Search

The full-thickness resection device (FTRD) offers a safe and effective approach for resection of complex colorectal lesions but is limited to lesions 2 cm in size. A hybrid approach-combining EMR with the FTRD-significantly expands the pool of lesions amenable to this technique; however, its safety and efficacy has not been well established.We report a single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent full-thickness resection (FTR) of colorectal lesions, either with a standalone FTRD or a hybrid (EMR + FTRD) approach. Outcomes of technical success, clinical success (macroscopically complete resection), R0 resection, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated.Sixty-nine FTR procedures (38 standalone FTR and 31 hybrid EMR + FTR) were performed on 65 patients. The most common indications were nonlifting polyp (43%) or suspected high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma (38%). Hybrid EMR + FTR permitted resection of significantly larger lesions (mean, 39 mm; range, 15-70 mm) compared with standalone FTR (mean, 17 mm; range, 7-25 mm; P .01). Clinical success (91%), technical success (83%), and R0 resection (81%) rates did not differ between standalone and hybrid groups. Most patients (96%) were discharged home on the day of the procedure. Three AEs occurred, including 2 patients who developed acute appendicitis.A hybrid approach combining EMR and FTRD maintains safety and efficacy while permitting resection of significantly larger lesions than FTRD alone.

Background and Aims Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a safe and effective minimally invasive bariatric procedure. This study compared weight loss in patients undergoing ESG with that of matched patients undergoing high-intensity diet and lifestyle therapy (HIDLT). Methods In this case-matched study, patients were matched 2/3:1 (HIDLT/ESG) by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). One hundred five patients (30 men) who underwent ESG + low-intensity diet and lifestyle therapy (LIDLT) between 2016 and 2018 were compared with 281 patients (92 men) who underwent HIDLT at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions from 2013 to 2014. Weight was evaluated 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after beginning HIDLT or post-ESG to determine the mean percent total body weight loss (%TBWL). Results Mean age across both cohorts was 48.0 ± 12.1, and baseline BMI was 40.0 ± 7.7 kg/m2. In multivariable analysis controlling for age, sex, and baseline BMI, the mean %TBWL at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months was significantly higher in patients undergoing ESG than matched patients undergoing HIDLT. Specifically, at 3 months, the mean %TBWL in the ESG cohort was 14.0% compared with 11.3% in the HIDLT cohort (P Conclusions Through 12 months of follow-up, patients who underwent ESG achieved significantly greater weight loss than patients enrolled in HIDLT. ESG appears to be a valuable alternative for patients who experience difficulty complying with HIDLT.