target volume (HR CTV), intermediate-risk CTV (IR CTV), and the bladder and rectum were calculated. Dose values were biologically normalized to equivalent doses in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2). Results: The median D90 (HR CTV) and D90 (IR CTV) per fraction were 6.8 Gy (range, 5.5–7.5) and 5.4 Gy (range, 4.2–6.3), respectively. The median V100 (HR CTV) and V100 (IR CTV) were 98.4% (range, 83–100) and 81.8% (range, 64–93.8), respectively. When the dose of EBRT was added, the median D90 and D100 of HR CTV were 80.6 Gy (range, 65.5–96.6) and 62.4 Gy (range, 49–83.2). The D2cc of the bladder was 62 Gy (range, 51.4–89) and of the rectum was 65.9 Gy (range, 48.9–76). Conclusions: Although the targets were advanced and difficult to treat effectively by ICBT, MRI-aided image-based ISBT showed favorable results for CTV and organs at risk compared with previously reported image-based ICBT results. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Purpose: To introduce an effective ambulatory technique in high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) for prostate cancer, we investigated the displacement distance using our novel calculation method. Methods and Materials: Sixty-four patients treated with HDR-ISBT as monotherapy were examined. Of these, 4, 17, and 43 patients were administered treatment doses of 38Gy (3 days), 49Gy (4 days), and 54Gy (5 days), respectively. For dose administration, we used 776 flexible applicators with a removable template (ambulatory technique). Using CT images, we calculated the relative coordinates of the metal markers and applicators. From these coordinates, to analyze displacement during treatment, we measured the distance between the tip of the needle applicator and the center of gravity of the markers along the average applicator vector. Results: The median displacement distance for all applicators was 7mm (range, −14 to 24), and that of each treatment schedule was 4, 6, and 9mm for 38, 49, and 54Gy, respectively. Of the 776 applicators, displacement of >10mm was seen in 198 (26%) applicators and >15mm in 57 (7%) applicators. Body height (p <0.0001) and anticoagulant usage (p <0.0001) were significant factors influencing displacement. Conclusions: We investigated needle applicator displacement using our unique method. Additional cranial margins are necessary if there is no repositioning of the dwell position. CT scanning should be performed daily during treatment for checking the position of the applicator to detect and rectify the issue of displacement. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Purpose: For safer treatment of seminal vesicles (SVs), we initiated a new technique using an anchor applicator for high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) of prostate cancer. Methods and materials: Between January 2004 and March 2005, 23 intermediate- to high-risk patients were treated with HDR-ISBT as monotherapy. Transrectal ultrasonography guided implantation of the treatment applicator in and around the prostate gland and proximal SV. We used an “anchor” applicator to prevent posterior displacement of the SV. After insertion of the anchor applicator, the actual treatment applicator was implanted at the best position for optimal SV coverage. SV coverage was analyzed using a dose-volume histogram. Results: Implantation of the applicator on the posterior side of the SV was successful for 43 of 46 SVs (93%). The median percentage of the SVs receiving the prescribed dose was 41% (range 11–86%). Only one case of acute Grade 2 toxicity (3%) was seen. Conclusions: Our anchor applicator technique for HDR-ISBT can separate the SV from the rectum. This is the first report of dose-volume histogram analysis of the SV for HDR-ISBT. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Simple Summary: We explored the role of each very high-risk factor and found that simple summation of the number of very high-risk (VHR) factors (T3b–4 and Gleason score 9–10) is an easy and very high predictive power to separate VHR-2 (both T3b–4 and Gleason score 9–10) and others (VHR-1; T3b–4 or Gleason score 9–10, VHR-0; none of T3b–4 and Gleason score 9–10). The VHR-2 group showed a strikingly lower biochemical control rate and distant metastasis free survival rate than other groups, resulting in higher prostate cancer specific mortality than the VHR-1 and VHR-0 groups. This study aimed to examine the role of very high-risk (VHR) factors (T3b–4 and Gleason score 9–10) for prognosis of clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer. We reviewed multi-institutional retrospective data of 1413 patients treated with radiotherapy (558 patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and 855 patients treated with brachytherapy (BT) ± EBRT. We introduced an index by simple summation of the number of VHR factors—VHR-0, VHR-1, and VHR-2. With median follow-up of 69.6 months, the 5-year biochemical disease free survival rate (bDFS), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMSF) rates were 59.4%, 7.65%, and 83.2% for the VHR-2 group, respectively; 86.7%, 1.50%, and 95.4% for the VHR-1 group, respectively; and 93.1%, 0.12%, and 98.2% for the VHR-0 group, respectively. The VHR-2 group had significantly worse bDFS, PCSM, and DMSF than the VHR-0 (hazard ratios: 4.55, 9.607, and 7.904, respectively) and VHR-1 (hazard ratios: 1.723, 2.391, and 1.491, respectively) groups. The VHR-2 group could be identified as a super high-risk group compared with other groups, and could be a good candidate for clinical trials using multimodal intensified treatments. Simple summation of the number of VHR factors is an easy and useful predictive index for bDFS, PCSM, and DMSF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Recently, high-risk prostate cancer was subdivided to a very-high-risk group considered to have the worst prognosis, including clinical stage T3b–T4, primary Gleason pattern 5, or more than four biopsy cores with Gleason score 8–10. Among these, T3b–T4 stage is a special interest in radiotherapy because of their wider target volume outside the prostate. We examined this subgroup and found that dose escalation in radiotherapy both with brachytherapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) improved biochemical free survival rate but not in prostate cancer specific survival rate and overall survival rate. To examine the efficacy of dose escalating radiotherapy into patients with cT3b or T4 localized prostate cancer, we compared Group A (86 conventional dose external beam radiotherapy: EBRT group, treated with 70–72 Gy) and group B (39 high dose EBRT group (HDEBRT group, 74–80 Gy) and 124 high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR) + EBRT (HDR boost)) using multi-institutional retrospective data. The actuarial 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) rate, prostate cancer specific survival rate (PSS), and overall survival rate (OS) were 75.8%, 96.8%, and 93.5%. Group B showed superior 5-year bDFS rate (81.2%) as compared to the group A (66.5%) (p < 0.0001) with a hazard ratio of 0.397. Equivocal 5-year PSS (98.3% and 94.8% in group B and group A) and OS (both 93.7%) were found between those groups. Accumulated late grade ≥ 2 toxicities in gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts were similar among those three groups. Therefore, both HDEBRT and HDR boost could be good options for improving the bDFS rate in cT3–T4 localized prostate cancer without affecting PSS and OS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is used to improve overall survival (OS) in prostate cancer treatment; however, we encountered that long-term ADT in elderly patients may be related to high other-cause mortality (OCM). This study aimed to confirm the potential risk associated with long-term ADT in elderly patients using a different large cohort. A comparison analysis was conducted between the ≥2- and <2-year ADT groups using open, large data from 1840 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy (1172 treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR) + external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and 668 treated with external beam radiotherapy). The OCM-free survival (OCMFS), overall survival, and prostate cancer-specific survival rates were measured. The 10-year OCMFS rates in patients aged ≥75 years were 94.6% and 86% in the <2- and ≥2-year ADT groups, respectively, but were 96.3% and 93.5% (p = 0.0006) in their younger counterparts. If dividing into HDR and EBRT groups. This inclination was found in brachytherapy group but not in EBRT group. The overall survival rate was also lower in the elderly patients in the ≥2-year ADT group than in the <2-year ADT group; however, the 10-year prostate cancer-specific survival rate was the same in both groups. Long-term ADT in elderly patients resulted in not only higher OCM rates but also poorer OS rates; therefore, longer-term ADT in elderly patients should be performed with meticulous care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We compared radiotherapy outcomes between 241 elderly patients aged ≥75 years and 867 younger controls (age <75 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer. The elderly group showed an equivalent actuarial seven-year biochemical failure-free survival rate (7y-bNED) (94.9%) to the younger control group (96.4%, p = 0.593). The incidence of late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities grade ≥2 was also similar between the elderly and younger cohorts, while no grade ≥4 adverse events occurred. We also examined the role of brachytherapy (BT) in the elderly group, in comparison with image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT). BT showed superior 7y-bNED (94.1%) than IG-IMRT (84.6%, p = 0.0183) in elderly patients, which was 100% (100% for BT and 100% for IG-IMRT, p > 0.999) for the low-risk group, 94.6% (92.8% and 100%, p = 0.203) for the intermediate-risk group, and 80.5% (91.2% and 73.6%, p = 0.0195) for the high-risk group. BT showed higher GU toxicity and equivalent GI toxicity to IG-IMRT. In conclusion, elderly patients showed bNED and toxicity that were equivalent to those observed in younger controls, and BT is a plausible option also for healthy elderly with potential to improve bNED, with higher but acceptable GU toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this paper is to compare outcomes between high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-BT) monotherapy and image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) for localized prostate cancer. We examined 353 HDR-BT and 270 IG-IMRT patients. To reduce background selection bias, we used the method of inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) with propensity scores. The actuarial five-year biochemical failure-free survival rates were 92.9% and 96.7% (p = 0.1847; p = 0.077 in IPTW) for HDR-BT and IG-IMRT, respectively; they were 100% and 95.8% (p = 0.286) for the low-risk group, 95.6% and 92% (p = 0.42) for the intermediate-risk group, 90.4% and 84.9% (p = 0.1059; p = 0.04 in IPTW) for the high-risk group, and 87.1% and 89.2% (p = 0.3816) for the very-high-risk group. In the assessment of accumulated incidences of grade ≥ 2 toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0) at five years, HDR-BT monotherapy showed higher genitourinary toxicity (11.9%) than IG-IMRT (3.3%) (p < 0.0001). The gastrointestinal toxicity was equivalent for HDR-BT (2.3%) and IG-IMRT (5.5%) (p = 0.063). No Grade 4 or 5 toxicity was detected in either modality. HDR-BT showed higher genitourinary toxicity than IG-IMRT. HDR-BT and IG-IMRT showed equivalent outcomes in low-, intermediate-, and very-high-risk groups. For high-risk patients, HDR-BT showed potential to improve prostate-specific antigen (PSA) control rate compared to IG-IMRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study presents multi-institutional individual data of reirradiation (ReRT) for head and neck cancer using brachytherapy (ReRT-BT) collected by national surveillance in Japan. We distributed an e-mail-based questionnaire to 153 institutions equipped with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy facilities and received responses from 76 institutions (49.7%). Of these 76 institutions, only four (5.2%) performed ReRT-BT for head and neck cancers, and three provided individual patient's data. Six ReRT-BT cases of patients with recurrent head and neck cancer, treated with HDR brachytherapy in seven ReRT sessions, were identified from three institutions. Three patients (two cases of lips and one case of gingiva) who underwent curative-intent treatment achieved complete response at the treated area. Three patients who received palliative treatment (one case of tongue and two cases of maxillary sinus) had sustained tumor growth at the treated site, but with improvement in symptoms. No grade ≥3 toxicity was found after HDR ReRT-BT. ReRT-BT for head and neck cancer using HDR brachytherapy is a safe and useful approach to treat recurrent cancer after initial radiotherapy with curative and palliative intent. However, the scarce availability of ReRT-BT is a barrier to the wider utility of this effective procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To objectively evaluate the radiation dermatitis caused by accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy. Patients and Methods: The skin color and moisture changes were examined using a newly installed spectrophotometer and corneometer in 22 patients who had undergone APBI using open cavity implant high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (36 Gy in six fractions) and compared with the corresponding values for 44 patients in an external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) control group (50–60 Gy in 25–30 fractions within 5–6 weeks) after breast conserving surgery. Results: All values changed significantly as a result of APBI. The extent of elevation in a∗ (reddish) and reduction in L∗ (black) values caused by APBI were similar to those for EBRT, with slightly delayed recovery for 6–12 months after treatment owing to the surgical procedure. In contrast, only APBI caused a change in the b∗ values, and EBRT did not, demonstrating that the reduction in b∗ values (yellowish) depends largely on the surgical procedure. The changes in moisture were less severe after APBI than after EBRT, and the recovery was more rapid. The toxicity assessment using the Common Toxicity Criteria, version 3, showed that all dermatitis caused by APBI was Grade 2 or less. Conclusion: An objective analysis can quantify the effects of APBI procedures on color and moisture cosmesis. The radiation dermatitis caused by APBI using the present schedule showed an equivalent effect on skin color and a less severe effect on moisture than the effects caused by standard EBRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To perform the largest in vivo dosimetry study for interstitial brachytherapy yet to be undertaken using a new radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeter (RPLGD) in patients with pelvic malignancy and to study the limits of contemporary planning software based on the results. Patients and Methods: Sixty-six patients with pelvic malignancy were treated with high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy, including prostate (n = 26), gynecological (n = 35), and miscellaneous (n = 5). Doses for a total of 1004 points were measured by RPLGDs and calculated with planning software in the following locations: rectum (n = 549), urethra (n = 415), vagina (n = 25), and perineum (n = 15). Compatibility (measured dose/calculated dose) was analyzed according to dosimeter location. Results: The compatibility for all dosimeters was 0.98 ± 0.23, stratified by location: rectum, 0.99 ± 0.20; urethra, 0.96 ± 0.26; vagina, 0.91 ± 0.08; and perineum, 1.25 ± 0.32. Conclusions: Deviations between measured and calculated doses for the rectum and urethra were greater than 20%, which is attributable to the independent movements of these organs and the applicators. Missing corrections for inhomogeneity are responsible for the 9% negative shift near the vaginal cylinder (specific gravity = 1.24), whereas neglect of transit dose contributes to the 25% positive shift in the perineal dose. Dose deviation of >20% for nontarget organs should be taken into account in the planning process. Further development of planning software and a real-time dosimetry system are necessary to use the current findings and to achieve adaptive dose delivery. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: The largest in vivo dosimetry study for interstitial brachytherapy yet examined was performed using new radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeters (RPLGDs). Based on the results, a dose prescription technique achieving high reproducibility and eliminating large hyperdose sleeves was studied. Methods and materials: For 61 head-and-neck cancer patients who underwent high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy, new RPLGDs were used for an in vivo study. The Paris System was used for implant. An arbitrary isodose surface was selected for dose prescription. Locations of 83 dosimeters were categorized as on target (n = 52) or on nontarget organ (n = 31) and were also scaled according to % basal dose isodose surface (% BDIS). Compatibility (measured dose/calculated dose) was analyzed according to location. The hyperdose sleeve was assessed in terms of prescription surface expressed in % BDIS. Results: The spread of compatibilities was larger for on nontarget organ (1.06 ± 0.32) than for on target (0.87 ± 0.17, p = 0.01). Within on target RPLGDs, compatibility on <95% BDIS (0.95 ± 0.10) was better than on ≥95% BDIS (0.84 ± 0.18, p = 0.02). The number of patients with diameter of hyperdose sleeve ≥10 mm was increased with a dose prescription to <77% BDIS (p = 0.046). For nontarget organs, the maximal positive deviation was 84% of the calculated dose. Conclusions: Dose prescription is recommended to >77% and <95% BDIS for reproducibility and elimination of excessive hyperdose sleeve. For organs at risk, radioprotection should be considered even when calculated dose seems sufficiently low. Further development of planning software is necessary to prevent overestimation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: PurposeTo examine the prognostic factors for lymph node metastasis after brachytherapy for early (T1-T2N0M0) oral tongue cancer.: Methods and materialsWe reviewed the records of 571 patients (500 low dose rate and 71 high dose rate) treated at Osaka University Hospital between 1967 and 1999.: ResultsPatients with lymph node metastasis had tumor with an average diameter of 26 ± 8 mm and a thickness of 9 ± 5 mm; for patients without lymph node metastasis, the corresponding dimensions were 23 ± 8 mm and 7.5 ± 4 mm (p = 0.0004 and 0.001, respectively). After 5 years, the ulcerative (48%) and indurative/infiltrative (39%) types showed a higher ratio of nodal involvement than the exophytic (31%) and superficial (19%) types (p <0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed ulceration (p = 0.006) and a thickness of ≤6 mm (p = 0.04) to be statistically significant predisposing factors for lymph node metastasis. The lymph node control rate was 68% in 1967–1979, 71% in 1980–1990, and 66% in 1990–1999; the corresponding successful salvage rates for lymph node metastasis were 43%, 33%, and 58% (p = 0.04).: ConclusionThe appearance of the tumor, especially the presence or absence of ulceration and the diameter and thickness, are useful prognostic indicators for lymph node metastasis. Although the rates of lymph node metastasis did not change, the salvage outcome for recurrence after interstitial radiotherapy has recently improved. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: PurposeTo examine retrospectively fractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer with special focus on tolerance and toxicity, especially chronic toxicity.: Methods and materialsBetween May 1995 and October 2001, 43 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy without external beam irradiation at Osaka University Hospital. The stage was T1, T2, T3, and T4 in 8, 14, 18, and 3 patients, respectively. The adenocarcinoma was well, moderately, or poorly differentiated in 12, 16, and 15 patients, respectively. The median initial prostate-specific antigen level was 19.3 ng/mL (range 3.8–233.0). Thirty-eight patients also received hormonal therapy. Metallic needles were implanted transperineally under real-time ultrasound guidance, followed by a dose optimization program. Patients were irradiated twice daily at intervals of >6 h. A total dose of 54 Gy in nine fractions within 5 days (48 Gy in eight fractions within 5 days for the first 7 cases) was administered in one implant session. The median follow-up was 24 months (range 1–76).: ResultsRadiation Therapy Oncology Group acute toxicity of Grade 4, 2, and 1 occurred in 1 (2%), 12 (28%), and 8 (19%) patients, respectively. Five patients had late toxicity: one with rectal ulcer (Grade 2) and four with rectal bleeding (Grade 1). The volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose showed significant correlations with the incidence of acute and chronic toxicities (p = 0.005 and p = 0.014, respectively). The 3-year actuarial overall survival, local control, and biochemical no evidence of disease rate was 94%, 100%, and 55%, respectively. The crude biochemical control rate for low, intermediate, and high-risk patients was 100% (5 of 5), 80% (8 of 10), and 61% (17 of 28), respectively.: ConclusionHigh-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy was found to be feasible and well tolerated. It showed a low chronic toxicity rate without any event of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group of Grade 3 or greater. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This study aimed to explore the current status and pattern of practice for reirradiation using brachytherapy (ReRT-BT) through a survey in Japan. We distributed an e-mail-based questionnaire to 153 institutions equipped with high-dose-rate brachytherapy facilities. We received responses from 76 institutions (49.7%). Forty-three of these institutions performed ReRT-BT and 42 institutions (55%) performed ReRT-BT during 2009–2018. However, 29 of the 42 institutions (69%) reported difficulty in obtaining ReRT-BT case information from their respective databases. Almost all the institutions encountered insufficient database system to extract details about the ReRT-BT cases. Responses from 33 institutions included the number of ReRT-BT cases; this increased from 90 in the period 2009–2013 (institution median = 0.5; 0–16) to 172 in the period 2014–2018 (institution median = 2; 0–26). Nine institutions had to perform ReRT-BT for more than one case per year. The major location for cancer treatment was the pelvis (94%), followed by the head and neck (5%) and others (1%). In six site-specific scenarios, barring uterine corpus cancer recurrence, more than 90% of radiation oncologists agreed to perform ReRT-BT, whereas other areas (head and neck, prostate, and rectal cancer) gained 16–37% agreement. This decade saw an increase in the number of ReRT-BT cases in Japan and radiation oncologists' interest in ReRT-BT as a viable therapeutic option. However, scarce availability, immature education system, and insufficient database system are barriers to further consensus building. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • A long-term data for HDR-BT monotherapy and LDR-BT with or without EBRT. • LDR-BT showed equivalent PSA control and late toxicity ≥G2 GI and GU with HDR-BT. • LDR-BT showed higher acute ≥G2 GU and late grade 1 GU toxicity. • Acute GU toxicity predict late GU toxicity grade ≥G2. • Additional EBRT with LDR-BT elevated GI toxicity to LDR-BT only. Abstract Background To compare the outcome of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-BT) monotherapy and low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer. Methods and materials We compared 352 patients treated with HDR-BT as monotherapy (median follow-up time 84 months, NCCN risk classification; low: intermediate: high = 28:145:179) and 486 patients with LDR-BT with or without EBRT (90 months, 194:254:38). HDR-BT treated advanced disease with more hormonal therapy than LDR-BT. LDR-BT excluded patients with T3b–T4 tumor and initial PSA >50 ng/ml. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) involving propensity scores was used to reduce background selection bias. Results The actuarial 5-year biochemical failure-free survival rates (bNED) were 92.9% and 95.6% (p = 0.25) in the HDR-BT and LDR-BT groups, respectively, and it was 100% and 97.3% (p = 0.99) in the low-risk, 95.6% and 94.3% (p = 0.19) in the intermediate, 89.6% and 94.9% (p = 0.26) in the high-risk groups, and 93.1% and 94.9% (p = 0.98) in selected high-risk group excluding T3b-4 and initial PSA ≥50. IPTW correction also indicated no difference in bNED between LDR-BT and HDR-BT groups. LDR-BT showed a higher incidence of genitourinary (GU) toxicity grade ≥2 than that of HDR-BT in the acute phase and grade 1 toxicity in late phase. Acute GU toxicity grade ≥1 predicted late GU toxicity grade ≥2. External beam radiotherapy plus LDR-BT elevated GI toxicity than LDR-BT only group. Accumulated incidence of late grade ≥2 GU and GU toxicity was equivalent between HDR-BT and LDR-BT. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were detected in either modality. Conclusion HDR-BT monotherapy showed an equivalent outcome to that of LDR-BT with or without EBRT for low-, intermediate- and selected high-risk patients. LDR-BT showed equivalent incidence of grade ≥2 late GI and GU toxicities and higher grade ≥2 acute GU toxicity as that of HDR-BT as a monotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • A long-term retrospective data for three frequently used HDR-BT monotherapy schedules. • All HDR-BT monotherapy schedules showed excellent outcome in biochemical control. • Higher BED correlated with higher but acceptable genitourinary toxicity. Abstract Background Herein, we report the outcomes of 3 schedules of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-BT) monotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Patients and methods A total of 347 patients were treated with 45.5 Gy/7 fractions (n = 86; 45.5 Gy arm, median follow-up time 131 months), 49 Gy/7 fractions (n = 149; 49 Gy arm, 75.9 months), and 54 Gy/9 fractions (n = 112; 54 Gy arm, 68 months). Results The actuarial 5-year biochemical failure-free survival rates were 86.8%, 94.1%, and 88.5% (p = 0.2023) for the 45.5 Gy, 49 Gy, and 54 Gy arms in the high-risk group; 90.4%, 100%, and 97.4% (p = 0.0818) in the intermediate-risk group; and not available, 100%, and 100% in the low-risk group, respectively. The 5-year distant metastasis-free (and overall) survival rates were 94.4%, 98.2%, and 96.3% (100%, 92.8%, and 99.1%) for the 45.5 Gy, 49 Gy, and 54 Gy arms (p = 0.5454 and p = 0.0028), respectively. At 5 years, accumulated incidence of grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity was 1.2%, 2.7%, and 3.4% for the 45.5 Gy, 49 Gy, and 54 Gy arms (p = 0.5605), respectively. For genitourinary toxicity, the 49 Gy arm showed a higher grade ≥2 toxicity of 20.5% than those observed in the 45.5 Gy (2.4%) and 54 Gy arms (10.1%). No grade 4 or 5 of either type of toxicity was detected. Conclusions The 3 schedules showed equivocal outcomes in each risk group, with different toxicity profiles. HDR-BT monotherapy with these schedules is an acceptable treatment option for localized prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of image-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) for reirradiation of locally recurrent uterine cervical cancer. Methods and Materials Between 2008 and 2015, patients receiving reirradiation using HDR-ISBT for local gross recurrence of uterine cervical cancer after definitive or postoperative radiotherapy were analyzed retrospectively. The prescription doses per fraction ranged 2.5–6.0 Gy, whereas the cumulative equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions ranged 48.6–82.5 Gy. The effects of prognostic factors on the local control (LC), progression-free survival, and overall survival were analyzed, and late toxicity data were evaluated. Results Eighteen patients were included in the analysis, with a median followup of 18.1 months. A tumor response was obtained in all patients, with radiological and pathological complete remission seen in 12 (66.7%) patients. The 2-year LC, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates for all patients were 51.3%, 20.0%, and 60.8%, respectively. The hemoglobin level and maximum tumor diameter were shown to be statistically significant prognostic factors for LC ( p = 0.028 and 0.009, respectively). Late ≥ Grade 2 adverse events were observed in 5 patients (27.8%). Conclusions Image-guided HDR-ISBT for the reirradiation of locally recurrent uterine cervical cancer may play an important role for local tumor control in a subgroup of patients. However, the treatment indication must be weighed against the risk of higher-grade late toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose To report outcomes and risk factors of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer patients. Materials and Methods This multi-institutional retrospective analysis comprised 3424 patients with localized prostate cancer at 16 Asian hospitals. One-thirds (27.7%) of patients received only neoadjuvant ADT, whereas almost half (49.5%) of patients received both neoadjuvant and adjuvant ADT. Mean duration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant ADT were 8.6 months and 27.9 months, respectively. Biochemical failure was defined by Phoenix ASTRO consensus. Biochemical control rate, clinical disease-free survival (cDFS), cause-specific survival, and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Results Median followup was 66 months. Ten-year biochemical control, cDFS, cause-specific survival, and OS rate were 81.4%, 81.0%, 97.2%, and 85.6%, respectively. Receiving both neoadjuvant and adjuvant ADT was detected as a favorable factor for biochemical control, cDFS, and OS, but pelvic irradiation was detected as an adverse factor for cause-specific survival, and OS. Ten-year cumulative rates of late Grade ≥2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were 26.8% and 4.1%, respectively; receiving both neoadjuvant and adjuvant ADT was detected as a favorable factor for preventing both toxicities. Conclusions HDR combined with external beam radiotherapy was an effective and safe treatment for localized prostate cancer. Combination of long-term ADT was suggested to be necessary, even for HDR brachytherapy, and was useful in suppressing late toxicities. Meanwhile, pelvic irradiation was suggested to have an adverse effect on OS of our study population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To present mature results of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) as monotherapy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.Methods and Materials: From 1995 through 2012, 190 patients, 79 with intermediate-risk and 111 with high-risk prostate cancer, were treated with HDR-BT alone using 48 Gy/8 fractions, 54 Gy/9 fractions, or 45.5 Gy/7 fractions over 4 to 5 days. Neoadjuvant with or without adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy was administered to 139 patients, 35 intermediate- and 104 high-risk.Results: Median follow-up time was 92 months (range, 10-227 months), with a minimum of 2 years for surviving patients. Respective rates of cause-specific survival, overall survival, metastasis-free survival, and biochemical no evidence of disease for the intermediate-risk patients were 100%, 100%, 96%, and 93% at 5 years, and 100%, 96%, 91%, and 91% at 8 years. Corresponding rates for the high-risk patients were 97%, 93%, 84%, and 81% at 5 years, and 93%, 81%, 74%, and 77% at 8 years. The cumulative incidence of late grade 2 to 3 genitourinary toxicity was 5% at 5 years and 10% at 8 years, and that of late grade 3 was 0 at 5 years and 1% at 8 years. The cumulative incidence of late grade 2-3 gastrointestinal toxicity was 4% at 5 years and 6% at 8 years, and that of late grade 3 was 0 at 5 years and 2% at 8 years. No grade 4 or 5 toxicity was detected.Conclusions: Our single-institution study with a median 8-year follow-up showed that HDR-BT as monotherapy was safe and effective for patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]